{"id":161177,"date":"2011-10-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-10-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011"},"modified":"2016-07-28T04:03:42","modified_gmt":"2016-07-27T22:33:42","slug":"jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011","title":{"rendered":"Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                        1\n\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI\n   Contempt Case (Civil) No. 290 of 2011\n                   With\n          I.A. No. 2312 of 2011\n\nThe Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika\nUchcha Vidyalaya Shikshak\/Karmchari\nSangh &amp; Others                     ...     ...   Petitioners\n                     Versus\nThe State of Jharkhand &amp; Others    ...     ...   Respondents\n                     -------\nCORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE\n       HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE POONAM SRIVASTAV\n       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD\n               ------\nFor the Petitioners    : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate\nFor the Respondent     : Mr. Rajesh Shankar, S.C.-I.\n                      ------\nOrder No. 04                     Dated 13th October, 2011\n\n1.   Heard learned counsel for the parties.\n\n2.   The grievance of the writ petitioners is that the order\n\npassed by Full Bench of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4783 of\n\n1996 dated 07.12.1999, upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme\n\nCourt in Civil Appeal No. 6626-75\/2001 vide order dated\n\n03.01.2006<\/pre>\n<p>, has not been complied with by the State<\/p>\n<p>Government.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.   In the contempt petition it has been submitted that<\/p>\n<p>earlier also contempt petition was submitted and that has<\/p>\n<p>been withdrawn and, thereafter, this contempt petition has<\/p>\n<p>been submitted. This contempt petitioner has been placed<\/p>\n<p>before the Full Bench in view of the fact that earlier order,<\/p>\n<p>disobedience of which has been alleged, was passed by the<\/p>\n<p>Full Bench of this Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.   According to the learned counsel for the petitioners,<\/p>\n<p>the Alam Committee was constituted in pursuance of the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                           2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>directions   given   in   the   orders   referred   above   and<\/p>\n<p>thereafter, Chugh Committee was constituted vide order<\/p>\n<p>dated 20.06.2010. The Chugh Committee recommended in<\/p>\n<p>favour of the writ petitioners and that recommendation has<\/p>\n<p>not been rejected by the State Government and the State<\/p>\n<p>Government has thereby not implemented the direction<\/p>\n<p>given by the Full Bench of this Court, upheld by the<\/p>\n<p>Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.   Learned counsel for the State submitted that after<\/p>\n<p>considering both the reports, a decision was taken by the<\/p>\n<p>State Government on 09.02.2011, copy of which has been<\/p>\n<p>placed on record along with reply to the contempt petition<\/p>\n<p>as Annexure-A, and it is submitted that this decision was<\/p>\n<p>taken consciously by the State Government to implement<\/p>\n<p>the direction given by the Courts i.e., by the Full Bench of<\/p>\n<p>this Court and the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court, and that is<\/p>\n<p>clearly mentioned in Annexure-A.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.   The petitioners have filed a supplementary affidavit<\/p>\n<p>and annexed the copy of the opinion given by the Advocate<\/p>\n<p>General dated 20.08.2011 and recommendation of the Law<\/p>\n<p>Department of the Government dated 20.08.2011 (above<\/p>\n<p>two dates are not clear and legible in the annexures but we<\/p>\n<p>presume that these opinions were given subsequent to the<\/p>\n<p>Government decision dated 09.02.2011).<\/p>\n<p>7.   We have considered the submissions of the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the parties and we are of the considered<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                          3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>opinion that after the decision of the Court referred above,<\/p>\n<p>the Government has taken a decision on 09.02.2011. Before<\/p>\n<p>this decision, the reports of Alam Committee and Chugh<\/p>\n<p>Committee both were before the State Government. After<\/p>\n<p>Government&#8217;s decision, if any other opinion has been given<\/p>\n<p>by any of the officer of the Government or office of the<\/p>\n<p>Government, that will not render the decision of the State<\/p>\n<p>Government a non est or can be said to be a decision not<\/p>\n<p>attained finality.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.   Learned counsel for the petitioners frankly admitted<\/p>\n<p>that the validity of Annexure-A cannot be challenged in a<\/p>\n<p>contempt jurisdiction.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.   In view of the above reasons, if petitioners want to<\/p>\n<p>raise their grievance that in the decision dated 09.02.2011<\/p>\n<p>the Chugh&#8217;s committee report has not been taken into<\/p>\n<p>consideration or because of the subsequent opinion some<\/p>\n<p>other decision should have been taken, at the most, the<\/p>\n<p>writ petitioners could have approached the Court by way of<\/p>\n<p>filing a writ petition. It is also pertinent to mention here<\/p>\n<p>that so far as direction to follow any particuler committee&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>recommendation is concerned, that is not in any of the<\/p>\n<p>directions issued by the Court and, particularly, the<\/p>\n<p>grievance of the writ petitioners is that the Chugh&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>Committee recommendation has not been followed by the<\/p>\n<p>State Government, for that also,    learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners failed to show us that any direction was given in<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                       4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>              any of the above orders to follow the Chugh&#8217;s Committee<\/p>\n<p>              report, therefore, in limited jurisdiction under the contempt<\/p>\n<p>              proceedings, we are not in a position to address the issues.<\/p>\n<p>              10. We are of the considered opinion that no case is made<\/p>\n<p>              out for the contempt or disobedience of the orders passed<\/p>\n<p>              by this Court and the petitioners are free to avail any other<\/p>\n<p>              remedy, if it is available to them. This contempt petition is<\/p>\n<p>              dismissed and notices are discharged.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                              (Prakash Tatia, C.J.)<\/p>\n<p>                                              (Poonam Srivastav, J.)<\/p>\n<p>                                              (R.R.Prasad, J.)<\/p>\n<p>Birendra\/Sudhir\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 290 of 2011 With I.A. No. 2312 of 2011 The Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika Uchcha Vidyalaya Shikshak\/Karmchari Sangh &amp; Others &#8230; &#8230; Petitioners Versus The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-161177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-10-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-27T22:33:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-10-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-27T22:33:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011\"},\"wordCount\":658,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011\",\"name\":\"Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-10-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-27T22:33:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-10-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-27T22:33:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011","datePublished":"2011-10-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-27T22:33:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011"},"wordCount":658,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011","name":"Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-10-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-27T22:33:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jharkhand-rajya-project-balika-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-13-october-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jharkhand Rajya Project Balika vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 13 October, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=161177"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161177\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=161177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=161177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=161177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}