{"id":15981,"date":"2009-01-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009"},"modified":"2017-09-29T09:22:33","modified_gmt":"2017-09-29T03:52:33","slug":"sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 4206 of 2008()\n\n\n1. SREE MOOKAMBIKA FLOUR MILLS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. G.VIVEKANANDAN, AGED 58 YEARS,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. K.B.RASHEED MATHER, KAKKANATTIL HOUSE,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.SHRIHARI RAO\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :01\/01\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n              M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n            ===========================\n           Crl.R.P. NO. 4206    OF 2008\n            ===========================\n\n      Dated this the 1st day of January,2009\n\n                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>    Revision petitioners are accused 1 and 2 in<\/p>\n<p>C.C.621\/2003 on the file of Judicial First Class<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate-I, Aluva.    Second respondent is the<\/p>\n<p>complainant.     Second   respondent   lodged   the<\/p>\n<p>complaint against the first revision petitioner,<\/p>\n<p>the firm and the second revision petitioner its<\/p>\n<p>Managing Partner and    two other partners of the<\/p>\n<p>firm alleging that they committed the offence under<\/p>\n<p>section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.  Accused<\/p>\n<p>pleaded not guilty.    Learned Magistrate on the<\/p>\n<p>evidence of PW1 and Exts.P1 to P7 DW1 and Exts.D1<\/p>\n<p>and D2 found accused 3 and 4 not guilty and<\/p>\n<p>acquitted  them.      Revision   petitioners   were<\/p>\n<p>convicted for the offence under section 138 of<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act.  They were sentenced to<\/p>\n<p>simple imprisonment for one year, without taking<\/p>\n<p>note of the fact that first revision petitioner is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP4206\/2008              2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>only a firm.    Petitioners challenged the conviction<\/p>\n<p>and sentence before       Additional Sessions Court,<\/p>\n<p>North     Paravur   in   Crl.A.776\/2007.      Learned<\/p>\n<p>Additional    Sessions  Judge  on  reappreciation  of<\/p>\n<p>evidence confirmed the conviction.      But sentence<\/p>\n<p>was modified to a fine of Rs.1,25,000\/- as against<\/p>\n<p>the first revision petitioner firm and         simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment    for  three  months  and  a  fine   of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.10,000\/- and in default simple imprisonment for<\/p>\n<p>two months as against second revision petitioner<\/p>\n<p>with    a    direction  to   pay   Rs.1,25,000\/-   on<\/p>\n<p>realisation to second respondent as compensation.<\/p>\n<p>Revision is filed challenging the conviction and<\/p>\n<p>sentence.\n<\/p>\n<p>    2.     Learned counsel appearing for the revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioners was heard.\n<\/p>\n<p>    3. Learned counsel, in view of the evidence on<\/p>\n<p>record and the concurrent findings of fact did not<\/p>\n<p>challenge the conviction but sought modification of<\/p>\n<p>the sentence.     It was submitted that considering<\/p>\n<p>the fine awarded as against     firm the substantive<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP4206\/2008              3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>sentence as against    second revision petitioner may<\/p>\n<p>be reduced as well as the fine.\n<\/p>\n<p>    4.       On going through the judgments of the<\/p>\n<p>courts below, I find no reason to interfere with<\/p>\n<p>the   conviction.      Evidence  establish  that   in<\/p>\n<p>discharge of the liability of first          revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner firm, second revision petitioner being<\/p>\n<p>the Managing Partner issued the cheque which was<\/p>\n<p>dishonoured for want of sufficient funds and second<\/p>\n<p>respondent had complied with all the statutory<\/p>\n<p>formalities provided under section 138 and 142 of<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act.    Conviction of revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioners in such circumstance, for the offence<\/p>\n<p>under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, is<\/p>\n<p>perfectly legal.\n<\/p>\n<p>    5.      Then the only question is regarding the<\/p>\n<p>sentence.       Learned  Additional  Sessions   Judge<\/p>\n<p>modified the sentence to a fine for the amount<\/p>\n<p>covered by the dishonoured cheque as against the<\/p>\n<p>firm and simple imprisonment for three months in<\/p>\n<p>addition to a fine of Rs.10,000\/- as against the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP4206\/2008              4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Managing Partner the     second revision petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>Considering the entire facts and circumstances of<\/p>\n<p>the case, interest of justice will be met, if the<\/p>\n<p>sentence     is modified,  reducing  the  substantive<\/p>\n<p>sentence to imprisonment till rising of court.     So<\/p>\n<p>long as the sentence is not varied or modified<\/p>\n<p>against the interest of second respondent, it is<\/p>\n<p>not necessary to issue notice to second respondent.<\/p>\n<p>As per the modified sentence awarded by Sessions<\/p>\n<p>Judge second respondent is     to get a compensation<\/p>\n<p>of Rs.1,25,000\/- which was the amount covered by<\/p>\n<p>the dishonoured cheque.    In such circumstance, the<\/p>\n<p>sentence is modified as follows:-     First revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is sentenced to a fine of Rs.10,000\/-.<\/p>\n<p>Second    revision    petitioner   is   sentenced  to<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment till rising of court in addition to a<\/p>\n<p>fine   of    Rs.1,20,000\/-  and  in  default   simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for one month.    On realisation of fine<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,25,000\/- to be paid to second respondent as<\/p>\n<p>compensation under section 357(1) of the Code of<\/p>\n<p>Criminal Procedure.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP4206\/2008             5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>    Revision is allowed in part.       Conviction of<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioners for the offence under section<\/p>\n<p>138 of Negotiable Instruments Act is confirmed.<\/p>\n<p>Sentence      is     modified.    First     revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner\/first accused   is sentenced to a fine of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.10,000\/-.      Second revision  petitioner\/second<\/p>\n<p>accused     is sentenced to imprisonment till rising<\/p>\n<p>of court and a fine of Rs.1,20,000\/- and in default<\/p>\n<p>simple imprisonment for one month.    On realisation<\/p>\n<p>of  fine,    Rs.1,25,000\/- to   be  paid  to  second<\/p>\n<p>respondent as compensation under section 357(1) of<\/p>\n<p>Code of Criminal Procedure.   Revision petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>granted four months time to pay the fine.     Second<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner is directed to appear before<\/p>\n<p>the Magistrate on 2.5.2009.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR<br \/>\n                                         JUDGE<br \/>\ntpl\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>    W.P.(C).NO. \/06\n<\/p>\n<p>   &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>    SEPTEMBER,2006<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 4206 of 2008() 1. SREE MOOKAMBIKA FLOUR MILLS, &#8230; Petitioner 2. G.VIVEKANANDAN, AGED 58 YEARS, Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Respondent 2. K.B.RASHEED MATHER, KAKKANATTIL HOUSE, For [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-29T03:52:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-29T03:52:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":723,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-29T03:52:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-29T03:52:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009","datePublished":"2008-12-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-29T03:52:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009"},"wordCount":723,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009","name":"Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-29T03:52:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-mookambika-flour-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sree Mookambika Flour Mills vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15981\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}