{"id":155455,"date":"2010-09-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010"},"modified":"2015-01-15T05:27:36","modified_gmt":"2015-01-14T23:57:36","slug":"sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
   Nasiruddin, Ad_v.)\n\nIN THE HIGH-COURT o:= KARNATAKA ATvsEA:s:c;A\u00a3;o<RET _z "  \n\nDATED THIS THE 2"" DAY Of' SEPTE E9i--!3.E4R,','"--2'0;1. L'JE'_'_: '  T\n\nBETORE       \nTHE HONBLE MR. 3UST1CE A.\u00a7Q;.._\u00a7\/Egxyuoo-Pk\u00a7:LA GQWDA\nWRIT PETI'\ufb01QN M:'o.;.6'5o_4\/T2010 ANS\nWRIT PETITION NQ.2564'9\/.2_O'1AQ~,(_(\u00a7M-CPC)\n\nBETWEEN;    ~ \n\nSri C.D.Sang'ay' Raj, as  \nS\/o. sri"C.H,:3eva':a;aj, \nAged 'about 33-'years,  ._\nResiding at No.4,-.   \nBenson Crosas Road"; .. \nBenson Town," _  \nBanggaiore ---- 560' 046.\n\n"  '  EEEEE   PETITIONER\n\n1 .  'v\ufb01ayafakshmi,\nD\/o.':.'ate K.H.Ramachandra Reddy,\n\n=  A. ,_W\/V0'. Sri R.SrinEvasa Reddy,\n" _ Aged about 39 years.\n\n2,. Smt. Pushpavathi,\n\nD\/o. Eate K.H.Ramachandra Reddy,\nAged about 37 years.\n\n\n\n. Smt. Geetha,\n\nD\/o. late K.H.Ramachandra Reddy,\nW\/o. Sri G.Ramesh Reddy,\nAged about 34 years.\n\n. Sri K.R.Ananthakumar,\n\nS\/o. late K.H.Ramachandra Reddy,\nAged about 32 years.\n\n. Smt. Ashwathamma,   \nW\/o. Kate K.H.Ramachandra Reddy, _1\n\nAged about 50 years.\n\nNo.1 and 5 are residents   \nKa\u00e9kondanahaliy, Varthur Hobii, \nCarmelaram Post,   _  \nBangaiore --- 560 03.5.} 1\n\nKarnataka7EIectrEci\u00abty"Board\nErnv.pEo--y"ees' Co-.,op\u00bbera-tnie Society Ltd.,\nAt Ananda Rao C%rcEe.,__  \n\nRace Course Road," \n\nE3a..ngaEore._- '$60 009.\n\n..Represented*--Vby___i_ts. Honorary Secretary\nV" r.\u00a71\\i'.G}t'!\\\u00a3yarayanaswamy.\n\n  Ab\/i;\u00bb's.V  ray.aika Enterprises,\nA '-N'o.16.\u00e9?,{.1.*5, 123' Cross,\n-_Mah.a!aI<jsnmi Layout,\n\nBangaiore - 560 080,\nRepresented by its Partner\n\nA " *=._Szri B.M.Narasimha Murthy.\n\n"  K.N.Narasimha Guptha,\n\nS\/o. K.T.Nagaraj Guptha,\n\nMajor, R\/at No.2A, Gundappa Street,\nNo.101, Ctoth Centre,\n\nK.R.Market, Bangalore -- 560 002.\n\n\n\n9. M\/s. Goiden Gate Properties Limited,\nHaving its Registered office at\nNo.820, 8"" Block,\nKoramangaia,\n\nBangaiore ---- 560 095.\nRepresented by its partner\nSri S.Martin, S\/o. Sri Satrigo.\n\n(By Sri i(.Sundaram, Adv. for R1 to  ~'i\n\n  C y  "e'Es1P;oiN'piE\u00bbm'*S A C'\n\nThese writ petitions aireiiifiied ur:d.er~ Artici'es"'2\u00bb25 ands\n\n227 of the Constitution of India praying "to" caii for the\nrecords in o.s.t.No.42\/1.995  Conn-ected: with\nO.S.No.550\/2203 fiiedibv the Vrespondeynts 1 to 3 against\nthe petitioner and other 'irespionfdentsfpepnding on the fiie of\nAdditionai City Civil Judge at vBanga'iore..',_'C._ity and set aside\nthe order passed on 1.'7'"i'Au:gu'st.'=201?0 {which is impugned\nas Annexure;'~'--- K-)y.i_i-3nd:ii_n the at)'oye7'ca.se and aiiow I.A.No.4\nand 5 whiithv__aire:j.p'ro_ti.uted --..asfAnnexures F and G in\n\nO.S.No.4'2_[_41i995L y \n\n Tisese petitionsicoming on in preliminary hearing B'\n\n  grouip ithisday, themtfourt made the foliowing:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Rvespoiidents 1 to 3 have instituted a suit against the<\/p>\n
 respo’ntie-nts 1 to 6 and the petitioner, who incidentaliy is<\/p>\n
t\u00abhyejiA”?t” defendant in the suit. The reiief prayed in the suit<\/p>\n
  H is for partition and separate possession of 1\/4″‘ share and<\/p>\n
mesne profits. The suit has been contested by the
\npetitioner and the 9″‘ respondent by filing a joint written<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
statement. Respondents have filed o.s.550\/zopafkagipjadinst<\/p>\n
respondents 4, 5 and 6 and the petitioner  <\/p>\n
that the sale deeds in respect'””0’f\u00ab.th”e <\/p>\n
properties are void and not  <\/p>\n
permanent injunction. The ‘–p.ie’titionera._andp:2.”d”‘~:d’efendant”‘<\/p>\n
have filed the written…statem’eiht’–and conte’stedE the suit
\nclaim. Both the suits’V”‘\u00bbb:Y–.an order dated
\n15.4.2010 andf;av–.cortjrhonet:-1a’i~:[i:–asbeen held. For the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs, .P’w”.’_1_  “7_N:o:tici:ig that PW.1 was not<\/p>\n
cross-:::exaVrhline;d,_’V  discharged. The 7″‘ defendant
\nfiled an’xapplication’ro’n’—.20\u00ab.”7.2010 to set aside the order<\/p>\n
dated. the case for arguments and to<\/p>\n
co’nsid5eii* the apepllicavtion filed under 0.18 R.17(a) for<\/p>\n
  for cross-examination. 7″‘ defendant<\/p>\n
filed  appiication i.e., under 0.18 R.17 to recall<\/p>\n
 vi._.;i:’he plaintiffs filed their objections on 27.7.2010 to<\/p>\n
 the said applications and the Trial Court has<\/p>\n
   pvdismissed both the applications i.e., It.As.4 and 5. These<\/p>\n
writ petitions are directed against the said order.<\/p>\n
\/”‘<\/p>\n
K’<\/p>\n
2. The impugned order shows that there.-‘–i._s\u00bb no<\/p>\n
diligence on the part of the defendants in <\/p>\n
conducting the suits. However, in the interes-tifof juVst’ice.,V_”‘_I <\/p>\n
deem it appropriate to allow the :pr’ay’erst in  and\ufb02\ufb01 in<\/p>\n
order to provide an opportunity to’\u00abt__he_fpetiti’onAer’and <\/p>\n
defendants in the suit to cross:–‘e.xamhiV’ne.P\\.ll1li_:. suit is”<\/p>\n
stated to be posted tor?xi9.2Q1’U.-itSince. thefflea-rnejd counsel
\nappearing for ‘the defend’antis?7ls a:”‘ii\u00a7.iVo.harnmadan and in<\/p>\n
view of Ramzangp.erio\u00a7dHa;nd:::igdjjfestiyal’being on 8.9.2010,<\/p>\n
the suit he”\u00e9diqau}nedja”tr\u00a7__14._9V\u00a7’2o1o on which day, PW.1
\nshall keep” hersel’fA:.fj;:rrese:n’t\u00ab’before the Court and the Trial<\/p>\n
Court.sahailfpevrmit’ the defendants to cross–examine PW.1.<\/p>\n
.  \u00a7f”‘ifo’r a,9sny'”reasonfthe crosswexarnination of PW.1 is not<\/p>\n
 4″oh:’11.14.9.2o1o, the Trial Court is directed to<\/p>\n
gfrant ora~e’_;r’nore opportunity to the defendants to conclude<\/p>\n
 Across’?-e\ufb01famination of PW.1. Learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs submit that the plaintiffs have no further<\/p>\n
   ___\u00e9-vidence to lead other than the one placed through PW.1.<\/p>\n
After the cross-examination of PW.1 being complete, the
\ndefendants shall file their side of iffdidavit evidence in the
\n\/\/<\/p>\n
ra<\/p>\n
11<\/span>
\n6<\/span><\/p>\n
Trial Court within one week therefrom. The depon:e.nts<\/p>\n
thereof shall make themselves available__;’_:fo’rC.’_’ero;=.f__5’*_
\nexamination by the learned counseimfor thepiai.nt.iffs\u00bb.:asAany_d
\nwhen the suit is posted for cross–e>;arrn’inAeti’o.nL- “r_ea_rnr~;d’<\/p>\n
counsel appearing for the wgiartjes assure trh’isZ;CQ_urt_:\u00a7that_:\u00b0.<\/p>\n
they would render ready co–o4p’eratEtVon ‘fo’r..Vt_he Trial Court
\nfor compietion of thevtrial _at_anvearly..id’ate and also would
\nassist the Court. by arguihnig theacaiseVytojenable the Trial<\/p>\n
Court to .Vti1e:i..sVuit_j.4at.yftheearliest and at any<\/p>\n
event, before the ciolsure  for winter vacation-<\/p>\n
2010.\n<\/p>\n
 the”~\u00a7:\u00bb;ai:dA’~1ivew’of~th_e__:natter, the writ petitions<\/p>\n
stand’–..Aa’ilowe.dT. order stands quashed. The<\/p>\n
 iindicjzatedlsulprra.\n<\/p>\n
r<\u00e9;'\/-\n<\/p>\n
Zitpayrties shall”*virenderjfneeessary co—operation to the Trial<\/p>\n
_ _Court’for conductinghfof the trial and disposal of the suit, as<\/p>\n
sd\/-3″\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda Nasiruddin, Ad_v.) IN THE HIGH-COURT o:= KARNATAKA ATvsEA:s:c;A\u00a3;o<RET _z " DATED THIS THE 2"" DAY Of' SEPTE E9i–!3.E4R,','"–2'0;1. L'JE'_'_: ' T BETORE THE HONBLE MR. 3UST1CE A.\u00a7Q;.._\u00a7\/Egxyuoo-Pk\u00a7:LA GQWDA WRIT PETI'\ufb01QN M:'o.;.6'5o_4\/T2010 ANS WRIT PETITION NQ.2564'9\/.2_O'1AQ~,(_(\u00a7M-CPC) BETWEEN; ~ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-155455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-14T23:57:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-14T23:57:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":611,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-14T23:57:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-14T23:57:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-14T23:57:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010"},"wordCount":611,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010","name":"Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-14T23:57:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-d-sanjay-raj-vs-smt-vijayalakshmi-on-2-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri C D Sanjay Raj vs Smt Vijayalakshmi on 2 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155455"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155455\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}