{"id":162605,"date":"2008-04-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008"},"modified":"2018-02-14T03:32:00","modified_gmt":"2018-02-13T22:02:00","slug":"farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State … on 4 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State … on 4 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: R.B.Naik<\/div>\n
 15''}\n._ID\n\nIN THE HIGH ooum OF KARNATAKA, BANGHLQRE\nDATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL..w2{v)V:(I8\"'sj\"wVs. 0 h\n\n \n\nFamo\"\" 'ii Fthmed,\nS\/o Ameer Ahamed, '\nAged about 42 years; \u00ab_\n\nDriver of Bus Be.-aring-- ~\n\nNo.KA.o2\/9225, _    .\nBehind Basaves-ii1waI'\u00a3i'I*a1'i;ies,j]__ 1 .0 \"\nHorapet,    \nChitradu.__rga';  \"     :Pet.itioner\n\n(By \nANDf7..,,   ii 0   \n\n....i:,..'i.__\n\nT116 State~oi' K.l:'iJ\".Tl.l:l.l.-\".'-i.i'h1'..~,-\"iv\n\nBy its State  Prosecutor,\n\n'_  Qoutrt ofA'Kama'taka,\n .B\u00e9i1.2\u00e9L!.ore-*~5_60 001; : -.e-spondent\n  Addi\ufb01onai S'.P.P.,)\n\n Revision Petition is filed under Section\n\n397 as 401 Cr.P.C-. praying to set aside the Judment and\n\n usenteiice of conviction passed by the Additional, Sessions\n Judge, Fast Track Court--i,. Chitradurga in\n\"._Cri;A.No. 16\/2005 dated 11-10-2005 and the judgeH1_11_\n\nand sentence passed by the C.J.M., Chitradurga, in\n\nV   102\/2903 dated 02606-2965.\n\n\n\nThis petition coming on for hearing, this edgy the\n\nCuurt, made the fellew\ufb01ngz V _\n\n,,,e-\n\nPetitioner-accused is convicted t'0f' 'it1:.e' .01TeI1\u00a2ese. \n\npunishable 11\/8. 279, 337, 3303 0003045  \n\n.L_\n\nf 6 1:11 d {O ;-ffji fie' '--'.fR\u00a7;e,1.,GG5i'~--..1ui*E an ri\ufb02e 1\npunishable UIS. '%  R1. for three\nmonths and pay     default to undergo\n\nsimple    days for an oifence\n\nI-2.1. its: six  pay \ufb01ne of Rs. 1,000;- in\n\ndefat\ufb02t,  jtxndergb  for one month for an offence\n\n V'  - &pttI':1iS:;1'xa'l3lt:&  IPC. To undergo R.I for a period of\n\n  \"Q_ne\" pay \ufb01ne of Rs.3,000_l-,. in default to pay\n\n42,..- ..V--_.'... .. ..\n1-~1__c, _.tu_ ,uuuc1' u 3.1. for 3 months for an e\ufb01enee\n\n AApuI1ishACable U\/S. 304(A) IPC, by the Judgment of\n\n cozevic\ufb02on and sentence passed by the Chief Judicial\n\n A .----\u00a7MagistI'ate, Chitradurga dated 02.06.2005 in C.C.No.\n\nv4.9\u00bb.\/1.ua'.f2L.e\n\n\n\n102\/ 2003, which is con\ufb01rmed by Judgment}--.i dated\n\n11.10.2005 passed by the Additional Sessions.\u00a7l;1id_\ufb01\u00e9:.;_:Fast\n\nTrack Court, and Chitradurga in Cr1.A. No, 0.   0 \n\n4-Is'...-...m\n\n2_ ma 11 ' pr 4.}. ....;;.\n\n4* '......*.... .'.--,._-.. '.'..._ \u00ab ....;\niu\ufb01 ufi\ufb02i lasts 01 u.._u.: PL'Ua\u00a7;U'VV LL 1._U':\u00a2:: H,!L_ A 6:15 \n\nfollows: . h A V\nThat on 06.10.2002'lV'Vi'l\":.'?1t _VVahout,.4': 'Dam, on\n\nDavanagere -  Matadakare area,\n\nthe acct_1_,d_-_ -,ti   driver of\n\n.... .;\\.-u 1-an-;-nu\n\nThpppeswa\ufb01iy  __ 'KIA-U2-9220 drove the\nsame     and negligent manner,\ndashed to fan __autorickshaw bearing No.KA-\n\n16\/75\"? i~-    Jtirinivasa, due to impact, the\n\n' 5! 'V -- V\" ., V .. .-...-1\n  _H\ufb02'|1f.l\"\\'ly'il\"1kQl\"Il1II'r 1'1f1'I\"l'I\u00a3I1Il' g'l')IvI'v7I'I1'Il'a all';\n\n.A  died on their way to hospital and one\n\n  the hospital While taking treatment and\n\n other  viz., Srlnivasa (driver of auto--PW.4),\n\n  Roopa\ufb02l and RT. Savitha a1__,lt__in_._ inim'ies= .A...,...r\n\n'V; ' Q 'Lani-ru-r-I u-u-nan as-931-1 _ _ ' '-\nCGHeCt.'IIig '\u00a3336 1'61 vmit uiutci , tn ui:l.Lu run I:\n\n \"Chitradurga \ufb01led charge sheet against the accused-\n\n5iA.v\\au.L\u00ab___\n\n\n\npetitioner for the offences punishable U\/ S. 279,Vi33p7, 338\n\n63 304-A IPC.\n\n3. The prosecution in support it-\u00e9fci.\u00e9_1se \n\nchurn-In-|rl-:-I\ufb02nnnnrl Tlflfu 'I 4-.-u. T3111' 1''! ..-u.'-. .-.' ..-..'I..1?'\u00a3-uh.-..-I 'I\"..\\.... 'I L-\nc tutu mu r.wa.1 LU r.w.1r  A\n\nP. 15. No evidence Was: let on , \npetitioner. On apprecia\ufb01oxntof the  tiocumentary\nevidence, the    A tile accused-\n\n... nu.-'us Amt.' gs..- asa.-l\u00bb4LI'.a|\", _\\.-~ a '- :1 \u00abIt, -1': rl-I%JvIII6\\-I J. -ura.i.\\ra.L\\z\n\n\u00a73'_ij:'si'i  1115 nf'\ufb01=-nngg\n\nsentenced\"  A  ibefore.\n\n ._  bpwitnesses examined P.W.1 is the\n\ncleaner meant,\n\n not supported the case of the\n\n'PlI'|l$E|\u00a3VIl'I\"'I'I\"';I\\TIV-'lGI'Il\" '-11: 'man 'nag;-In I-Iwcu-I<I-xzu-1 1-:1-uni-31:; In' F') H... R\n\u00abI~'5.i~"'\u00a7\\a\\\/3-.5-I-A-['41.]-I  .ll.bv1.l\u00a2:I.D I)'-IIJJ-I LI. LKJKJ. lluaulb. I. W-A L" 'J\n\n\u00bb ere ._the  Witnesses for scene of occurrence\n\n  but he have not supported the case of\n\n \ufb02iepactaident, PWA is :1 xx. -i'a_t-1ic__shnw and\n\nptosecuticn. PW.3 is the complainant and eyewitness to\n\n___ __ _ 11431.. __n_\n" :__:_-___I __-__....:4.._.___ 4.- ___:_1__.;. 111:. rs IL A __ 4.1__:___\ngl 1 cu- yC IIJICSS LU HLSUIUCIIL. FWS. O (5 "1" 1 U1 11\n\nH evidence have stated that autorickshaw was proceeding on\n\n\\\n\n\n\nthe extreme left side of the road and it was goitjogein the\n\nWest-East direction, at that time, the bus east\n\ncorn side, entered its extreme right s\u00a7id.e'v_A4_j;I:I._rt;.r; of \n\n: nu A-uni  n-a-n1-u-.-'.--  _-_':_'._' V _.\n.{'GE'ud and 1111'. {I1 uuttu IU1 1% 41; 5.1  rg\n\n\ufb01r\n. a9\n5\n\n0:\n\nextreme left side of the roa.d,_ becanse of \n3 & 4 and other sustaj11e'i.l_V'?grievot1's  and two\n\npersons died on waist the.hh~ospita1 and another\n\n'___\u00e9!'S()!1 died in vhgspie,-.;!.c  .....u....M...\n\nNot'run' g coritragiigis evidence to disbelicve or\ndiscard    Ixiaterial on record further\nrevedl__s that'tii1ere"is"a:"divid.er at the scene of occurrence\n\nas depicted   the spot sketch. Petition _.r--\n\n 1:a'*~.crossed the {Md dmuer auu uau g 1\n\n  -edfttxeme right side of the road and caused\n\nt ta\u00a2cid\u00a2nt;serte *\n\n7\nL' xi1'1G--t1e.t r_r_m'n 7 r . .122 & 5. mm I=w.9 & 10 are\n\nas\n'6:\n\nA r1cac1 bodies of deceased N.G. Vasanthalakshmi, Kum:\n\n\/P4\n\n\ufb01iau.\/\\ ault 1\/9-\u00bb-\n\nA. _ _,,, '!A '\n\n\n\nSavitha 85 G. Soumya and issued post mortem reports as\nper Ex.P.6, 7 & 8 respectively. PW.11 85  the\ndoctors who treated the injured \n\n1'\n\nTNT? A\\ ._.-.-.-..-I 1"}.-....-.-..-. II'!!!\n'T 1u IKUULJH. [FVV\n\n6. PW. 12 is the; Motor e  i svhs\ninspected the bus as  the   in the\n\naccident. He in    depesed that the\n\nnnnidpqf ip nn_.ta i 'n qnnv ('I11 ,\n........ . v . . .....1 _. 'IJ\u00a7'? ..i \n\naccordingly;-.he;issue.Ci.as perex.p. 10. W. 13 is the\n\nowner ct   accident, she has been\n  ....\u00a21id-' not support the case of the\nprosecntieI1,vv'  are the investigating officers,\nV   "accused.\n\n it .1'  careful scrutiny of the material on record\n the ocular evidence of injured eyewitnesses\n\n---- r--------- '-p' -u- ----'I--------' --- w--'\n\nit  it PWs=3 \u00abJ; 4 ..eupL. wit\nV' .. __ L1... __ ._\n\n;u1c same would reveai the' [.11 ace-U\n\nH being the driver of the bus drove the same in a h'gh speed,\n\nf\ufb02ulvx\/.'*.'L_,tl\/L..\n\n \n\n\n\nin rash and negligent manner, took the bus tejextrelne\n\nright side of the road and dashed against \n\nwhich was proceedings on the   of \n\n-_.-....l f'l\\'l-... .-..._....\n1 HM. 111C 15 C\n\nnegligent in driving the as .__''and  was no\ncontributory negligence on partaoi'  anmnckshaw\n\ndriver. There is   on record to\n\neyewitness.   triaiicourt as"vrei1"'as the first appeiiate\ncourt. on agapretgiatioli  t.'1e: m_ateria1'on record in proper\n\n._ at 5 right conclusion that the\n\npctitioner4_'_here'ii1_ham committed the o\ufb02'ences\n\nptrsnsruable U}... '. 1"" On re-\n\n\u00bbA Vjaplpieciiation. of the material on record, I do not \ufb01nd any\n\n   in the Judgments and order of conviction\n\nA .1r_i':\u00ab\n\nA7  the trial Court as well as the first appellate\n\nrt;\n\n_ .;,_..\n\n_ 'I_._.______ ._ __ __._______I\n\nat n w v r, as garos tn" "entence. it is\n\nan\nUS\n\n'Harguecl by the learned counsel for the petitioner that\n\n\n\npetitioner herein is sole bread earner in the famiiy~.,and he\n\nhas got responsibility to maintain his \n\nwho are solely depending upon the H  \n\nfamily to look after his   \nput behind bars, pe\ufb02\ufb01onerantihis  will be\nput to untold   sentence imposed\nupon petitioner  is too harsh,\nexcessive   ' ac taxen While\n    \n __  it no the hardship pleaded by the\npetitionee   the totality of the facts and\n\n.;rfc{:I1'fnAst 11  Ls, this . "rt i... of .he csnside. W *..e=.'.* that\n\nI\ni\nI\n1\ni\n5\n\n.A  senizenee imposed upon the petitioner for the proved\n\n   harsh and excessive and the same is\n\nliable  modi\ufb01ed. Hence, I pass the following:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
it it “Judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the court<\/p>\n
x.\u00e9’]ju\\\/l_C\u00bbLI- I’.\/’-._ ‘<\/p>\n
below convicting the petitioner for the oifenees pufxishable
\nU\/S. 279, 337, 333 & 304-A IPC is  :_ The<\/p>\n
O I
\nnapfence _f ‘I1’|’I’I”I 3<\/p>\n
Av!-l’\\I.lC saggy: .5<\/p>\n
1,, 1-‘r<\/p>\n
petitioner the offences pur1ihi;”1e…u[S;.33b’279–, 43.  Vc’\u00a7:,s3cJu8″‘-..<\/p>\n
IPC., remains un-a]Iered.Huoweve,1_?’,”‘in  the<\/p>\n
sentence of imprisonment   1 1etitioner for<\/p>\n
an offence punishabie\ufb02l  he is sentenced to I<\/p>\n
u.I.1uu.1 5.. “,5…  ‘fef_  u. inn. u.um..m
\nfor the sail?     i\ufb01he of 1?s.3,000\/-. in
\ndefaq1t__of   jeisentenced to su\ufb01’er S.I. for
\nfurtlier  It is ordered that the<\/p>\n
.1rren V, II the<\/p>\n
3 ;trial, to set 011’ as provided under Section 428<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State … on 4 April, 2008 Author: R.B.Naik 15”} ._ID IN THE HIGH ooum OF KARNATAKA, BANGHLQRE DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL..w2{v)V:(I8″‘sj”wVs. 0 h Famo”” ‘ii Fthmed, S\/o Ameer Ahamed, ‘ Aged about 42 years; \u00ab_ Driver of Bus Be.-aring– ~ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-162605","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nFarook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-13T22:02:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State … on 4 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-13T22:02:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":159,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008\",\"name\":\"Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-13T22:02:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State … on 4 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-13T22:02:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State … on 4 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-13T22:02:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008"},"wordCount":159,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008","name":"Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-13T22:02:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/farook-ahmed-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-state-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Farook Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka By Its State … on 4 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162605","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=162605"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162605\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=162605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=162605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=162605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}