{"id":161456,"date":"2008-11-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-08-10T19:45:55","modified_gmt":"2018-08-10T14:15:55","slug":"the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>RFA No.1909 of 1991                    1\n\n In the Punjab and Haryana High Court,at Chandigarh.\n\n\n\n\n             RFA No. 1909 of 1991\n             Decided on November 04,2008.\n\n\n\n\nThe State of Punjab and another\n\n                                           --- Appellants\n             vs.\n\n\nHardev Singh and others\n                                           ---Respondent<\/pre>\n<p>Present:     Mr.N.S.Pawar, Addl.Advocate General, Punjab,<br \/>\n             for the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>             None for the respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>             This judgment shall dispose of R.F.A Nos. 1909,1910 and X-<\/p>\n<p>Obj No.43-CI of 1998,1911,1912 and X-Obj No.40-CI of 1998,1913,1914<\/p>\n<p>and X-Obj No. 32-CI of 1998,1915 and X-Obj No.34-CI of 1998,1916 and<\/p>\n<p>X-Obj No.41-CI of 1998,1917 and X-Obj No.36-CI of 1998,1918,1919 and<\/p>\n<p>X-Obj No.38-CI of 1998,1920,1921,1922 and X-Obj No.37-CI of<\/p>\n<p>1998,1923,1924,1925,1926 and X-Obj No.39-CI of 1998,1927 and X-Obj<\/p>\n<p>No.33-CI of 1998,1928 and X-Obj No.44-CI of 1998,1929,1930 and X- Obj<\/p>\n<p>No.35-CI of 1998 and 1931 all of 1991 as the common questions of law and<\/p>\n<p>facts are involved in all these appeals.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> RFA No.1909 of 1991                  2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            Land situated in the revenue estate of village Dadhi,Tehsil and<\/p>\n<p>District Ropar, measuring 24.82 acre was notified under Section 4 of the<\/p>\n<p>Land Acquisition Act,1894 (for short,&#8217;the Act&#8217;),dated 13.12.1984 followed<\/p>\n<p>by declaration under Section 6 of the Act issued on 24.12.1984, for public<\/p>\n<p>purpose namely, for the construction of SYL. Canal. The Land Acquisition<\/p>\n<p>Collector awarded compensation @ Rs. 27972\/- per acre for the acquired<\/p>\n<p>land which was gair-mumkin. Aggrieved with the inadequacy of<\/p>\n<p>compensation, the claimants\/landowners filed objections under Section 18<\/p>\n<p>of the Act, which were referred to the Civil Court where the claimants had<\/p>\n<p>prayed for higher compensation. On the other hand, the appellants herein<\/p>\n<p>defended the validity of the award of the Collector and alleged that<\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded is adequate, fair and reasonable and does not call for<\/p>\n<p>further enhancement.\n<\/p>\n<p>            The claimants examined PW-1 Pritam Singh, who tendered sale<\/p>\n<p>deeds Ex.P-1 to P-4 and a copy of the agreement mark A. On the other hand,<\/p>\n<p>the respondents\/appellants herein examined Joginder Singh, Kanungo as<\/p>\n<p>RW-1 and tendered sale deeds Exs. R-1,R-2 and Akash-Sajra Ex. R-3.<\/p>\n<p>            After appreciating the evidence brought on file, the learned<\/p>\n<p>District Judge, Ropar, vide his award dated 1.4.1991 reassessed the market<\/p>\n<p>value of the acquired land @ Rs. 50,000\/- per acre.\n<\/p>\n<p>            The State of Punjab has preferred the aforesaid appeals against<\/p>\n<p>the award of the learned District Judge, Ropar dated 1.4.1991.<\/p>\n<p>            Mr.N.S.Pawar, learned Addl. A.G. Punjab, appearing for the<\/p>\n<p>appellant-State has contended that the Court below has committed palpable<\/p>\n<p>error in enhancing the compensation at a higher rate of Rs.50,000\/- per acre<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> RFA No.1909 of 1991                                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>as compared to the prevailing market rate.\n<\/p>\n<pre>                 No     body      has     put     in    appearance         on    behalf      of     the\n\nrespondents\/claimants.\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>                 I have heard learned counsel for the appellants-State and have<\/p>\n<p>perused the record with his assistance.\n<\/p>\n<p>                 The claimants examined PW-1 Pritam Singh, who deposed that<\/p>\n<p>he is Lamberdar of village Dadhi. Village Hardo Nimoh is at a distance of<\/p>\n<p>4\/5 kilometers from his village. There is only Nangal Hydel canal in<\/p>\n<p>between his village and Ropar-Nangal Highway. He deposed that Kiratpur<\/p>\n<p>town is at a distance of about one kilometer from his village Dadhi. He<\/p>\n<p>further deposed that he is the witness to sale deeds Ex. P-1 to P-4. Village<\/p>\n<p>Dadhi falls in District Ropar and village Hardo Nimoh is also in District<\/p>\n<p>Ropar. The land situated in village Hardo Nimoh was also acquired for<\/p>\n<p>construction of SYL canal. He stated that villages Anantpur, Kotli, Pathreri,<\/p>\n<p>kajauli ,Ballan etc. fall in Ropar District and the department had awarded<\/p>\n<p>the compensation for the land acquired in these villages @ not less than<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,00,000\/- per acre. He also deposed that there was an agreement with<\/p>\n<p>the Chief Minister,Punjab and the claimants. Besides the oral evidence, the<\/p>\n<p>claimants have tendered sale deeds Exs. P-1 to P-4 which are tabulated<\/p>\n<p>below:-\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8212; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8212;<br \/>\nEx. Village Area                  Date of sale Consideration Average price<br \/>\nP-1 Dodhi 10marlas 11.9.1985 Rs.5000\/- Rs.80,000\/-per acre<br \/>\nP-2 Hardo 4marlas                 20.1.986         Rs.10000\/- Rs.4,00,000\/-per acre<br \/>\n     Nimoh<br \/>\nP-3 do-         4marlas           22.11.1985 Rs.11500\/- Rs.4,60,000\/- per acre<br \/>\nP-4 do-         6marlas           14.5.1986 Rs.16800\/- Rs.4,48,000\/- per acre\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8212; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8212; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>                 The learned Civil Court had observed that the aforesaid sale<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> RFA No.1909 of 1991                    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>deeds cannot be taken into consideration because the sale has taken place<\/p>\n<p>after issuance of notification under Section 4 and declaration under Section<\/p>\n<p>6 of the Act. However, acquisition is of 13.12.1984, whereas Ex P-1 is the<\/p>\n<p>sale deed dated 11.9.1985 of village Dadhi, by which the land has been sold<\/p>\n<p>for Rs.80,000\/- per acre which shows upward trend. Even Exs.P-2 to P-4<\/p>\n<p>which are sale deeds of village Hardo Nimoh, adjacent to village Dadhi,<\/p>\n<p>wherein also rising trend is shown because the land has been sold towards<\/p>\n<p>the close of the year 1985 and beginning of the year 1986 for over more<\/p>\n<p>than Rs. 4,00,000\/- per acre.    Therefore, in these circumstances, the Court<\/p>\n<p>had found that since the land in question of village Dadhi is on the Ropar<\/p>\n<p>Nangal road and is near Kiratpur town. Therefore, the amount of Rs.50000\/-<\/p>\n<p>per acre has been awarded over and above the compensation of Rs. 27972\/-<\/p>\n<p>per acre assessed by the Collector, which in my view, is just and adequate in<\/p>\n<p>the facts and circumstances of the present case.\n<\/p>\n<p>              So far as the sale instances Exs. R-1 and R-2 are concerned, the<\/p>\n<p>same cannot be taken into consideration simply for the reason that average<\/p>\n<p>price per acre in respect of sale instance Ex.R-1 comes to Rs. 6400\/- per<\/p>\n<p>acre and the average price in respect of sale instance Ex.R-2 comes to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.3600\/- per acre, which is much less than the award of the Collector<\/p>\n<p>assessed @ Rs.27972\/- per acre.\n<\/p>\n<p>              No one chose to appear for land-owners to argue the cross<\/p>\n<p>objections.\n<\/p>\n<p>              In view of the totality of facts and circumstances, I do not find<\/p>\n<p>any substances in the arguments raised by learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>appellants-State that the compensation of Rs.50,000\/- per acre is on higher<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> RFA No.1909 of 1991                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>side. Therefore, the present appeals being meritless as well as the cross<\/p>\n<p>objections which are devoid of any merit, are hereby dismissed without any<\/p>\n<p>order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>November 04,2008                                         (Rakesh Kumar\nJain)RR                                                          Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008 RFA No.1909 of 1991 1 In the Punjab and Haryana High Court,at Chandigarh. RFA No. 1909 of 1991 Decided on November 04,2008. The State of Punjab and another &#8212; Appellants vs. Hardev Singh and others &#8212;Respondent Present: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-161456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-10T14:15:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-10T14:15:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1083,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008\",\"name\":\"The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-10T14:15:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-10T14:15:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-10T14:15:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008"},"wordCount":1083,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008","name":"The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-10T14:15:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-punjab-and-another-vs-hardev-singh-and-others-on-4-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The State Of Punjab And Another vs Hardev Singh And Others on 4 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=161456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161456\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=161456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=161456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=161456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}