{"id":158563,"date":"2009-09-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009"},"modified":"2016-07-28T01:02:06","modified_gmt":"2016-07-27T19:32:06","slug":"karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
I\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 7*\" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 20.O9]'+\u00ab.,f,V\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. PD. DINAKA_R.AN_, cH,IE'FE'3LJ_::T'I.\nNo.19339\/2oo'9,.t\u00a7e:r;_gI_f_:agerieved by the order dated\n\nO6.O8._2OO\u00a3\u00a7fwh'erei'Vn t\u00e9tettearned singie Judge of this Court\n\n theI'*~w\u00abri't petition by imposing exerrtpiary\n\n mtg vQf\"'RQ:S.; zsiooo\/~.\n\n The appeliant herein ~ Karnataka Arya Vysya\n\nA '*:GfMAaVh\u00e9s_abha (hereinafter referred to as 'the Society')\n\nfiled W.P. No.I9339\/2009 being aggrieved by the order\n\n'\ufb02passed by the first respondent - Under Secretary to<\/pre>\n
\\J”\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\nGovernment, Department of Co–operative Soci_eties<\/p>\n
(Annexure ‘E’ to the writ petition), wherein Administratovr<\/p>\n
has been appointed under Section 27~A of <\/p>\n
Societies Registration Act, 1960, (h_erei_nafterlrefeirreldw t’_0.Vas_ 0″<\/p>\n
‘the Act’ ) since no elections wer\u00e9iziheiid cieslpite <\/p>\n
of term of office of the office__”‘o.eare’rs of  – v 0′<\/p>\n
Society and appointment of’,_4hdm_i_r:istrator\u00abislimited to
\nthree months or tiil Ve’le\ufb02cti,o’ng.’ is _ the Executive
\nCommittee of the’-p_etitioner–  is earlier.
\nIt is the co  said order has
\nnot  law and is passed
\nwithout,  to the petitioner to
\nsubstantiate its  period of office of the<\/p>\n
petitionier. — Sd’ciety’s office bearers has been enhanced<\/p>\n
  3  5 years by amendment .\n<\/p>\n
 “Learned single Judge, after considering the<\/p>\n
.,,.iCententi’o’ns of the iearned counsel for the petitioner and<\/p>\n
 ,.11t’h.Ve””ie’arned Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3<\/p>\n
 “and the learned counsel for the impieading applicant, by<\/p>\n
order dated 06.08.2009, held that though the bye=~iaw of<\/p>\n
\\\/3<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
the petitioner – Society has been amended enhancing the<\/p>\n
tenure of the Executive Committee of the Society.,:f\u00abro’rn<\/p>\n
three years to five years, the competent <\/p>\n
approving the resolution relating _t_o…a_i4ner:t:iVment;V\u00bbof” bf-,.(e–‘-,_,<\/p>\n
law, has made the said bye–law prosgpecjtivve <\/p>\n
that it is not applicable”ft_o’–~._the’A”-e\u00a7<isting'Ai\ufb01xecutive <\/p>\n
Committee and wherefore, th_ehte._nure of  liicecutive
\nCommittee of the petitio-her.4:.So,cietyVf,hadexpired and no
\nelections are heyldand passed by the
\nfirst    appointing
\nAdminist_ra,tor~.,u:'ndier" the Act is justified.
\nLearnedisipgiewfjudge'further held that : the Petitioner has<\/p>\n
suppresseci–_the  competent authority, while<\/p>\n
 approivifng. the resolvutioin, had made the amended hye–iaw<\/p>\n
 pro.sKpec_tiv.e.a'iid had specificaily stated that the same was '<\/p>\n
fnotf'f.a,i3i5E'ica*vbl_e'V~:to" the existing Executive Committee; the<\/p>\n
V . terrn""ofv*\u00ab.':office of the existing Executive Committee has<\/p>\n
..',,"'—".,,expiired and the office hearers of the Society are continuing<\/p>\n
  ihfoffice without holding any election and wherefore, there<\/p>\n
C  isfno merit in the writ petition and accordingly, dismissed<\/p>\n
it the writ petition by imposing exemplary cost of<\/p>\n
\\\/L<\/p>\n
S
\nRs.25,000\/–. Being aggrieved by the said order of the
\nlearned single 3udge dated 06.08.2009, the writ petitioner<\/p>\n
has preferred this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
4.. We have heard the learned ilsenilorl,’4counsel._ 0′<\/p>\n
appearing for the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
S. Learned Senior ‘co~eVn’s~el”–~._appearinglifor the
\nappellant submitted  has already
\nnotified electlopnl’ to .ng.dl’0n1ittee of the
\nappellant -1; grievance of the
\nappellant in to the finding given by
\nthe learnedsingle’  appellant has suppressed<\/p>\n
the,,.;5.j91atierial factivand imposition of exemplary cost of<\/p>\n
  -vtearned counsel appearing for the impleading<\/p>\n
0.  ..,.l:aApplican’t:and the learned Additional Government Advocate<\/p>\n
  a_l5i3\u20ac:aring for respondents 1 and 2 submitted that they<\/p>\n
 -ivwlould leave it to the discretion of the Court to consider<\/p>\n
waiving of cost.\n<\/p>\n
V’<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
7. We have given careful consideration to_.__the<\/p>\n
contentions of the Eearned counsel appearing <\/p>\n
parties and scrutinized the material on record.    A<\/p>\n
8. The material on record :’woii_lAdr~’cEe’a~rl_y” <\/p>\n
in the writ petition filed * L’<\/p>\n
i\\Eo.19339\/2009, the ap_pellantp…hVe’rein.._.hadlc’ha_llepfged the
\norder passed by the firstrespondent.’uVnd’\u00a7r–..$ection 27-A of
\nthe Act dated  has been
\nappointed   period of three
\nmonthsvpvor,pt_iEl\u00bb.,e”l’ecti:’oVn   Committee of the
\nSocietyiggwhicihieiieiiisea’rlier.. ‘Since it is not disputed that<\/p>\n
Administra’to_r*h_as” a.l”i*ea’d:\u00a7\/_.\u00bbs\u00bbtaken charge and has notified<\/p>\n
 election’ to the Eirecutiive Committee of the appeliant —<\/p>\n
 t-A\u00a7oci,ety,_ilearne~d’senior counsel appearing for the appellant<\/p>\n
fairltpsuvbniivtted”that the appellant confines the grievance<\/p>\n
V . in the a-ppeail oniy to the finding of the learned single<\/p>\n
 regarding suppression of fact by the petitioner –<\/p>\n
 a”ppei’iant herein and imposition of cost of Rs.2S,O0O\/-.<\/p>\n
\\,\/5<\/p>\n
7<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
9. We have perused the averrnents made in the
\nwrit petition as also the material on record and the same<\/p>\n
would make it clear that what was challenged in Vthlepjlwarit<\/p>\n
petition was the order of the first responclent;”‘ap’p.o–intii:.g’=<\/p>\n
Administrator under Section 27–A of the Act.,.uaj’i1dV trje..fac:t’  <\/p>\n
that bye-law has been amended Iextendi.n”g-_t:h,e”–tenu.re\u00e9<\/p>\n
the Executive Committee of ,the__ appel_l_ant –  <\/p>\n
years to 5 years is not dispulvted, _iiavii’ig,_VV:re:gard to the
\nmaterial on record, it’is”clea.r *4theT”a.mended bye~laws
\nwere produced in the W.fit:l’E1et.i’t_ion a’ndl’t.hsg,’..learned single<\/p>\n
Judge has held  of “Executive Committee<\/p>\n
is exte’n_de,d  However, mere fact that the
\nappellant herein “4 _p’eVtitio”ner has not stated that the said<\/p>\n
amendment walla not be applicable to the Executive<\/p>\n
  pnwould not by itself lead to the conclusion that<\/p>\n
th_e”l’sVaAid”  been intentionally suppressed so as to<\/p>\n
 . gain””anyfiadvantage or to abuse the process of the Court.<\/p>\n
llaxring regard to the above said material on record, we<\/p>\n
hold’ that the finding of the learned single Judge that the<\/p>\n
it  “appellant herein has suppressed the said material fact and<\/p>\n
C’ hence, is liable to pay exemplary cost of Rs.25,GOO\/- is<\/p>\n
\\_\/L<\/p>\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
liable to be set aside and the impugned order of the<\/p>\n
learned single Judge dated 06.08.2009, in aE’i.,,’fotl1er<\/p>\n
respects, remains unaltered.\n<\/p>\n
Accordingly, the Writ Appeal\ufb01s dispbsed    <\/p>\n
 * .1′; V”l’Chie\u00a7’}L’afstice<\/p>\n
\u00a7U!’\u00a5’la<\/p>\n
0′  __I ndiex:   ” ‘_,<\/p>\n
We.b*~Host –3’,j\\f\u00e9s”\/ No<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit I IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 7*” DAY OF SEPTEMBER 20.O9]’+\u00ab.,f,V PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. PD. DINAKA_R.AN_, cH,IE’FE’3LJ_::T’I. No.19339\/2oo’9,.t\u00a7e:r;_gI_f_:agerieved by the order dated O6.O8._2OO\u00a3\u00a7fwh’erei’Vn t\u00e9tettearned singie Judge of this […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-158563","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKarnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-27T19:32:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-27T19:32:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":957,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-27T19:32:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-27T19:32:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-27T19:32:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009"},"wordCount":957,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009","name":"Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-27T19:32:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-arya-vysya-mahasabha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka Arya Vysya Mahasabha vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158563","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158563"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158563\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158563"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158563"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158563"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}