{"id":162176,"date":"2010-02-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010"},"modified":"2017-04-27T01:28:05","modified_gmt":"2017-04-26T19:58:05","slug":"the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"The Oriental Insurance Company &#8230; vs Balaiah S\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Oriental Insurance Company &#8230; vs Balaiah S\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY..:2\u00abC)f1{)\"'--VVA'\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K N  ~ A \n\nM.F.A. No. 34'?0}()F_\"2\u00a3\ufb01iO6\"'~.  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nTHE ORIENTAL INSIJ'1'\u20aca\u00a3\u00a7NC_E.\"COl\\Z;P}'XNY LT15\" \nGANATRA CHAMBERS No.57 ;  *\n\nSADASHIVAPET, LAKSHMI RO\u00a3\ufb02),_-~\u00abPU1\\;iE_ \nREP BY ITS AI\")MINIST}\"*\nREGEONAL QF*FIC'EE, i3ANGALORE* V. \n\n   ~ ~    ..APPELLANT\n\n[BY  \n\nAND \n\n BAI4AlA1'~LS\/OVI{ALLANNA\n=  AGED ABOUT51 YEARS\nV. , % R,\/.O.4VH~O_ROGERE,\n\" -- _H1jLII{U'mE HOBLI,\n~ SIR_A_'FALUK.\n\n.,_ W\/O. BALAIAH\n AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS\nR\/O HOROGERE.\nHULIKUNTI33 HOBL1,\nSIRA TALUK n\n\n\n\n3 MANAGING DIRECTOR,\nKESAR ROAD LINES LTD (P) LTD\nCHADHA HOUSE, DESHPANDE NAGAR _\nHUBLI, KARNATAKA \n\n     '\n\n[BY SRI. S K VENKATAREDDY, ADV...' AEci4Ii\"E1f't  I\"  it\n\nTHIS M.F.A FILED U\/S 175(1)  \n\nTHE JUDGMENT AND AwARD*._D;'xTED\u00bb'*-oiyg1252004\"T.\nPASSED IN MVC NO.755\/1.998 ON  FILE 'OF THE'\n\nADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.)=.&amp;ADDL;-,MACT, TUMKUR,\nAWARDING COMPENSATION ..OF\"\u00bbRs.2,25,-000\/-- LESS\nINTERIM COMPENSATION   PAID WITH\nINTEREST @ 6% RA. FT&lt;GT~.rI&quot;TIe<i>De_!1ant--Insurance Company to pay the award amount\n\nit  WaiTd to recover the same from the owner of the vehicie.\n\nK\":\n\n\n\n2) Respondents--1 &amp; 2 as the parents of<\/pre>\n<p>deceased Onkaraswamy @ Onkara \ufb01led claim petition<\/p>\n<p>under Section 166 of the M.V. Act<\/p>\n<p>compensation from the owner and insurer.of&#8221;the&#8217;&#8212;..lor::3f <\/p>\n<p>bearing registration No. KA 2521_g3,0_ for_.ti1&#8243;e&#8221;  of the &#8221; it<\/p>\n<p>said Onkarswarny in the motor <\/p>\n<p>occurred at about 11.45   <\/p>\n<p>petition was contested  &#8216;i-n_surer&#8217;-of the lony<br \/>\ninteralia on the ground llthvecvideceased was a<\/p>\n<p>gratutous passengerrfi travelling-.&#8217;_ir1V&#8217;   goods carriage,<\/p>\n<p>therefore,   not liable to indemnify the<br \/>\ninsured respec-idof &#8220;claim arising out of the said<\/p>\n<p>accident.\n<\/p>\n<p>   xThe&#8221;&#8221;l&#8217;ri&#8217;b&#8217;unal by its judgment and award<\/p>\n<p>  dated   while answering Point No.1 held that<\/p>\n<p>the:  Onkaraswarny was travelling as an<\/p>\n<p> unatrthorised passenger in goods carriage. The<\/p>\n<p>l&#8217; &#8211;..Trihunal on the basis of evidence on record quanti\ufb01ed<\/p>\n<p>  &#8230;..the compensation at Rs.2,25,000\/&#8211; and in the light of<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;i<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7\\ &#8216;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><br \/>\nthe findings on Point No.1 held that, the insurer is not<\/p>\n<p>liable to indemnify the insured, consequently, the claim<br \/>\npetition as against Respondent No.2&#8211;Insurance<\/p>\n<p>Company came to be dismissed and the owner of\u00bb the<\/p>\n<p>iorry was directed to pay the entire <\/p>\n<p>amount. Subsequently, the claimants  <\/p>\n<p>under Order 47 Rules 1 and 2   of<\/p>\n<p>the judgment and award passedllvbylithe &#8216;i&#8217;ri.bt1&#8217;nallV<\/p>\n<p>far as it relates to dismissallo&#8217;f..:the c1aimp&#8217;etition against<br \/>\nthe Insurance Company. Thei petition was<\/p>\n<p>contested &#8216;appellantQlnlsurance Company inter<br \/>\nalia onthe  petition is not rnaintajnable<\/p>\n<p>in the _ light ..:lof&#8221;.thel&#8221; speci\ufb01c \ufb01nding recorded by the<\/p>\n<p> its jiidgment that the deceased was an<\/p>\n<p> anaatho-risedgpassenger travelling in the goods carriage<\/p>\n<p>and th-erefore, the petition was sought to be dismissed.<\/p>\n<p> A.  4&#8217;)? The learned Member of the Tribunal,<\/p>\n<p>however, by the order under appeal placing reliance on<\/p>\n<p> several decisions \u00e9ited, held that the insurance<\/p>\n<p>Fa<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><br \/>\nCompany at the first instance should pay the award<\/p>\n<p>amount and thereafter, the Insurance Company is at<br \/>\nliberty to recover the amount from the owner. In that<br \/>\nView of the matter, the Tribunal allowed the preview<\/p>\n<p>petition and directed the appe11ant&#8211;Insnrancf&#8217;\u00e9..\u00e9onipany<\/p>\n<p>to pay the award amount with liberty <\/p>\n<p>same from the owner of the vehviciief &#8216;Being-:<\/p>\n<p>the said order allowing _.the  pe.t.itio&#8217;11\u00b0\u00a7V#,&#8217;=-4 <\/p>\n<p>Insurance Company has presented this.  alia<br \/>\non the ground that   error in<\/p>\n<p>aiiowingitthetiirevit\u00e9igg petition,..&#8221;VVthough in the light of the<br \/>\nspeci\ufb01c&#8217;\ufb01ndings.Ai&#8217;ecordie&#8217;d\u00ab by the Tribunal in its original<\/p>\n<p>judgment the,Vrevi&#8217;ew.&#8221;&#8216;petition was not maintajnable, as it<\/p>\n<p>  fall  any one of the grounds on which<\/p>\n<p>    review its judgment under Order 47<\/p>\n<p>Rules  ad: of C.P.C.\n<\/p>\n<p>#5}: Upon service of notice of this appeal, the<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217; re\u00bbspxondents\/claimants have appeared through their<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9\/at<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel. I have heard the learned counsel on<br \/>\nboth sides and perused the records.\n<\/p>\n<p>6) As noticed above, in its judgment f\u00a5dated<\/p>\n<p>01.12.2004 while considering Point No.1, <\/p>\n<p>recorded a de\ufb01nite finding that the    <\/p>\n<p>travelling in the lorry in question  <\/p>\n<p>transporting any goods at that time.._ ln other&#8221; the  &gt;<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01nding of the Tribunal was thatiatythe of accident,<br \/>\nthe deceased was V &#8220;trayellin.g  Aidan unauthorised<br \/>\npassenger in they goods&#8221;&#8217;\u00bbcarri&#8217;age_._ 2&#8242; is no dispute<\/p>\n<p>that the &#8212;is a goods carriage VlZ., lorry<\/p>\n<p>bearing reg.istration&#8217;No- 232130. It is in the evidence<\/p>\n<p> onyrecolrd that*th_e..,.deceased was a student and was<\/p>\n<p>  said lorry at the time of the accident to<\/p>\n<p>go   Therefore, the Tribunal held that the<\/p>\n<p> deceased was an unauthorised passenger travelling in<\/p>\n<p>V~l,&#8221;_thel&#8221;goods carriage. In that View of the matter, the<\/p>\n<p>  Tribunal held that the insurer is not liable to indemnify<\/p>\n<p> the insured. Consequently, the claim petition was<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><br \/>\ndismissed against the Insurance Company. However,<\/p>\n<p>strangely the Tribunal reviewed its own judgment on the<br \/>\npetition filed by the ciaimants and directs the Insurance<br \/>\nCompany to pay the compensation amount  the<br \/>\nclaimants and then to recover the same<br \/>\nof the vehicle. it it<\/p>\n<p>7] Under the<br \/>\narises for my considerationyin\ufb02pthisappeal   1 V K V<\/p>\n<p>1) &#8216;Whether the Trit5una1_ is &#8220;j1..1s&#8221;tii&#8217;ied&#8217;:\u00a7 in<br \/>\nreviewing its ownr-judgment ? &#8216; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;A   review&#8217; sought would fail<br \/>\n1 = &#8216;vdthiri,_the&#8221;-an&#8217;;-bit&#8217; of Order 47 Rule 1<br \/>\n&#8221; and..20.f <\/p>\n<p>pt&#8217;-}_ As tv&#8217;totd.-\u00a347 Rules 1 &amp; 2 of cpc, &#8216;any<\/p>\n<p>pe.r&#8217;sori&#8221;&#8221;tfconsidering himself aggrieved by a decree or<\/p>\n<p>    an appeai is ailowed, but no appeal<\/p>\n<p>has b&lt;\u00e9er1.A\u00a77pAreferred may apply for a review of the<\/p>\n<p>jrcidgment, to the Court which passed the decree or<\/p>\n<p>drndade the order. However, such a review can be sought<\/p>\n<p> &quot;only if the party applying for review satisfies the Court<\/p>\n<p>that new and important matter or evidence has been<\/p>\n<p>go\u00bb<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>discovered which were not within his knowledge even<br \/>\nafter exercise of due diligence as such, he could not<br \/>\nproduce the same before the Court when the decre:e*.was<\/p>\n<p>passed or order was made; or that therei*&#8221;&#8216;are.__&#8217;_sor_ney<\/p>\n<p>mistake or error apparent on the face ofrecord; oi&#8217;, <\/p>\n<p>that there exists other sufficient reason for&#8221;-.reviewing<\/p>\n<p>the judgment or order. The -r__eview.of the   ;<\/p>\n<p>not sought on the ground soine new.  important<br \/>\nmatter or evidence  _disc-2:)vere.d-igsufosequent to the<\/p>\n<p>judgment of  Tribunal} :and._ifr,1__ iof\ufb01the exercise of<\/p>\n<p>due    evidence was not within the<br \/>\nknowledge&#8217; of nor it was their case that<\/p>\n<p>they could\u00e9unot&#8217; produce any such evidence at the time<\/p>\n<p> when :&#8221;the_&#8221;d.ecree was passed. It is neither the case of<\/p>\n<p> the  that there was a mistake or error<\/p>\n<p>appare&#8217;n&#8217;t&#8217;oh the face of the record, which was required<\/p>\n<p>.   &#8216;tc-.__he &#8216;corrected by exercising the power of review. The<br \/>\njudgment of the Tribunal dismissing the ciaim petition<\/p>\n<p>  against Respondent No.2 was based on the definite<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01nding recorded by it on Point No.1 that the deceased<\/p>\n<p>\/}<\/p>\n<p>%g;\/_, ..,.z<\/p>\n<p>\/I<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>was an unauthorised passenger in a goods carriage and<br \/>\ntherefore, the insurer is not liable to indemnify the<br \/>\ninsured in respect of such claims. Having rega_rd._to<\/p>\n<p>such definite finding recorded by the  <\/p>\n<p>Tribunal in exercise of its power of revie&#8217;W&#8217;vu:nder. Order&#8217;*~ V<\/p>\n<p>47 Rules 1 8: 2 could not have  <\/p>\n<p>directing the Insurance_'&#8221;&#8211;~CoInlpany.g   <\/p>\n<p>compensation amount determinegdiito the&#8221;&#8216;cI,aj;ocfants and<\/p>\n<p>then to recover the sanie \u00abfroxnVl&#8217;a-tlviel&#8217;o1\u00e9fVner._<\/p>\n<p>9) It  gnovvowell\u00e9gsettiedllthat a policy of<\/p>\n<p>insurance&#8217; issuefdg\u00e9iri,  of a goods carriage is not<\/p>\n<p>statutorily..required._Vto.:_lcover the risk of any passenger<\/p>\n<p> ca,rri.ed_gi&#8217;inV% a good_s_..carriage for hire or reward, unless<\/p>\n<p> i there &#8220;contract to the contrary. In the case on hand,<\/p>\n<p>th&#8217;e&#8221;j)olic3tfijssued was only an &#8220;Act Policy&#8221;. There was no<\/p>\n<p> contract to the contrary by receiving additional<\/p>\n<p> premium. Therefore, in the light of the finding on Point<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;No.1, the Tribunal is not justified in reviewing its<\/p>\n<p>judgment and directing the appeilant\/Insurance<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01t. _ ,,\/&#8217;\/<br \/>\n.5 ~. Hf&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">10<\/span><br \/>\nCompany to pay the compensation amount to the<\/p>\n<p>Claimants and then to recover the same from the owner.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the order under appeal cannot be <\/p>\n<p>10) Accordingly, the appeal is a1IoWe&#8217;c&#8217;i-a\u00a7&#8221;&#8216;~ _<\/p>\n<p>order dated 15.07.2005 passed 1;} Review&#8221;\u00bbi\u00a7et.iti0:g1fiieid \u00bb <\/p>\n<p>in MVC No.&#8217;755\/1998 is herebjr,&#8217; aaasaeaaa <\/p>\n<p>Review Petition is dismissed&#8217;,  .\n<\/p>\n<p>The amount in deposit  anp-ea}  ordered to<br \/>\nbe returned to the app.eHan&#8217;&#8211;t_.   &#8221; &#8216; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Sci\/=~<br \/>\nEUDQE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Oriental Insurance Company &#8230; vs Balaiah S\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY..:2\u00abC)f1{)&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;VVA&#8217; BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR JUSTICE K N ~ A M.F.A. No. 34&#8242;?0}()F_&#8221;2\u00a3\ufb01iO6&#8243;&#8216;~. BETWEEN: THE ORIENTAL INSIJ&#8217;1&#8217;\u20aca\u00a3\u00a7NC_E.&#8221;COl\\Z;P}&#8217;XNY LT15&#8243; GANATRA CHAMBERS No.57 ; * [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-162176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Oriental Insurance Company ... vs Balaiah S\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Oriental Insurance Company ... vs Balaiah S\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-26T19:58:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Oriental Insurance Company &#8230; vs Balaiah S\\\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-26T19:58:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1193,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010\",\"name\":\"The Oriental Insurance Company ... vs Balaiah S\\\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-26T19:58:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Oriental Insurance Company &#8230; vs Balaiah S\\\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Oriental Insurance Company ... vs Balaiah S\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Oriental Insurance Company ... vs Balaiah S\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-26T19:58:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Oriental Insurance Company &#8230; vs Balaiah S\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-26T19:58:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010"},"wordCount":1193,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010","name":"The Oriental Insurance Company ... vs Balaiah S\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-26T19:58:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-company-vs-balaiah-so-kallanna-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Oriental Insurance Company &#8230; vs Balaiah S\/O Kallanna on 15 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162176","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=162176"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162176\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=162176"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=162176"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=162176"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}