{"id":160291,"date":"2010-12-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010"},"modified":"2015-10-31T13:46:31","modified_gmt":"2015-10-31T08:16:31","slug":"chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 9*\" DAY OF DECEMBER,g201Vo..'D_jj   %\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.J\\={I VE::Is}Uj;{3f)_P}'\\LA.:\n\nw.P.No.5534\/D2010'(eiM\u00bbecPc)T.Te\"--T.Eff' \"  \nW.P.NOS.6173--6174\/_2010(GM-CF'C \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nChandrashekaraiah  .\n\nSince dead by his vLRs.,\"' * \n\n1. Leeiavathi'---..  ~ jg    .\nW\/0 late Ciiandra.she'i\u00e9'ara'ia.hT-  \nAged abDDt\"*5'Q.,years', \" 3'\nR\/aTt\"No*.83'i3,  cross, _\n\nKen g eri -- Sa'teE!-it_e' 'Towri '  ., '\nBa n'gafo.re ~.560fO60.,__\"\" \n\n2. Madura  \"    \nCg\/O iate Ch'a.r_1drashekariah\n-' v  ._fAgerJ_abT0ut 27' 'y*ea'rs,\n' \u00abTR\/at\" [\\1o_.4I6._9 K\n 'i*9A\"\"'-!\\{iEaE.,riT',TODD. Canara Bank\n. '5Raja'ji.haga.'r_','~'I Block,\n7 B'angalDre':TAT\n\n  G\u00e9rudarangalah\n\nE Aged about 84 years.\n\n\n\nVide order dated 20.10.2010\nAmended the cause title of the\nPet\u00e9tion that the respondent No.1 is<\/pre>\n
Died and the respondent No.2 to 12(c)
\nare the L.Rs of Respondent No.1<\/p>\n
Chandramma
\nW\/o Rajashekar I
\nAged about -40 years.\n<\/p>\n
Venkatesh
\nS\/o late Rajashekar
\nAged about 24 years.\n<\/p>\n
Shamsundar<\/p>\n
S\/o late Rajashekar _ .\n<\/p>\n
Aged about 21 Vyears’;” —\n<\/p>\n
Chandra).-.’r’:..thiatA;jt’_,1 ~ 4 _
\nS\/o Go\\irind.a’iwah’      l-\n<\/p>\n
Aged abo~s.lt”5f::’.:..,years’,y  ”
\nR\/alt”N’o;~5gSi7,  “Cro’ss; _
\nIII ‘Block, Koiianjalnga’lav~—._ r
\nBan”g_a|o.re — .56\u00ab0″r’03\u00ab’l_,_t”‘*~ <\/p>\n
Anasuya. . –.\n<\/p>\n
W\/’o late ShIyas’han\u00a7<ar<\/p>\n
_ '5 b._0Ut 4105' y.e.al*s.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
-(D\/o~l,a’t.e Shlvashankar<\/p>\n
 Aged abo__uf 24 years.\n<\/p>\n
vamum”\n<\/p>\n
D\/o late Shlvashankar<\/p>\n
‘Aged about 22 years.\n<\/p>\n
:V “Glrish
\nF S\/o late Shivashankar<\/p>\n
Aged about 20 years.\n<\/p>\n
10. Nanda
\nD\/0 late Shivashankar
\nAged about 18 years.\n<\/p>\n
11.’.-Suresh
\nS\/0 Garudarangaiah
\nAged about 48 years.\n<\/p>\n
12. Chennaswamy
\nSince dead by his LRs<\/p>\n
12(a) Smt.Gayathri<\/p>\n
W\/o late ChennaiS’v.rl_am.’}.  :\u00ab <\/p>\n
Aged about 32 yea’rs~.- *<\/p>\n
12(b)Kum.Rad_hik_a .  .\n<\/p>\n
D\/0 late Ci*}e.:1na\u00a7;wan1y ‘<\/p>\n
Aged.4abvo__ut_1;1. yea.rs.–.._  C<\/p>\n
12(c):K’o’r\ufb01;’L\u00e9i:ha    l
\nD\/0-. Eate CE’:fe..n ‘rias’w_amy ‘
\nA’g.ed\u00ababo-u_t ‘2._ijV’yea–rs;’ <\/p>\n
Prop, Defen’da_nits.,:l;–2(b) “aha (c)
\nBeing minors re;3.resen,’ted by<\/p>\n
 V’  _ the.i._r\u00b0’Na-tural Guard”ia’n, Mother
\n,i’.e_.,,’ prop, Defendant No.12(a).<\/p>\n
ll” Ailare V’ d__i  at N 0.8<\/p>\n
San_jeeya.n”ayaika Lane
\nAvenu er. Road Cross<\/p>\n
Bangaiore – 560 oo2.\n<\/p>\n
 RESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
  ..u5These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and
\n  2227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the
\n.,,_records and set aside the order dated 11.2.2010 on<\/p>\n
I.A.No.8 to 10 in O.S.!\\io.299-4\/2001 on the file of the City
\nCivil Liudge, Bangalore vide Annexure — K.  <\/p>\n
These petitions coming on for preliminary’*–h’ear_ij’n~lg,__in<\/p>\n
‘8’ group this day, the Court made the following:  <\/p>\n
QRDER,mm,<\/p>\n
Chandrashekaraiah, the orlginai’.’_Aplaintlff_,’eAfifed,<\/p>\n
for partition and separate p’oss’e.ssion.”claiming h~i,s”‘s’l’ia’re in”<\/p>\n
the plaint schedule pro__perties,.a–ndev-fo’r.conseq’uen.ti:a| reliefs.
\nThe respondents are  said suit. The
\nplaintiff having\u00bb V’\/diecig”  ‘ll’-reipfelsentatives are
\nprosecuting      fi  statement, the
\ndefendVa_n_ts  One of the contentions
\nraisedi\ufb01in  is that, the plaintiff has
\nrelinquished’ his  the joint family during the<\/p>\n
yeaeer_;,e’1’9?.6. Iss-u_es having been framed, for the plaintiffs,<\/p>\n
,PW_s” .1  .hla–ve deposed and on behalf of the defendants,<\/p>\n
“‘1.1″5_dlefen’daraVt,’has deposed as DW–1. Certain documents<\/p>\n
relaltiingetoll katha change in the name of<\/p>\n
mcuhandrashekaraiah\/deceased plaintiff was sought to be<\/p>\n
 a._coVn’fi’onted, the execution of which, DW-1 denied. Legal<\/p>\n
if  -relpresentatives of the plaintiff filed I.As No. 8 to 10 i.e.,<\/p>\n
‘t<\/p>\n
_,.\u00bb”‘<\/p>\n
,5<\/p>\n
for re-opening of the case, recalling of PW-1 and for<\/p>\n
production of documents. Statement of objectiorisrwhere<\/p>\n
filed to the applications by the 11″‘ defendant;;’~w’hVichQrfras.<\/p>\n
adopted by other defendants. The triaiteerr.j:ri’.ndi’ngc,upJ’~<\/p>\n
applications to be devoid of merit <\/p>\n
Aggrieved, the legal representativ’e.s:”o.f the:.pE.ai’ritiff<\/p>\n
filed these writ petitions.\n<\/p>\n
2. Sri Y.R.VSad:asivag  -learned counsel
\nappearing for the petitiionersr co’nte_n’d.e_d the trial court
\nhas erred in dVisa1il’o’yvin4gi  in”‘I’};As No.8 to 10 and
\nthe imrp’u’gii1.-ecijgyord\u00e9r; inthe fact’s”a4nd circumstances of the<\/p>\n
case, is>_irfa_tion_ai ~and’iiil_:eig.ai._.<\/p>\n
 ‘i’h’-e,__V’respondents, though served, have<\/p>\n
” ”reVm’ai n  uinrep resented.\n<\/p>\n
 A  halve perused the writ petition papers.<\/p>\n
  .Vi.A No.8 was filed under Order 18 Ruie 17 read<\/p>\n
kl”‘:g,v\\iitiri-._Section 151 CPC to recall PW-1 and permit her to<\/p>\n
 deplose further with regard to the documents obtained<\/p>\n
L.\n<\/p>\n
\/I<\/p>\n
from the Bangalore Mahanagara Palike. I.A No.9 vvas filed<\/p>\n
under Section 151 CPC to re-open the case and per’n\ufb01_its:.the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs to lead further evidence with <\/p>\n
documents obtained from the..\u00bb8a.n4galore’_Wi~ia4ha’rivagaraV<\/p>\n
Palike. LA No.10 was filed under”\u00abOrtiAer”:7 <\/p>\n
to permit the legal repre’slen’tativeAs’ of  ‘p:l’a’i’n~ti’ff ton<\/p>\n
produce the documents liste_d.Wat_ ‘Seriai.’n’um.ber 1 to 5
\ntherein, which were”‘..V:A’0′.3t’r”)ir’\u00a7\u00e9?”  the Bangalore
\nMahanagara Palike   been stated in
\nthe affidavit. the documents
\n were not in the
\ncustody of thVel”leg.a:i’representatives of the plaintiff at the
\ntime of   the same were obtained<\/p>\n
from.;theA.Bang’alore’ Mahanagara Palike on 18.12.2009 and<\/p>\n
:the_i”‘documen’tsvare very much essential to prove the case.<\/p>\n
  _\u00e9.”V’31i?Vhe\u00e9 trial court has observed that, plaintiff has<\/p>\n
“._l’TOt stated; the purpose for which the documents are helpful<\/p>\n
A case and that, the documents being not in custody<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
\/f’.\n<\/p>\n
of the plaintiff at the relevant point of time is not a ground<\/p>\n
for allowing delayed production.<\/p>\n
7. The suit is one for partition and <\/p>\n
possession contending that, plaint..schedui’e”pro..perties\u00bb_areitit<\/p>\n
joint family properties, liable for <\/p>\n
sharers. The documents s:}oug_ht to be. proVdu:ced,. more-l<\/p>\n
particularly those at serial  to 3,..,sAho,i}vn in LA
\nNo.10, when examined–.in_,the ?!;i’gl’l4f”–vC)f::fll.g stand taken in
\nthe written statement,….pvrimaV”fa’ci_e to be having<\/p>\n
some relevance i5i:o’r._idec’isio-n in__thje. suit? The permission to<\/p>\n
produce %evi’ci\u00a7pce’\u00e9i;\u00a7\u20acfhou’l’dinot buelshvut at the threshold. The
\ntrial ofvvthe suit to an end. Hence, the prayer<\/p>\n
in I.As No.8. ,8: .9vf.ou’ght'”lVto have been allowed and the<\/p>\n
 of dowcurnents at serial number 1 to 3 shown in<\/p>\n
i\\l~o.’1\u00bb(:_):’lo\u00e9urgihtgto have been permitted. In not doing so,<\/p>\n
thereiis an’V’iira;tionai act on the part of trial court.<\/p>\n
\u00e93.,_.t’ The parties should not be prevented from<\/p>\n
it  rpi=o.duiCing the evidence, more particularly the documentary<\/p>\n
  _gves}idence, which may be helpful to the court for arriving at<\/p>\n
l<\/p>\n
\/\/*”\n<\/p>\n
_\/r<\/p>\n
a just decision in the matter after conclusion of the triai.<\/p>\n
The deiay has been expiained, in as muchveasiythe<\/p>\n
documents have been obtained from they\u00a73an._g:aIiqre.<\/p>\n
Mahanagara Palike on 18\/12\/2009, by which_yd_:a.te <\/p>\n
been discharged.\n<\/p>\n
In the said View of .thc-gmatterj the:’V:Wrjt….petE’tions-.t’<\/p>\n
stand aliowed in part. Impugneo .order”sta:ndssquashed.
\nCase of the plaintiffs  re_~opeun”e.d’.v.r’:”\u00ab_<\/p>\n
The legal” __repres\u00e9ritati_ye.s–__ \u00abthe plaintiff are
\npermitted to jprgo\u00e9liiilie”d:oc_u’mentsfand\u00bbPW~1 is permitted to
\ndeposf\u00e9vllfuyrtniaer,  die’p:ositio.’nV”being iimited merely for
\nmarkin:q.of\u00ab.the\u00ab th’ree_\u00bbld’o_c{;m’ents listed in serial number 1<\/p>\n
to 3_a_t I.Aa”i’~.’oV;10.’.’- A’iThe”:admissibility or otherwise of the<\/p>\n
 .,4._Sai5.:H03:-[.Jf\u00a7’i”.3.ntS  kept open for consideration.<\/p>\n
 by filing I.As No.8 to 10 have<\/p>\n
obst’ruct.ed’the final decision in the suit. The suit having<\/p>\n
,:been filed in the year 2001 for the relief of partition,<\/p>\n
 -_’l’\u00ab-””<\/p>\n
[4<\/p>\n
Sub-Ordinate Courts) Rules, 2005, is requiredd.-.to be<\/p>\n
decided expeditiously.\n<\/p>\n
PW-1 shall appear in the trial court “d\u00e9\u00a7te <\/p>\n
of hearing and her evidence shalbbe.,conjoie,ted’,e.ith4e’r on it<\/p>\n
the same day or on the adjourned  <\/p>\n
may deem fit. The trial o?l’._’t’h..e suit ,sna_llitlvl)e*:@:’o’mp:leted”‘V<\/p>\n
within three months from the_..date”a_,_cooy”‘of_th,i.s order is
\nsupplied and the suitvshsll..b’e,_’d’ecid”eda\u00e9tl any event, within
\na period of six months,fro’m:’tnVd’ays..,,  a ‘
\nOrd       :\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/’-\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 9*” DAY OF DECEMBER,g201Vo..’D_jj % BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.J\\={I VE::Is}Uj;{3f)_P}’\\LA.: w.P.No.5534\/D2010′(eiM\u00bbecPc)T.Te”–T.Eff’ ” W.P.NOS.6173–6174\/_2010(GM-CF’C BETWEEN: Chandrashekaraiah . Since dead by his vLRs.,”‘ * 1. Leeiavathi’—.. ~ jg . […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-160291","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nChandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-31T08:16:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-31T08:16:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1288,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-31T08:16:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-31T08:16:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-31T08:16:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010"},"wordCount":1288,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010","name":"Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-31T08:16:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekaraiah-dead-by-lrs-vs-garudarangaiah-on-9-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chandrashekaraiah Dead By Lrs vs Garudarangaiah on 9 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160291","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=160291"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160291\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=160291"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=160291"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=160291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}