{"id":162927,"date":"2010-07-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010"},"modified":"2017-09-26T02:32:53","modified_gmt":"2017-09-25T21:02:53","slug":"r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWA.No. 1122 of 2010()\n\n\n1. R.BHAGYALAKSHMI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. KERALA ELECTRICAL AND ALLIED ENGINEERING\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.K.THANKAPPAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN\n\n Dated :14\/07\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n              C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\n                             &\n                  P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ.\n\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n               Writ Appeal No.1122 of 2010.\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n\n           Dated this the 14th day of July, 2010.\n\n                      J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
Gopinathan, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     The petitioner in WP(C).No.4192\/2009 is the appellant.<\/p>\n
She was provisionally appointed as a Stenographer on 19-4-<\/p>\n
1991 in second respondent Company for a period of six<\/p>\n
months as advised by the Employment Exchange. On expiry<\/p>\n
of the term of appointment, her service was terminated.<\/p>\n
But, she continued as a casual Stenographer on daily wage<\/p>\n
basis.  While so, after obtaining application from the<\/p>\n
appellant, the then Managing Director appointed her as<\/p>\n
Personal Assistant in the scale of pay of Rs.380 – 1262 by<\/p>\n
Ext.P1 order dated 16-4-1994 and she commenced her<\/p>\n
service with effect from 18-4-1994. Later, by Ext.P2 dated<\/p>\n
6-3-1995 her service was confirmed with effect from 18-10-<\/p>\n
1994 in the scale of pay of Rs.750 – 1997. While so, by<\/p>\n
WA.No.1122\/2010.\n<\/p>\n
                           -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
Ext.P3 dated 29-3-1997, the appellant was posted as<\/p>\n
Stenographer under the General Manager (Marketing). It<\/p>\n
appears that there were so many such appointees working<\/p>\n
in the second respondent Company in various sections. The<\/p>\n
first respondent having noticed the back-door employment,<\/p>\n
directed the 2nd respondent to terminate the services of<\/p>\n
such employees who secured appointment through back-<\/p>\n
door methods.      Consequently, Ext.P4 memo dated 10-7-<\/p>\n
1997 was served upon the appellant and other employees to<\/p>\n
show cause for not terminating their services. Challenging<\/p>\n
Ext.P4, the appellant and other affected 145 persons moved<\/p>\n
this Court by filing OP.No.16404\/1997.           During the<\/p>\n
pendency of that proceedings the services of 145 persons<\/p>\n
affected by Ext.P4 order was regularized, it is submitted, on<\/p>\n
compassionate grounds.     The appellant and four others<\/p>\n
were not regularized. So, she filed a representation seeking<\/p>\n
regularization. Since, no orders were passed she moved<\/p>\n
this Court by filing WP(C).No.5285\/2008.<\/p>\n
WA.No.1122\/2010.\n<\/p>\n
                          -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
     2.   By Ext.P9 judgment this Court disposed that writ<\/p>\n
petition directing the first respondent to consider her<\/p>\n
representation with notice to her.   The first respondent,<\/p>\n
accordingly, considered her representation and her service<\/p>\n
as Stenographer was regularized by Ext.P10 order dated 1-<\/p>\n
9-2008.      Ext.P10   order  is   silent  regarding  the<\/p>\n
commencement of the service.       Assailing Ext.P10, the<\/p>\n
appellant     preferred   WP(C).No.4192\/2009      seeking<\/p>\n
declaration that she is entitled to have her service as<\/p>\n
Personal Assistant regularized with effect from 16.4.1994.<\/p>\n
The learned single Judge by the impugned judgment dated<\/p>\n
28-5-2010    found  that  the   appellant  is entitled  to<\/p>\n
regularization from 18-4-1994, the date of commencement<\/p>\n
of her service by Ext.P1.      Whereas, her request for<\/p>\n
regularization as Personal Assistant to the Chairman was<\/p>\n
declined. As against the judgment declining her prayer for<\/p>\n
regularization as Personal Assistant to the Chairman, this<\/p>\n
appeal was filed.\n<\/p>\n
WA.No.1122\/2010.\n<\/p>\n
                            -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
     3.    We have heard the learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n
the appellant as well as the Government Pleader and the<\/p>\n
Standing Counsel for the second respondent. Irrespective<\/p>\n
of her entitlement to the claim for appointment as Personal<\/p>\n
Assistant, we find that she was, in fact, having no<\/p>\n
educational qualification to claim appointment to that post.<\/p>\n
The respondents 1 and 2 in their counter-affidavit had<\/p>\n
specifically stated that the qualification for appointment as<\/p>\n
Personal Assistant are:\n<\/p>\n
     (i)   Graduation in English Literature;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
     (ii) Typewriting and Shorthand Higher; and<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
     (iii) Ten years experience in similar post.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
There is no whisper in the petition that the petitioner had<\/p>\n
such qualification. Curiously, we note that the petitioner<\/p>\n
had conveniently omitted to plead as to whether she has got<\/p>\n
sufficient   educational    qualifications    and    required<\/p>\n
experience to get an appointment as as a Personal<\/p>\n
Assistant. The petitioner is only a Commerce graduate with<\/p>\n
WA.No.1122\/2010.\n<\/p>\n
                                 -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
Typewriting and Shorthand Lower. There is no case that<\/p>\n
she is having any experience. Though the petitioner had, in<\/p>\n
her reply-affidavit, put the respondents to proof of the averments<\/p>\n
in the counter-affidavit regarding qualification for the post of<\/p>\n
Personal Assistant, there is no whisper that the educational<\/p>\n
qualification for the post of Personal Assistant affirmed in the<\/p>\n
counter-affidavit is not correct. There is also no whisper in the<\/p>\n
reply-affidavit that she has got sufficient qualification to hold the<\/p>\n
post of Personal Assistant. When a party seeks a relief asserting<\/p>\n
rights, it is for that party to establish by pleadings that he or she<\/p>\n
is qualified for that right. In the absence of specific pleadings, it<\/p>\n
is quite appropriate to accept the pleadings in the counter-<\/p>\n
affidavit. So, reliance has to be given to the averments in<\/p>\n
the counter-affidavit and to conclude that the petitioner<\/p>\n
lacks qualification.\n<\/p>\n
     4.     It is pertinent to note that Ext.P3 by which the<\/p>\n
appellant was posted as Stenographer was not assailed so<\/p>\n
far. Therefore, as on the date of Ext.P4, the assailed memo, the<\/p>\n
appellant was only a Stenographer. So long as the appellant has<\/p>\n
WA.No.1122\/2010.\n<\/p>\n
                             -: 6 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
no challenge against Ext.P3, her claim seeking posting as<\/p>\n
Personal Assistant is devoid of merit.       Adding to that the<\/p>\n
respondents have got a case that the post of Personal Assistant is<\/p>\n
of officer category and that of the Stenographer is of worker<\/p>\n
category and that though in Ext.P1 it is stated that the appellant<\/p>\n
was appointed as Personal Assistant, she was given a pay scale<\/p>\n
of Rs.380 – 1262, which is that of a worker category and that<\/p>\n
scale of pay of the Personal Assistant affirmed as Rs.1850-3550<\/p>\n
in the counter-affidavit is not countered by the appellant.<\/p>\n
Therefore, it is to be concluded that though the appellant was<\/p>\n
designated as Personal Assistant, she was appointed in a lower<\/p>\n
category. From the materials on record, it is evident that the<\/p>\n
vacancy was not notified. But, on an application filed by the<\/p>\n
appellant, she who was working as a casual Stenographer<\/p>\n
on daily wages, somehow or other managed to get her<\/p>\n
appointed on Stenographer’s scale with designation as<\/p>\n
Personal Assistant. It appears to be a clandestine dealing<\/p>\n
on personal consideration and not an appointment on merits<\/p>\n
or on the basis of qualification or after a due selection<\/p>\n
WA.No.1122\/2010.\n<\/p>\n
                            -: 7 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
process or there is any transparency in her appointment.<\/p>\n
Really, the appellant is not entitled to regularization. But,<\/p>\n
the first respondent was pleased to regularize on<\/p>\n
compassionate grounds. Whatever that be, the appellant<\/p>\n
lacks qualification to be appointed as Personal Assistant.<\/p>\n
Therefore, she is not entitled to be regularized as a Personal<\/p>\n
Assistant. Her claim on that count lacks merit and deserves<\/p>\n
no consideration. In the above circumstance, we find that<\/p>\n
the appeal is ill-advised and devoid of merit.<\/p>\n
     In the result, the appeal is dismissed with no order as<\/p>\n
to costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                            C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
\n                                          (Judge)<\/p>\n
                                   P.S.GOPINATHAN,
\n                                          (Judge)<\/p>\n
Kvs\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WA.No. 1122 of 2010() 1. R.BHAGYALAKSHMI, … Petitioner Vs 1. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, … Respondent 2. KERALA ELECTRICAL AND ALLIED ENGINEERING For Petitioner :SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY For Respondent :SRI.M.K.THANKAPPAN The Hon’ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR The Hon’ble MR. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-162927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nR.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-25T21:02:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-25T21:02:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1096,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010\",\"name\":\"R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-25T21:02:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-25T21:02:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-25T21:02:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010"},"wordCount":1096,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010","name":"R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-25T21:02:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-bhagyalakshmi-vs-principal-secretary-on-14-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R.Bhagyalakshmi vs Principal Secretary on 14 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=162927"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162927\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=162927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=162927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=162927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}