{"id":156373,"date":"2010-09-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2"},"modified":"2018-11-11T03:18:36","modified_gmt":"2018-11-10T21:48:36","slug":"ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<pre> \n\n1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNETAKA, AT \n\nDATED TI-{IS 'THE 221\u00bb-1 DAY cm  \n\n'rm: HOFFBLE mm. JUS'I'ICE-  4 'mm':  \n . no.~51*a;%2c@_   % %\nBE WEE:     \n\nM!s.IBEXGaI]a.g11erP\\:t\"--LI):1.A,'._     \nIta registered Head C}\ufb02'x;9\"at f *   \nNo.175f 54, I?a.j*\u00a311:}.Taaj?i1as;=_R\u00ab\u20ac;a.-2:::i,   \n4'  ~    \nMr.Ra_je.,sh H;R;:   \n\nS-Io.  . . . APPELLANT\n\n  \"   (By .'4Siv'fi\"I~.i::;'j:1\"I.' Vidyadhar, Adv.)\n\n% A3:-LN; \u20acI~I\u00e91i'?\u00a3:I1..13heemaA      ,\n'-ES\/Vo';  52 years,\n\nPmp. *\u00a3?r\u00bb9s?\u00a7:=:zj'V'I'-:5;:b;~~Ir1dia, 110.531,\n Road-;jNr3.ar Double Tank,\n\n _LaxIizipu;\u00b0*ar_:1--,V'Myaore--04. .. . RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>   _  Criminal Appeal is filed u]s.3&#8217;78(-4) of Cr.FC<br \/>\nV  to net aside the Judgment and order of acquittal<br \/>\n  29.2.2003 in CrI.A.No.818\/ 2007 paased by the XXVI<br \/>\nu\ufb01ddl City Civil as Sassions Judge, Bangalore City, acquitting<br \/>\n ,  respondent\/acrzuaed for the o\ufb02&#8217;ence pf under %tion.13-B<br \/>\nofthe KI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>This Criminal Appeal coming on for hearirg this day,<br \/>\nthe court delivered the \ufb01allogzyxgz<\/p>\n<p>JQDGMEHT j<br \/>\nmas appeal is by the oomplairmnt  by<\/p>\n<p>the order of acquittal of the respondent ~&#8211;  <\/p>\n<p>the XXXVI Aden. City cm and s&lt;g35ior_saJ;1dsge\u00a7,%%a  <\/p>\n<p>Criminal Appeal Na.s13\/2007  &#8211; * V<\/p>\n<p>2. A complaint was    tVhe<br \/>\nrmpondent &#8212; accused  afV&#8217;AC1\u00a7aque iasued,<br \/>\nwhich is dmwn_on  % R;a.1,52,7oo;&#8211; lent in<br \/>\ncommotion    On presentation of<br \/>\nthe  with an endorsement<\/p>\n<p>  After isauance of aged<\/p>\n<p>  to he filed. The learned IUI.ap}3t1&#8217;ate,<\/p>\n<p> the basis of the complaint \ufb01lcd, has<\/p>\n<p> and sentenced in pay Ra.1,63,DOO[~.<\/p>\n<p> xpay U16 amount, the accused to suffer SI for on:<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;  out of the ordered amount, an amount of<\/p>\n<p> shall be remitted to the State as \ufb01ne. Aga.1ns&#8217; t<\/p>\n<p> , the accused preferrai an appeal in Criminal App-aal<\/p>\n<p>110.818} 2007. The Appellate Court on the ground that<br \/>\nnothing has been stated by the complainant as to what was<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01t&#8217;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\nthe amount due, opined that the complainant has failed to<\/p>\n<p>prove the  and to discharge the liability,  was<\/p>\n<p>issued and therefore, reversed the \ufb01nding of !A:heJ:f <\/p>\n<p>in aoquitting the accused. Against Which,   <\/p>\n<p>corzlpkiinant.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. The, lower   of<br \/>\nJudgment noted the   aV1v: E;:.D-1 Written<br \/>\nby the complainant  it is admitted<\/p>\n<p>that    stopped the practice of<\/p>\n<p>   that, the complajxlant allaeg<\/p>\n<p>on  fencing mate:-na&#8217; I was supplied and<\/p>\n<p> .  E;-a\ufb02ae, t&#8217;heyV&#8221; &#8220;&#8221;&#8221;  agreed to aupply on cash terms in<\/p>\n<p>1s}_:):1&#8217;Vt\u00a2;:_ bf  Also, a request was macie to rebook the<\/p>\n<p>  Ex.D-2 is the subaequcnt letter of the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   to the accused. Therea\ufb02er, Ex.D&#8211;3 was. sent by<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;ar\u00e9cuscd to the complainant, whercin a bkanl-: cheque<\/p>\n<p>  with date and amount was encbsed to enable the<\/p>\n<p>V x conxplajrlant to draw the total cost of that materials and it was<\/p>\n<p>hoped that a punirtitve  wouki be taken to supply<\/p>\n<p>3?&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>materials to Tata Coffee em, Aooorditlgm the accused<br \/>\nrequested to send the matxarie\ufb02s to Tat:-1 oof\ufb01ese. The\ufb02ppellate<\/p>\n<p>Court having noted that no ev&#8217;n:1ence is <\/p>\n<p>supplied the material either to the accused 0%  <\/p>\n<p>ami also in the absence of proof :Jif&#8221;&#8216;\u00e91tx:21}1}:1t   <\/p>\n<p>documentary evidence, held that   A<\/p>\n<p>cannot be believed. mum;  \ufb01ne year<br \/>\n2002, signed blank oheqge  theaccused to the<br \/>\ncomplainant and that  pmduced any<br \/>\naccounts   materials auch as<br \/>\nExhibite\u00bb.\/&#8217;D41  &#8221;  ly, the Appe\ufb01ahe Court<\/p>\n<p>formed   the accused has rebutted the<\/p>\n<p>   the complainant has failed to prove<\/p>\n<p> the lower Appellate Court noting the<\/p>\n<p>  we sent along with Ex.D-3 for supply of<\/p>\n<p> that until and unless supply of material is<\/p>\n<p>   there is no  enforceable debt. However,<\/p>\n<p>%%   upon the order ofthe Trial Court that if accused<\/p>\n<p> . tn  cent: as security, there was no necessity \ufb01ur him<\/p>\n<p>tn give a blank signed cheque and the accused ought to have<\/p>\n<p>given the cheque  a1:m1unt,it has opined the<\/p>\n<p>W&#8217;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><br \/>\nTrial Court has committed an error. Accordingly, the<br \/>\nAppellate Court opining that the order of the  in<\/p>\n<p>perverse, acquitted the accused.<\/p>\n<p>5. In the case on hand, although <\/p>\n<p>convicted the accused and orde&#8217;1?\u00e9Ad&#8221;&#8216;ta&amp;_   <\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,e3,0oo;-, what is     X<\/p>\n<p>question was issued in  &#8216; busmea\u00b0 Va<br \/>\ntramaction and th\ufb01  A&lt;.)pir1:&#039;;-ii  a blank<br \/>\ncheque ought not to \u00a3113 accused to the<\/p>\n<p>  the cheque mentiomn.g&#039;<br \/>\nthe  V  Court having noted the<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01e complairmnt and the accused<\/p>\n<p> o&quot;u__ceI*ta:1nV;     &#039;aocumenm Praduced i..=.-., Exhibits 131<\/p>\n<p>  mapped sendmg&#039; that&#039;. n:1atena1&#039; on credit<\/p>\n<p>   aocused sent an advance blank cheque<\/p>\n<p>  %   supply of material, that it was the boundazu duty<\/p>\n<p> to produce the books of accounts to allow<\/p>\n<p>VT  the mater1a1a&#039; were supplied and despite that, if on<\/p>\n<p> u x presentation of the cheque, the cheque was dishonourcd,<\/p>\n<p>theI1onlytheaoc:u.sedwwou1dbeIiabIe andintheakaenne of<br \/>\nW<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><br \/>\nsuch material being produocd. he has opined that the order of<\/p>\n<p>t11e&#8217;I&#8217;rialCourtis erroneous. _ 2\n<\/p>\n<p>6. A1thou.gh,  presumption is available!<\/p>\n<p>of thc ommplajnant, the accused is shown to <\/p>\n<p>the presumption by adducing cogent  <\/p>\n<p>the documents which are in   df  e  J<\/p>\n<p>between the accused ans!<br \/>\nExhibits 13-1 to 13-3,  documents<\/p>\n<p>produced by the accuaea&#8217;   the DD to the<br \/>\noomp1a5n\u00a3%for*%\u00e9?az1ci%%%1\u00e95.30.00ot- and also Exhibits<br \/>\n13-14 to  _&#8211;  for which the witrnass for<\/p>\n<p>the  .&#8217;pIu;e;i;de:d hia ignorance. The accused<\/p>\n<p>    made &#8220;&#8221;&#8221; H snrnce-\u00b0 re attempt to rebut the<\/p>\n<p>. E\u00e9zasoning given by the Appellate Court is that it<\/p>\n<p> apac:Lf &#8221;  &#8217;11: stand of the comp1\ufb02JI&#8217;1B11t&#8217; that the mater1.a.1&#8242;<\/p>\n<p> be supplied only on such payment and atoppad<\/p>\n<p>VT  the materiah on c@it basis. Hecessm-ily, the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  eornplairxant ought to have shown that the materials ware:<\/p>\n<p>supplied, but no documents have been produced in this<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>regard to show that t.hc:re is a Legally enforceable debt. Might<br \/>\nbe the cheque issued by the accused to the complainaxxt for<\/p>\n<p>supply of materials was dishonoured an  the<\/p>\n<p>Appellate Court, but the oomplaiiumt failed  <\/p>\n<p>material and failed to prove the  Q3   Ea&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>error on-rnm1&#8217;tt.cd by the AppcI1a\u00a3e.__  &#8216;A J<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01ndirg of the Trial Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, the   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF&#8217; KARNETAKA, AT DATED TI-{IS &#8216;THE 221\u00bb-1 DAY cm &#8216;rm: HOFFBLE mm. JUS&#8217;I&#8217;ICE- 4 &#8216;mm&#8217;: . no.~51*a;%2c@_ % % BE WEE: M!s.IBEXGaI]a.g11erP\\:t&#8221;&#8211;LI):1.A,&#8217;._ Ita registered Head C}\ufb02&#8217;x;9&#8243;at f * No.175f 54, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-156373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-10T21:48:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-10T21:48:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":928,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-10T21:48:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-10T21:48:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-10T21:48:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2"},"wordCount":928,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2","name":"M\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-10T21:48:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ibex-gallagher-pvt-ltd-vs-sri-n-harish-bheemaiah-on-22-september-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Ibex Gallagher Pvt Ltd vs Sri N Harish Bheemaiah on 22 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=156373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156373\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=156373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=156373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=156373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}