{"id":161966,"date":"2009-03-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009"},"modified":"2019-02-12T02:40:57","modified_gmt":"2019-02-11T21:10:57","slug":"state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar And A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
IN 3&3 HIGH CQURT OF xaemeeaaa AT BAweALGR5_\naaeas EHIS THE 2am 333 6? MARCH 2eG\u00a7e,3\nPRESENT:\n$52 HON'\ufb01LE ea. JUSTECE N. Renae ,:% \nANS _ ._ . K\n\nTHE RGN'BLE MR. JUSTE\u00a3E A\u00a75,eeAcHEAy\u00a7RE: '\n\n\u00a2..._.:\"'\n\nN7' \n\nHr\n\nWRIT A??EAL No.382\u00e9\"QF 200\n\nBETWEEN: - .~w.f=\n\n1. State Benk3Qf;Myse:e,e _ x '\"\na bo\u00e9y ce\ufb01s\ufb01iiuted under thej _\nFrovisiona ef the State Beak ef Indie\n{Subsidiary Banks}\u00abAe:; 1959;\nHead 0ffi\u00a2e3,Banga;\u00a7xe-369 009,\nRep. hynizs Maheginge\ufb01irecter.\n\n2. State Benk*Qf\"My3Qre'.\nEmpleyee\u00e9\ufb01 Previdegt Fund;\nState Bank C\u00a7_Myscre Eeilding,\nxv K;G: Read, Ba\ufb01qaee:e--36Q O09,\n  Re\u00e9. gy its Trustees. ... A?PELLANTfS\n\n:uvefB\u00a7A\u00a7fi;vS:V;\u00a7arasimhan, \ufb01dv.E\n\nz'* AND3\n\nze*gK;S.Vas\ufb01\u00a7eva Tatachar,\n__\" Qged about 62 years,\n4_$\/9. K;S.Srinivaea ?etacher,\n\nEatlief werkieg as Office:\n\n'*_\"In Middle Management Grade Seelemll,\nu State Bank of Mysore,\n'a \"PPS Section, Head Gffice,\n\" \" \"8ang&l<3pre-\u00abS60 009. . . . R}?.3?OE'\u00a7DEi'*5T\/S\n\n{By Sri. P.S.Rejagapal, Senier Edvecate.} M\/\/,w\n\n\n\n2 WA N0.3826\/G2\n\nThia Writ Appaai is filed u!Sec.4 0fz_th@\nKarnataka High caurt Act, praying to set a3;d\u00a7"the\nOrder passed in W.P. NQ.6435f23QQ dated 13.G3,2Q@2;,\n\nThis Writ Appeal Gaming on for ,\u00a7re1imin:fy"'\nHearing, this day Kumar J., deliverwd the fQl$\u00a2w;ngr._\n\nJ{3DGME\u00a7\u00a5?Z' T A 'i'\n\nThe appellants have \u00a7xefe:red"tbis w;itWap\u00a7\u00e9al,t\n\nchaliengiag the orde: passed_\ufb01y"the l\u00e9arned single\n\nJudge; setting aside \u00a7n\ufb01ex\u00e9r\u00e995C"$hd*E" to the writ\n\npatitien, undtrt@hich t\ufb01e\u00a5a\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9;;a\ufb01t\u00e9ttava saught to\nrecmver thg\u00bb$r\u00a7\u00a7%\u00a7i\u00a2\u00a7\u00a7y"\u00a7@nSi\u00a2\ufb01Ht\u00e9td and also the\nameunt gag 't\u00a7t;t\u00a7\u00a7!bba%iA't%\u00a7m} the provi\ufb01ent fund\ncontrib\ufb02?iQh\u00a3\ufb02t*\n\n2. At,$\ufb01e 'r\u00e9S\ufb01\u00a2n\u00a7@%t  was warking in the 1st\n\nappellantwbadk, '*5 He retired. fremt service on\n\nC 3G,O6:1\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7.'x How\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9r, pxiar to his zetirament,\n\ndistipi\u00e9\ufb01arytgr\ufb01ceedings were initiated.against him\n\nand twas _ke\u00a7t' un\u00e9ez saspension pending enquiry.\n\n n_4?bough h\u00e9jzetired on 3G.G6.l999, for the gurpose of\n\n*\u00abAc\u00a2nti\ufb01\u00a7in\u00a7 disciplinary preceedings, E3 was deemed\n\n=\u00a30'Q@ continued in service. He was paid provisienai\n\nKp\u00e9hsion after rat\u00e9xement ti?l he was \u00a7ismi3sed fram\n\nservic\u00e9 after the enquiry. Itt is not in dispute\n\nthat the raspondent had borrcwed housing loan frem\n\n\n\n'&@covef ghe \u00e9ues ta {ha bank an account of housing\n\n$QanS}=_a\u00e9Va\ufb01ceS, license fee and other recoveries\n\nAqas\u00e9gg\ufb01he previsionai gansian, which is a gart sf\n,\ufb01h\u00e9i p\u00e9nsiea fgomi which alas the amaunts can be\n~if\u00e9c0ve\u00a7ed. Inscfar 33 the recovgry of the provident\n\nwfun\u00e9 is cencerned, he submits that the respon\u00e9ent\n\n4 WA NO.3826f\ufb012\n\nbaak to initiate approgriate proceedings is reqgver\ntha iaans, which are due ta the bank in acc\u00e9f\ufb01a\ufb01cg\nwith iaw and thus he set aside Annexuxesfi\ufb01r\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01i\nand a direction was issued. {Q mt\ufb01a ;a\u00a7\u00a7eii\ufb01\ufb01iSiit\u00a7' \npravide t\ufb01e entire pxevisianai:pen5i$mia#\ufb01iaig\u00a7,:h@{\npravident fund in terms<i0\u00a7 \ufb01\ufb01@i'Saidri9f\u00a7\u00a7;E'in_i\nadditien ta Cash equivalent %\u00e9%a;&s2\u00a7riviie\u00a7e leave\nif avaiiable to the r%$\u00a7ond\u00a7n\u00a7i&\u00e9\u00a7%in5 Ag@iieved by\nthe same, the bank has g\ufb01@\ufb01eg\ufb014\ufb01'Ehi\u00a7igiit apgeal.\n\u00e9. \ufb01ri, 2\ufb02$fV$N\u00a7r\u00a7\u00e9i\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7$;uiwlearned counsel\n\nappearing f$:Vi#\u00a7ha\u00a7\u00a7g\u00a7\ufb013\ufb01\u00a7$;C\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3ends under Section\n\u00a7\u00a7 cf t\ufb01e $fat\u00a7i\u00a7%@%-\ufb01f{\u00a53SQi% Employees' {?ension)\n\nReguiatisns " i995iiVEh@;\u00e9j\ufb01after referredi ta as\n\n"Reguiatians"xfsr_*sh0r\ufb01}, the bank is emtitiad. to\nfron\u00bb {he c\ufb01mm\ufb02tatien vaiae mf tha pensiea or the\n\npemsionz\u00e9: the famiiy pen\ufb01ion. Wha\ufb01 that being the\n\nhas given in writing that tha bank csuid recaver any\n\n\n\n5 WA No.3826fO2\n\namount due from him to the bank from the aforesaid\n\npxovi\u00e9ent fund contribution and eherefore, he oeeoot\n\nhave any grievance. ?he learned single Jedge has  j\n\ncommitted. serious error in ignopgng the"=eEofesaid_'\n\nstatutory provisions as well as the pnoertaking oi j\n\nthe respondent and therefore1_ the, EearneoA.oo\ufb01neeio<\/pre>\n
submits that the impugoed Gide: _is ‘3\ufb01\u00e9ole eto be<\/p>\n
quashed.\n<\/p>\n
5. Per contra, the learned Co\ufb01heel apgearing<\/p>\n
for the respondent %Q??@t\u00a3eo the ieo\ufb01oned order.<\/p>\n
6. oTHewfecEeEareeeot in oispute. The short<\/p>\n
question that arises fo\ufb01 on: consideration is;<\/p>\n
e\u00bb WheEeer*othe-\u00aboank can make any<\/p>\n
A \ufb01eooyeries ffom the provisional pension
\nV\u00bb  ano_’wheehe; from the provident fund
\nA*.’oo\ufb01teih\ufb01E\u00a7oe’of the empioyee, the loans
\n @oe f;5\u00a7e\u00a3he employee could be adjusted<\/p>\n
to the loans due to the empioyerebank?<\/p>\n
V”7g: Regulaiions 69 deals with the recovery of<\/p>\n
 benk’s dues is as under:\n<\/p>\n
“\ufb01ecoverg gg Baek’s dues: The Bank
\nsheik be entitled to recover the dues to the<\/p>\n
Bank on aooount of housing ioane, advances,<\/p>\n
6 NR No.3826fG2<\/span><\/p>\n
licenge fees, Qthex recaverias and
\nr\u00e9coveries dua ta staff cowepezative czedgt
\nseeiety from the commutatio\u00a7T vaiue 0\ufb01u t\ufb01&_
\nge\u00a7si0m 0: the pension 35 th@ .wf\u00a7mil\u00a7 r<\/p>\n
pansign.”\n<\/p>\n
Hmwever, Regulations 46 deais with \u00e9rdvisicna; V<\/p>\n
p@nsion, which rea\u00e9s as under:\n<\/p>\n
“Pzcvisiemal Pensiqg. W C1}An_ empl\u00e9yee<\/p>\n
whu has r@tir@d_ on attaining the_ age of<\/p>\n
superannua\ufb01\ufb02ah 0% Q\ufb01herwi$@gah\u00a7’\u00e9gainst whom
\nany depa%tm%\u00a7tal QfZju\u00e9;\u00e9ial proceeding are
\ninstit\ufb01ted \u00a7r Qhei\u00e9 d\u00e9\u00a7\u00e9rEm\u00e9ntal proceedings
\nar\u00a7 \u00e9bntihu\u00e9&[‘\ufb01f\ufb01rcvi\u00e9i\u00e9hai pension, aqual
\nto {h\u00e9 ma2i\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 \u00a7%\u00a7\u00a7i\u00aen which wcaid have been<\/p>\n
admissible to him} would be allowed subject<\/p>\n
tQ_ adfaatma\ufb01t T \ufb01\u00e9ainst final retirament
\n_b%n@fi\ufb01s s\u00e9nc\ufb01imned to him, upcn conclusian
\nA<_\u00a7f {\ufb01e yrgceedings but no recevery shall be
\n$ \ufb01ad\u00a7\u00a5yh@r@ the pension finally sanctioned :5
\n'U l\u00e9ss"\u00a3ha\ufb02 the pxovisianal Qension or the
\n\ufb01\u00e9nxib\ufb01 is reducad or h\ufb02thheid etc. either<\/p>\n
pe%m&hentiy 3: far a specified period.<\/p>\n
{2} In suc\ufb01 cases the gratuity' shall
\nset be paid ts such. an empioyaa umtii the
\nconclusion of the preceedings against him.
\nThe gratuity shall be paid :9 him an
\nconclusion of the proceedings subject ta the<\/p>\n
decigisn of t\u00a7e yrocaeding. Any racoveries<\/p>\n
"gtovieieeel._penSion;"where the pension is finally<\/p>\n
V$anctioned*ie less than the provisional pension or<\/p>\n
xt'the'*:esoondent is not entitled for provisional
\n_\u00a7e\ufb01eio\ufb01 after the departme\ufb01tei enquiry. Because of
\nu an Order of dismissal, the provisional pension paid<\/p>\n
i"oeenot be recovered. No recovery could be made from<\/p>\n
7 WE No.3826\/S2<\/span><\/p>\n
to be made from an employee shall be
\nadjusted against the amount of gratuity<\/p>\n
payable.” ‘ ‘ V A<\/p>\n
8. Reguiatioes 46 eeecificaiiy’ deaieiiwiteloe\ufb01
\ncase of an employee who hae retited on~etteieiogxtee*a
\nage of superannuation andf\ufb02 ag5in\u00e9t\u00bb”iw\ufb01\u00a2m\u00bb4i\u00e9g\u00a7
\ndepartmentai oz judicial pzoceeoieee are igiii\ufb01p\ufb01edio
\nor continued, in which eve\ufb01te hie sertioe ie oeemed<\/p>\n
to have been contineed for et;e”*purpoSe’Aof said<\/p>\n
investigation; fherefofe} the respondent continues
\nto work as _eetlief,’i”f\ufb02eE”\u00a7es} hot been paid any
\nsaia\u00a7y.{ He has been paid the provisional pension.<\/p>\n
Therefore; the’ eferesaia \u00abprovision makes it clear<\/p>\n
that non reo4\u20ac;v:e\u00a2’il3!_’;sha_li”‘”be made from the aforesaid<\/p>\n
the’ peesioef ii reduced or withheid etc., either<\/p>\n
permaeeptiy or for a specified geriod. Therefore,<\/p>\n
the said provisional pension. It is in that<\/p>\n
context, the learned single Judge has rightly held<\/p>\n
K\/_<\/p>\n
8 NA Ne.3826\/G2<\/p>\n
it is gm the nature of a subsistence allowance, We<\/p>\n
zould say it was eaid in lieu 05 Salary andxea he<\/p>\n
had already reached superannuation and h1\u00a7_Ser\u00a7iee$l.<\/p>\n
waa centinued enly fer the purpose _of’u\u00a7on&eeting *<\/p>\n
enquiry, he was paid a provisiOQal,pehs3e\ufb01,’whie\ufb01 la<\/p>\n
in lieu of the work he wee perfe:ming.W Lt is}noL_l<\/p>\n
the amount paid t0 the emeleyeeuafteeee\ufb01lrement.
\nin that View of the ee%:e\u00aee%%@e;\u00a7%@he ll\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3 of the
\nexpress provision coeealeed fin, {\ufb01g greguiatiens,
\nRegulations 49’ll$’ net ,g\u00a7p2:\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7i\u00e9,f” The case is
\ncovered undef \u00a7e\u00a7uia\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7”4\u00a7;’l us such recevery is<\/p>\n
permissiblem:\ufb01;l3Q;-‘iherefore, the learned aingle<\/p>\n
Judge rightly’eei\ufb01eei\u00a7e=\u00a7\ufb01neXure–“C” as illegal.<\/p>\n
9,., :a\u00a7c\u00a7;:-3 as llad\ufb01usting the employee’s<\/p>\n
‘prQvi\ufb01en;;fund Cdntfibution is concerned, all that<\/p>\n
\u00a7he*TemplQyeee states in his letter is that he<\/p>\n
underiakee \ufb01e make good, if the liabilities exceed<\/p>\n
‘tee terml\ufb01al benefits. But, he wanted the terminal<\/p>\n
ll eenefips Nincledieg the provident fund contributien<\/p>\n
.\ufb01O be Settled. it dees eat mean that the employee<\/p>\n
‘e\ufb01\u00e9sleuthorised the empleyex to adjust the prevident<\/p>\n
ufund contribu\u00e9ion towards the emeeet, whieh is<\/p>\n
legally’ receverable. However, the leained single<\/p>\n
9 WA \u00a7o.3826fG2<\/p>\n
3udge hag resazved tha lib\u00e9rty is tha bank to
\nracsver tha amount due from the employee in a magnet
\nknow\ufb01 ts law. ?herefore, that \u00a7art of .\u00a7h\u00a7 V\ufb02:$e;
\naiso do not call for intazferenca. Hence{ we \u00a7\ufb01 n\u00a7\u00a7
\nfind any merit in this app@a1& \u00a7\ufb013 \u00a7a$\u00a7 t\u00a7e<\/p>\n
following:\n<\/p>\n
GRDER<\/p>\n
The writ appeal i$”di$mis$e&};V<\/p>\n
Z.A. Nos}; Cg\ufb01d ‘2. bf 2U\ufb013 ara ordered. to be<\/p>\n
Sd\/..\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
Sd\/-o
\nJudge<\/p>\n
‘5~ Ksm*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009 Author: N.Kumar And A.S.Pachhapure IN 3&3 HIGH CQURT OF xaemeeaaa AT BAweALGR5_ aaeas EHIS THE 2am 333 6? MARCH 2eG\u00a7e,3 PRESENT: $52 HON’\ufb01LE ea. JUSTECE N. Renae ,:% ANS _ ._ . K THE RGN’BLE MR. JUSTE\u00a3E A\u00a75,eeAcHEAy\u00a7RE: ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-161966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-11T21:10:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-11T21:10:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":866,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009\",\"name\":\"State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-11T21:10:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-11T21:10:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-11T21:10:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009"},"wordCount":866,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009","name":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-11T21:10:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-bank-of-mysore-vs-k-s-vasudeva-tatachar-on-26-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Bank Of Mysore vs K S Vasudeva Tatachar on 26 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=161966"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161966\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=161966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=161966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=161966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}