{"id":159625,"date":"2008-03-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008"},"modified":"2015-12-10T02:02:36","modified_gmt":"2015-12-09T20:32:36","slug":"smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nM Im \".15  mu DAY 01? MAP\"H_.'.?{9L.;.\" Q 5  % \n\nJ..J'JI-J.J-'lJ.J' &\u00a3l~I.\\\\.I :5\n\nBEFORE V  b\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE_AJ\u00a7'i'\u00ab...5'.\n\nI-I.R.R.P NC:S'?T..v8\/\u00a7'0(V:)'7'     \n\nSmt. Padmavathi, _\n'.I!{o.La.n.tc.A.nji11.e.ppe.,  '\nAged about 60 years,  I\nR\/'at.'\ufb01.No.6jS5j3,;TJ'L'V  .  ' _ _ V\nWard No.12, , .V  >  \"\n\nKalmatt1,R\u00a2dd5r\u00a7   ~ _ \n\n   -._.PF.'l'l'l'IONER\n\n(By sma.   iTkTaia%,LAciv.)\n\nAND: ..\n\n \"  1,  '\n\n   \n\n 'W\/'nehate\ufb01i-Naaanpa.\n \n\n \n S\/o.Late Iwasavva.\n AL I Agedhbout 48 years,\n\n_ _----_\n\ng Sio.La'u:e K.1agup\nT Agad about 36 yams,\nA 4' Kiri-liiiin'\nJ\"?\n\nD\/o.Latx: K.Nagappa,\nAged about 35  -- \n\n\n\n are residing at\nD.No. 10, Ward No. 18,\n001331 Swamy Road,\n\n('I\n\\..Ia-llll\n\nmm. up D n a. mu: 1IntInue',Q;a;::'a-Ifirwu 1.1%\u00bb. n+'3+_I'u-. <\nll'-I-3 Ill-I-'ll\\OJ I 'W Isl-I'-I'-I w'"v' -K' .1'-nI\\.l1\u00a2I\u00bb  '1-Fl I-I"J'\n\nCode of Civil Procedure 'against *-the \n22.11.2002 passed in ir-T.'u'"_'.fRcvis'icn_1_1"~Ae  tuition\nNo.12]2005 on the tile 91' the  Disttictl\ufb01esaions\nJudge, Bellary partly ailpwirig the,' petition  under\nSec'dan27{2'i{1}ofK.R.Act.J--.    .. \n\nThis H.R.R.'P_.   admission, this day,\nthe Court madc'ti1s:'fo11tnvf.Iri_g':    = \n\n_    \n order, the parties would\nbe referredteetae   in the Trial Court.\n\n  :2. A.  have let out the premises in\n\n   ijespondcnt on a monthly rent of 123.25] -\n\n1; m. nt_hlv .en_.__c:y eem\ufb02egeg Lrom\n\n'    to the petitioners, the tenant is in arrears of\n\nh V.  _;fe-int from September 1982. Despite various demands,\n\n '  the respondent has not paid the rents. The statutory<\/pre>\n
Bellary — 533302. …REsmHDENEre     <\/p>\n
 :=<\/p>\n
u3uI<\/p>\n
notice dated 10.04.1993 was issued dc1nandjx1g’aI’r\u00e9a.rs<\/p>\n
of rent amounting to Rs.4,70O \/- for the 9 <\/p>\n
sonnnnber 1972 up to April 1998. An    <\/p>\n
5,l.V’\u00a2l.I \ufb01n  a !’  -s,gu_<\/p>\n
5….-. Of Rs.5\u00a7m,I=.:l.5.-a\u00a7._j   <\/p>\n
arrears of rent. According torthc   V<\/p>\n
due was Rs.4,125\/-. Hence, ‘lil1c_”\u00bb1~::opoiidoti:1tv’in  to
\nbe evicted under secuongz 1(‘i)(o_\u00a7o\u00a3_ Rent<\/p>\n
Co… .1 A_…, 196;, It ls..t.f;_elr  respondent,<\/p>\n
without  coo\u00a79c:\u00a71\u00a7;_:”l”Tll::Vicspondcnt has also
\nput 111?, a ._coiV1Si1o1c\ufb02on.Vb_Without the permission of the
\nlocal au\ufb02lo\ufb01\ufb01oo  consent of the landlord.<\/p>\n
en…_ic,” 1:. -::v “9.  nlilc to be ctrlctcd. u.t1r_1cr Bcctioxl<\/p>\n
.-noun–an<\/p>\n
  Rent (‘;onf1″iA’-u., l9:-51. They<\/p>\n
moo nooloootono that the original landlord had mod 9.<\/p>\n
  ; suif” inoto;s”.No.135\/1994 restraining the respondent<\/p>\n
K x V’ .l’1’om__plitting up any construction. But however, the<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
arrears of rent and she has paid the rents
\nshe is not a defaulter. She would contend ” <\/p>\n
LL: Viol. uuu you uuuuuau ta. 1-… ‘-w’ up 3…-…\u00a3~_-ip.–“…’ —<\/p>\n
mound under Section \ufb01iiijicj
\nturtzher contend that she’ -has not pntV*d-   .
\nconstruction in violation of 2  ‘eon}di\ufb02ons<\/p>\n
and she is not liable ms secuoe 2l(1)(o)<\/p>\n
4. A’J1.1d’ge’–;AI1avh1g mgard to the<\/p>\n
-we ‘V ow M’ “Lee opinion t..h.e.t mm
\npetitioners   the relief under .’3ecu”on<\/p>\n
21(1)?! of itheivhct; Bvut’ in so far as Section<\/p>\n
 V’ ‘”21(i)iE:) is concex-ned’,’.”iVt was dismissed as a@inst which,<\/p>\n
  a revision before the learned<\/p>\n
  the evidence let in by the parties has<\/p>\n
i  hemmed the \ufb01ndings remrding the arrears of rent.<\/p>\n
   in so far as eviction under Section 21(l)[c) of the<\/p>\n
\u00abmet It Rent C no! Act, 1961, has  <\/p>\n
.\/.’-”\n<\/p>\n
same and has granted eviction on that count aieo,<\/p>\n
Hence, this petition by the respondent<\/p>\n
5. Incmentany, it is to be noticed  d on d  <\/p>\n
proceedings were initiated in the
\nKamataka Rent Control Act _ Bnt %<\/p>\n
u… r…-.-..–.-.. -7-‘ _,.____…<\/p>\n
fh– nmdeucy of me <\/p>\n
Control Act Waslrepi\u00e9eed’ Act, 1%.\n<\/p>\n
Hence, the     'the learned\nTrial Judge      of the new\n\nAct.  \"\"\"  .  d M\n\n6.  counsel appearing\n\n<\/pre>\n
  tbr the  submits that having regani to the<\/p>\n
‘~,J.I3\\.r|.u’ I:I.L.I.\\.I .\\.au.uu.g.u.wunua.-uv uv uu.-.-<\/p>\n
-..;-.:e. cunt! lV;I;r\\?UIf\ufb02\ufb02’I”\ufb02fI!’\ufb02S’ I’v\\th  Q11 “Q, ____i;H_g_1 we<\/p>\n
not   the respondent is in <\/p>\n
H V’ of rent  far as putting up a construction without<\/p>\n
  is concerned, he submits that the \ufb01nding is<\/p>\n
  recorded in the earlier pmoeeamgs i.c., in the<\/p>\n
V’ ;’.’:+ :…….a.n. 4…: 1… +1. I-Minn…-. <\/p>\n
lauliitcu 113 L116 p\\.”””uuu1ua=Iu<\/p>\n
\/,”7\/7”\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7. I 113% p-:.:’u…… the 2.-rz-.3.’-‘-.:g.-‘:e.r’.. @er  by<\/p>\n
the learned  Judge as well as the learned e
\nJudge. In so far as the \ufb01nding recorded
\n2’7(2)(a) of the Act conesponding:-to arts’ it<\/p>\n
the old Act, I am ofthe View that   <\/p>\n
:.’.”.’i-‘~ 41:…\n<\/p>\n
um.-\n<\/p>\n
as-uncvn uasuucnv-ml-Its “‘t\\II1’Il”  ‘V  HQ 4’.  _\n<\/p>\n
3.’ ‘HI’ ‘- .’lK1lt”_I Fl-‘1″-“Io<\/p>\n
1” “V6 03 ll.UI..Il.l5.I.1I.l xumuxu \ufb01ut..{ –<\/p>\n
respondent is in a11ea::*s..V_oi*   to the
\nsame, I am of the view  cannot be
\nfaulted. t   t  W h<\/p>\n
 of the new Act is
\nconoerned,. wfiieuiet Judge in her revietonal
\npewer   ii\u00e9ttn’ mg Jmnoeedinns mlanm tn the<\/p>\n
 V_.– — ___ V11 7-; .. I… — — .. .– .-.—..—.-.j– —- —.-..–:..-T, –_ .__<\/p>\n
‘ _ ….. ..__._a. :…..I-…__..a..1…..
\nll. .Il.ul.aI.l.l.CLI Ll<\/p>\n
Cl!
\n7?\n<\/p>\n
hi
\n0:\n<\/p>\n
an _\n<\/p>\n
–..\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
\n5<\/span>
\nIII!-\n<\/p>\n
I\n<\/p>\n
–r<\/p>\n
  against demolition and construction<\/p>\n
  Premises. Appanently. it is to be<\/p>\n
 ‘,notiouec1  while disposing of the appeal \ufb01led by the<\/p>\n
his C urt moditied. Lhe judmnent
\n.,…\n<\/p>\n
‘HA4-I rung ‘Ann .n.’ Vanni whom no –<\/p>\n
” ma decree in rt..st. I\\io.iG8ii%8 and the suit of inc”<\/p>\n
 ” netitioner was partly decreed and the respondent was<\/p>\n
permanently restrained from demolishing the scheduke M
\n“\/7<\/p>\n
.-f\ufb02f ‘<\/p>\n
premises and putting up a new constructions
\nexcept in accordance with law. In fact
\nand decree was made available to the   _\n<\/p>\n
-Ju..ge; In pe.._.J.3..’2  V t  V’ A’
\nJudge has considered the tine?’   *’
\nappeal. In fact while dealin\u00a7’*t=:Vr\u00a7;iptIr1_Vt:l1e”  etieecuon A
\n27(2)(1) of the Act,  Judge also
\nobserved that the   has not
\n%:1    said \ufb01nd}?-‘ is<\/p>\n
based on     disc” mansion on the
\nsaid  will not advance the case<\/p>\n
of the re5]\u00a7onden.t;t:V..’A’  regard to the fact that a<\/p>\n
_  is   the learned District Judge that<\/p>\n
‘  ‘J  ‘ I-I-J_.2ILrIIa3I CI.IL\\J.I- Kiel’-Ill -l..luIh.ll.l\\-l.J.lul.5 “I<\/p>\n
I-an. In ‘idly:\n<\/p>\n
1;; utiuun\ufb01<\/p>\n
“end newly constructed buiiding did not<\/p>\n
d d L men ttvim’ the features and the characters of the<\/p>\n
 which was let out to the tenant as per the<\/p>\n
  uphctegraph produced at Exs.P1(a) as {.13}, a case <\/p>\n
. c\u00bb 1…. 44..- …..a..u.:………… J.-…._ …:..a..1…….. -….I.__
\nI. Hy Ll]. uuu 1 3 101 CV1UI.\ufb02.lI.l (J.<\/p>\n
1)
\nSection 27(2)(l) ofthe Act. 9%<\/p>\n
9. Having regard to -the \ufb01ndings recorded <\/p>\n
Courts below, on the question ofarreara of I’|’=__!ii:’_.*\u00ab I;  _<\/p>\n
I-‘nan –:1:-\ufb02u lama’-\n<\/p>\n
4- In
\nLII I LIJIIL<\/p>\n
‘ lawns-nun-rm-a-I nun-vlgcl\ufb01
\nas p 5:11:11 Uxuuza<\/p>\n
E?\n<\/p>\n
below do not warren    i'\n\nthis petition.\n\nPetition stands  \n\n  .:        Ixgdq\u00e9\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008 Author: Ajit J Gunjal IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT M Im “.15 mu DAY 01? MAP”H_.’.?{9L.;.” Q 5 % J..J’JI-J.J-‘lJ.J’ &\u00a3l~I.\\\\.I :5 BEFORE V b THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE_AJ\u00a7’i’\u00ab…5′. I-I.R.R.P NC:S’?T..v8\/\u00a7’0(V:)’7′ Smt. Padmavathi, _ ‘.I!{o.La.n.tc.A.nji11.e.ppe., ‘ Aged about 60 years, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-159625","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-09T20:32:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-09T20:32:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":900,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-09T20:32:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-09T20:32:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-09T20:32:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008"},"wordCount":900,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008","name":"Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-09T20:32:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-padmavathi-vs-smt-k-kotramma-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Padmavathi vs Smt K Kotramma on 11 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159625"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159625\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}