{"id":162653,"date":"2011-07-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011"},"modified":"2015-10-23T16:33:00","modified_gmt":"2015-10-23T11:03:00","slug":"vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Patna High Court &#8211; Orders<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                                    Cr.Misc. No.32346 of 2009\n                 1.     Vijay Prasad, S\/o Ram Kishun Sao\n                 2.     Nirmala Devi, Wife of Vijay Prasad\n                 3.     Razia Devi, Wife of Ram Kishun Sao\n                 All resident of Mohalla- Patwa toly, Manpur, P.S. Buniyadganj,\n                 District-Gaya        ..........           ...... Applicants\n\n\n                                             Versus\n            1. The State Of Bihar\n            2. Rakha Devi, Wife of Sri Ajay Prasad @ Krishna Prasad, D\/o\n            Chhotu Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Makhlaut Ganj, P.S. Kotwali,\n            District- Gaya. ..................                     Opposite Parties.\n                                           -----------\n<\/pre>\n<p>              For the applicants: Ms. Soni Srivastava, Advocate<br \/>\n              For the Opposite parties:\n<\/p>\n<p>3   25-07-2011             High Courts records of this petition was eaten away<\/p>\n<p>                  by the white ants and it was reconstructed when a notice with<\/p>\n<p>                  regard to the same was given to the counsel who provided the<\/p>\n<p>                  court with the copy of the petition for consideration.<\/p>\n<p>                           Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicants as<\/p>\n<p>                  well as learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party No. 2.<\/p>\n<p>                           This petition has been preferred under section-482 of<\/p>\n<p>                  the Cr.P.C. against the order dated 23.09.2007 passed by Sri<\/p>\n<p>                  D. Srivastava, J.M. Ist Class, Gaya in Complaint Case No. 971<\/p>\n<p>                  of 2008 whereby and whereunder, he, having found prima facie<\/p>\n<p>                  case under section-498A of the of the Indian Penal Code,<\/p>\n<p>                  ordered to issue processes against the applicants and other<\/p>\n<p>                  accused to procure their attendance for facing trial for the<\/p>\n<p>                  above-said offence. The applicants have invoked the inherent<\/p>\n<p>                  jurisdiction of this court for quashing the above-said order dated<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                     -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>23.09.2007.\n<\/p>\n<p>         Brief facts of the case are as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>          O.P. No. 2 filed complaint case bearing Complaint<\/p>\n<p>Case No. 971 of 2008 against the applicants and two other<\/p>\n<p>accused stating therein that the marriage of opposite party No.<\/p>\n<p>2 was solemnized with accused Ajay Prasad @ Krishna Prasad<\/p>\n<p>in the year, 1992 according to Hindu Rites and Rituals and after<\/p>\n<p>marriage, opposite party No. 2 went to her matrimonial home<\/p>\n<p>and started leading her conjugal life alongwith her husband and<\/p>\n<p>after sometimes, she gave birth to a male child. Subsequently,<\/p>\n<p>her husband developed illicit relationship with applicant No. 2<\/p>\n<p>who happens to be sister-in-law (Gotani) of the opposite party<\/p>\n<p>No. 2 and when she made protest, the applicants and other<\/p>\n<p>accused subjected her to cruelty and harassment in both ways;<\/p>\n<p>mentally and physically and also started demanding Rs 25,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>for starting a business. Furthermore, when the father of<\/p>\n<p>opposite party No. 2 visited house of the applicants, the same<\/p>\n<p>demand was made by the applicants and other accused and<\/p>\n<p>also they (applicants) misbehaved with him. The father of the<\/p>\n<p>opposite party No. 2 filed an Informatory Petition in the court of<\/p>\n<p>SDM, Gaya and when the applicants and other accused got<\/p>\n<p>knowledge about the filing of aforesaid informatory petition, they<\/p>\n<p>ousted the opposite party No. 2 from her matrimonial home and<\/p>\n<p>after that, the opposite party No. 2 filed the above-said case. It<\/p>\n<p>is also the case of opposite party No. 2 that applicant No. 1 was<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                      -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>residing at Kolkata in connection with his business and he<\/p>\n<p>oftenly used to visit his house.\n<\/p>\n<p>         Learned court below having conducted an inquiry<\/p>\n<p>under section 202 of the Cr.P.C. passed the impugned order in<\/p>\n<p>the manner as stated above.\n<\/p>\n<p>         The contention of learned counsel for the applicants is<\/p>\n<p>that applicant Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are; brother-in-law, sister-in-law<\/p>\n<p>and mother-in-law of the complainant respectively and as a<\/p>\n<p>matter of fact, entire allegation centres around against the<\/p>\n<p>husband of opposite party No. 2 because according to<\/p>\n<p>complainant&#8217;s case itself, the alleged occurrence took place on<\/p>\n<p>account of so-called illicit relationship of the husband with the<\/p>\n<p>applicant No. 2. It is further contended on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>applicants that the present case does not come under the<\/p>\n<p>purview of section-498A of the Indian Penal Code because<\/p>\n<p>now-a-days, it has become a fashion to implicate almost all the<\/p>\n<p>in-laws even if a trivial dispute took place between the husband<\/p>\n<p>and the wife.\n<\/p>\n<p>         Learned counsel for the applicants heavily relied upon<\/p>\n<p>a decision reported in 2010 (7) SCC 667 (Preeti Gupta &amp; Anr.<\/p>\n<p>Vs State of Jharkhand &amp; Anr) in which the Apex court of this<\/p>\n<p>country has held that,<\/p>\n<p>      &#8220;if there is no specific allegation made against the<br \/>\n      appellants in complaint, and         none of the<br \/>\n      witnesses attributing any role to them-Held, their<br \/>\n      implication was only meant to harass and<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                       -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      humiliate husband&#8217;s relatives&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The learned counsel for the applicants also relied<\/p>\n<p>upon decision reported in 2009(10) SCC 184 (Neelu Chopra &amp;<\/p>\n<p>Anr Vs Bharti) in which it has been held by the Apex Court of<\/p>\n<p>this country that ;\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8220;&#8230;..for lodging a proper complaint mere mentioning<br \/>\n      of relevant sections and language of 498A and<br \/>\n      others are not sufficient&#8230;&#8230;.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>          On the otherhand, learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>opposite party No. 2 supported the impugned order and<\/p>\n<p>submitted that learned court below has rightly held that a prima<\/p>\n<p>facie case is made out against the applicants. It is further<\/p>\n<p>contended by him that if the applicants have any grievance in<\/p>\n<p>respect of taking cognizance of the offence under section-498A<\/p>\n<p>of the Indian Penal Code, they may raise the aforesaid<\/p>\n<p>grievance at the time of framing of charge.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>          Having heard rival contentions of the parties, I have<\/p>\n<p>gone through the record. It is well-known fact that section-498A<\/p>\n<p>of the Indian Penal Code has been enacted to check the dowry<\/p>\n<p>related offence. In the present case, the dispute between the<\/p>\n<p>husband and the wife arose on account of so-called illicit<\/p>\n<p>relationship of husband of the opposite party No. 2. So even if<\/p>\n<p>the contents of complaint are taken into consideration, then also<\/p>\n<p>it cannot be said that the dispute between the opposite party<\/p>\n<p>No. 2 and her husband arose on account of non-fulfillment of<\/p>\n<p>illegal demand. Furthermore, I find that according to complaint<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>        case itself, the applicant No. 1 was residing at Kolkata and at<\/p>\n<p>        the time of alleged occurrence, he often used to come at his<\/p>\n<p>        home and apart from this, no specific overt act has been<\/p>\n<p>        attributed against these applicants.\n<\/p>\n<p>                 In the aforesaid circumstance, I am of the view that it<\/p>\n<p>        is a fit case in which this court must exercise the power vested<\/p>\n<p>        under it under section-482 of the Cr.P.C. to check the abuse of<\/p>\n<p>        the process of law.\n<\/p>\n<p>                 On the basis of aforesaid discussions, this Cr. Misc.<\/p>\n<p>        Case is allowed and the order dated 23.09.2007 passed by<\/p>\n<p>        Shri D. Srivastava, J.M. Ist Class , Gaya in connection with<\/p>\n<p>        Complaint Case No. 971 of 2008 stands quashed in respect of<\/p>\n<p>        the applicants only.\n<\/p>\n<pre>AKV\/-                                  (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court &#8211; Orders Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32346 of 2009 1. Vijay Prasad, S\/o Ram Kishun Sao 2. Nirmala Devi, Wife of Vijay Prasad 3. Razia Devi, Wife of Ram Kishun Sao All [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-162653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court-orders"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-23T11:03:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-23T11:03:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1008,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court - Orders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-23T11:03:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-23T11:03:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-23T11:03:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011"},"wordCount":1008,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court - Orders"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011","name":"Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-23T11:03:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-prasad-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-25-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vijay Prasad &amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 25 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=162653"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162653\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=162653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=162653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=162653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}