{"id":156205,"date":"2009-11-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2"},"modified":"2016-05-28T01:01:51","modified_gmt":"2016-05-27T19:31:51","slug":"kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Supreme Court of India<\/div>\n
Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: ……………J.<\/div>\n
Bench: V.S. Sirpurkar, Deepak Verma<\/div>\n
           C.A. @ S.L.P.(C) No.11118 of 2007\n                                      -1-\n                                                                        REPORTABLE\n\n                     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA\n\n                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\n\n                  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7312     OF 2009\n              [Arising out of SLP(C) No.11118 of 2007]\n\n\n  KAMRUL ISAM ALVI                                ....Appellant\n\n           Versus\n\n  STATE OF M.P.                                   ....Respondent\n\n\n\n                              J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
  Deepak Verma, J.\n<\/p>\n
  1.          Leave granted.\n<\/p>\n
  2.       Appellant’s land admeasuring 3.10 acres situated at<\/p>\n
           village    Pehantala,      Tehsil       &    District       Hoshangabad<\/p>\n
           falling     in    survey       No.     15,     was        acquired    for<\/p>\n
           construction of Bagda Branch Canal. A notification<\/p>\n
           was issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition<\/p>\n
           Act, 1894 (for short `the Act’) on 9.11.1973. The<\/p>\n
           Land     Acquisition     Officer       passed    an        award     dated<\/p>\n
           21.2.1975     determining        the    amount       of    compensation<\/p>\n
           payable     to    the     appellant.            He        assessed    the<\/p>\n
           compensation at Rs. 6,523.95.                The said compensation<\/p>\n
           was    accepted   by     the   appellant       under       protest    and
\nC.A. @ S.L.P.(C) No.11118 of 2007
\n                                      -2-<\/span>
\n           reference was sought to be made to the Reference<\/p>\n
           Court by filing an application under Section 18 of<\/p>\n
           the Act.\n<\/p>\n
  3.       Initially, when the appellant filed his application<\/p>\n
           praying for reference to the Civil Court before the<\/p>\n
           Land Acquisition Officer a sum of Rs. 25,000\/- was<\/p>\n
           claimed on account of water reservoir and sluice<\/p>\n
           gate constructed thereon, which was in addition to a<\/p>\n
           claim of compensation of Rs. 15,500\/- in respect of<\/p>\n
           the    acquired    land.         However,    record        shows     that<\/p>\n
           appellant had also filed another application by way<\/p>\n
           of statement of claim on 22.3.78 before the Land<\/p>\n
           Acquisition     Officer,        Hoshangabad,       praying       therein<\/p>\n
           that   compensation       for    water    reservoir        and      sluice<\/p>\n
           gate    installed        thereon       should      be     payable      at<\/p>\n
           Rs.6,46,579.95.\n<\/p>\n
  4.       Accepting the contention of the appellant that the<\/p>\n
           Land     Acquisition         Officer        had         not      awarded<\/p>\n
           compensation with respect to the water reservoir and<\/p>\n
           the sluice gate, the Reference Court, while noting<\/p>\n
           that it cannot exercise the original jurisdiction of<\/p>\n
           Land     Acquisition        Officer,        vide        order       dated<\/p>\n
           05.07.1983,       remitted       the     matter      to       the    Land<\/p>\n
           Acquisition     Officer      for    fixation       of     compensation
\nC.A. @ S.L.P.(C) No.11118 of 2007
\n                                         -3-<\/span>
\n           with respect to water reservoir and sluice gate.<\/p>\n
           This application was duly placed on record and Land<\/p>\n
           Acquisition         Officer         was     fully     aware        of     the<\/p>\n
           enhancement of the claim made by the appellant.<\/p>\n
  5.       However, the Land Acquisition Officer vide his award<\/p>\n
           dated     28.10.1983          even        though    considered           that<\/p>\n
           appellant        had        claimed        Rs.      6,46,579.95,           as<\/p>\n
           compensation        towards     water         reservoir      and       sluice<\/p>\n
           gate    but    in     his    wisdom       accepting    the       evaluation<\/p>\n
           report of the Irrigation Ministry and rejecting that<\/p>\n
           of an Engineer he awarded a sum of Rs.24,145\/- for<\/p>\n
           the     same    and    also     awarded       interest       @    6%     with<\/p>\n
           solatium at the rate of 15%. Thus, the total amount<\/p>\n
           came to be Rs.43,463.75.\n<\/p>\n
  6.       Feeling        dissatisfied          therewith,        the       appellant<\/p>\n
           preferred       another       reference       being     Reference        No.<\/p>\n
           46\/84.\n<\/p>\n
  7.       It is also pertinent to mention here that before the<\/p>\n
           Reference Court, that is, First Additional District<\/p>\n
           Judge, Hoshangabad in Reference Case No. 46\/84 in<\/p>\n
           the statement of claim filed by the appellant on<\/p>\n
           24.11.1984, he had specifically claimed a sum of<\/p>\n
           Rs.6,46,579.95          as     compensation           for    the        water<\/p>\n
           reservoir and sluice gate installed therein.
\nC.A. @ S.L.P.(C) No.11118 of 2007
\n                                       -4-<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
  8.            Order dated 05.07.1983 passed by Reference Court<\/p>\n
           makes it clear that award was contested mainly on<\/p>\n
           two grounds. Firstly, that the land sought to be<\/p>\n
           acquired    was     irrigated      and    market   value    was   Rs.<\/p>\n
           5000\/-     per    acre    and     secondly,     the   compensation<\/p>\n
           regarding Bandhan i.e. water reservoir and sluice<\/p>\n
           gate should have been fixed at Rs. 6,46,579.95. The<\/p>\n
           Reference        Court    was     of     the   opinion     that   the<\/p>\n
           compensation for the water reservoir and sluice gate<\/p>\n
           had not been assessed, therefore, matter deserved to<\/p>\n
           be remanded to the Land Acquisition Officer.<\/p>\n
  9.       Following is the relevant              and operative part of the<\/p>\n
           order dated 5.7.1983:\n<\/p>\n
                 “In the result     the reference is sent
\n                 back to the Land Acquisition Officer
\n                 with direction that it shall fix the
\n                 compensation   regarding   the   acquired
\n                 Bandhan   and   gates.     The   evidence
\n                 adduced in the Court will be read as
\n                 evidence before the Land Acquisition
\n                 Officer after fixing the compensation
\n                 it is contested by the applicant then
\n                 the Land Acquisition Officer may again
\n                 make reference as per law.     Parties to
\n                 appear before Land Acquisition Officer.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                                 ( Sd\/- )
\n                                    First   Addl.Judge   to  the
\n                                    Court of District Judge.
\n                                    Hoshangabad.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
<\/blockquote>\n
C.A. @ S.L.P.(C) No.11118 of 2007
\n                                          -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
  10.      After    remand         by     Reference           Court    to    the     Land<\/p>\n
           Acquisition Officer, fresh award came to be passed<\/p>\n
           on    26.10.1983.        In        the     same,    despite         specific<\/p>\n
           direction     issued          by     Reference        Court,       as   noted<\/p>\n
           earlier,     the        amount       of     compensation          for   water<\/p>\n
           reservoir and sluice gate was again fixed only at<\/p>\n
           Rs. 43,463\/-.       The appellant herein once again filed<\/p>\n
           application under Section 18 of the Act praying for<\/p>\n
           reference to the Civil Court for grant of adequate<\/p>\n
           and proper compensation for the said reservoir and<\/p>\n
           sluice gate.\n<\/p>\n
  11.      The   Reference         Court       vide    order     dated      20.06.1994,<\/p>\n
           after considering the evidence available on record<\/p>\n
           and   relying      on    a    decision        of    the    High    Court    of<\/p>\n
           Punjab & Haryana in the case of Radhey Shyam vs.<\/p>\n
           State of Haryana AIR 1981 (P&H) 57 fixed a sum of<\/p>\n
           Rs.5,45,738 as compensation for the reservoir and<\/p>\n
           sluice gate together with 30% solatium and interest<\/p>\n
           as required to be paid to the appellant under the<\/p>\n
           provisions of the Act.\n<\/p>\n
  12.      Feeling aggrieved by the said order\/award passed in<\/p>\n
           Reference     Case           No.     46\/84     (old        No.    1\/77)     on<\/p>\n
           20.6.1994, respondent -the State of Madhya Pradesh
\nC.A. @ S.L.P.(C) No.11118 of 2007
\n                                          -6-<\/span>
\n           preferred      an   appeal      in        the   High    Court       of   Madhya<\/p>\n
           Pradesh at Jabalpur under Section 54 of the Act.<\/p>\n
  13.      Vide the impugned judgment and order dated 2.4.2007,<\/p>\n
           a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/p>\n
           at Jabalpur was pleased to set aside the award dated<\/p>\n
           20.06.94 passed by Reference Court in                            favour         of<\/p>\n
           the appellant and the compensation of Rs.43,463 for<\/p>\n
           water reservoir and sluice gate, as was fixed by the<\/p>\n
           Land    Acquisition        Officer          after      remand,      has       been<\/p>\n
           upheld.\n<\/p>\n
  14.      Hence this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
  15.      Critical      examination         and      perusal      of    the     impugned<\/p>\n
           order     passed     by     the      High       Court    shows        that      it<\/p>\n
           proceeded on the assumption that appellant had not<\/p>\n
           claimed amount of Rs. 6,46,579.95 as compensation<\/p>\n
           for    water     reservoir        and      sluice      gate     and      he    had<\/p>\n
           confined      his   claim      only        at   Rs.    25,000\/-       for     the<\/p>\n
           same.\n<\/p>\n
  16.      It     appears      to    us    that        the     learned      Government<\/p>\n
           Advocate, who            appeared before the Division Bench,<\/p>\n
           had probably due to bona fide mistake not brought<\/p>\n
           to      the      notice        of         the     Court,        appellant’s<\/p>\n
           application\/statement                of     claim       dated       22.3.1978
\nC.A. @ S.L.P.(C) No.11118 of 2007
\n                                         -7-<\/span>
\n           claiming specifically a sum of Rs. 6,46,579\/- as<\/p>\n
           compensation         for water reservoir and sluice gate.<\/p>\n
  17.      Even though, this fact also finds place in the first<\/p>\n
           order passed by Reference Court on 5.7.1983 wherein,<\/p>\n
           in   the    second     part     of    the    said   order,    which     is<\/p>\n
           relevant      for     the     purpose       of   deciding    the    said<\/p>\n
           appeal, it has been mentioned as under:<\/p>\n
                   “The applicant has contested the award
\n                   on two grounds firstly the acquired
\n                   land was irrigated one and the works
\n                   value of it at the time of acquisition
\n                   was Rs. 5000\/- per acre hence he is
\n                   entitled     to      Rs.      15,500\/-    as
\n                   compensation     for      the    land,   and
\n                   secondly, the land acquisition officer
\n                   has    not    fixed      the    compensation
\n                   regarding the Bandhan and its sluice
\n                   gates fixed in the said Bandhan for
\n                   which the appellant is entitled to
\n                   Rs.6,46,579.95 P as compensation.”<\/p>\n
  18.      It is not disputed            before us that against the said<\/p>\n
           order      passed    by     Reference       Court   on    5.7.1983,     no<\/p>\n
           appeal was preferred by the State and the said order<\/p>\n
           had attained finality.               That being so, it can safely<\/p>\n
           be    presumed        that      respondent-State            was    fully<\/p>\n
           satisfied with the said order passed by Reference<\/p>\n
           Court        on     5.7.1983.       In   the     said    order,    it   is<\/p>\n
           categorically mentioned by the learned Judge of the
\nC.A. @ S.L.P.(C) No.11118 of 2007
\n                                         -8-<\/span>
\n           Reference       Court    that        the      amount        claimed     by<\/p>\n
           appellant for water reservoir and sluice gate be<\/p>\n
           assessed at Rs.6,46,579.95.\n<\/p>\n
  19.      Once this order came to be passed and matter stood<\/p>\n
           remitted to the Land Acquisition Officer, obviously,<\/p>\n
           the     parties       went      to     trial      with      the      clear<\/p>\n
           understanding         that    what     has    been     claimed    by   the<\/p>\n
           appellant herein for the water reservoir and sluice<\/p>\n
           gate was as mentioned hereinabove and not at the<\/p>\n
           rate of Rs.25,000\/- only as was claimed earlier.<\/p>\n
  20.      The reasoning of the            High Court that under Section<\/p>\n
           25 of the Act, which existed prior to 24.9.1984,<\/p>\n
           only those amounts would be payable to the appellant<\/p>\n
           which    have     been       claimed        specifically,     does     not<\/p>\n
           appear to be borne out from the record.                             In the<\/p>\n
           teeth    of     the    order        dated     5.7.1983,     appellant’s<\/p>\n
           application dated 22.3.1978 filed before the Land<\/p>\n
           Acquisition      Officer       and    statement        of   claim    dated<\/p>\n
           24.11.1984 filed by the appellant, it was crystal<\/p>\n
           clear that a sum of Rs.6,46,579.95 was claimed for<\/p>\n
           water    reservoir       and        sluice      gate.        Thus,     the<\/p>\n
           reasoning of the High Court does not appear to be<\/p>\n
           legally tenable.\n<\/p>\n
C.A. @ S.L.P.(C) No.11118 of 2007
\n                                       -9-<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
  21.      Obviously, it appears to be a bona-fide mistake on<\/p>\n
           the part of the learned Government Advocate who did<\/p>\n
           not    notice     the     Order     dated     5.7.1983        and     the<\/p>\n
           appellant’s       earlier       application    filed    before        the<\/p>\n
           Land    Acquisition       Officer    on     22.3.1978    wherein        a<\/p>\n
           specific claim was made for                awarding compensation<\/p>\n
           for    the   water    reservoir      and    sluice     gate    at     Rs.<\/p>\n
           6,46,579.95.       That being so, we are of the opinion<\/p>\n
           that    looking      to   the    matter    from   any   angle,        the<\/p>\n
           impugned judgment cannot be sustained in law.                       It is<\/p>\n
           hereby set aside and quashed.                  The award of the<\/p>\n
           Reference Court dated 20.6.1994 in Reference Case<\/p>\n
           No. 46\/84 (old No. 1\/77) is hereby restored with all<\/p>\n
           consequential benefits as mentioned therein.<\/p>\n
  22.      The appeal stands allowed to the aforesaid extent<\/p>\n
           with costs throughout.            Counsel’s fee Rs. 10,000\/-.<\/p>\n
                                                          ……………J.\n<\/p>\n
                                                          [V.S. Sirpurkar]<\/p>\n
                                                             …………..\n<\/p>\n
  .J.\n<\/p>\n
                                                             [Deepak       Verma]\n\n\n\n  New Delhi.\n  November 04, 2009.\nC.A. @ S.L.P.(C) No.11118 of 2007\n                                    - 10 -\n<\/pre>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Supreme Court of India Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009 Author: ……………J. Bench: V.S. Sirpurkar, Deepak Verma C.A. @ S.L.P.(C) No.11118 of 2007 -1- REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7312 OF 2009 [Arising out of SLP(C) No.11118 of 2007] KAMRUL ISAM ALVI […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-156205","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"\nKamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-27T19:31:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-27T19:31:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":1551,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court of India\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-27T19:31:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-27T19:31:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-27T19:31:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2"},"wordCount":1551,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court of India"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2","name":"Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-27T19:31:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamrul-islam-alvi-vs-state-of-m-p-on-4-november-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kamrul Islam Alvi vs State Of M.P on 4 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=156205"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156205\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=156205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=156205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=156205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}