{"id":156417,"date":"2009-11-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009"},"modified":"2014-12-26T21:16:51","modified_gmt":"2014-12-26T15:46:51","slug":"v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.MC.No. 2992 of 2009()\n\n\n1. V.V.MIDHUN SINGH,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. SIJI, D\/O.PUSHPAM,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.VIJAYASINGH\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :06\/11\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n              M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n\n              ------------------------------------------\n               CRL.M.C.NO. 2992 OF 2009\n              ------------------------------------------\n\n              Dated 6th         November 2009\n\n\n                           O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>          Petitioner is the accused in C.C.601\/2002 on<\/p>\n<p>the file of     Judicial First Class Magistrate-III,<\/p>\n<p>Neyyattinkara,  now      pending         as     L.P.24\/2006,   taken<\/p>\n<p>cognizance for the offence under Section 493 of Indian<\/p>\n<p>Penal Code   on Annexure-A complaint after conducting<\/p>\n<p>an inquiry under Section 202 of Code of Criminal<\/p>\n<p>Procedure. This petition is filed under Section 482 of<\/p>\n<p>Code of Criminal Procedure, to quash the proceedings<\/p>\n<p>contending that learned Magistrate                 has not conducted<\/p>\n<p>a proper enquiry under Section 202 of Code of Criminal<\/p>\n<p>Procedure. It is contended that Annexure-A complaint<\/p>\n<p>was filed    without any bonafides and falsely and<\/p>\n<p>first respondent without         filing a petition before the<\/p>\n<p>police,  filed     Annexure-A           complaint        before  the<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate directly and Magistrate without                  applying<\/p>\n<p>his  mind   as   per      Annexure-D           proceedings,    taken<\/p>\n<p>cognizance of the offence. It is contended that                when<\/p>\n<p>there was no marriage, as the original document of<\/p>\n<p>Crmc 2992\/09<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                              2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>marriage mentioned     in the complaint was not filed,<\/p>\n<p>learned Magistrate should not have taken cognizance of<\/p>\n<p>the offence. It is also contended that second respondent<\/p>\n<p>did not prosecute O.P.94\/2002 filed by her after getting<\/p>\n<p>a copy of objection filed by the petitioner and the<\/p>\n<p>allegations in the complaint are not correct.<\/p>\n<p>            2.  Learned   counsel  appearing  for   the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was heard. Learned counsel vehemently argued<\/p>\n<p>that    learned   Magistrate  should  not   have   taken<\/p>\n<p>cognizance of the offence and though it is alleged in<\/p>\n<p>the    complaint  that   petitioner had   taken   second<\/p>\n<p>respondent to the Sub Registrar Office for registering<\/p>\n<p>the marriage, in fact petitioner was illegally confined<\/p>\n<p>and forcibly taken to Sub Registrar&#8217;s    office and got<\/p>\n<p>the document    executed and registered and it was not<\/p>\n<p>voluntarily done and petitioner had no sexual contact<\/p>\n<p>with the second respondent and therefore, no offence<\/p>\n<p>under Section 493 of Indian Penal Code was committed.<\/p>\n<p>It is also argued that though cognizance was taken, as<\/p>\n<p>per order dated 8\/10\/2009, the order does not show that<\/p>\n<p>all the      materials were considered by the learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate and instead, it only shows that prima facie<\/p>\n<p>a case has been found without disclosing all the<\/p>\n<p>Crmc 2992\/09<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                              3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>materials and therefore, the order is illegal. Relying<\/p>\n<p>on the decision of this court    in <a href=\"\/doc\/93591\/\">Kader   v.  State of<\/p>\n<p>Kerala<\/a> (1999 (3) KLT 262) it is argued that an enquiry<\/p>\n<p>under Section 202 of Code of Criminal Procedure       is<\/p>\n<p>not an empty formality and the order shows that learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate    did not conduct proper enquiry   and hence<\/p>\n<p>it is to be quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>            3.  Records  produced by  petitioner   reveal<\/p>\n<p>that a     man missing case was originally registered by<\/p>\n<p>Puvar police, on the complaint that    second respondent<\/p>\n<p>lady is missing.      Second respondent along with the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner    were  arrested  from  the   house  of   the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and produced before Judicial First Class<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate-III, Neyyattinkara. Annexure-E(1) statement<\/p>\n<p>of second respondent was recorded where she disclosed<\/p>\n<p>that she had gone to the house of   petitioner on her own<\/p>\n<p>wishes voluntarily and she is aged 18 years and she<\/p>\n<p>intends to live with the petitioner and she had not<\/p>\n<p>married him and she is to be          permitted to live<\/p>\n<p>according to her wishes.   As seen from Annexure-E report<\/p>\n<p>learned Magistrate therefore released second respondent.<\/p>\n<p>On the same day Annexure-F registered agreement was<\/p>\n<p>entered into by the petitioner and second respondent and<\/p>\n<p>Crmc 2992\/09<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>got   it    registered   before  Sub   Registrar   office,<\/p>\n<p>Neyyattinkara stating the they       have been living as<\/p>\n<p>husband and wife and would thereafter live as husband<\/p>\n<p>and wife. True, the registered agreement          to live<\/p>\n<p>husband and wife will not create a legal marriage.<\/p>\n<p>Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted<\/p>\n<p>that second respondent had in fact    reached the house of<\/p>\n<p>petitioner only on that morning and petitioner was taken<\/p>\n<p>to the Magistrate      under the pre-text     that second<\/p>\n<p>respondent     is to be identified     by him before the<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate    and  after  the    Magistrate  released  the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent, petitioner was     forcibly taken    to<\/p>\n<p>Sub Registrar office and got Annexure-F registered.<\/p>\n<p>            4.  On the materials produced, it cannot be<\/p>\n<p>said   that   second  respondent  was  not  there on   the<\/p>\n<p>previous night, when police took    second respondent and<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in custody and produced them before the<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate    and  the  marriage  agreement  entered  into<\/p>\n<p>before the Sub Registrar office was not voluntarily.<\/p>\n<p>These are all facts which could be decided only on<\/p>\n<p>evidence. Though learned Magistrate did not write a<\/p>\n<p>speaking order, while    taking cognizance of the offence,<\/p>\n<p>and   issuing   summons  under  Section  204  of  Code  of<\/p>\n<p>Crmc 2992\/09<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Criminal Procedure.       Magistrate is not expected to<\/p>\n<p>write a detailed order as    in the case  of dismissal of<\/p>\n<p>the complaint under Section 203 of Code of Criminal<\/p>\n<p>Procedure.    Annexure-D  proceeding  paper  shows   that<\/p>\n<p>learned Magistrate    conducted an inquiry and statements<\/p>\n<p>of  complainant   and  witnesses  were  recorded  and  an<\/p>\n<p>investigation under Section 202(1) of Code of Criminal<\/p>\n<p>Procedure was ordered and a report was obtained. It is<\/p>\n<p>after conducting detailed enquiry under Section 202 and<\/p>\n<p>finding    a  prima  facie  case  Magistrate  has   taken<\/p>\n<p>cognizance of the offence.\n<\/p>\n<p>            5.  On the materials it cannot be stated<\/p>\n<p>that the cognizance taken was not     legal or proper as<\/p>\n<p>canvassed. In such circumstances, I find no reason to<\/p>\n<p>interfere with that order. Petitioner is at liberty    to<\/p>\n<p>seek an order of discharge, raising all the contentions,<\/p>\n<p>under Section 245 of Code of Criminal Procedure,       as<\/p>\n<p>necessarily the   Magistrate has to record   the evidence<\/p>\n<p>of second respondent    and her witnesses in the presence<\/p>\n<p>of   petitioner   as  provided  under  Section  244   and<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is at liberty to cross examine the witness,<\/p>\n<p>if so wishes. The Magistrate has to proceed under<\/p>\n<p>Section 246    of Code of Criminal Procedure  by framing<\/p>\n<p>Crmc 2992\/09<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                              6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>a charge only after hearing the petitioner and second<\/p>\n<p>respondent as provided under Section 245 of Code of<\/p>\n<p>Criminal Procedure .\n<\/p>\n<p>            Petition is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                  M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,<br \/>\n                                            JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nuj.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.MC.No. 2992 of 2009() 1. V.V.MIDHUN SINGH, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, &#8230; Respondent 2. SIJI, D\/O.PUSHPAM, For Petitioner :SRI.P.VIJAYASINGH For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR Dated :06\/11\/2009 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-156417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-26T15:46:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-26T15:46:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":943,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009\",\"name\":\"V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-26T15:46:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-26T15:46:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-26T15:46:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009"},"wordCount":943,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009","name":"V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-26T15:46:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-midhun-singh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-6-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"V.V.Midhun Singh vs State Of Kerala on 6 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=156417"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156417\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=156417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=156417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=156417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}