{"id":157232,"date":"2010-11-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-09-28T00:46:48","modified_gmt":"2016-09-27T19:16:48","slug":"ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
-1-\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 26?\" DAV OF NOVEMBER, \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE Moi-mi SHANT-'\u00a7\\.i\u00a7i'AC\u00a7{\u00a7Ll'i5'A'R~\u00e9.  \n\nC.M.P. No.78\/2(E51.(_)_:\"A--A.V_z'\n\nBETWEEN :\n\nM\/s. Down!inkTelenet  .\n\nA Proprietorship Concerns _ \nHaving its office at  \nDoor No.752\/C, 5\"' Cross' . :1\u00bb '\nAir View Colony   .. \nKonena Agralnara  ~ '\n\nAirport Road' (O.!d~)_  \nBanga|ore_-_-_56O.V%{3i??,_ V\n\nRep byjits Prop'ri_etoi:fj\" \u00abV\n\nK.J. Ba<;~:.avarajV.    -- I ..Petitioner\n\n(By M\/s. CarIappa-- \n\nAND} E'\n\nV'  V:f1.;V_i'\u00a7\/1,'-s:"Diha:Vrti._,_AirteI Ltd .,\n\nHa_v"in_gi its Re-gistered Office\n_  H~v-5,5,12,.j=Mehrauir Road\n. New De!iijir--?'11O 030\n"Rep..__by~its Managing Director.\n\n.VopM\/s';r--~E%.harti Airtel Ltci.,\nV Having its office at\n' Maruthi Infotech Centre\n\n.< pd.\n\n\n\n11\/1 and 12\/1, Block A\nWest Wing, Koramangaia\nInner Ring Road, Amarjyothi\n\nLayout, Bangalore~71. ..Respon<:len'ts:"'v,y\n\n(By M\/s. Lex Nexus, Adv.,)\n\nThis CMP is \ufb01led under Sectioiri 1(5) of the 'Ar'oitra,ti.ori_y\nand Conciliation Act, 1996, praying thfcl,_l_;71;_l_1It$l_HQI17bI6fCOu:}fl}A'\nmay be pleased to appoint Mr. Justi{e_e"S. Ven1\u00a3a'tare__inai1--.\n(Retd.), Former Judge of the_rH_igh Couiir. of K.ernataka., at \nNo.161. 2nd Block, ill Stage, West of "Chord Roaid',"i~iJ.udges * '\n\nColony, Basaveshwamagar, Bangalore-'?\u20ac3_ or' any other\ncompetent person as the Sole A:\u00a7bitr_ator to adjiipdieate upon\nthe dispute of the Partiesiinder the'-Contract dated 4.4.2005\nand consequently refer' 'the'--gd1ispulteV"l of the parties to\nArbitration. "  i   T'\n\nThis CMPoori'1'1ng:=ongfoi': this day the Court\nmade the fO1]y0ViT1'}'igi--h~_'_ ~. \u00ab    V \n\nrrrr IV Q'   R.\nThe"  into between the\n\npetitionerland~res.pond'ents for laying telephone lines\n\n.---.is_and.l'to:y_A~-Tcarry oluti*~-~l~oca| access and subscriber access\n\n The petitioner has completed the\n\nwo-rl<  touit by the respondents. Though<\/pre>\n
V””‘-pl”rzertain\u00bb.’amounts are paid to the petitioner by the<\/p>\n
  respondents, there is allegedly still balance due to the<\/p>\n
\\\/5<\/p>\n
petitioner by the respondents. There was exchange of<\/p>\n
notices between the parties. However, dispu_4tes-.._ar_e<\/p>\n
not settled. The petitioner has filed <\/p>\n
invoking Section 11(5) of ,th\u00bbe._’Ar_bVi’trat’i’on”‘<\/p>\n
Conciiiation Act, 1996, praying <\/p>\n
dispute for adjudication to ‘the.”Arbit.rator.._i   <\/p>\n
2. Learned   for the
\nrespondents su_i.’mf_1its ithait   not due any
\nsu ms of  paid all sums
\n security deposit is
\nreturned.”   parties are not agreeing<\/p>\n
to they facts.V”Thus,~–._thenre exists dispute between the<\/p>\n
‘id’\u00ab_pa’rt.i’es,.,feiatingiiitopayment of money. According to<\/p>\n
ii’-..th.eu’pe”t\u00abi.tioVner_j..amount is not paid to it, whereas<\/p>\n
   to the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
acc.ordj_.rig_it’oAithe respondents, entire amounts are paid<\/p>\n
if<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
3. Copy of the agreement entered into between<\/p>\n
the parties is produced at Annexure–A. ClausAe.%’i_;4.of<\/p>\n
the agreement is arbitration clause. Notice’_:”i’s'”iV’s1s.:ujeid_”‘_<\/p>\n
by the petitioner to the responde’n”ts–~3’_’;’i.n’v:ol<ingV'4 it<\/p>\n
arbitration clause. Though the?'.A_'ar'bitrati'o:n <\/p>\n
reveals that the Arbitral Trib.gn.al sh'al_l coAnvsis't"ofV~Vthree * it<\/p>\n
Arbitrators, i.e.,  Arbii't'rat:ors'-~,.andA"a-n~*\u00a7Umpire,
\nlearned advocates appearinigion  sides agree
\nbefore this that  be referred to<\/p>\n
Sole  '  <\/p>\n
l3oth_ the':VI'pa%rtie's.:Iuagree that Justice Jayaram<\/p>\n
Chouta n'1a~\\,rVbeVa~.pp~ol'irited as Sole Arbitrator to resolve<\/p>\n
th"e."':'di_sVpuvite bet'we'en the parties. Accordingly, the<\/p>\n
  :fo_elllow.ifng  is made:–\n<\/p>\n
 ,.\u00a7u;sti’ce T.Jayaram Chouta, #385, 5″‘ Main, 11*”<\/p>\n
A  n.Cr”o\u00abss, RMV II Stage, E3angalore–56O 094, is appointed<\/p>\n
.   Hl\ufb01as Sole Arbitrator, to resolve the dispute between the<\/p>\n
\\_W<\/p>\n
parties. The learned Arbitrator, on receipt of a copy of<\/p>\n
this order, shaii enter upon the reference, issuev..n_io.t’iic.e<\/p>\n
to the parties and then proceed to resolve  .<\/p>\n
in accordance with the provisio.n\u00bbs…of t’_he”4Arji.;itrai;i~on-._<\/p>\n
and Conciiiation Act, 1996.\n<\/p>\n
Office is directedto  to
\nthe learned Arbitrator,”_fort_h,i\u00a7v:ivth::,*Vi’,V:_v.:~FfiVce is further
\ndirected to  if any, filed
\naiong with? oveti,tioner to enabie the<\/p>\n
petitioinerVtoierodiitgce fbeiforei’t’h’e'”iearned Arbitrator.<\/p>\n
Petition  of accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
Sci\/-\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26?” DAV OF NOVEMBER, BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE Moi-mi SHANT-‘\u00a7\\.i\u00a7i’AC\u00a7{\u00a7Ll’i5’A’R~\u00e9. C.M.P. No.78\/2(E51.(_)_:”A–A.V_z’ BETWEEN : M\/s. Down!inkTelenet . A Proprietorship Concerns _ Having its office at […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-157232","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-27T19:16:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\\\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-27T19:16:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":429,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\\\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-27T19:16:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\\\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-27T19:16:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-27T19:16:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010"},"wordCount":429,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010","name":"M\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-27T19:16:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-downlink-telenet-vs-ms-bharti-airtel-ltd-on-26-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Downlink Telenet vs M\/S Bharti Airtel Ltd on 26 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157232","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157232"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157232\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157232"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157232"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157232"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}