{"id":156707,"date":"2008-08-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008"},"modified":"2017-06-09T15:16:16","modified_gmt":"2017-06-09T09:46:16","slug":"s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: S.R.Bannurmath & Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT or-\" KARNATAKA AT  A7\nDATED THIS THE 14*\" DAY OF AuGusT,.,\u00e9j\u20ac@;3:VA..:j:  3 T\nPRESENfM] 'p.  % \nTHE HON'8LE MR.JUSTI.CEa s.P\u00a7;'L%\u00a73}x:~:wuak\u00e9\u00bbz;a\ufb01;%i%\"  \n\nA N \n\nms HOIWLE MR. JUSTICE.AA.\u00a5\\$'}'afEI\\i'ij\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7PALA si:>woA\n\nWRIT Permow 199:7. 15:3.2k:\u00a7eo5Ti(GM~::Pc)\n\nE \n\nSmt. s. Mee:%a%%k:\u00a7s\u00ab3'm %. 7~      A\n\nAged aiao;;t_V41'~.y\u00e9'a?\u00a7,_ _ , \nw\/o Sri. B. Suresh  '\nR\/'at :~so.'a;\/74,- ' '\n\nC.M.R. Layout, He:jr;\u00e9;j;= ,\u00a7\u20acesa_\u00a7',..:' \n\nLingarajapura\u00e9n\u00e9n, A\nBanga\u00a3or_e~ 566-\u00bb Qf8#.._ \n\n    \u00e9mgj\u00e9vasan, Adv.,)\n\n  1. S.,.__N:-\ufb01\u00e9fajan,\n\nAgedasgut 44 years,\n\n S\/0 !ateN- Subramanivan,\n\nA  2';  Baiambai Subramamyan\n\nAged about 66 years,\n\nV%    .'.W\/0 late No. Subramanian\n\n   Both are r\/at No.3\/1 F\" Street,\n\n 9et:itioner\n\n\n\nQuestioning the rejection of the pla\u00e9nt, petitioneripl.ai.f\u00a7tiff-.._\n\nhas f\ufb02ed RFA 266\/20%.\n\n4. We have heard learned counse! ._on b:oi:\u00a7ivV\"5\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7;eo\"a;j'g;V  \n\nperused the record.\n\n5. Sri C.B.Srinivasan,   \"foe\npetitioner contera\u00e9ed  of$\u00a7r...v'dated\n8.10.2004 passed by the   plaintiff\nto value the suit;    Act is far in\n\nexcess of its i'ori$ki\u00a7_otio'n;. .irea?\u00a7'v.\u00a7v'ioiated rules of fair\n\nprocedur\u00e92__an_d cfb\ufb01afturai justice by not granting\n\nreasonable\" o;;:$;\u00bbor'tu'n\u00a7tg\u00a5'A'  petitioner to state her\n\n_vobject\u00a7\u00a2\u00a7ns to i:h'e. about the correctness of the\n\n:\"V.v'oiu3.t:\u00a7%on  is contended that without opportunity\n\noAf\"'he*ak.;_'ir\u00a7g','Tthne  order was passed. Learned cotmsei\n\n aiso p\u00e9ointc-;d omit that in the piairst, the averments are to\n\n efrecothat the piaintiff has been in joint and\n\n4'_'_corat\u00a7tr'*u<\u00a7t\u00a7ve possession and enjoyment of the suit\n\nVT '::'_4so\u00bbh\u00abi-gdule properties along with defendants i and 2 arm\n\nhence it Is the piaint averments alone which have to be\n\nkl\n\n\n\nof the cieniai of the titie of the piaintiff to the suit pmpe.r\u00a7_;y\n\nand she being not in actuai possession and enjoyi*ne"n\u00a3f"af"~.s_'\n\nthe property, is iiabie to pay the Ceurt fee eh t.3\u00a7\u00e9 :r:sVrh'e\u00a7t "\n\nvame of the property of her share in izerms   \n\n(1) of section 35 of the Act and thus::'.i:h'a\u00e9 t'\ufb01'a_i: '\n\njustified in passing the impugn\u00a7s;rdek\u00a7\" .;.sa.rAh\u00e9:\u00a7J\";{:6tihsiei\n\nmade submissions in surapsrt ofVt.hs\u00a7:A'i'mpa:gnsd\"care:1er,:\u00a7\nIr'. Having heard iea__rh.ed {coqnse.IV_~Q%h--..both sidss, the\n\npoint for consideration is:    A\u00bb\n\n\"whet-her'*\u00a7:;':he*~.\u00bbtriai \"C-mvrt has propsriy\nexe:rcised\"\"$:h.g'=_ju:tisdi5:tioh in passing the\nimpkm\ufb01ed' stag\":-r, 'a.r1cis...\"vgfhether the impugned\norder' suffers 'from' :1_1:-r\ufb01eriai error or irregutarity?\n\n.a; Ti2e uiiamgste\u00e9s facts are tam, the suit fest\"\n\n'A'~.psArtjit:sr: 's1%.d--.sspsrate psssession has been fired by the\n\npst%tAihnherV;\" :\"I\"_::._\u00a7tr\u00a7:;%3\"';.{>iaint, she has inter siis conten\u00e9ed that\n\nV she isnin jxsjht \"Sand constructive possessien and enjoyment\n\nH K    the. 4_suivVt\"' scheduie properties. Respondents\/defendants<\/pre>\n
.’_’ha\u00a7’s”C6ntested the suit and have \ufb01led the written<\/p>\n
T istst\u00e9ment denying the ciairn and materiakfverments made<\/p>\n
\/A<\/p>\n
for partition of suit scheduie properties as well  <\/p>\n
deciarat\u00e9on that certain aiienations mae.e_”:”‘-ey’fjjthe<\/p>\n
defendants in respect of joint far:r*::.;’ii\u00a7  T_ <\/p>\n
binding on the piaintiffs, was \ufb01le-s:$_by xreiuing izirwejeiz”.-,’:.;.i~.i’A’t”u’.’*::’,’\u00a7<'-;~.i.r\u00e9"'viVit<\/p>\n
Section 35(2) of the Act, whieT%!.:VV:"'s~;as resisteei the
\ndefeneants, inter aiia cei'f:'zeai*:cti_\u00abi*i\u00a7'V_ piei\ufb01tiffe net
\nbeing it': posse-esien ef the  sheuizzi
\nhave valued the ;3u'a%%;.V\u00a7inee\u00a7\u00a7  the Act on the
\nground that  of the property.\n<\/p>\n
Censiderifi\u00e9’tithe:$eig;’\u00a7Vi5’iee’ei.?\u00a7\u00a7s,Aeh’tissue was framed ~
\nwhether ttseeuit  for the immose of<\/p>\n
Court fee end”‘j~uif’is:$ir:tie’s3.V”‘i”he trial Court had held that<\/p>\n
;_f’t’%~..e._ ;)i’\u00e9i:fitiff:S were  pessession of the suit schedule<\/p>\n
 vaiue the ciaim under sub-sectier: (1)<\/p>\n
i it   of Seetien 35’ tiiilie Act and ciirectee them to vaiue the suit<\/p>\n
-:_t’_;’:…_’preperty ‘aec1:ardingiy and fer new payment of the Court fee,<\/p>\n
 igifented having exeired, piaint was rejected. ween<\/p>\n
‘   erde} cf the trial Ceert was questienee in epeeei in this<\/p>\n
 A..__4’4\u00a7:eurt, fosiewirzg the iaw laid dc;-wt: by the Hozfbie Supreme<\/p>\n
Ceurt iii tfi\u00e9 case of NEELAVATI AND GTHERS VS. NATRA3<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
\/ .\n<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
amended.\n<\/p>\n
(iii) The plaintiff in a suit beinodonflllnusllvitls nas)ehe,’~<\/p>\n
choice of filing a suit of\u00bbipo_rticulo-5 nature ‘o.r=se,ek: a
\nparticular relief. Neither titeeefend-ant  the Court
\ncan alter the suit as one fore differeritrellef or as a
\nsuit failing in a different\u00ab”catepoiy_ and require the
\nplaintiff to pay coort_-ffee *on;_sslch_’eltered category of<\/p>\n
(iv) If th_e–_pl_aintjiff ,cljelms’~~.”thet ‘Vile is in joint
\npossession o*;?;,._.i-3′, 5,l’–op;\u00a2,rrty end ‘ seeks partition and
\nseparate”possession’,_jhe”~~oetegories the suit under 5.
\n35(2) of_the;\u00bb’_Act.’ \u00ab,l-i=e]’ is,””the’jrefore, liable to pay
\nceumfee ‘oniy”3ii:nder, S. 35(v2)V.” If on evidence, it is
\nfound the-tj_..he’\u00ab~.wes ‘-\u00abn_ot_ in joint possession, the
\ncon’seq\u00abeence” ls..,4titat=._ti’le reiid may be refused in
\nregard to ‘south. pro__p”e:’ty or the suit may be
\ndismissed. _ But thetguezatlon of Court treating the
\nsuit as one falling under 5. 35(1) of the Act and
\ndirecting th’e-.plaln.tlff to pay the court-fee under
\n‘-S.35{e1)'”o.f the Actdoes not arise. Even after written<\/p>\n
. ‘-.stetemenVt’*~\u00aba_nd evidence, (which may demonstrate
\n   V ei’>ee’r:..-;e- of ‘possession or joint possession) if the
\n‘ ~. “piainti\ufb02f’_v\u00bbch’eoses not to amend the plalnt to bring the
\n‘suit under 5. 33(1) and pay court-fee applicable<\/p>\n
thereto,” ” he takes the chance of suit owing
\ndismissed or relief being denim.\n<\/p>\n
 , (V) on appreciation of evidence, if the Court
\n ‘cilsbelleves the claim of plat-ntif!’ regarding joint<\/p>\n
: possession, it can only hold that the case does not
\n fall under 5. 35(2) and, therefore, plaintiff is not<\/p>\n
entitled to relief. It cannot, in the judgment, hold
\nthat the case of plaintiff should be\\:ategorised under<\/p>\n
reasonabie opportunity to the plaintiff to have her, V.
\nregard to the valuation of the suit for the  k
\npayment of Court fee, the impugned”oi’der”–,su;ffers\u00ab.froth <\/p>\n
materiai infirmity and there is a Aroateriai <\/p>\n
committed by the trio! court and”so’iaseqdentiy~V.t\ufb01ehis<\/p>\n
iiable to be set aside.\n<\/p>\n
For the foregoing reassess, ti$.e:vierit’\u00bbpeti1t’ion is aiiowed<\/p>\n
as foliows:\n<\/p>\n
(5)<\/span><\/p>\n
(H3 ..\n<\/p>\n
hordes’?    passed in
\no.s’.1s3}i3ooej%i by the xvm Additional City
\n” 41Civi_{3djd.Qe,.Bahgaiore, is hereby sa aside;<\/p>\n
 tri2ai*i’isCd’drt is directed to hear the
\n_%_pa:tAiesvv….e.nd pass orders with regard to<\/p>\n
  –.\u00a7fa~i.dation and payment of Court fm,
\n in View the iaw laid down by this
\n.  in the decisions referred to supra;\n<\/p>\n
Since the suit is of the year 2904 and is one
\nfor partition and separate possession, the
\ntrial Court is directed to expedite the
\nhearing with regard to the aforesaid aspect<\/p>\n
of the suit and aiso the triai and dispose! of
\nthe suit;\n<\/p>\n
Since both sides are represented, In   _<\/p>\n
any delay in dispesai of the suitkgt is “that_ u  <\/p>\n
the trial Court shah take up the:’:;uit_jfo..r:’ cnhei\u00a7!eret3i3nA <\/p>\n
on 1.9.2008 and the parties4–shaIIh’a.p’near  V<\/p>\n
triai Court without any
\nLearned counsei apheeLi1nd\u00ab_fo{r’thhefpnrties shail keep<\/p>\n
their clients -present’=.hefore;__thA\u00e9~_  Court on<\/p>\n
1.9.2003tevitait\u00e9ifurthertortiersfrom the ma! Court.<\/p>\n
The ;\u00a7etitionerin|’eiAnt4iff–f\u00e9hell produce a copy of this<\/p>\n
_order  ‘record Gttthvte ttial Court within a period of one<\/p>\n
inAV-menth’vt’fro\u00a7;n:te\u00a7iay, to enable the trial Court to take foiiow<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
X %  kissi-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008 Author: S.R.Bannurmath & Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT or-” KARNATAKA AT A7 DATED THIS THE 14*” DAY OF AuGusT,.,\u00e9j\u20ac@;3:VA..:j: 3 T PRESENfM] ‘p. % THE HON’8LE MR.JUSTI.CEa s.P\u00a7;’L%\u00a73}x:~:wuak\u00e9\u00bbz;a\ufb01;%i%” A N ms HOIWLE MR. JUSTICE.AA.\u00a5\\$’}’afEI\\i’ij\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7PALA si:>woA WRIT Permow 199:7. 15:3.2k:\u00a7eo5Ti(GM~::Pc) E Smt. s. Mee:%a%%k:\u00a7s\u00ab3’m […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-156707","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nS Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-09T09:46:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-09T09:46:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":825,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008\",\"name\":\"S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-09T09:46:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-09T09:46:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-09T09:46:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008"},"wordCount":825,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008","name":"S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-09T09:46:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-meenakshi-vs-s-nagarajan-on-14-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S Meenakshi vs S Nagarajan on 14 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156707","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=156707"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156707\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=156707"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=156707"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=156707"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}