{"id":157803,"date":"2009-02-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009"},"modified":"2016-07-04T06:59:32","modified_gmt":"2016-07-04T01:29:32","slug":"basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi … on 16 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi … on 16 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
:50?' 5:.o%:2;~ :-'>v\"\"v':--> L\"~'*'~%\"\"*:,. L*\u00e9W~\"L3\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT   \n\n'k \n\nBEFORE\n\n43? 3 '7...,2,\u00bb'3 '3 I\n\n:v\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUsT1cE~is:_;:s{: KEsHAxIA\u00a7:AR.\u00a7*{AN.a\n\n.\u00a7.:i_,.A P\n\nR.S.A. No. 486_\u00a7F 2'\u00a3}'9_\u00a73\namwszn:  \u00e9 %\n\n1 BASAVANNA- _ if\ns\/0 LATE_!VEA_I)_'APF'A \u00a7  . \n40 'ms. ,  O   HAN'AGALL1.-V\u00a7I,LAGE\nMYSORR  1313-': \n     ~   APPELLANT\n\n(BY SR1: H*,\u00a7:  ',J\u00a713vocATE )\n1 MA\u00a7\u00a7iAD.EV!\u00a7i'PA ' \nV \u00ab    S;:Q*~C\u00a7:{AILI_JARE AN-GADI MADAPPA\n }' Sii~$(:Ev.Jf)}:.?:(;;\u00a7';A'S\u00a7ED BY LRS\n(A) \"'  GiJ1\u00e9m.iNGAPPA\n S\/OLATE MAHADEVAPPA\nMedan, R\/0 NO 2355,\nx  MADHWACHAR ROAD\n K R MOI-IALLA, MYSORE\n\nMAHADEVASWAMY\n\nS\/C} LATE MAHADEVAPPA\nMAJOR, R\/O NO 2365,\nMADHWACHAR ROAD\n\nK R MCJHALLA, MYSORE\n\n \n\nDATED THIS ms 13m, AY OFfJFME\u00bbBRtI:eXI\u20acY\"\u00a7i?f\u00a7\u00a7)'~   \n\n\n\n(<3) SiiIVAKUMAR\n3\/0 LATE MAHADEVAPPA\nMAJOR, R\/0 NC) 2365,\nMADHWACHAR ROAD\nK R MOHALLA, MYSORE A  \" \n}vfAJOR_, R,i'().._S.HOP NO 2386\/ 1,\n\n%  _ 7*\"m:'\"A:\u00a3*E_D 1513:2003 _z*-'A3333 EN\"\nR.A.NO.244\/1993 ON THE FILE..__G1\u00a7' THE.__ 1 ..wi):;,\"'(:iVIL\nJUBGE (SR.DN.), MYSORE, PALRTLY ALLQWINGE THE\nAPPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE\u00bb-~-THE'~.JU{)GIvIENT AND\nDEGREE DATED 25.8.93._4_PASE1EI:).I'H..V_'9:S\u00a2NO.478\/90 ON\nTHE FILE OF THE PRL. I MU_NSIEF7, ,MYs:<:;RE.,\n\nTHIS RSA :s::0MI:\u00a2(:{ PfGR?~.HEAE3$I\u00a7iG THIS DAY,\nma comm DE\u00a7,}IVif3REI)'THE"FOL3L,OWI3?G;~\n\nThis;"'S<'$:: orid:  against the judment\n\nand deczfee cia'e;ed'v1S.o3;~:2'C{\u00a7:\u00a7 passed by the 1% Additional\n\n  {,S1'.I)hI'1L},vV-mmysore, in RA. No.244 of 1993,\n\nkaaher\u00e9unde\u00a7":1:e\ufb01zgdgaeut and Decree dated 25.03.1993\n\n  pas\u00e9gegftiy  Mansiff, Mysore, in 0.8. No.478\n\n _4\u00a2\u00a7_199ou, was modi\ufb01ed.\n\n"   Appeliant is the 2nd pmmu\ufb01 before the Triai\n\n  Appellant and his sister initially \ufb01ieai the suit cmly\n\n  gigainst their Uncle Maha\u00e9evappa for partition and\n\n$5 , .\nrf":;\u00a7"~_J"\nk'\/\n\n\n\nseparate passassion of their share 1111 the suit schegiule\nproperties. Item I'I'1 of the Schedule is house _\nbearing D001\" No2238q 1and item No.2 is  .\n140.2386 both situate\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9i i\\.\/\u00a3adavah'(;A1j;a;' Sf.I'6\u00a32'{:,.::  \nHowever, subsequently, the 'Z114  4' \noccupation 0f Item No' 1   \n\nYellappa were impleaded as I)efe:}4gf:f:ei:7:1t::;..:\u00bb_2    suit\n\n3) The case of  \u00a7s;_'_,as follows\u00bb\n\nOne Ch\u00a7i1arc% \ufb01\ufb01gnga\u00e9;:ii  {:11ree sons by\nname, Mada\u00e9\ufb01pa; V  *M\u00e9\u00a7h.\u00e9devappa. P1ainI:iff\n\n ____  _' 1       Exgjc'\/\\<_'  523  E  \n\nNo.1 is the daugigtegfand. No.2 isgghe first son of\nChillare  schedule property was\n\njointly Cg':.'*3'1\u00a2(1   brothers and it was in their\n\n _\u00a5.g;\u00a7'i13$1}v}QI'??'i3'*<S.S\u00e9'SS2'l\u00a3:5.'\u00e9"\u00a3: Atvvf\ufb01\u00e9n' point of time, the property was\n\nawed; Va.;\u00e9::"$.1,1V\u00a2ii;.~.t}ae father of plam\ufb01\ufb01s had 1\/std share in\n\n  the Su\ufb01. pgop\u00e9fijk. The said Madappa was ailing 'and he\n\n" i:'v'"wVasAAatta\u00a2l\u00a2;t:\ufb01 with Paralysis Strake about 24 years prim" to\n\nV'  of the suit and his cundition was very bad and\n\n, _!\n\n ""*.\u00a5as.graduaHy zieteriorating, as such, he was not in a\n\n2:\n\/a ':3\n\nF \n\n\n\npositien to speak much less uzaderstand anything.\n\nikfendants were residing separately. Ttlerssfore, the \n\nof the plainti\ufb01s was being looked after by his " \n\nlong as she was alive. As the father of the  i.A\u00e9?as i113   ' \n\nan helpless state and was  I_ \n\nmother, the defendants cameV.rt9_ th\u00e9'  \n\nWhere he was residing, pI'et\u20ac3I}(1ui'f'1#V' i3I;\u00a3it   look\na\ufb01er the Weifare of both   "the br\u00e9t\ufb01er and\ngained C()I1f1d\u20acI).G\u20ac:  of  taking\n\nadvantage of    and helpless\n\ncondition:'V'\u00e9f['th\u00a7iVf,  bf  Defendant No.1\nunduly   ,Madappa and obtained the\n\nsale aegcg daf\u00a7::iV_"{}\ufb01,(}=i\u00a7'3_ 9pertiae'3 i'*s1 not binding on the plaintiifs as they continued\n\n joiat posseasion of the schedule property, as such,\n\n. K  are entitled for partition and separate possession of\n\n ~ _ ag\n  their 1\/aw share in the schedule groperties. 36 also\n\n\\ ?\n.i:>E,b \/d\/,.\n\n\n\ncentended that there was mt: legal Ilecessity fer ,. V\n\nte alienate the properties.\n\n4) Upon S6I'Vi()6 of suit sum\ufb01zongs;  \n\ncontested the suit interalia cgyrmmiixg \" ti1atTt.}:1g:.._._VSfV11}it A\n\nSchedule Property as a Whole . \nbefore the partition and'    the shop\nportion of the   three\nbrothers,       04.06.1947,\n allotted with twu\nshops  2385\/2, whereas the house\n\nportion was  ti;   of the mother. He further\n\n.vc9nten5i.\u00a7:<l that  sfxle deed dated 06.04.1979, the\n\n01'  for legal mcessiales ask} the portion.\n\nwlli'Q\ufb01.\u00ab;;a\u00a7'  him undcr tim partition. Therefore,\n\n ' the sale ptiglfii\u00e9 \ufb01\u00e9chedule property is  on that: plain1:1\ufb01' s.\n\n  \ufb01rxrsl\u00e9e circumstances, he sought for dismissal of the\n\n   ..\n<\/pre>\n
S) In the light of the pleadings of the parties, the<\/p>\n
Tria}. Court framed the following issues:- <\/p>\n
ISSUES<\/p>\n
Whether the plaintiffs prove that the $.”\u20aci; ‘ <\/p>\n
is maintainable Without<\/p>\n
cancaliation of the   _
\n06.04.1979 executed by=..:4t1v\u00a7ir..fifat*.1_<\u00e9r.' <\/p>\n
favour of the defendant?\n<\/p>\n
Whether the p1ama33;\u00a7:~’o\u00a7e
\nin jeint posse\u00e9gsion
\nwith the defeiiciaixf’  tfcxgut fee
\nmen\ufb01mrgerj as <\/p>\n
  p}:.e:if1\ufb01if%;,1to’:}e that the sale<\/p>\n
“i\/<\/p>\n
 by -undue ixxfiuenoe and
\n ‘ngi -. c<):i:';=1__'c9"3;*  any right to the
\nM   aei2:%naantV%in'~:11e%% "suit properties?<\/p>\n
;,y-}Wi1\u00a3:the1"H  'vdefcndant proves that the
\n_ ~._$11\u00a7j'p:::"portion was divided among the<\/p>\n
 Vbfothem and the shop premises<\/p>\n
 Nos. 2386\/1 and 2386\/32 fan to
\n"  share 9f the pIainti\ufb01's father?<\/p>\n
Whether the plam\ufb01\ufb02s are entitled to past
\nmesne pro\ufb01ts of RS358\/~ claimed?<\/p>\n
 %<\/p>\n
vi} Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a
\nshare in the suit properties? If so, what
\nIs their share?  \u00e9 " V' I<\/p>\n
vii) What reliefs are the  ”\n<\/p>\n
1; Whether the defer;d_ants\u00a7 ~._j ‘.2._.aI1d ‘,.\u00a3$ :are
\ntenants in Malig\u00e9s
\n2335\/1?  %  ~ % <\/p>\n
ii) Whether the   Lrcceiving rents
\nfrom the V\u00a7lefe:1tiar_\u20act;3~V 1 compelling<\/p>\n
6)  lard evidence, the utiai Court by its<\/p>\n
_\u00a7udgme:1t,a11ci tie\u00a7\u00a7ree’dati:d i\u00a75.()8.93, answered Issue No. 1 in the<\/p>\n
ai\u00a7:mg:\u00a3ivq ;,o1qn1g “the suit of me piainti\ufb01” is maintairmble<\/p>\n
\\\u00a7?it,1i’c.2\u00a71f  of the Sake Deed dated 6.4.19?’9,<\/p>\n
  but 3;1:s.u$$ac=<=:_1fcxii 'I:E:=3's?::1e Nos. 2 and 3 in the negative holding that the<\/p>\n
~  -'g\u00e9ive failed to prove that they are in joint possession of<\/p>\n
   = s\u00e9hedule properties and they have further failed to prove<\/p>\n
  the Sale Qeed is vitiated by undue in\ufb02uence. 011 Issue<\/p>\n
   30.4, the 'Fria1{i:aur1; held that the 1st defendant has pmven that<\/p>\n
\/\u00bb~.\n<\/p>\n
the shop pertion was divided among three brothers and the shop
\npremises bearing 119.2386\/1 fell to ‘($16 share of <\/p>\n
father. III that View of the matter, the triai Court; ia\ufb01xlc<\/p>\n
No.4 in tha amrmative. Having regar_djoQ the ‘\u00e9i\u00e9i(E\u00e91_1t:\u00e9’*\u00bb:>v1’:’x,re:\u00a2,a:i:rd  <\/p>\n
that the shag premises was allotted  t.0 \u00a7a\ufb01i\u00a7r’~<\u00a7f   "<\/p>\n
under the partition, the trial  h\u00e9kl
\nsuit schedule was an anccgstral   the hands
\nof Madappa, as such,   {it}  _ abaoiute right to
\nalienate the said' i\ufb01x\ufb01pporta\u00e9 by legal
\nnecessities   ngag I\u00a7Atv:;A'g'\u00e9#iii\u00e9'cessity' on the part of
\nMadappa   jgroperty, it was held that the<\/p>\n
sale deed axecum 1:s;E   is not binding on the 2m!<\/p>\n
_ ' " As t\ufb01e  being the daughter of Madappa and<\/p>\n
\u00ab. 'E v.=  3'. . –\n<\/p>\n
w_r\\<v\\a.v.1~..~m.2 K;,~,\u00ab'::;@  3\u00bb<\/p>\n
 V.sh;e  even much prior to 1992, the trial Court held<\/p>\n
 to question the alienation e\ufb02ected by her<\/p>\n
V Vv fatk1e:{'—- I513}  Vi\u20acW of the matter, the Trial Court decreed the<\/p>\n
 and de\u00e9lama that the 2nd plaintiff is enti\ufb02ed for par\ufb01tian<\/p>\n
4'_'_\u00a7;'::id._V5s'epAaf.1"atse possession of 3\/2 (half) share in Item No.1 and I \/6th<\/p>\n
AT : Si;Lar\u00a7\u00e9 in item No.2. Being aggriewi by the said judgmem: and<\/p>\n
 """ W<\/p>\n
If}<\/p>\n
decree, the 1*' dafendant Mahadevappa \ufb01kd  the<\/p>\n
court of Civil Judge, (Sr.Dn.) in RA. of .244 of  '    .<\/p>\n
7) The First Appellate: co::rt”‘by’\u00ab me ;z:\u00a71gm:;1t?’\u00abku;u1ei’vL% x<\/p>\n
appeal, allowed the appeal in    t1:;e
\njudglnent, the First Appellate C0–\ufb01fi,rai$;ed._ti2s; gs poirits
\nfor consideration. VV _4   V’\n<\/p>\n
1) Whether the piaa:ti\u00a71’sk%k%%’prqv\u00a7-  the suit is
\nmainta\u00e9;ia.ble   of
\nthe_\u00e9a1e;fd\u00a7ed   dam _cr3′.o’4;:9?9 executed by<\/p>\n
  in  thge defendant?\n<\/p>\n
ii)  “;Wheti1ef   prove that they were in
\n Jo11fi\u00a7L_ H. of the suit schedule
\n% ‘   pro;$ei*ti<_\u00e91S\u00a7Wit1*1 the defendant and the Court fee<\/p>\n
'  1;-n1eI1xt:iom'$d'E\ufb01S 'payable and stx\ufb01cient?<\/p>\n
     the plainti\ufb01igpmve that the sale deed is<\/p>\n
   by undue \ufb01rihiluence and does not<\/p>\n
 . V”‘c;\u00a7)i::i\u00a7}ey any right: to the defendant in the suit
\nVv\ufb01roperties?\n<\/p>\n
 \ufb01r)” Whether the defemlant proves that the shop<\/p>\n
portion was divided among the three brothers<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
and the shop premises bearing Nos. 2386′;-..1,
\n2386\/ 2 fell to the share cf the plaintiifs’  , <\/p>\n
V) Whether the plaintiffs are    <\/p>\n
Inesm pro\ufb01ts of R$.7S8\/i-..siaimed?’V ”   \\4 V<\/p>\n
vi) Whether the piaintiifs
\nthe suit properties? V 9 6,\u00bb WEEK,   <\/p>\n
Vii) What reiief     <\/p>\n
8) On re–assesaI3a\ufb01\u00a7%’1:\u00a7t’\u00a7)Vt; Q11 rword and also<\/p>\n
taking into oon;\u00a7\u00a7xi:2\u00ab;r;a:_’tioIi:_’  evidence, the First<\/p>\n
Appe1latc:v;Cou1_;t Ii\u20ac\ufb01l(1..V_jV\u00a3i1attii\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01tli\ufb01r ofthe plainti\ufb01s had right to<\/p>\n
sell his shaiebnly    6f the suit schedule property and<\/p>\n
ttlereforp’, so itein if-3.1 of the suit schedule property is<\/p>\n
“gale  binding on the 2114 plainw’, as such,<\/p>\n
tiie  for the partition in Item No’ 1, but they<\/p>\n
 are 1;oi:..en\u00a7i\ufb02e;<\u00a7'"for any share in Item No.2. In that View of the<\/p>\n
H  'In \u00e9'i:tz:r,_.  \u00e9suit of the plaintiffs in respect of Item No.2 came to<\/p>\n
  and it was further held that the \ufb01rs: piainti\ufb01" is<\/p>\n
  ] em::iea for 1\/4m share and the 2nd plaintiff is entitled for 3\/4th<\/p>\n
 ":\u00e9f1are in Item No.1. Being aggrievw by the Judgment and<\/p>\n
K ,\/'\/
\ng, . \/,<\/p>\n
I2<\/p>\n
Becme passed by the First Appellate Court, the 2%' plazixiti\ufb01" has<\/p>\n
\ufb01led this Secmul Appeal,<\/p>\n
9) While admitting the appeal onH__’i’ 8:;!0E\u00a7;_2\u00a7G23; <\/p>\n
foilowing substantial question of 1a~m’vas”rajsa1 fur. \u00e9:m1si:ieratiozi <\/p>\n
in this appeal. > _ A j<\/p>\n
“Whether the Appeuat\u00a7}c~\u00bb  erg\u00e9cik in
\nreversing the judgmeqlt a1:Zid”‘d\u00e9f3Tf\u00a7\u20ac.,Df  share
\nto the appellant inv   and in
\nrejecting the Qiaim of._t3:ie’-.a}.:\u00a7\u00a2f11aiit,  of Item
\nNo.2 and3ax?E1f:t:;’E1er:=:t1<=;  behalf of the<\/p>\n
  czontrary to law"\n<\/p>\n
10}  ”  of notice of thia appeal,<\/p>\n
“ci.*:_fgenciA\u00e9L11*i*~—1’\u20ac’o. 1, who is the contesting party, has<\/p>\n
   learned counsei.\n<\/p>\n
ii)  i\ufb01ize heard the learned counsel (>11, both sides on the<\/p>\n
.. , ‘A  ‘s1.V1::t’)@trf1:1t:iaVi”c..;uestio11 of iaw raised by the Court<\/p>\n
 12) There is 110 dispute mgardmg the rexaaonsmp<\/p>\n
  the parties. The 1\u00b0’ tiefendant Mabadevappa is<\/p>\n
the Junior Petemai Uncle of the piain\ufb01\ufb01. Timers also<\/p>\n
413731, <\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
First Appellate Court; held that crnly item No.1 was<\/p>\n
ancestral property at the hands 01′ Madappa as .4 H<\/p>\n
same under EX.PI, therefore, Madappa had —  M<\/p>\n
to aiienate the same, as such, the sgiie or \u00abitem  <\/p>\n
binding 011 the 213*’ plainti\ufb02”. Hawever, A.respeet:’ef<\/p>\n
No.2, the First Appellate come; r:a[:s*-hem’i  said
\nproperty was settled in far\u00e9our of’VSi1:\u00e9i;-. i’I since
\nSm: Nanjamma dried   her three<\/p>\n
sons, the undivigtietii. \/3″:\u00a5’__  of in Item. No.2<\/p>\n
became the  ef\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9dieppa, as such, he was
\nentitled  ..even with’ out there being any<\/p>\n
legal nseceseity’.~V ‘_I’11erefe1te,V””\u00e9Khe sale effected by Mactappa<\/p>\n
Si1;’1\u20ac1e1’*’:e.j;I:3;x;,I):I  reHs’pee’t  of Item No.2 is binding on the<\/p>\n
  A.:s:317;\u00a7,’h, the plaintilfs are not entitled for any<\/p>\n
— VV   shaie  In so \ufb01ar as grant of relief of partition<\/p>\n
 favouryef the plaintiffs in respect of Item N51 is<\/p>\n
  the defendants have not challenged the<\/p>\n
h   of the Courts below. Therefore, in so far as Item<\/p>\n
 ‘\u00bb\u00bb..44;E*\u20ace.1 is concerned, this Court is not required to consider<\/p>\n
said aspect: of the matter. Therefore, the enly question,
\n eeeeeeee <\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
required to be ccmsidered is, as to whether aenia;<\/p>\n
share in Item No.2 to the p}ainti\ufb02’ is justri\ufb01ed.<\/p>\n
13) As neticed above, undeIj”ES{.P1,A_   <\/p>\n
settled in favour of Smt   ‘pa.$”~ef;”;;:ai.  ”<\/p>\n
gandmother of the plai111;i\ufb01’s;  a  1″e:—s:.1 1’it,V
\nbecame the absoiute pregaexjpy of “I’I;1erc is
\n:10 dispute that Smt.   leaving
\nbehind her    gfellappa and<\/p>\n
Malmdevappa;     Hindu Succession<\/p>\n
Act, the  t\u00e9x\ufb01alg Hindu dying itxtesmte shall<\/p>\n
devolve accbrding ta.  cut in Section 16, firstly,<\/p>\n
“upon  Lson\u00e9s;   (including children of any<\/p>\n
 $01}. or {i%1jghtcr) and the husband. As per<\/p>\n
fa.@<"V2.f;g- 't.}1e heirs speci\ufb01ed in subsection (1) of<\/p>\n
"  $ecti\u00a7}i:.. 15,' in one entry shall be preferred to those in<\/p>\n
.. Slicfgeeciing (army, those included in the same entry<\/p>\n
 'izz\ufb01ie simultaneously. Therefore, all the three S\u20ac)I1S of<\/p>\n
  f~\u00a5anj$1mma succcedeei tn the estate of 81111;. Nanjamma in<\/p>\n
AA""'\u00e9\u20ac;ual shares as per SBCti(}I}S 15 and 16 of the Hindu<\/p>\n
\\. M
\n6?: \/'
\n4;\n<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
Succession Act upon the death of Smt. ,<\/p>\n
intestate.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
14) As the property at Item iv T <\/p>\n
Madappa to an extent of 1\/33′?    .\n<\/p>\n
cannot constitute as ancestraih’  lV:ik1e }ImI1ds
\nMahadevappa. In the  of\n<\/p>\n
173. mm KUM’I’A    saws
\nsocnmr    the division<\/p>\n
Bench of thisi    What constitutes<\/p>\n
  “the decision of the Privy
\nCounsel in thgcas\u00e9  HUSAIN mm vs.<\/p>\n
 .\u00a7\u00a7:sv’.4  (Am 1937 as 233), it has<\/p>\n
 -\u00bb?_1Veid _V  properties inherited from the male<\/p>\n
\u00e9.e$c\u20ac;Vi*3;d%a1Vi.t’ V\u00a7fi\u00a7i;1yA’j:=.i#\u00a7:;ulc1 constitute as ancestral properties<\/p>\n
 and a:’fiy..  inherited \ufb01om the female descendant<\/p>\n
 ” .\u00a7\u00a7;\u00bbmf1<jt- gori\ufb01titute as ancestrai property.<\/p>\n
 15) in “Hindu Law” of 14th Editiora Page 625, the<\/p>\n
 ‘~\u00bb-gamed Author Mr.Mu1lah has stated that, it is settled<\/p>\n
by a decision of the Judicial ccsmmittee,  term<\/p>\n
49$<\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
‘Anecestral Property’ must be confined ta ”
\ndescemiixlg tcs the children \ufb01om malt line and
\nthat property that the son acqmre’    <\/p>\n
jointly and equany to that of his r\u00e9.:t;\u00e9x\u00a5,k_’%T In of<\/p>\n
above, it is clear that the ..i11tc.z;e3t of.
\nthe property of Sam.   aI;s<3}.ute
\nproperty of Madappa, ove1""4"\\zV\u00a7'*11i<:'i1-,–.    right to
\nalienate, Under  .. Appellate
\nCourt has    by Madappa in
\n\ufb02avour of    in respect of Item
\nNo.2 is   the plaintiffs are not<\/p>\n
entitled for a\ufb01y.snar\u00a7 ;n':~tgmL-*No.2 .<\/p>\n
     of the above, I do not see any error<\/p>\n
 Appellate Ctmri: in reversing the:<\/p>\n
 Ref  Court in respect of {tam No.2 of the
\n”   is concerned. The \ufb01nding in this regard is
\n i\u00a7;:.’lat\u00a53\u00a7\u00a70rz;\u00e9,nce with law and also evidence on record. There
\n  gounds to interfere with the said fmading of the First<\/p>\n
Afjpeiiate Conn. The \ufb01nding of the Lower Appellate Ccmrt<\/p>\n
K ,7
\n\/ rrr ,..\u00bb<\/p>\n
18<\/span><\/p>\n
in this regar\u00e9 is saumi and based 0:: the settled pmwipks<\/p>\n
of iaw. As such, there is 110 perversity in the ..<\/p>\n
the Court beiow. In this view 61″ the matter, I  M<\/p>\n
in this appeal. Hatace, tha 3t1bsta;n\ufb01ai\u00ab .c:g}1’r;sti<'\u00a7jiT;\u00a7V:v {pf <\/p>\n
raised for consideration is anssveredv\ufb01\u00e9cgidingly and  "<\/p>\n
appeal is liable to be dismissed;
\nAcc:csrdirzg1y, the   \u00a316 (Eider as<\/p>\n
to costs.\n<\/p>\n
h &GR&;kfh M “- j\u00ab    <\/p>\n
I9<\/p>\n
KNKJ: RSA.No.486\/2003<\/p>\n
21.3.2011<\/p>\n
Order on ‘Being Spoken To’
\nThe typographical error in mentioning the date of<\/p>\n
the judgment is ordered to be corrected as <\/p>\n
instead of 18.2.2009. Registry to carry <\/p>\n
in this regard and rescan the same and_t*i1e–rea.fter, 4–Aiss__t1e. ‘ <\/p>\n
corrected certified copy of the  t’o_th’e”p0zirt”i_eSr.:i;_*2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi … on 16 February, 2009 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana :50?’ 5:.o%:2;~ :-‘>v””v’:–> L”~’*’~%””*:,. L*\u00e9W~”L3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT ‘k BEFORE 43? 3 ‘7…,2,\u00bb’3 ‘3 I :v THE HONBLE MR. JUsT1cE~is:_;:s{: KEsHAxIA\u00a7:AR.\u00a7*{AN.a .\u00a7.:i_,.A P R.S.A. No. 486_\u00a7F 2’\u00a3}’9_\u00a73 amwszn: \u00e9 % 1 BASAVANNA- _ if s\/0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-157803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBasavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-04T01:29:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\\\/O Chillare Angadi … on 16 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-04T01:29:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1851,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\\\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-04T01:29:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\\\/O Chillare Angadi … on 16 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-04T01:29:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi … on 16 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-04T01:29:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009"},"wordCount":1851,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009","name":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-04T01:29:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi … on 16 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157803"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157803\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}