{"id":157902,"date":"2011-03-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011"},"modified":"2018-09-08T11:47:40","modified_gmt":"2018-09-08T06:17:40","slug":"ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: K.M.Thaker,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/3524\/2011\t 6\/ 6\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 3524 of 2011\n \n\n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nRITESH\nLALITCHANDRA DESAI - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT THROUGH SECRETARY & 2 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nMAHENDRA U VORA for\nPetitioner(s) : 1, \nMR JANAK RAVAL AGP for Respondent(s) : 1, \nNone\nfor Respondent(s) : 2 -\n3. \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 23\/03\/2011 \n\n \n\n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n
1.\tPresent
\npetition is directed against the order dated 12.05.2010 passed by the
\nlearned Commissioner under the Right to Information Act, 2005
\n(hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).\n<\/p>\n
2.\tFrom
\nthe facts stated by the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner
\nhad, in September-2007, made an application under the provision of
\nthe Act and sought certain information. The Competent Authority had
\nresponded to the said notice by its reply dated 14.09.2007.\n<\/p>\n
3.\tIt
\nalso appears that the concerned department had filed objection
\nagainst the said application and thereafter, the application was
\nadmitted by the concerned authority  for hearing and decision.\n<\/p>\n
4.\tThe
\npetitioner has claimed that by communication dated 26.10.2007, the
\nCompetent Authority had directed the petitioner to deposit the amount
\nas per the Rules framed under the Act.\n<\/p>\n
5.\tAfter
\nthe petitioner deposited the requisite fees, the information was
\nsupplied to the petitioner by the order dated 03.11.2007.\n<\/p>\n
6.\tSubsequently,
\nan appeal was filed in November-2007 since, according to the
\npetitioner, the information supplied to him was not adequate or
\ncomplete. Appellate Authority passed an order dated 20.11.2007
\ndirecting the authority to provide the information to the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
7.\tEven
\nafter the said direction, the petitioner was not satisfied and that
\ntherefore, he prosecuted the appeal further. Therefore, the Appellate
\nAuthority directed the contesting parties to remain present for
\nhearing on 26th December, 2007, however, the petitioner
\ncould not attend the hearing due to personal difficulties.\n<\/p>\n
8.\tThe
\npetitioner has asserted that he was allowed to inspect the file and
\nupon inspection, he noticed that some pages were missing, thus he
\nplaced the said fact before the Appellate Authority.\n<\/p>\n
9.\tSubsequently
\nafter hearing present petitioner and the opponent, the learned
\nCommissioner passed the order dated 12.05.2010 which is impugned in
\npresent petition.\n<\/p>\n
10.\tMr.Vora,
\nlearned advocate has appeared for the petitioner. Mr.Vora, learned
\nadvocate for the petitioner, has submitted that the petitioner has
\nnot been supplied necessary information as requested for by him.
\nMr.Vora, learned advocate, has also submitted that on inspection of
\nfile, he has noticed that certain pages were missing. Mr.Vora,
\nlearned advocate, has submitted that the order does not carry the
\nobject of statute further and has been passed without appreciating
\nthe fact that every citizen has right to receive information. Instead
\nof passing order in consonance with the object of the Act, the
\nlearned Commissioner has committed error in passing the impugned
\norder rejecting the petitioner’s application.\n<\/p>\n
11.\tOn
\nperusal of the order passed by the learned Commissioner, it comes out
\nthat the learned Commissioner has taken note of every applications
\nmoved by the petitioner and the various orders passed from time to
\ntime.\n<\/p>\n
11.1\tThe
\nlearned Commissioner has also taken into account the fact that after
\nthe earlier order, the Appellate Authority had passed further order
\ndirecting the concerned department to provide the petitioner record
\nfrom Pages-1 to 17 of the file and the said details were provided to
\nthe petitioner on 26th November, 2007 and thereafter, the
\npetitioner filed fresh appeal and on 27th May, 2008.\n<\/p>\n
11.2\tHe
\nhad represented that the copies of certain documents were not made
\navailable.\n<\/p>\n
11.3\tThe
\nsaid grievance has also been taken into consideration during the
\nhearing on 20.06.2008 and it has been addressed by the learned
\nCommissioner.\n<\/p>\n
11.4\tIt
\nis also recorded by the learned Commissioner that the file pertaining
\nto the sale of plot was made available for inspection by the
\npetitioner, on 23rd June, 2008, he was also allowed to
\ntake out the copies of the relevant documents which he required.\n<\/p>\n
11.5\tIt
\nis recorded in the impugned order that the petitioner had requested
\nfor copies of 22 pages which were made available to him.\n<\/p>\n
11.6\tAfter
\ntaking into account, all the aspects, particularly the aforesaid
\naspects, the learned Commissioner has reached to the conclusion that
\nthe relevant and necessary documents\/information, as prayed for by
\nthe petitioner and as available on the file\/with the authority were
\nmade available to him and that therefore, there was no reason to
\naccept the petitioner’s application that he had not received the
\ninformation.\n<\/p>\n
11.7\tThe
\nlearned Commissioner has, after taking into account the material
\nsupplied to the petitioner, recorded the conclusion that the
\npetitioner failed to make out any substantial ground to establish
\nthat the information sought for was not made available to him.\n<\/p>\n
11.8\tThe
\nlearned Commissioner has recorded a specific and categorical finding
\nto the effect that the petitioner’s allegation that the information
\nis not supplied or not made available to him cannot be accepted.\n<\/p>\n
12.\tSuch
\nbeing the finding of fact, there is no reason to interfere with the
\nimpugned order, more so, when during the hearing, the petitioner has
\nfailed to establish, by showing relevant details and material
\nregarding the allegation that certain information was not made
\navailable to him.\n<\/p>\n
13.\tIf
\nit is the allegation of the petitioner that some pages were\/are
\nmissing from the file then the petitioner’s remedy may be before
\nappropriate forum but on that ground, the impugned order of the
\nCommissioner cannot be faulted.\n<\/p>\n
14.\tSince
\nthe petitioner has failed to point out anything from the record which
\ncould lead the Court to conclusion that the finding reached by the
\nlearned Commissioner is perverse or contrary to the material on
\nrecord, the petition does not deserve to be entertained. Hence, the
\npetition fails and the same is rejected. Notice is discharged.\n<\/p>\n
(K.M.\n<\/p>\n
Thaker, J.) <\/p>\n
rakesh\/<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011 Author: K.M.Thaker,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/3524\/2011 6\/ 6 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3524 of 2011 ========================================================= RITESH LALITCHANDRA DESAI – Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH SECRETARY & 2 – Respondent(s) ========================================================= […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-157902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRitesh vs State on 23 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-08T06:17:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-08T06:17:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":892,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-08T06:17:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-08T06:17:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-08T06:17:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011"},"wordCount":892,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011","name":"Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-08T06:17:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ritesh-vs-state-on-23-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ritesh vs State on 23 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157902"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157902\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}