{"id":162800,"date":"2009-01-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009"},"modified":"2017-09-05T22:25:58","modified_gmt":"2017-09-05T16:55:58","slug":"prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; &#8230; on 8 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; &#8230; on 8 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                       CWP No.8387-CAT of 2002                          -1-\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                                 CASE NO.: CWP No.8387-CAT of 2002\n                                  DATE OF DECISION: January 8, 2009\n\nPROF. R.K. SINGHAL                                     ...PETITIONER\n\n                                VERSUS\n\nCHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION &amp; OTHERS                     ...RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA.\n<\/p>\n<p>       HON&#8217;BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR.\n<\/p>\n<p>PRESENT: MR. KUNAL DAWAR, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER.\n<\/p>\n<p>         MR.A.D.S. JATTANA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS.\n<\/p>\n<p>ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.(ORAL)<\/p>\n<p>            The petitioner is aggrieved by the judgement of Central<\/p>\n<p>Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh dated 30.3.2001, vide which the<\/p>\n<p>reimbursement of medical claim for a sum of Rs.78,958\/- has been granted.<\/p>\n<p>            The petitioner who was working as a Superintending Engineer<\/p>\n<p>in the Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh developed acute chest pain<\/p>\n<p>on 15.4.1999 and was admitted to the Emergency Ward of PGI, Chandigarh.<\/p>\n<p>He was discharged on the same day and was advised to undergo Coronary<\/p>\n<p>Angiography. The petitioner got himself admitted in Apollo Hospital on<\/p>\n<p>18.4.1999, however, after being discharged was admitted to Escorts<\/p>\n<p>Hospital, New Delhi on 27.5.1999. The petitioner underwent Coronary<\/p>\n<p>Artery Bypass Surgery at the Escorts Hospital on 27.5.1999 and was<\/p>\n<p>discharged from the hospital on 2.6.1999.\n<\/p>\n<p>            The petitioner raised a bill amounting to Rs.1,73,300\/- which<\/p>\n<p>was the amount spent by him on his medical treatment. The petitioner was,<\/p>\n<p>however, reimbursed an amount of Rs.78,958\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Being dis-satisfied with the reimbursement the petitioner filed<\/p>\n<p>O.A. No.845-CH of 2000 before the Central Administrative Tribunal,<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                        CWP No.8387-CAT of 2002                           -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Chandigarh Bench which was dismissed vide impugned order dated<\/p>\n<p>30.3.2001.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents had<\/p>\n<p>granted sanction to the petitioner vide Annexure P-6 for taking treatment for<\/p>\n<p>his heart disease from Escorts Hospital, New Delhi and therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>respondents are bound to reimburse the entire expenses incurred by him.<\/p>\n<p>Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a judgement in Mrs. Surya<\/p>\n<p>Pandit, IAS (retired) vs. State of Punjab, reported as (1995-3) PLR 683,<\/p>\n<p>wherein it has been held that there can be no justification for limiting the<\/p>\n<p>reimbursement of expenses to the rates of All India Institute of Medical<\/p>\n<p>Sciences, New Delhi.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The arguments of the petitioner have been controverted by the<\/p>\n<p>counsel appearing for the respondents. Counsel for the respondents has<\/p>\n<p>drawn our attention to Annexure R-2 which is a letter written by the<\/p>\n<p>Director Health Services, Chandigarh Administration, Chandigarh dated<\/p>\n<p>7.2.2001, whereby ex-post facto sanction was accorded to the petitioner to<\/p>\n<p>undergo treatment at Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre, New<\/p>\n<p>Delhi, subject to the condition that he would be reimbursed the medical<\/p>\n<p>charges as per rate of Government Hospitals of PGI\/AIIMS New Delhi<\/p>\n<p>under the provisions of Medical Attendance Rules and Instructions of the<\/p>\n<p>Government.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Counsel for the respondents has further submitted that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner being a Government employee is free to get himself treated at any<\/p>\n<p>of the recognized hospitals in the country, however, he would be reimbursed<\/p>\n<p>the medical expenses at AIIMS rates. It is submitted by the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>that in the present case although the petitioner has raised a bill of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                         CWP No.8387-CAT of 2002                            -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,73,300\/-, but he would only be reimbursed at the AIIMS rates which<\/p>\n<p>has already been paid to him. Learned counsel further submits that the<\/p>\n<p>authority relied upon by the petitioner in Mrs. Surya Pandit&#8217;s case (supra) is<\/p>\n<p>not applicable to the facts of the present case as according to the<\/p>\n<p>Government Policy the medical reimbursement can only be given at the<\/p>\n<p>AIIMS rates. Counsel for the respondents has also placed reliance on a<\/p>\n<p>Division Bench judgement of this Court in Raghuvir Prasad Mittal Vs.<\/p>\n<p>State of Haryana and others, reported as 2008(3) SCT 362, wherein<\/p>\n<p>reimbursement was given to the petitioner at the AIIMS rates, although he<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was allowed to get himself treated from Bombay Hospital and<\/p>\n<p>Research Centre, Mumbai.\n<\/p>\n<p>             We have heard learned counsel for the parties at length.<\/p>\n<p>             A perusal of the facts narrated above shows that the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>has been given the medical reimbursement as per AIIMS rates.              The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has not been able to point out any deficiency in the<\/p>\n<p>reimbursement granted to the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner has not<\/p>\n<p>been able to show any policy of the State Government whereby the<\/p>\n<p>expenses which an employee incurs in the hospital on his treatment, the<\/p>\n<p>same has to be reimbursed to him in total. Even if the petitioner would have<\/p>\n<p>got himself treated abroad still, he would be entitled to reimbursement at the<\/p>\n<p>AIIMS\/PGI rates only. In view of the above, we find no infirmity in the<\/p>\n<p>impugned order (Annexure P-10) and accordingly the writ petition is<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n                                        (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA)\n                                              JUDGE\n\n\nJanuary 8, 2009                            (NIRMALJIT KAUR)\nGulati                                         JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; &#8230; on 8 January, 2009 CWP No.8387-CAT of 2002 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CASE NO.: CWP No.8387-CAT of 2002 DATE OF DECISION: January 8, 2009 PROF. R.K. SINGHAL &#8230;PETITIONER VERSUS CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION &amp; OTHERS &#8230;RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-162800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; ... on 8 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; ... on 8 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-05T16:55:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; &#8230; on 8 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-05T16:55:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":743,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; ... on 8 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-05T16:55:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; &#8230; on 8 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; ... on 8 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; ... on 8 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-05T16:55:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; &#8230; on 8 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-05T16:55:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009"},"wordCount":743,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009","name":"Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; ... on 8 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-05T16:55:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prof-r-k-singhal-vs-chandigarh-administration-on-8-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prof. R.K. Singhal vs Chandigarh Administration &amp; &#8230; on 8 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=162800"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162800\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=162800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=162800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=162800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}