{"id":16153,"date":"2008-10-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008"},"modified":"2018-09-16T04:32:54","modified_gmt":"2018-09-15T23:02:54","slug":"dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANG\u00a7sII,CII\u00a7E'fIf'*   I-\n\nDATED THIS THE 31\" DAY OF cI\u00a2::PQBEI_&lt;;     \nBEFORE   V&#039;  \nTHE I\u00abIoN&#039;BLI;\u00ab: MR. JIJs&#039;r1cE;&#039;kI&amp;;IIoK&quot;I3  \nCRIMINAL PETITION Nq,_45?&#039;f--..QF   \n\nBETWEEN: &#039; u &#039;  &#039;\nDR SHIVANAND BEKAL  ,\n\n3\/0 LATE SR1 SHANTHA NAIK - \nAGED 57 YEARS,   : ~=\n\nBIRECTORC1F&#039;iaI&#039;RjIj_V._f. *    \nGULBARGA; _:-   &#039;\n\n PETIIIQNER\n\n{By  KI9i!I2*i}i\u00a7I\u00a7ATI+I.\ufb011A-I}VO(3A&#039;I&#039;E}\n\nAND :\n\nTHE CENTRAL BUREAIJ &#039;IWINVESTIGATIQN\n BY 1&#039;13 DI&#039;..sLIPEI2I.:srrEN1;f:ENT oz? POLICE,\n&#039; &#039;    . . . . . ..&#039;\n \n BANGA&#039;LORE.&#039;\u00bb AV &#039; \n       RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>&#8221; (By-Sn&#8217;. : _EEA\\?I.}$F{ANKAI? FOR<br \/>\nI M\/S A\u00a73IIQII&#8217; HARANAf.~I\u00a3\u00a7LL{ Ass*rs., ADVOCATE)<\/p>\n<p>4.  &#8221; &#8221; vI,x&#8217;\u00a5&#8217;\u00a7!iS CRLIP IS FILED U\/8.482 CR.P.\u20ac3, BY THE ADVOCATE FOR<br \/>\n3 \u00a5._&#8217;F\u00a5:I&#8217;E&#8217;*.PETIT1&#8243;ONEIQ PRAYING THAT TESS HONBLE COHRT MAY BE<br \/>\n F&#8217;\u00a7.EASED&#8221;&#8216; TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER D&#8217;1&#8242;.04.09.&#8217;.2OO7<br \/>\n. .V:PASSED\u00a7 3&#8242;!&#8217; THE XX} ADDL, CITY CIVIL AND SE-SSiONS JUDGE AND<\/p>\n<p> S?i}}CIAL JUDGE FQR CB\u00a3 CASES, BANGALORE ON HIS FILE IN<\/p>\n<p>._*-._SPL,C.C.NO.60\/07 AND 8:: PLEASED TO ALLOW THE APPLICATION<br \/>\n FR-E:f) BY THE PETITIONER U\/8.243 (3) OF c1a&gt;.:&gt;.c. IN THE AFORESAIB<br \/>\n &#8216;I&gt;I&#8221;~2I3C:EE:DINGs, SPL.C.C.NO.60\/9&#8242;? PENDING ON THE FILE OF&#8217; THE XXI<br \/>\n&#8216;2\\DDL.CI&#8217;I&#8217;Y CIVIL ARI} 3313310913 JUDGE AND THE spasm. JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>FCIR CBi CASES, BANGALORE.\n<\/p>\n<p>THIS CRLP. CEGMING cm FOR ADMISSION fr\u00a71ifs.. DAf_&amp;&#8217;~,<\/p>\n<p>comm&#8217; MADE THE FOLLOWING:\n<\/p>\n<p>Qi<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner has  iazgto &#8220;q11\u00a7:$s?ion :&#8217; &#8216;w3:ge.\/Hotdci; <\/p>\n<p>dt,04.09.2(}O7 passed by the XXI Adc:il. :(3i}t:3_z  mg: and Special<br \/>\nJudge for OBI Cases at  $0.60] 200&#8242;? (\u00abOBI<br \/>\nJudge&#8217; for short).     &#8216;V i . &#8216;V  V<\/p>\n<p>2. The petitioxig-:  a\u00a7:,1.A  311 r\/W 243(3) of<\/p>\n<p>Cr.P.C.&#8217;. for %3oia::{d 32. T&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Sri Magzxjs-anath_,    counsel appearing for the<br \/>\npc\ufb01tianer s11b1:;;1it\u00a7\ufb021 at ~fhe  was not aware of certain\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.-enquiry  in respczct of other delinquent<\/p>\n<p>em1i1&#8217;oy\u00e9t;s.&#8217;V&#8217; &#8212;  to knew of the said proceedings, the<\/p>\n<p>  fof  said Pws was \ufb01led. He: further submits that<\/p>\n<p>  itnpossible far the petitioner to produce omi\ufb01ed<\/p>\n<p>tiig\u00e9 papers in the enquiry proceedings, as the cloetmmcnts<\/p>\n<p>V&#8221;  they izxdcaed mm into volumes. He stihmits that certain<\/p>\n<p>4&#8243;v.i1;;4f;tg_3v1&#8217;ta11t questizans were left out while cmss~exami:n:ing the said<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01\ufb01imcsses. If an opportunity is denied to the petitioner ta get the<\/p>\n<p>\u00a3824..\n<\/p>\n<p>said witnesses meailed and c:mss&#8211;cxami31ed further, tiz\u00e9xt  V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>to denial of masonablc oppommities. mgasu. s1\u00a7bn3it:$:&#8221;i.hz{tVi}ot_\u00a71&#8242;.<\/p>\n<p>tha I.As an-2: made for recalling 3 wit11csse\u00a7;.__ xis  ~.<\/p>\n<p>LA in respect of pw-32 and he su\u00a7ms\u00a7;~~ ._g11at i1c: wcmlfd  his &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>application only to recall PWS    &#8220;~<\/p>\n<p>4. S11 Ravishankar, the   mspondcnt<br \/>\nsubmits that the dgpaitiziacnt\u00e9\u00e9yl  in ncspcct of<br \/>\nother delinquents \\isT:\u00a7&gt;tj3V. the o\ufb01encc or charge<br \/>\nlevelled agai:;%s\u00a3{heT%;;\u00a7\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7ner.&#8221;_&#8217;%\ufb01\u00a2 submits that despite the<br \/>\ntime frame bding  Cotlrt, the case is not gcatting<br \/>\ndisposed caf, as  p\u00e9ii\ufb01Gnc$1&gt;_  on maldng one after the other<br \/>\n  submiAf\u00e9i31~atVit is only with the motive to protmct<br \/>\nthe.Vp:b\u20ac\u00a7it\u00a7Liig1gsL.   jL <\/p>\n<p>5; &#8216;T\ufb01c s11b:\u00a7\u00a7.$\u00a7ions of the learned counsel have received my<\/p>\n<p> consigi\u00e9ration. The C.ri111i11a1 case is of the year 1997. The<\/p>\n<p>cannot be protracted endlessly. Some material dates<\/p>\n<p>V&#8221;  pmsecution closczi its side of evidence an 13,0&#8217;?,2(}O6.<\/p>\n<p> was examizmcd on 03.10.2006. The pc\ufb01tioncfs side<\/p>\n<p>  3 adjoumzmcnts to address the arguments. At last on<\/p>\n<p>19.06.2007. thc angtlments on behalf of the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>Qgi\ufb01\ufb01.\n<\/p>\n<p>advanced in part, The case was posted for further <\/p>\n<p>26.06.2007. Again an adjournment was seught   vV.r\u00e9;s\u00bb:  <\/p>\n<p>adjourned to 30.G6.20()&#8217;7.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Conside\ufb01ng the age and the pmg19es_e&#8217;ef the &#8216;1&#8217;:he&#8217;;C&#8217;BIV  *&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Judge is of the con\ufb01rmed View that  stage&#8221; oif&#8217; afguieents,<br \/>\nthe ease cannot be reopened-    V&#8217;   Vv\n<\/p>\n<p>7. I have also gone   apf\ufb01lieefion, which the<\/p>\n<p>peiitjener has \ufb01led   1&#8217;1  f24C%(3) of the Cr.P,C,<\/p>\n<p>Even if all    are taken on their face<br \/>\nvalue, then   made out for zecallitlg the<br \/>\nwitnesses,  &#8216;of&#8221;t11e.  has two parts. While. the first<br \/>\n his    part is mandatozy. When the CB!<\/p>\n<p>Juci&#8217;ge&#8217;__i&#8217;S_ef&#8217; View that it is not essential to recall the<\/p>\n<p> ;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;-e&#8217;j,1:t1.\u20acSSeE;L&#8217;.i:V!1 q13.esii{;1i, it is only the tint part, which is attiracteztt<\/p>\n<p>..  beea1&#8242;:se&#8217;:.in cross&#8212;exa:mi11a.tion the emmsel for the accused<\/p>\n<p>   questions, which ought tea have been put) is not 3<\/p>\n<p>V&#8221; V-V:gn;ii1i;d for recalling the wimesses far further cross-examination:<\/p>\n<p>4&#8242; &#8216;v.T}:;e.V.peti\ufb01oner has not produced the copies of any documents 511<\/p>\n<p> {he departmental enquiry, The application under Sex::t&#8217;ion 31 1 dares<\/p>\n<p>net even disclose when he was made aware of the departxnental<\/p>\n<p>\u00a3334.\n<\/p>\n<p>enquiry procaedixzgs in respect of other dclinquentg, V.<\/p>\n<p>docllments were bulky or vcpittminotas, the I1E3l\u20acVaI1&#8217;f.__dDCi1$\u20ac11iSf V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>alone ceuld have been produced.\n<\/p>\n<p>8. View from any anglc, I d&gt;Q_nc3t &#8216;\ufb01;1::i&#8211;..aI1y  &#8220;f\u00e9r;<\/p>\n<p>iglt\ufb01rfcrcncc in the mattcer, Th:-. imfial\u00e9iurd c:;r\u00a3i*e_1&#8217;; &#8216;dofegzs  L1,\u00abD&#8217;Vf;%VVVsu1?fe:r<\/p>\n<p>fmm any perversity; m\ufb01xmityv :31: cu1V&#8217;i:a1}:1iss&#8217;  pk&#8217;-tit1&#8217;on.<\/p>\n<p>bvz&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANG\u00a7sII,CII\u00a7E&#8217;fIf&#8217;* I- DATED THIS THE 31&#8243; DAY OF cI\u00a2::PQBEI_&lt;; BEFORE V&#039; THE I\u00abIoN&#039;BLI;\u00ab: MR. JIJs&#039;r1cE;&#039;kI&amp;;IIoK&quot;I3 CRIMINAL PETITION Nq,_45?&#039;f&#8211;..QF BETWEEN: &#039; u &#039; &#039; DR SHIVANAND BEKAL , 3\/0 LATE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-15T23:02:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-15T23:02:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":801,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-15T23:02:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-15T23:02:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-15T23:02:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008"},"wordCount":801,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008","name":"Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-15T23:02:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shivanand-bekal-vs-the-central-bureau-of-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr Shivanand Bekal vs The Central Bureau Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16153\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}