{"id":157887,"date":"2008-11-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-01-06T15:35:32","modified_gmt":"2018-01-06T10:05:32","slug":"state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.L.Manjunath & S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
IN THE axaa COURT OF KARRATAKA.AE BAma\u00a7\u00a7Q\ufb01$; x%\n\nDAIEB T313 was 2o\"'nAx OF \u00a7cv2ggg\ufb01;2cQS.  '\n\nPRESENT}\n\nTHE Honzngs M. auswxgn 'H L Mn\ufb01a\ufb01ggy\ufb01 E.\nTEE HOK'BLS M.JUSTICE s a,sAmyanARAxaNA\n\nR.F;i\u00a7Ho.i:3\u00e9i20G6,\nBETWEEN: V _Wf._  A h\n\n1 STATE BARK OF MY$0EE\"; \" *3\u00bb W5\nno s44,,zEg\u00a7EGGwna_RgA5';v\nBANGALOREe\u00a79 * '\/{\u00a5\ufb01Rq: %\nREPRESENTED E: ITS MERAGEKG nxaxcwqa\n\n2 srara BAEK CE nyscaa _\nHAI\ufb01 RQA\ufb02,KQDUR;_EAGDI tALuK\nBANGALORE RURAL 9:5?\nRBFRESENTED BY ITS B\ufb01h\ufb01c\ufb01 MANAGER\n~+v ' \"~. V ... APPELLAETS\n\n {3y ss;:_ARa\u00a71HB KUMAR,ADv. )\n\n.\"pnvAND':\n\n'L_\";. K \u20ac.\u00e9uB\u00ae3MAR2A SETTY\n\nxsxo KQV. RAJAPRA ssrwy\n,\u00bb A353 65 YEARS\n}'G\u00a3\ufb01ERAL MERCHANT\n\n'go 733, MAEE RGAD\n\n.<KUDUR, MAGEI TALUK\n\naanaazaam RURAL DIST ... RESPONDEHT\n\n(By 8131: K. PRADEEP 1'='\u00a3AIK;ADVi)\n\n\n\nR}\n\nTEES RFA FILE U\/S.96 03' CPC AGAINST THE\nJUDG1-\ufb01'N'\u00a3 AND DEGREE DT..5.4.2006 PASSED IN\n0.s-No.1mJ20o3 on TI-E FILE 0? TE Aapzgj-.4\u00a2_:'cIvIL\nJUDGE (312,913), RAMA1~IAsARA2~\u00a3, nE13.intiff along with\n\n\"at 18% p.a. ccarwounded. with quarterly\n\n.'_A;:e:\u00a751V:Ts\"A-- from the date mf suit till the date \u00abof\n\n\u00bb tealizat1on.\n\n\u20ac~\/\n\n\"-tlkiifia \"jazzy;  \"\n\n\n\n2 .. For the sake of canvenience \n\nwculd be referred to as per their _.3t\u00a77ii:3,1s:.A_?.:'i>\u00a7f:f\u00a2\u00a7r\u20ac=a5 \n\nthe Ccmrt belew.\n\n3. The resyoncient filed \u00e9g \u00e9mit T,a%g;:;ti2ist1*. \n\nState. Ban}: of Mysore for  ~.c$f?-V-jaftjears of\n\nrent of Rs.3.99,138\/~:\ufb01\u00a7ta \u00e9\u00a7}@:\u00a7\ufb01\ufb013 wi\u00e9h interest\nat; the rate of 18%  recsovary of\ndamagas at the \u00e9g\ufb01e \u00a2\u00a3;R\u00a7;3i;$eaz%per nnnth fra\n\nHay 2003 till t\ufb01g data 5: nanagng aver of the suit\n\nproperty *  suit was filed far\n\nposseasion %A  4V3;:1:ss-gtriazlse yroyerty alscu During\n\nfang  of \"the____$.uit, the State Bank cf Mysore\n\n\\%'a._\u00a7:a.1:;\u00e9:.1V a.1}t*3y1'1g:\u00a7;'::<_i_lx=.2cS. over passession Qf the jgrogzaerty\n\n 'ta ths\u00e9*.p1\u00e9:i;i\u00a7;j\u00a7.:iA'_-if-la.n.?:c3,. Therefrbre, the reliefs\n\n oii V th\u00e9 ..p\u00b03,Vaii1t3.ff has been restricted only for\n\n  \u20ac>f arrears of rent and damages frcxn the\n\n f.\u00a7#t\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01 suit tili the actual date of dgliverg of\n\nV '- A \u00a7x'>s$ession .\n\n3\"\n\n\n\n4. Accarding to the plaint avenuents, the suit\nschemle property was leased cut to the appe:'l 3.a.nt.-\n\nBank on a monthly rent of 123.800] -~ \n\n31.1o.19s3. Initially the lease was  \n\nof five years and an opticitiwwas;   1VE:.'~'.*2.e  V\n\ntenant to renew the lease'   t:\u00e9\u00a3it13 'o\u00a3\n\nfive years each. Even. \"'a\u00a3'i;e:: .c:*.r.>a:a;...   {bf 15\nyears of lease periimi, .53..'.i.L\ufb01C;\u00ab.:\u00e9:'  d\u00a3;f'e\u00a3idant-Bank\ndid. nut vacate the prezmisest, terminating the\n\ntenancy {of _  the suit was instituted.\n\nAccording'  _ the!  \"averruents, the defendants\n\nhad aggx-e'\u00ae \ufb01ve'-.   Ttzhe rate of Rs.6,0GO,'-- pen:\n\n  :'%':s;.,_11.::,\u00a7\u00e9a and though it was agreed. to\n\np\u00e91y F;\u00e9: month, the same\u00bb was not paid. by\n\n the  'a1L?\u00a3a:iA went an paying the rent last paid.\n\n:7 \"p;VrV;?:i.\u00a2:>::{ 1.11.1998. It was also cantended that\n\n4'_'tiieV_V'plainti\u00a3f is entitled far a. sum. czf Rs.31,8G0\/-\n\n menth as ciamages consiwring the prevailing\n\ntent in the area. whare the suit sczhedxile praperty\n\nsituated .\n\n{V\n\n\n\nthat this Court has no jurisdictican to try the\nsuit? _\n\n5) Whether: the plaintiff is entitled. the\nvacant posaession of suit propexty  \nfor?    .\n\n6) What order car decree?  ._\n\n'I. Thereafter: on bev:ha.lf;__z  plai'xi:tiff_,\n\nplaintiff was exami'ned  it  i\"i:'i\u00e9$n \n\nthat he relied uponV<t*1f;e  iitwow\u00e9zitnesses\n\nwho were examined as' VA  \ufb01tnd plaintiff\n\nrelied 'S-1P<'J_1'1e  912. on behalf of the\n\ndefendant\ufb01 4' , 011:5-'V":..AY\u00a7_4i\u20acz_cEi:\u00e9&i\u00a7.rana, official of the\n\ndefenc$;9;nt,sf--B\u00e9:Lr\ufb02\u00a7 '#35  as aw}. . He relied\n\n  of  lease deed which was marked\n\na.?s"' _E:~:[_.trial caurt after: apyreciating the\n\n argunie-nt$"  by the parties, decreed the\n\n:".v4."s1.i'i?;Vi_.d.irs=.%ct:Lng the defendant to pay a sum of\n\n4'_'R_\u00a7;~4;3@,938\/-- with intezraat at 18% p.a. vzxowunded\n\ni\ufb01ritzi quarterly rests from the date of suit till\n\nthe date f realisaticn. Challenging the Judgment\n\nW\n\n\n\n'JV\n\nand chacree of the trial ccmrt, the pre.sg+:zat\u00e9'VVw.5a ,_j;:j5;:~\u00a7az1\n\nis filed.\n\n8 . We have heard. the learz{aad:1.A_\u00a7:i$un:se;,i \n\nfor the parties .\n\n9 . '\u00a7.'hc-ugh severaT3_;_.\":'~   by the\nappellants in the   the course\nof argumentS_,\u00a7-iv   are urged by\nthe ma\ufb01a?   \n\n1) The   a serizsus EIEOI'\nin  knit cailing upon the\ndg\ufb01\u00e9ndangs  sum me R:s.4,:-313,938 \/--- along\n\n  18% 9.2;. inc: he conpouncaed\n\n\"'    V V \n\n 10. \u00ab:3: is contenwd. by the agspellants, there\n\n <._w:\u00a7'\u00a7~.s. Lr"i:3 agreement to gay rent at the rate mi\n\n"=.\/._"1\u00a7s.'5,0${J\/- per mxrxth after expiry .._ ;\u00a7~.ea.:3e period and that the plaintiff did mat prove\n\nthat the de\ufb01endant is liable to pay a sum of\n\nRs.31,800l- fer the use and damages frcxn May\n\n\u00abV\n\n\n\n2:303 1:111 the actual date 9:? n*::h  .__6n  may 2963, the trial caurt has\n\n  error in deareeing the suit. I The\n\n i\ufb01zzfther contend that no evidsezzae was\n\n 1et: \"\"'--in 'a\ufb01\u00e9i without there being any pleading\n\n 'A44\"'uf1ne:\u00a2:es$'a\u00a3ri1y the remarks ara made against the\n\n \"as if the Bank is \u00abEl cheater. Therefore, he\n\n this Court to set aside the decree by\n\nU allowing the appeal.\n\n('V\n\n\n\n11. Fer contra, 1~\u00a3r.Pz:adeep Naik, 1:~..'<:.e:-:"_\u00ab* \n\n- r\n\ncounsel for the respondent contends ti; " the t3\u00e91-:i3V.' <\/pre>\n
  ._:,;e (5    –\n<\/p>\n
court is justified in dacraezing 09 ‘4<\/p>\n
anti Ex.P12. Since Ex._P9 arm”-V. Ex.1-\u00a7>1..2’A’ Lar\u00e9; .”‘n\u00a5)’t<\/p>\n
disl\ufb01uted, the maintifr    claizt
\narrears of rent at :’the — per
\nmonth along with   thereon till
\nA9311 2903 a.f:d;’~~,;\u00e9roz{:\u00a7._   plaintiff 13
\nentitled to’  at the rate of
\n123.31 ,ao._:cwi’,’\/”–V_V     on the proof and
\nevidehng ‘*.lVxe\ufb01 \u00a2   ‘”p1a1n2;1\u00a3\u00a3. It is also<\/p>\n
ccntenciea\ufb01 _ th\u00e9t\u00bb. th\u00e9 e\ufb01d\ufb01ence of P935 4 2 and 3 and the<\/p>\n
pVi:c>d3.1A_ cecvsiwtby the plaintiff to show the<\/p>\n
 rent near the vicinity \u00a2:>f the<\/p>\n
Z “”3che<m}..e  fvfaperty as can May 2003, are neat<\/p>\n
 the a.ppe}.1.a.nt.s–defenda.nt3. Therefore,<\/p>\n
4t1f:\u00e9:.V"tr'ial court is justified in granting the<\/p>\n
 Since the San}: has not paid the arrears.-3<\/p>\n
%~:-\u00b0i1V.i5*1:, 7-22\u00a2:<\/p>\n
dismiss the suit.\n<\/p>\n
12. aaving heard_ th\u00e9=r d\u00e9unsel ” for the
\nappellants, the fbllawing \u00a75%ht\u00a77\u00a7\u00a9\ufb01id arise for
\nconsideration q\u00a3\u00bbrh3s\u00a7Court i\ufb01 th;\u00a7 appeal:<\/p>\n
1) Whether S\ufb01hra trial; \u00e9o\ufb01r\ufb01r was \ufb01ustified in<\/p>\n
decreeing rue rare for 3 arm of R3.4,30,938\/–<\/p>\n
alongr with: r\ufb01t\u00a2r\u00a7sr_.at 18% p.a. to be
\naompundrd as qr\u00e9rr\u00e9rly rests tram the date of
\n>\u00bb_$ui\u00a7it;il_thr astral data of realisatian?\n<\/p>\n
2) ,\ufb01h\u00e9therL’t\ufb01\u00a7~ trial court was justified in
\n@\ufb01r\u00a7hg \ufb01rgr\ufb01argeab1e remarks against the<\/p>\n
‘,gppeil$ntS\/defendants Bank?<\/p>\n
{3}_X%$\u00a2\u00a3her the Judgment and decree of the trial<\/p>\n
rN_rrc\u00e9urt are required to be modified or reversed?<\/p>\n
\u00e9?\n<\/p>\n
El<\/p>\n
13 . Having heard the counsel for f1j”Pxe\u00ab’<\/p>\n
this court has noticed the \u00a3o11ow3;:;\u00a7gg’*vv_u\u00e9:i\u00a7:i1s;\u00a7ute,gvr\u00a7=:d.a  e\u00e9iafenciants to continue<\/p>\n
in pcs3essT\u00a7._\u00a2.”\u00a7r:j_gaffI::\u00a7:he:.’.Va\u00a7r\u20ac2ed….:;*%:nt. 8211: the disgaute
\nis  The plaintiff claims rent<\/p>\n
at the r:\u00e9\u00a3ue\u00a7%._1\u00a7s:_V.”6.;.’300_\/m per month along with<\/p>\n
_.1vv:i..4n1:e;:e1~.st;1_”‘apt\u00a2””–V3Q__,_4.2oc3 and from 1.5.2003 the<\/p>\n
 pAla\u00a7Lr;1:if.\u00a3”~Vis “‘claiming the damages at the rate of<\/p>\n
  as.’3i”;v%8oO’;”-\u00a5j-;_;%\u00e9:L: xzxmth.<\/p>\n
124   In ordex to pmve the respective<\/p>\n
  \u00e9.\u00a75:\u20ac3:.\u00e91’&.3;ions, the pxaxntiti has been exaxnmed as<\/p>\n
 “We have seen the evidence of P931. In the<\/p>\n
 the plaintiff has not explained. how he<\/p>\n
is entitled to claim interest at 18% p.a. or at<\/p>\n
r\u00b0~\/<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
any other rate uptca 30″‘ April 2003 c1aim3.!’f\u00a7;’.._:’?r;ant<\/p>\n
at the rate of Rs.6,000\/– per mnth fzamf1;:1;:a9a <\/p>\n
and similarly no positive  :’:i.’s= in  <\/p>\n
the plaintiff to show that tun bgigaingnnf \ufb02im’was<\/p>\n
fetching Rs. 31 ,800\/–  ~;. ‘\u00e9xcegsft\ufb01’ <\/p>\n
the certificate issned   cf
\nKudmc to show that   let cut its
\nbuilding at Rs 2,65%}; Pg: gngtg\ufb01gnr a shqp of
\n1.25 Sq. Thn In oraer tau
\nprc\u00e9ve P8__,.   also examined FW2
\nK.E$wara;3:.5a._, ‘  Kudrur Grazia Panchayat.<\/p>\n
He has’ gbean drasg\u00e9n\u00e9x\u00e9mined by the Advocate for the<\/p>\n
  :9 show that the {:3-rama Panchayat,<\/p>\n
Knnnrfhan int nut a shop cf its to a tenant at the<\/p>\n
” rate \u00e9f nspa\ufb01ese\/–pnz month, no other daumnnt i$<\/p>\n
 “\ufb01r: show actually the same has been leased.<\/p>\n
\ufb01g a particular tenant and such tenant is being in<\/p>\n
 In View cat’ the suggestion made by the<\/p>\n
L’, \u00e9nunse1 for the appellants-Bank, it is not<\/p>\n
possible to acute to the aonaluaion that Ex.P8 has<\/p>\n
8*’<\/p>\n
been proved by examining P962 and it is Wa;l::\u00a7_V not<\/p>\n
 1n the evidencee that the __3′;:>r .V’_*7.$\u00e9er;__”9f<\/p>\n
the plaintiff can be eoxgarecl  <\/p>\n
which is in front of the <\/p>\n
claim the rent at ‘1:he.\u00bbl’z:_z;teAV”\u00a7’f’
\nmonth. we premzises    by the
\nplaintiff to the   al Hcozrmercial
\nbuilding. Ex\u00a7P4 1s_th\u00a7 pl#\ufb01 df gag building which
\nwas leased  From looking
\ninto Ei,p4; \ufb01t ls cigar that it is more in the<\/p>\n
nature of’=–_.3* building let: cut to the<\/p>\n
_VVBa.r11:,._\u00a7lV ‘i’11er\u00e9’f:E a similar dimensions in front of<\/p>\n
–_[a.  stand, which is used fer mainly business<\/p>\n
*\u00ab..:;p\ufb01:Epose. Therefore without aggreciating the<\/p>\n
levidentza 01? PW1, P932 and so alas PW3, the trial<\/p>\n
court has granted a. decree as prayed for by the<\/p>\n
8\/<\/p>\n
plaintiff. In addition to that tni:ai..$’_:’\u00a7ic:iz\u00a7_::4:-;__j’ i-ms’<\/p>\n
seen there is no prayer in the p1.s;i’mi}  ‘-awairii. <\/p>\n
interest at 18% with quart\u00a7.=r].;y..ji’r\u00e9s_’tsL’ <\/p>\n
withaut there: being any i\ufb01sue, 2withoutV:”tha.1;\u00a3; <\/p>\n
any evidence, the Ciouzct   the
\ncieeree. The trial vz:\u00a2:\u00a7’;11:t–_L l’3{.:3..’5u not given its
\nfindings hcw it vI1as:.”‘t’:x3>3.!i\u00e93 V’t\u00a7:;,_ Qiixalusion that<\/p>\n
the h.:4.$_   ,t1i\u00e9m\u00a3:1ecreta1 amount.
\n   ccnsidering that
\nthe Baxue\ufb01yhad’  pay mm: at Rs.5,\u20ac3l’30\/-<\/p>\n
per zagnth  .3,’99E3_ ‘as! yer Ex.P9 and Ex.P12; we<\/p>\n
gfiia\ufb01re the ‘o.pini\u00a2:n””that the plaintiff is entitled<\/p>\n
t<'::__. T.  claimng rent at the rate of<\/p>\n
i   mcmth less the amzmnt: already paid.<\/p>\n
the 33:3: with interest. at 18% p.a.. SQ far: as<\/p>\n
V' '–th\u00a3=; v.af:;'..'eara of rent is concerned, in View taf the<\/p>\n
,,,t,._.j;;;_w"t\u00a7of limitation, the plaintiff can claim arrears<\/p>\n
v"VA'~\u00bb._<.\u00a7nly for three years prim: tn the tiate 0f the<\/p>\n
institution. Since the suit is filed only in the<\/p>\n
month of June 2833; the plaintiff is entitled 'be<\/p>\n
43\/<\/p>\n
35<\/span><\/p>\n
claim the difference cxf Rs.6,G00\/— with interest
\nthree yeast pricxr to 1.6.2993 from 1″‘ dupe ZOQO
\ntill the date of vacating the pr\u00abm.i.5e$..::’biy~V.Vv the<\/p>\n
Bank .\n<\/p>\n
16. In the <::ircumsta.nc\u00a7es,_:"   <\/p>\n
cieczree of the trial mutt is"—Ani\u00a3.*~difi\u00a2\u00e9(1. r\u00e9\ufb01ilriing
\nthat the plaintiff is ""i'\u00bb:::':':i~::.:;.1;1.<e':'<:e._ 'z~,..\u00bb:s iiigltim the
\narrears of rent at "v~A_th<S. ;9:a**:.._e,n"'rzx.\u00a3 R.\u00e9i{6;000\/– pea:<\/p>\n
month 1.~ess~._\u00a7.}';e   gaid by the Bank. to<\/p>\n
be cal\u00e9uiagtgg'  2:111. the Bank has<\/p>\n
vactated.  *  and has delivared the<\/p>\n
 toav'the….\u00ab'p1.aint:.Lff with interest at 18%<\/p>\n
'3g3'a."=<\/p>\n
  iearned counsel for the a.ppe1lant–1ba.nk<\/p>\n
"*;_tha.t the Bari}: delivered posse.-ssian on<\/p>\n
 ._ . 6i".'*.?GO5. Therefore the plaintiff is entitled. 1:9<\/p>\n
\ufb01r"\n<\/p>\n
 the arrears from 1.6.2083 upto 30.6.2005<\/p>\n
ujjless the amount paid. by the Bank: with interest at<\/p>\n
K,—‘<\/p>\n
11%} p.a. 5\/<\/p>\n
19. It is seen by as that without:\n<\/p>\n
any evicixance and pleadings, the  1ha.\u00a7f\u00a7<\/p>\n
q. . . 0L\u00ab\ufb02~Y(kM.> I::.\u00bb\u00a2”T<\/p>\n
111.34% u  remarks again\ufb01tfj.   ‘*<\/p>\n
Batik, the same has    u#’.,
\nAccxardingly, the remarks    i\ufb01
\nparagraph 16 of the ‘    mutt is
\nhereby expungedf’   ,  , _<\/p>\n
20.    allowed–in-par:t.\n<\/p>\n
   to be refunded.\n<\/p>\n
Sinzilarljf,’ ” ._  H is entitled far<\/p>\n
pxoportignattz. cmgt\u00e9  amount in deposit shall<\/p>\n
   ———- –\u00abt3:3.al ccurt ta enable the<\/p>\n
 to\u00bb withdraw the same.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/–%
\nJudge<\/p>\n
501\/ -e
\nIiudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008 Author: K.L.Manjunath & S.N.Satyanarayana IN THE axaa COURT OF KARRATAKA.AE BAma\u00a7\u00a7Q\ufb01$; x% DAIEB T313 was 2o”‘nAx OF \u00a7cv2ggg\ufb01;2cQS. ‘ PRESENT} THE Honzngs M. auswxgn ‘H L Mn\ufb01a\ufb01ggy\ufb01 E. TEE HOK’BLS M.JUSTICE s a,sAmyanARAxaNA R.F;i\u00a7Ho.i:3\u00e9i20G6, BETWEEN: V _Wf._ A h […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-157887","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-06T10:05:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-06T10:05:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1142,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008\",\"name\":\"State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-06T10:05:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-06T10:05:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-06T10:05:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008"},"wordCount":1142,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008","name":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-06T10:05:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-v-subramanya-setty-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K V Subramanya Setty on 20 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157887","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157887"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157887\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157887"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157887"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157887"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}