{"id":157260,"date":"2008-07-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008"},"modified":"2018-12-28T04:39:18","modified_gmt":"2018-12-27T23:09:18","slug":"ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Ramanna<\/div>\n<pre>3.NJ&gt;1r2AvEEN KUMAR,\nMAJOR,   _\n\nFA'I'HER's NAME NO'? KNOWN 1\n\nTO THE APPELLANT',\n\nNo.66, 3342 CROSS,\n\nmm 'A' MAIN, Sm BLOCK, V\nJAYANAGAR,    V     \nBANGALORE--56\u20ac) 044.  ' .. RES?' NI}EN\"I'S\n\n(BY SR1 M.M.AsHoKAf; ;xpv.;_r\"\"_  \n\nTHIS CRLA. I8_FILED.wU,!S;V378{AA\u00a7 C1?;v\u00a5'.C.1v_'f'RAYING TO SET\nASIDE me GRDEIQOE' A;cQ:Jr1fm:, ~m,23;;~:,'2oos mssmn us:\nc.c:.re0.238\/02 on ma FELEL op 'ms---- A'DI)L.C.J.M. swam -\nACQUITTING 'I__'.i~~i'E\" R1a;s\u00a7?0N9.j:;:N=r1A:*,ca;sEn FOR THE or-'muss\nP\/UjS.188   'V    \n\nTH;$\"APi&gt;E\u00e9;:, C51': Fd1\u00e9\"H\u00e9AI2ING THIS DAY, COURT\nDELIVERED 'I'__I~\u00a3.!?. re*c:s:V.r,,_&lt;_:i&#039;\u00a3.*;1ns::\u00a7,_;__ --\n\n .&#039; i\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7HENT\n\n  &quot;is.  by the appellant cha1.k:n$&#039;ng the\n\n of acquittal dated 23-03-2006 made by\n\nme, &#039;;&amp;;de11;&#039;  Magistrate, Bangalon: Bistrict,\n\n   the rcspondcnts for the o\ufb02bncc\n\n sundar SCC.138 of NJ. Act holding that the\n\n notice has nod: bacn sent to the respondents within<\/pre>\n<p>  &#8216;i5&#8211;ti;ays from the date ofdishozaour ofchcqucs in question.<\/p>\n<p>2. The case cf the appcliant in brief is that the appellant<\/p>\n<p>is a partnership \ufb01rm so also Respondent No.1, Respondent<\/p>\n<p>%aPP\u00b0a&#8217;*%j%   <\/p>\n<p>N032 and 3 are partners of Rcspondcnt Neal   H<\/p>\n<p>respondents have borrorwead Rs.i,\u20ac){):,&#8217;0&#8217;O(}f\u00ab-.  <\/p>\n<p>said loan amount they issued sevtm  (of   ._<\/p>\n<p>When the sand&#8217; cheques were   itcd  fVGIf_ cza\ufb01\u00e9azsfiii\ufb01g\u00e9hi  &#8221; V<\/p>\n<p>were returned with &#8220;bank crxlgiorscpm-sJu::;.t&#8217;v&#8217;i1i;~a115i35&#8217;1&lt;$iactntv1i113:\u00a7is&#039; dated<br \/>\n6\/ 11\/2000. Thcmfom   &#039;gpt issued legal<br \/>\nnotice an 22\/11\/$_-{3\u00a3!Q.   any reply<br \/>\nfrom the   V&#039; against all<br \/>\nthe   V Court acquitted the<br \/>\nmspondcliifi 0._11A1\u00a7na:miatory provision of Sec.<\/p>\n<p>1333;] of NLE.._f\u00a7ct  complied with. Hence, this<\/p>\n<p> A   by the kxarsmd counsel 1231&#039; the appcilant<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7\u00a7ho is a oompiainant before the trial Court<\/p>\n<p> pmseni\u00e9gd  Ex.-.=..P~1 to 11-7 to its Banker, 1&#039;31 turn the<\/p>\n<p>u for callcction to the Bankrxr of the mspondcmt.<\/p>\n<p> &quot;jchoqucs were returned with an cndoxscnktnt<\/p>\n<p>j &#8211; ..&#039;:&quot;}\ufb02s&#039;i1\ufb01cicn.t Funds&quot; as per Ex.P~8 dated 6\/11\/2000 to the<\/p>\n<p>  Banker of the appcliant. The Banker of the appcilant in turn<\/p>\n<p>sent tha same to the appellant on 8\/ 11\/2000. Therefore notice<\/p>\n<p>, r<br \/>\n.&#039; _&#039;L._,, _f,,,.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221; M<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01x&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>4&#8242; &#8221; . 3<\/p>\n<p>has been issued to the axzcuscd Within 15 days   .617.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>mecipt of intimation from its bank. Thcmfmr: it   u V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>the trial Ceurt has committed a::\u00a2'&#8221;\u00e91&#8217;1*r:rA_\u00a7n <\/p>\n<p>analyzing and assessing the end&#8217; cn\u00e9axg 1 ztshc  <\/p>\n<p>wrongly acquitted the rcspondk\ufb01ni\ufb01.  &#8216;p1&#8217;* a-per &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>masons. Thcztfozt, appeal is  \u00a73iidvv\u00abthc&#8217;\u00a7ord\u00a2x&#8217; of<br \/>\nacquittal is to ix set asiacmi is   mat though the<\/p>\n<p>mspo11dentsissucd_A&#8217;\u20ac&#8221;_i;t:  \u00a331&#8242;  but he has<\/p>\n<p>bormwed *\u00a2:1;*cziLp&#8217;i*i\u00a7&gt;r&#8217;  and that he could not<br \/>\nrctalisc t1::\u00e9.sa_ m  e   it is prayed that in case this<\/p>\n<p>Court allow\u00e9i   &#8216;\u00ab:\u20aciC!11bl\ufb02 thx: cheques amount be<\/p>\n<p>4_ .  T\ufb01czcfggp, he prays for allowing the appeal.<\/p>\n<p>     V  Counsel for the appcliasnt has relied on<\/p>\n<p>. .   the acgim  in case of M19 MUNOTH INVESTMENTS<\/p>\n<p> v:a; :.M\/s. PUTTUKOLA PROPERTIES L&#8217;r1:&gt;., AND<\/p>\n<p> .&#8217;_A.=e$r&lt;3%:&#039;}i&#039;ELr2 mportcd in AIR 2001 5.0. 2752, wherein it has been<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Inter a\ufb01a pmvidcs that the payee has to<br \/>\nmake demand for the paymcnt of money by<br \/>\ngiving a notice &quot;to the drawer of the cheque<\/p>\n<p>\/I9:\n<\/p>\n<p>.\/ &#8216;<br \/>\n&#8216; .\n<\/p>\n<p>nut produced any bank statement before the  :;&#8217;;:5% _<\/p>\n<p>further argued that both the appellant as wc\ufb01gzs.   <\/p>\n<p>Bank are located very close to OH\u00bb;\n<\/p>\n<p>Thcrcforc the date mentioned m_;&#8217;:&#8221;:_;;.1&gt;-.9&#8242; ind&#8211;i;u.e\u00a7t\u00a2s; t\u00a7;.~i:&#8217;s:  ,<\/p>\n<p>was ciciivercd on 6-11-2000. Th(\u00e9i&#8217;x?\u00e9$z*s,_ they  \ufb01ght<br \/>\nin acquit\ufb01ng the msponeiegt ;  to be<br \/>\ndismissczd. &#8216; &#8221; &#8211;   A  .% <\/p>\n<p>6. In   &#8216;  counsel for the<br \/>\nrcspondcnt   Court in the case of<\/p>\n<p>RAN._m*HA.BALAS\ufb01&#8217;i\u00a7R;\u00a7M\u00bb\u00a7\ufb011g\u00a7ra__Am:&gt; ANOTHER vs. snanmr<\/p>\n<p>emu? ANLj&#8221;.QTH\u00e93R$&#8221;&#8216;\u00a7\u00a7cJp\u00ab\u00a7:&amp;ted in ILR 2007 KAR 765 and&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>4.\\,Vanomez%f &amp;ez::sion  of OM SHAKTHI sags? AND<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;-.M1 NjoR r:*yi&#8217; Ca\u00e9gbzj&#8217; C0-OPERATIVE SOCIETY L&#8217;I&#8217;D., vs. M.<\/p>\n<p>vE&#8217;s5_K;tTESi\u00a7&#8221;_~V_:cp\u00a7r\u00a3cd in ILR 2097 KAR 5125. He further<\/p>\n<p> submifam the Court has got discretion to ilnpasc \ufb01ne<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; N &#8221; af\u00a7iim:1:;t anti &#8220;not: the doubit: amount and the Court could either<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;saeni\ufb01ixczz\ufb01 the aocusad or impose \ufb01ne amount. Therefore, it is<\/p>\n<p> 130:-\ufb01xandatoxy provision to impose doubftc the \ufb01ne amount, for<\/p>\n<p>  \ufb01sfhich he referred to another co\u00bb-oniinatc Bench dcrcision of this<\/p>\n<p>Court: reported in IL}? 2008 KAR 1300.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;fs<br \/>\n&#8216;J. ___ \/z)&#8217;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; 3::-\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>7. Having heard the learned counsel f:\u00a7i*&#8221;&#8216;\u00a7:s\u00a3.it}{  _<\/p>\n<p>parties. Now, the point that arises for    <\/p>\n<p>dcaision is vcritxcthcr the Judgment   Qf <\/p>\n<p>by the trial Court is perverse, ingtmjrect &#8216;\u00a7IIcga1!? &#8211;   1 S<\/p>\n<p>3. it is an undisputcd&#8221;Vi&#8217;Z\u20ac=L:V;T\u00a73;&#8217; that  is a<br \/>\nFirm who \ufb01lnti a Rcsp\ufb01\ufb01d\ufb01\ufb01t No.i~<br \/>\npartnership \ufb01rm and Rcsp&lt;&#039;\u00a7r\u00a7dE;1&#039;f%&#039;I%&#039;;\u00a7$:. its partners.\n<\/p>\n<p>Admittedly, the     by R\ufb01sponxicnt<br \/>\nNos.2 and 3  v&#8217;\u00a7;?c3$};A3c;:1\ufb01ent No.1. When the<br \/>\nchcqucs  ..p:\u00a3:scntcd for encashmcnt tlm<\/p>\n<p>same were  mfdofscmcnt-Ex.P.8 as &#8220;insu\ufb01cittnt<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01znds\ufb02 ;  &#8221; &#8216;I?&#8217;.hc1&#8217;cVf&lt;5x&quot;z::, &#039; i-&#039;1pp\u00a3\u20ac:}1ant herein on the basis of the<\/p>\n<p> f\u00a7x\u00ab.._P.9 issued by its banktzr informed the<\/p>\n<p> cheques presented for oe\ufb01cctions bcfcm<\/p>\n<p>  the  Co-cxpcrativc Bank Ltd.., Avenue Road,<\/p>\n<p>~  but the clzmqucs which went: sent for co\ufb02ec\ufb01on of<\/p>\n<p>  of In\u00e9sia, Bangaiom were returned as &quot;insix\ufb01cicnt<\/p>\n<p>.   Ex.P~9 is the endorsement issued by the appcliant<\/p>\n<p>  ._&quot;4I}:&#039;ankcr Whcrein the date 6\/ 1. 1\/ 2&amp;0 has been mentioned. But<\/p>\n<p>aoczsrding to the appellant he has received the endorsement<\/p>\n<p> I I:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Z&#8217;<br \/>\n&gt;\/'&#8221;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8221;&#8221;\/W<\/p>\n<p>I.\n<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01om its banker 031 8\/11\/2000 to that e\ufb02bct   ~.. <\/p>\n<p>tmdomcmcnt on EX.P.9, thetm-after    <\/p>\n<p>\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01 1&#8217;33 the individual names of Rcspox\ufb01snt  <\/p>\n<p>Well as Respondent No.1 on   to<br \/>\nN.Sm&#8217;ya Bhagwan came   afivv\u00e9nii\ufb01mcmcnt<br \/>\n&#8220;not claimed&#8221;. Thcrcforc, 4&#8242; against<br \/>\nRespondent   &#8216;A   <\/p>\n<p>9. &#8216;i&#8221;he7  the respcrndents<br \/>\nhas assigzxzdv  \ufb01th&#8221;e&#8217;ap\u00a73ci1ant~ct3111p1ainant has<br \/>\nnot (:&#8217;OII1}$1i_6!;i&#8217;&#8211;  provisions of Sec. 138(1)] of<\/p>\n<p>NJ. Act. ThE:L..\u00a7:h::qiic3&#8243;V  to P&#8211;? were presented by the<\/p>\n<p>_ uto its buafn-k:c;* for encashment. Since the chcqucs in<\/p>\n<p>V. Equ \u00a2sa7\u00a7\ufb011a  the respondents pertain to Union Bank of<\/p>\n<p>1n\u00a212a,*&#8217;%%\u00a7::i.\u00abs:;\u00e9i;;;&amp;\u00a2  banker of the appenam sent it for<\/p>\n<p> &lt;;oIicc\u00b0ti&lt;m. \\Exs3P*8 and 17-9 are: the cmiorscmcnts issued by<\/p>\n<p>&quot;  .. nqspe\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01e bankers to the appellant. Ex.P-8 an<\/p>\n<p> &#039;::.tid&#039;-&lt;:\u00a7rssI\ufb01cnt sent by \ufb02it? rcspeudcnfs banker to: the appellant<\/p>\n<p>  Ex.P&#8211;9 issued by the appeilant Banker. The only<\/p>\n<p>  &#8211;\u00abc\ufb01\ufb01es\ufb01on left for considera\ufb01oxa is Whether the legal :::1::atioc smxt<\/p>\n<p>by the appellant is within 15 days from the date of mceipt of<\/p>\n<p>endarstztmcnt from its banker. The tria} Court on x\u00e9fu<\/p>\n<p>the endorsement mentioned in EXP-8 came to th\u00e9 <\/p>\n<p>that the endorscmcnt is dated 6} 1 1\/  &#8216;iara\ufb02faj\u00e9ct <\/p>\n<p>has not presented the cheque: befcmm  cf&#8221; ._<\/p>\n<p>Whcrc the respondents have a     he &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>presented the cheque hefoyet its  i;\u00a2::,, SuB1&#8217;a.ma1&#8217;j1ycswara<br \/>\nComparative Bank Ltd. Ci&#8217;   _ date has been<br \/>\nmentioned as 6\/ 1 1;2&lt;;_ro0, i:a\u00a2l&#039;g:g;gia::sc ;\ufb01cn\u00a7f&quot;:,f&#039;thc res\ufb01ench-mt<br \/>\nbanktzr was 01; 6    smit 133 t:Ij\u00e9VVQappc}Iant&#039;s banker<br \/>\ni.e, Subrimaxxyes\ufb01\ufb01aia. Bank Li:d., and in mm the<\/p>\n<p>same: was siagt\u00e9\u00e9 tg   as per Ex.P.9, which was<\/p>\n<p>_.the  i-an 8\/11\/2002. If the receipt of the<\/p>\n<p>  V$iidn:;\u00a3:;n;3i1tvEX.P\u00ab9 is fakcn as 8\/ 11\/ 2000 then tbs legal<\/p>\n<p> is\u00e9sued by the appellant to the<\/p>\n<p> :espo::4e1e:n:&#039;is+,\u00a7;\u00a7+;i:11in the statutory period. Thc iaw laid down<\/p>\n<p>by :11; Azpezxz; Court in case of ms. MUNOTH INVESTMENTS<\/p>\n<p> 3&amp;3. M\/S. PUTTUKOLA PROPERTIES L&#039;I&quot;D., AND<\/p>\n<p> ff ,a:~;&lt;f\u00a7T1\u00bbiER reported in AIR 2001 s.c. 2752 referred supra, is<\/p>\n<p>    appiicabIc to the facts 0:&#039; the case on hand.<\/p>\n<p>I 1<\/p>\n<p>10. As \ufb01ar as the cantcntrion taken by  +-<\/p>\n<p>ctmnscl that the person who has  the  13.-9  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>authmtisation to \ufb01le a complain&#8217; t is c&#8217;;:onc:en ed;..i11. \ufb02ift.<\/p>\n<p>cast: the complaint was libel .by..__    *<\/p>\n<p>Ramamurthy, for and on behalf of   There<br \/>\nis no need to produce  of -;?Q1ttg:\ufb01jiL\u00a7;_&#8217;\u00a23ii&#8221;a11tho1isation from<br \/>\nother partnezrs. The; law    in the case of<\/p>\n<p>RANJITI-IA EALASUBEAMANEAN: A&#8217;1~::\u00a7&#8217; ANCYMER vs. SHANTH!<\/p>\n<p>GROUP AND. &#8212; i&#8221;11~!~Li% 2007 KAR 765 is not<br \/>\napp}icabI;\u00a7;_ S0   by this Court in the case<\/p>\n<p>of OM s\ufb01hmm  &#8216;S\u00a3;\ufb01;&#8217;.ST.&#8217;:_&#8221;..&#8217;AND MINQRITY CREDIT co-<\/p>\n<p>4._VVDPER&amp;&#8217;\u00a7f\ufb01\/E s0(iI1a3&lt;r$zV1____m).,vs. M. VENKATESH reported in<\/p>\n<p>V. *- IL\u00a3z   is 3130 not made applicable to the fmts of<\/p>\n<p>th\u20ac.caiga::; &quot;&#039;fii~v_..V(}?Qj;&quot;&#039;SHAKTHI SC\/ST AND MINORITY CREDIT<\/p>\n<p>V V} SO~OPERATiV!\u00a7 SOCIE&#039;I&#039;Y&#039;S 1:rz:::., case the complaint is \ufb02ied by<\/p>\n<p>&quot; M  pxgsid\u00e9ni ofthc Sociacty, therefore he has tn produce power<\/p>\n<p> Qf &#039;amriiey or authorisatioxx to \ufb01le a complaint. Since the<\/p>\n<p>  pmsidcnt has \ufb01led the complaint Without authoriisatism, this<\/p>\n<p>    rightly dismissed the appeal preferred by the appcllallb<\/p>\n<p>complainant in the said case but in the instant case<\/p>\n<p>.\u00bb \\..\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  :;w&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;:7. _4&#8212;3&#8243;&#8216;&gt;- ff<\/p>\n<p>A;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>-1}-\n<\/p>\n<p>considezdng the fact that the appclkant is a  <\/p>\n<p>and complaint \ufb01lxzd y its managing partner then;   Vii)&#8217;  _&amp;  <\/p>\n<p>\ufb01le any authorisation to \ufb01k: tht: &lt;:0mpmV&#039;:int &#039; A<\/p>\n<p>11. The trial Court ca1cu\u00a7atingA *i:hx f'(;;:1usc &#8216;QfAact*2oif1=.ift:3%v&#8217;V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01lm&#8217; g a compiaint from ?\/1 1\/atotallyvh<br \/>\n9 of the complaint it is spc;\u00abr:i_f:\u00a7&lt;:a1ly.A \u00a3a&#039;*&#039;a&#039;:\u00a2.=:;*.&#039;5_1:&#039;::&lt;.&quot;lVV by&#039; the&#039;  that<br \/>\nthe cause of action fior  &#8211;;iiffcn:nt dams<\/p>\n<p>11.6., 6\/ I 1\/ 2000 and. :8}; 1\/ can not resist<\/p>\n<p>service of \u20ac152\u00bb mi L\ufb01awfg\u00e9\ufb02gc, the appellant send<br \/>\nthe notice  Wh_&#039;i&#039;v::h   by the respondents. It is not<\/p>\n<p>the case of tiic._ :&#039;t:s3p{$r;&lt;ie3:t  the address to which notice<\/p>\n<p>_s\u00a2nt  In  behalf a reference is made to a<\/p>\n<p> &#039;\u00ab:3.cc:Ai$i:;\u00ab.n:V of&#039;? t\ufb011c~ iH&#039;a1:;&#039;blc Apex Court in the cam of C.\u20ac\u00a7.AL.AVI<\/p>\n<p>HAJ:_\u00e9?S ,%\u00abPA\u00a37;;9E1fr$3 MUHAMMED AND ANOTHER reported in<\/p>\n<p> (-2.2007) &quot;&quot;6 scfcz  Thcrcfam it couzd be said that the<\/p>\n<p>H &quot; &quot; 4.it:sipe:usicnt\u00e9.&quot;&#039;ca.. $111011 contend that then: is no proper sermon&#039; of<\/p>\n<p> -izo\ufb01ee. The trial Court without pmper apprcciaticn of<\/p>\n<p>VT jjdccumcnts placed on rczcard cam: to a wrong conclusion in<\/p>\n<p>  &#8221;  the respondents. Hence this appeal is to has allowed<\/p>\n<p>V. by setting the order of acquittai passed by the trial court.<\/p>\n<p>12. Counsel for thr: appellant vchemt;Iatl.3f:  .. V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>since the cheques have been issued in    W139?<\/p>\n<p>not cncashcd on account ef  {he  ,<\/p>\n<p>Court may impose sentence igicublcV&#8221;t31\u00e9&#8221;\ufb0111\u00e9&#8217;:&#8217;:Eamount<\/p>\n<p>Imposing of he amouz;.\u20aci*..Ais <\/p>\n<p>Thercfom taking into &#8221;   km and<br \/>\ncircumstances gf     \ufb01ne in all of<br \/>\nRs.80,{}OG\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>13.  .&#8211;  The Judgment<br \/>\nand oxtiti\ufb01gf  the trial Court acquitting the<\/p>\n<p>rcapondrcnts  asiiic and Respondent Nos. .1 to 3 am<\/p>\n<p> for the \u00a7\u00a7\ufb01&#8217;cv\ufb01v&lt;v:_g;__&#039;p&#039;unishabIe under Sec.l38 of N .1. Act.<\/p>\n<p> and 3 are sentenced to pay \ufb01ne of<\/p>\n<p> default of payment of \ufb01ne amount thcy<\/p>\n<p> shall  .  for thzvcc months cash. Aftnr dcpasiting the<\/p>\n<p> ..an:&#039;1ou1&quot;r\u00a3.of Rs.80,000\/-, by Respondent N032 and 3 the<\/p>\n<p>  be payable to the appcizam herein. In<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n<p>Lr<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008 Author: K.Ramanna 3.NJ&gt;1r2AvEEN KUMAR, MAJOR, _ FA&#8217;I&#8217;HER&#8217;s NAME NO&#8217;? KNOWN 1 TO THE APPELLANT&#8217;, No.66, 3342 CROSS, mm &#8216;A&#8217; MAIN, Sm BLOCK, V JAYANAGAR, V BANGALORE&#8211;56\u20ac) 044. &#8216; .. RES?&#8217; NI}EN&#8221;I&#8217;S (BY SR1 M.M.AsHoKAf; ;xpv.;_r&#8221;&#8221;_ THIS CRLA. I8_FILED.wU,!S;V378{AA\u00a7 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-157260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-27T23:09:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-27T23:09:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1734,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008\",\"name\":\"M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-27T23:09:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-27T23:09:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-27T23:09:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008"},"wordCount":1734,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008","name":"M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-27T23:09:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shreyas-financiers-vs-ms-n-r-babu-brso-on-14-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Shreyas Financiers vs M\/S N R Babu &amp; Brso on 14 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157260\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}