{"id":156708,"date":"2009-03-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2"},"modified":"2019-02-15T21:23:37","modified_gmt":"2019-02-15T15:53:37","slug":"commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; &#8230; vs M\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Supreme Court of India<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; &#8230; vs M\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;J.<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: S.H. Kapadia, Aftab Alam<\/div>\n<pre>                                     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA\n\n                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\n\n                            CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4944 OF 2004\n\n\nCommnr. of Central Excise &amp; Customs, Indore                     ...Appellant(s)\n\n                     Versus\n\nM\/s. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd.                                  ...Respondent(s)\n\n                                         WITH\n\n                CIVIL APPEAL NOS.6519\/2005, 1152\/2006, 2127\/2006,\n                        2628\/2006, 2630\/2006 &amp; 4059\/2006\n\n                                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>          Delay condoned.\n<\/p>\n<p>          In this batch of Civil Appeals, the main issue which arose for determination<\/p>\n<p>before the Adjudicating Authority was whether Intravenous Fluids having a<\/p>\n<p>therapeutic value stood covered under Exemption Notification No.3\/2001.<\/p>\n<p>          In the lead matter &#8211; M\/s. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd. &#8211; the respondents were<\/p>\n<p>engaged in the manufacture of various types of Intravenous Fluids.         They were<\/p>\n<p>availing the benefits of Notification No.6\/2000, dated 1.3.2000. The said Notification<\/p>\n<p>was amended by Notification No.36\/2000, dated 4.5.2000, whereby Entry No.47-A<\/p>\n<p>was added thereby exempting &#8220;Intravenous Fluids&#8221; from payment of excise duty.<\/p>\n<p>However, from 1.3.2001, the earlier notifications were replaced by Notification<\/p>\n<p>No.3\/2001 which defined &#8220;Intravenous Fluids&#8221; as those which are used for sugar,<\/p>\n<p>electrolyte or fluid replenishment.    In other words, open-ended exemption stood<\/p>\n<p>restricted by the above three qualifications.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                            1<\/span><br \/>\n          Accordingly, show cause notices were issued in which it was alleged that<\/p>\n<p>the respondents were engaged in the manufacture of intravenous infusions of various<\/p>\n<p>kinds which becides the fluids included certain medicines having anti-bacterial,<\/p>\n<p>antibiotic and antimicrobial properties. It was alleged in the show cause notice that<\/p>\n<p>by addition of the following items to the Intravenous Fluids, the product attained<\/p>\n<p>therapeutic value and, consequently, it fell outside Notification No.3\/2001 which<\/p>\n<p>defined &#8216;IV Fluids&#8217; as those used for sugar, electrolyte or fluid replenishment.<\/p>\n<p>          The items added to the fluids are as follows:\n<\/p>\n<pre>          (a)        Ciprofloxacin I.P.\n          (b)        Metronidazole I.P.\n          (c)        PDZOLE-D\n          (d)        Ciprodex\n          (e)        Tinipidi Isotonic Infusion, and\n          (f)        Mannitol I.P.\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>          The most important aspect to be noted is that in the 2001-2002 Budget, an<\/p>\n<p>explanation was inserted in Notification No.36\/2000, clarifying that only such IV<\/p>\n<p>fluids which were used for sugar, electrolyte or fluid replenishment, were exempt<\/p>\n<p>from duty and not other IV fluids. This provision in the Budget was relied upon by<\/p>\n<p>the Department in the show cause notice(s) to deny the benefit of exemption claimed<\/p>\n<p>by the respondents under Notification No.3\/2001. Unfortunately, despite detailed<\/p>\n<p>analysis of the notification in question by the Commissioner, the Tribunal has not<\/p>\n<p>examined this aspect and, therefore, the matter needs to be remitted to the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>to give its finding as to what is the effect of the 2001-2002 Budget which restricts the<\/p>\n<p>definition of &#8216;IV Fluids&#8217; in terms of the above three qualifications.<\/p>\n<p>          There is one more aspect which the Tribunal is required to consider. In the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                            2<\/span><br \/>\nlabels of the respondent-Company, there is a warning stating that IV fluid<\/p>\n<p>manufactured by the assessee is Schedule-H Drug. What is argued on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>assessee(s) is that because of addition to the IV Fluid of one of the above-mentioned<\/p>\n<p>six items, the product manufactured is required to be sold as a Schedule-H drug. On<\/p>\n<p>the other hand, the Department has placed reliance on the Drugs and Cosmetics<\/p>\n<p>Rules, 1945 read with Schedule-H to indicate that when IV Fluid has dominant<\/p>\n<p>therapeutic value, it will not come within the exemption because it has to be treated<\/p>\n<p>as a Schedule-H drug. We do wish to express any opinion on this point. Suffice it to<\/p>\n<p>state that on the above two questions\/issues, the matter needs to be remitted to the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal for consideration in accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<p>          We may add that exemption notifications have to be read strictly. We may<\/p>\n<p>also add that the burden is on the assessee to prove that the item falls within the four<\/p>\n<p>corners of the exemption notification.\n<\/p>\n<p>          Before concluding, we may state that if on the second issue, regarding<\/p>\n<p>Schedule-H Drug, as spelt out hereinabove, if the Tribunal feels that the matter<\/p>\n<p>requires further evidence, it may either itself decide that point after giving<\/p>\n<p>opportunity to the parties or it may remit the matter to the Adjudicating Authority<\/p>\n<p>for its decision on factual aspect in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p>          Subject to what is stated above, the Department&#8217;s Appeals are allowed, the<\/p>\n<p>impugned judgment is set aside and the matters are remitted to the Tribunal for fresh<\/p>\n<p>consideration in accordance with law. In the facts and circumstances, there will be<\/p>\n<p>no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                            3<\/span><br \/>\n                  &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                             (S.H. KAPADIA)<\/p>\n<p>                           &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                  (AFTAB ALAM)<br \/>\nNew Delhi,<br \/>\nMarch 31, 2009.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         4<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of India Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; &#8230; vs M\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009 Author: &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;J. Bench: S.H. Kapadia, Aftab Alam IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4944 OF 2004 Commnr. of Central Excise &amp; Customs, Indore &#8230;Appellant(s) Versus M\/s. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd. &#8230;Respondent(s) [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-156708","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; ... vs M\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; ... vs M\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-15T15:53:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; &#8230; vs M\\\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-15T15:53:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":693,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court of India\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; ... vs M\\\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-15T15:53:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; &#8230; vs M\\\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; ... vs M\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; ... vs M\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-15T15:53:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; &#8230; vs M\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-15T15:53:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2"},"wordCount":693,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court of India"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2","name":"Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; ... vs M\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-15T15:53:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commnr-central-excise-vs-ms-parenteral-drugs-i-ltd-on-31-march-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Commnr.,Central Excise &amp; &#8230; vs M\/S. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd on 31 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156708","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=156708"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156708\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=156708"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=156708"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=156708"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}