{"id":158386,"date":"2008-08-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008"},"modified":"2016-04-29T16:35:47","modified_gmt":"2016-04-29T11:05:47","slug":"rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Akil Kureshi,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/6015\/2008\t 4\/ 4\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 6015 of 2008\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nRASIKBHAI\nCHHOTABHAI PANDYA &amp; 3 - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nVINUBHAI\nCHHOTABHAI PANDYA SINCE DECD.THRO HIS LEGAL HEIR &amp; 4 -\nRespondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nHARDIK C RAWAL for\nPetitioner(s) : 1 - 4.MRS MH RAWAL for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 4. \nMR\nBG PATEL for Respondent(s) : 1, \nNone for Respondent(s) : 2 -\n5. \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 08\/08\/2008 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>\tThe<br \/>\npetitioners have challenged the judgment and order dated 03.09.2007<br \/>\npassed by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal in Revision Application<br \/>\nNo.TEN.BA\/182 \/ 2006. By the said order, the Tribunal was pleased to<br \/>\nreject the revision application of the petitioners and confirmed the<br \/>\norder passed by the Deputy Collector as well as the Mamlatdar &amp;<br \/>\nALT.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe<br \/>\ncase pertains to the land which is part of Survey No.160 admeasuring<br \/>\nAcre 3 ?  12 Guntha of village Adas, Taluka Anand, District Anand.<br \/>\nThe petitioners as well as the respondent Nos.1 to 4 who are legal<br \/>\nheirs of the original tenant viz. Vinubhai Chhotabhai. Upon death<br \/>\nChhotabhai Bhailalbhai, his son Vinubhai Chhotabhai was declared as<br \/>\ntenant of the said land under the proceedings under Section 32-G of<br \/>\nthe Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (for short ?Sthe<br \/>\nAct??) to the exclusion of the other brothers. Chhotabhai paid<br \/>\npurchase price of Rs.5,000\/- and certificate in his favour in the<br \/>\nprescribed form of having become deemed purchaser was also issued.<br \/>\nVinubhai Chhotabhai expired in the year 1994. Names of his heirs viz.<br \/>\npresent respondent Nos.1 to 4 were entered into revenue record. Upon<br \/>\ntheir request, the land was converted into old tenure land upon from<br \/>\nnew tenure upon payment of the premium to the Government in the year<br \/>\n2002.  The land was sold by registered sale deed dated 20.02.2005 by<br \/>\nthe respondent Nos.1 to 4 in favour of the respondent No.5 herein.<br \/>\nSoon thereafter the present petitioners filed appeal before the<br \/>\nDeputy Collector being Tenancy Appeal No.78 of 2005 on 31.05.2005<br \/>\nseeking to challenge the original order of the Mamlatdar and ALT<br \/>\ndated 30.07.1976 declaring Vinubhai Chhotabhai as tenant of the<br \/>\ndisputed land. This appeal came to be dismissed by the Deputy<br \/>\nCollector by his judgment dated 24.03.2006. Upon which the<br \/>\npetitioners approached the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal. Their revision<br \/>\napplication also came to be dismissed by the impugned judgment and<br \/>\norder.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe<br \/>\nTribunal while dismissing the revision application observed that<br \/>\nafter the Mamlatdar passed his order in the year 1976, entries in the<br \/>\nrevenue record were made. Certificate under Section 32-M of the Act<br \/>\nwas granted in favour of the deceased Vinubhai Chhotabhai. New tenure<br \/>\nland was converted into old tenure by the heirs of deceased Vinubhai<br \/>\nChhotabhai by paying premium. Prior thereto, upon death of Vinubhai<br \/>\nChhotabhai, names of the respondent Nos.1 to 4 were entered as<br \/>\noccupants of the land. During the life time of Vinubhai Chhotabhai<br \/>\nand after his death, his heirs were paying the land revenue for the<br \/>\ndisputed land. The Tribunal also observed that the deceased Vinubhai<br \/>\nChhotabhai  was not eldest brother and therefore, rejected the theory<br \/>\nof Vinubhai Chhotabhai as being Karta of the joint family. On all<br \/>\nthese grounds, the Tribunal was pleased to uphold the order passed by<br \/>\nthe Deputy Collector which was based on merits as well as on delay in<br \/>\nchallenging the order passed by the Mamlatdar and ALT.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tI<br \/>\nhave no reason to take different view. With respect to the factual<br \/>\nfindings arrived at by the two authorities below, there is hardly any<br \/>\ndispute possible. Admittedly, the petitioners did not challenge the<br \/>\norder passed by the Mamlatdar in the year 1976, right upto 2005 till<br \/>\nthe land was sold by the heirs of Vinubhai Chhotabhai after<br \/>\nconverting it into old tenure from the new tenure. All through out,<br \/>\nVinubhai Chhotabhai and after his death, his heirs decedents who were<br \/>\noccupying and cultivating the land.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tLearned<br \/>\nadvocate for the petitioners drew my attention to the deposition of<br \/>\nVinubhai Chhotabhai before the Mamlatdar in which he has stated that<br \/>\nafter death of his father, he is cultivating the land as elder member<br \/>\nof the Hindu United Family. On the basis of the said statements,<br \/>\nreliance was placed on the decision of the learned Single Judge of<br \/>\nthis Court in the case of Shankerbhai Kanjihai &amp; Another v.<br \/>\nDagadubhai Govindbhai and others reported in 1991 (2) GLH 487. He<br \/>\nsubmitted that above statement of Vinubhai Chhotabhai in his<br \/>\ndeposition, has not been considered by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tI<br \/>\nam afraid on this count, the orders passed by the authorities below,<br \/>\ncannot be disturbed. Admittedly, for about 20 years, order passed by<br \/>\nthe Mamlatdar &amp; ALT was not challenged by the present<br \/>\npetitioners. Through out record of rights reflects the name of<br \/>\nVinubhai Chhotabhai and his heirs. At no stage, the petitioners<br \/>\ncomplained about the same. Thus, if Vinubhai Chhotabhai when<br \/>\ncultivating the land as member of HUF, after his death, when the<br \/>\nnames of his heirs to the exclusion of other family members were<br \/>\nentered, the petitioners ought to have raised their grievance. The<br \/>\npetitioners tried to challenge the order passed by the Mamlatdar only<br \/>\nafter the land was sold by the heirs of Vinubhai Chhotabhai in favour<br \/>\nof the respondent No.5. In the mean time, the land was converted from<br \/>\nnew tenure to old tenure by the heirs of Vinubhai Chhotabhai.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tAll<br \/>\nthe petitioners have any right against the heirs of Vinubhai<br \/>\nChhotabhai to claim their share in the accounts of sale proceeds, the<br \/>\nsame is different issue altogether. Learned advocate for the<br \/>\npetitioners stated that the petitioners have already filed civil suit<br \/>\nin this regard. The same shall be decided on merits on the basis of<br \/>\nthe evidence that may be brought on record unmindful of any of the<br \/>\nobservations made in this order.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tWith<br \/>\nthese observations, the petition is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>(<br \/>\nAkil Kureshi, J. )<\/p>\n<p>kailash<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008 Author: Akil Kureshi,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/6015\/2008 4\/ 4 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6015 of 2008 ========================================================= RASIKBHAI CHHOTABHAI PANDYA &amp; 3 &#8211; Petitioner(s) Versus VINUBHAI CHHOTABHAI PANDYA SINCE DECD.THRO HIS LEGAL [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-158386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-29T11:05:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-29T11:05:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":896,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-29T11:05:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-29T11:05:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-29T11:05:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008"},"wordCount":896,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008","name":"Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-29T11:05:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rasikbhai-vs-vinubhai-on-8-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rasikbhai vs Vinubhai on 8 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158386"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158386\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}