{"id":155608,"date":"2008-12-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2"},"modified":"2014-09-22T07:40:37","modified_gmt":"2014-09-22T02:10:37","slug":"honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2","title":{"rendered":"Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>rrirtlo 0,4,1? 113 agqexea S1<br \/>\nSQHIBJJ IiO&#8217;\u00a71I1.1&#8242;&#8221;E3&#8217;c] qmos AZQHOH :9q&#8217;:1 19:11 ppm; 071 :;1zap1zoc&#8217;\u00a3s;;u&#8217; ;;~I;}i&#8217;3._<br \/>\n139319 03 PH&#8217;? V&#8221;9J1&#8243;\u00a5X9UUV 9??\/\\ 80051-11 139399 U0\u00a51&#8217;E&#8221;-%3&#8217;1.11~V\u00a5..B__&#8217;\u00a34i&#8221;3.   V V<br \/>\np\u00a31)[I3I&#8221;1d&#8217;\u00a3II&#8217;_\u00a3 zaqg qstanb 01 31::\/Eezd &#8217;emu; 30 [I0&#8243;_f1R11E1S\u00a3IOQ.\u00a7_;)[{&#8216;j[\u00ab_ f  &#8221;<br \/>\n$0 2:52: &#8216;\u00a3&gt;1i:m 95$ S9Ii&gt;\u00a5&#8217;l~I&#8217;v&#8217; Japrm 9911.; SI I10%.tm:a-cl mm SILIJ;-._  L&#8221; %<\/p>\n<p>.LN(EI G&#8217;NOcI S3211 3<\/p>\n<p>(df{3:i)H r{iH9MSI30\u00a79=\u00a7?\u00a3iS  12*; &#8216;::wis% 5&amp;3 x  &#8221; <\/p>\n<p> &#8216;m\ufb01at\ufb01qpueg<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;1&#8217;=&#8217;z&#8221;\\&#8217;BIB2&#8243;\u00a7lI&#8217;\u20ac}9I 9,.3I-I9&#8217;l\u00a5.LVFiI{i&#8217;!-1&#8211;I.9}&#8221;\u00a7.. &#8216;(B&gt;f\u20ac$911J\u00a53.TI\u00a7I}<br \/>\nssxlag, [I-3.*\u00a7_4:&#8217;)&#8217;;:;;atm&#8217;z1oV:\u00a7) jQ_V.:;{\u00a7uQ1ss1u;{t;tI0;)<\/p>\n<p> ._ CZNV<br \/>\n(&#8216;sa1B&#8217;Jor3\u00a7V;:j\u20acs;:;p:;13f:)oe~isg\u00a7}   &#8216;S \/;;\\*g 1.13<br \/>\ng&#8217;3G\u00a7_91\u00a7&#8217;-3Q\u00a7pV. 5\u00a53!&#8211;\u00a7P\u00a793i&#8217;WV &#8216;m-1 &#8216;us 543)<\/p>\n<p>E-1iE{I\\{OI.Li\\L7.\u00a7::{j&#8217;:v _  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p> _ Jagxjmdj S1; riq p:91u9s9.IcI;&gt;;_.;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; A &#8216;om O9\u00a7&#8221;910I&#8217;93T-T98<\/p>\n<p>_: A   2 &#8216;Je\ufb01emfvfea &#8216;X3018 mg<br \/>\n , &#8217;91H;s:a&#8217;r\u00e9%&#8211;n&#8217;sI1puI&#8217;8I&#8211;IUBC:c1na:&gt; &#8216;9I \/e:1:&#8217;o:~1<br \/>\n_ .  &#8216;$;:21&#8243;{31:)0$sv qtu03A&#8217;9uo1q<\/p>\n<p>K <\/p>\n<p> V -V(s3\u00a7i&#8217;*.1;}ss\u00aez:}LL8QI&#8217;0N N0I.L1.1;M.L1am<\/p>\n<p>%  aI\u00a7ari251\u00a7:g va3c?{pa:\u00a7i*1A:\u00ab1s&#8221;AU CE{:)I.LSf1P &#8216;aw C\u00a7I&#8217;IEI.NOH (E{I&#8211;I.L<\/p>\n<p>i\u00a7{k&#8217;:lO.\ufb023EI<\/p>\n<p>  9o0z[&#8216;\u00e9{taIav\\1:z1:&gt;:F:i .tIO LHEEOC) HEEIPI (HHS. NI<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;U&lt;3?1if19d 1m-an Sm: alogawm 9118 &#039;1JTi0&#039;() sun riq <\/p>\n<p>paugmexa me; go uo;i1$9I1b f3I1;:A&#039;Eaq no 219951 ;{{tI0 3: mq Ieagidxg\u00bb  .  ~<\/p>\n<p>30 KpE9I}_&#039;I9.I ;\u00a7.1o:1n1e1ss 911:1 3I.i\u00a7\ufb02&#039;l&#039;3Al?s&#039; no 219931 1011 S1 .x9_1.t_&lt;&#039;)&#039;_A1f&#039;3;g:.1:-:;\u00abd_T.&quot;~<\/p>\n<p>3111 pm? .&#039;zaI1o&quot;_t&#039;3,%_t;;:)(i sq; go 139.1:-m:\u00a3; 911:1 0&#039;1  V&#039;  &#039;V<\/p>\n<p>9: s9m:.1oq&#039;1I1e am \ufb01q pgnssg u01;19:)gpI1=,{1_:;_9qj1 ;;\u00a5:L{j&quot;&#8211;;3ue  &quot;<\/p>\n<p>pm: %17 19 pagmou exam 18:11 sum}; 9:11  pyosz  :1Bi\u00a71<br \/>\ns1::)r:p.:d 9111 I30 _;V_\/x_ go may go&#8217; &#8216;._;\u00a7(V\u00a7o:)\u00a7&#8217;;V  p_QQ &#8216;1s..j1:gpun&#8211;s:ui<br \/>\n5.119101 SEQ .z9LI_1:;{1  p&#8217;jA\u00a51,t\u00a7&amp;\u00a7.'{L:&gt;sm10;)<\/p>\n<p>}_Z)8[I.IBQ'[ &#8216;J81{{)[fB.ITi}N&#8217;f&#8230;IS  .Iqf  *5<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;.I9uomr;9d ;)[}3&#8243;z'{q    .I9&#8217;\u00a3.I(){SS}_IL{I[I{O()<br \/>\n9111 Sq pessyd .z:\u00a7&#8217;p.;&lt;5 .&#039;_9m   9:13 niq pmrgdo<br \/>\nSE&#039; &#039;%&lt;_;&#039;z:1 113 .10 A9,_4g_,1; &#039;;&lt;$ 9:..a~31\u00a7:.1   JQJJYIS prnoqs .19UGE1!1ad<br \/>\n315131 ziiq  Spi\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01  :I\u00a7\u00a7q::A\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a7.t\\zs.&quot;&#039;o&#039;3V Se uonsarzb QQ1 :10 13V X8;<br \/>\npeppy   go 59 uogaag Jzzxpurx tI;1ta:)1;dldva<br \/>\nS%&#8217;1&#8243;_[:    :9&#8217;IL.[;i siq pQSS2\u00a7).IdX\u20ac~) txogtzyzdo 9:1&#8243;:<\/p>\n<p>V A r&#8217;*1r?:&#8221;pz%\u00e9\\i.&#8217;\u00ab?\u00a5\u00a5~\u00a333&#8217;\u00a2 SE &#8216;\u00e9~a?i)a &#8216;lav X&#8217;3.L P9999 QUIBA Bwzvwe\ufb02 am<\/p>\n<p> .. .  if .\u00bbjL*&gt;.&#8217;\u00e9s:1o;s&#8217;T;.1d.:d&#8217;  JQDIII1 .&#8217;t;;{e9p 32: SI own .1au0m:&#8217;19d gym<\/p>\n<p>H3030<\/p>\n<p>   Z3lI\u00a7.M(}\ufb02O_} am apem 3.21103 91;; &#8216;\ufb02ap<br \/>\nS{{fj;= SjI.I1.m91{ zimxxymqsjd .10; no 311111103 II01_r;1:&#8217;1;&gt;(i sgq;<\/p>\n<p>1310;} s\u00a7p;;{:1 Aiq &#8216;;QU p\u00a3;fe_..k\u00a7;410:}:1f1v:<br \/>\nam xiq suop aaq A'{U;o meg ;9\u00a7;.\u00a7o19x.3\u00a7\\\\  ;&gt;&#8217;q&#8217;1 go<br \/>\n938:} 911130 Sixzmg; :1IIeA:9[9.1u :93} Q1   &#8220;[&#8216;3u11qg.1&#8217;L<br \/>\n.10 3141193 .&#8217;IO&#8221;f.I2i&#8211;?d1&#8243;&#8221;iS apt;   {EaI;znq;.IJ,<\/p>\n<p>am J()I1E 1.11101) 31151;&#8217;    .&#8217;.1;9\u00a3\u00a5oyss&#8221;gI,:1u1(3&#8217;_) 9:1&#8243;: go<br \/>\nuogrgdo 9:111 Qugeu\ufb01x \u20act1\u00e9:q.$  .IQ[IOI$S\u00a5,\u00a5j[I'{I\u00a3()(;) am<br \/>\nuoy1&#8243;e*Jg\u00a7m13 .13\u00a79Os12qz;; s:1g;{_V&#8217;V&#8221;t:1();;1.$:;&gt;;*&#8221;\u00a5:&#8217;T\u00a3} qorzs; zytxgtmazxg &lt;31 mzau<br \/>\non S;   A_;3puzH\ufb01:SQ:.1_\u00a71Ot{3113g gwH9dd,3 gm &#039;.9?<br \/>\nma\ufb01a}  Vz\u00e9gn\ufb01jaq 1_;)9sg:e.1 S; uogtzsarub 91.11 uatgm<\/p>\n<p>psutzjnr-\ufb01ts; aq  &quot;&#8211;.T\u00a7O13\u00a7\u00a7Q\ufb01b 9:11 mq p[ot.{s:9.rq&#039;1 9:11 123 IIQAE}<\/p>\n<p>A.VV{1e\u00a7g:11&quot;41:_:\u00a7V&#039;;1t~h:s&#039;\u00a5\u00a7i\u00e9._ \u00bb;i$1:{1 0:1 z{3,.I:~.;&gt;q;{ \ufb01u:A.I:)$:;J &#8216;passuusgp<\/p>\n<p>s&#8221;;V.&#8217;:I0?13f?3\u00a7=?d. __1~\u00a7_1m s1q1A&#8217;:.&#8217;:;:&gt;u:;};;&#8217; &#8216;@3130 :)&#8221;E.1&#8243;.1 50 $1g.I9tu arm \u00a3;)IIIIL&#8217;fE\u00a3&#8221;X\u00a7)<\/p>\n<p> AV i3~&#8217;1v&#8221;.};34;;~Ij&#8217;g{&#8211;:)ii\u00a3g:&#8217;_A 1QI}\u00a3 _&#8217;IIIB 1 &#8216;J;9:;3,e'{If\u00a3 am 50 MGM. Sm&#8221;) {If &#8216;t~,.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar rrirtlo 0,4,1? 113 agqexea S1 SQHIBJJ IiO&#8217;\u00a71I1.1&#8242;&#8221;E3&#8217;c] qmos AZQHOH :9q&#8217;:1 19:11 ppm; 071 :;1zap1zoc&#8217;\u00a3s;;u&#8217; ;;~I;}i&#8217;3._ 139319 03 PH&#8217;? V&#8221;9J1&#8243;\u00a5X9UUV 9??\/\\ 80051-11 139399 U0\u00a51&#8217;E&#8221;-%3&#8217;1.11~V\u00a5..B__&#8217;\u00a34i&#8221;3. V V p\u00a31)[I3I&#8221;1d&#8217;\u00a3II&#8217;_\u00a3 zaqg qstanb 01 31::\/Eezd &#8217;emu; 30 [I0&#8243;_f1R11E1S\u00a3IOQ.\u00a7_;)[{&#8216;j[\u00ab_ f &#8221; $0 2:52: &#8216;\u00a3&gt;1i:m [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-155608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-22T02:10:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-22T02:10:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2\"},\"wordCount\":672,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2\",\"name\":\"Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-22T02:10:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-22T02:10:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-22T02:10:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2"},"wordCount":672,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2","name":"Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-22T02:10:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/honeycomb-associates-vs-commissioner-of-commercial-taxes-on-16-december-2008-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Honeycomb Associates vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 16 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155608"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155608\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}