{"id":158128,"date":"2009-11-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009"},"modified":"2015-12-17T16:29:02","modified_gmt":"2015-12-17T10:59:02","slug":"mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment &#8230; on 25 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment &#8230; on 25 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                      CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                       Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market,\n                         Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067.\n                                 Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                         Decision No.CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002539\/5680\n                                                               Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002539\n\nAppellant                                  :      Mrs. Neeta Bahl\n                                                  W\/o Mr. Pramod Bahl,\n                                                  2nd Floor, 100-Banarsi Das Estate,\n                                                  Timar Pur Road, Delhi-110009\n\nRespondent                                 :1)    Mr. Ravinder Kumar\n                                                  Public Information Officer\n                                                  Dy. Law Officer\n                                                  Central Establishment Department,\n                                                  Municipal Corporation of Delhi\n                                                  Town Hall, Delhi-110006\n\n                                           2)     Dr. Vireshwar Singh\n                                                  Public Information Officer\n                                                  Chief Medical Officer (Health)\n                                                  Health Department,\n                                                  Municipal Corporation of Delhi\n                                                  Town Hall, Delhi - 110006\n\nRTI application filed on                   :      12\/06\/2009\nPIO replied                                :      10\/07\/2009\nFirst Appeal filed on                      :      17\/08\/2009\nFirst Appellate Authority order            :      Not enclosed.\nSecond Appeal Received on                  :      07\/10\/2009\nNotice of Hearing Sent on                  :      20\/10\/2009\nHearing Held on                            :      25\/11\/2009\n\nInformation sought:\nAppellant sought following information on four points. Out of them first point was replied and other\nrests were to be replied:\n    1.      The status and Serial No. of Dr. S Basu (DH Town Hall), Dr. Deepak Jain (RBTB),\n            Dr.Suresh Bansal (HRH in the final seniority list (issued in 1990) of the GDMO of the\n            MCD Health Department.\n    2.      The certified copy of the office order by which Dr. S Basu is posted as Addl. DHA\n            (Medical).\n    3.      All certified copies of the Office Note and approval of the competent authority by which\n            Dr. S Basu assigned the post of the Addl. DHA (Medical).\n    4.      The name the officer assigned the work of the MCD for the same.\n\nPIO's Reply:\nApplication was forwarded by Nodal Officer, Health Department, Town hall to Respondents mentioned\nabove vide letter dated 15\/06\/2009.\nRespondent no. 1 replied regarding question no. 1 as follow:\nDr. S. Basu Sty. No. 440\nDr. Deepak Jain Sty. NO. 468\nDr. Suresh Chander Bansal Sty. No. 451.\n Above mentioned doctors are presently working to the post of CMO(NFSG) in the pay scale of Rs. 14,\n300-18, 300\/ pre revised.\nNote: Other remaining questions were not replied by any Respondent.\n\nGrounds for First Appeal:\nReply to point no.1 had been provided and rests were not provided.\n\nOrder of the First Appellate Authority:\nNot enclosed.\n\nGrounds for Second Appeal:\nDenial and refusal for the information. No response from FAA.\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n<p>The following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Mrs. Neeta Bahl;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Public Information Officer and Dy. Law Officer;\n<\/p>\n<p>               Dr. Vireshwar Singh, Public Information Officer and CMO(Health);<br \/>\n        The Respondent claims that some of the information was sent on 10\/08\/2009 which the<br \/>\nAppellant claims she has not received. Answer to query-3 was to be given by DHA and that was not<br \/>\nsent at all. Though the PIO has brought it with him. He has handed over the information to the<br \/>\nAppellant in the per sense of the Commission. He states that the person responsible in the DHA&#8217;s<br \/>\noffice for not providing information earlier is Dr. Venkat, OSD to Director of Hospital Administration.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>The appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>        The information has been provided to the Appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>The issue before the Commission is of not supplying the complete, required information by the<br \/>\nDeemed PIO Dr. Venkat, OSD to Director of Hospital Administration within 30 days as required<br \/>\nby the law.\n<\/p>\n<p>From the facts before the Commission it is apparent that the deemed PIO Dr. Venkat is guilty of not<br \/>\nfurnishing information within the time specified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 by not replying<br \/>\nwithin 30 days, as per the requirement of the RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>It appears that the deemed PIO&#8217;s actions attract the penal provisions of Section 20 (1). A showcause<br \/>\nnotice is being issued to him, and he is directed give his reasons to the Commission to show cause why<br \/>\npenalty should not be levied on him.\n<\/p>\n<p>He will present himself before the Commission at the above address on 24 December 2009 at 11.00am<br \/>\nalongwith his written submissions showing cause why penalty should not be imposed on him as<br \/>\nmandated under Section 20 (1).\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.<br \/>\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                  Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                        Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                               25 November 2009<br \/>\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)<br \/>\nCC: to,<br \/>\nDr. Venkat, OSD to Director of Hospital Administration through Dr. Vireshwar Singh, Public<br \/>\nInformation Officer and CMO(Health);<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment &#8230; on 25 November, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067. Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No.CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002539\/5680 Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002539 Appellant : Mrs. Neeta Bahl W\/o Mr. Pramod Bahl, 2nd Floor, 100-Banarsi Das Estate, Timar Pur Road, Delhi-110009 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-158128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment ... on 25 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment ... on 25 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-17T10:59:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment &#8230; on 25 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-17T10:59:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":371,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment ... on 25 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-17T10:59:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment &#8230; on 25 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment ... on 25 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment ... on 25 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-17T10:59:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment &#8230; on 25 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-17T10:59:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009"},"wordCount":371,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009","name":"Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment ... on 25 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-17T10:59:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-neeta-bahl-vs-central-establishment-on-25-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mrs. Neeta Bahl vs Central Establishment &#8230; on 25 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158128","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158128"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158128\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}