{"id":163263,"date":"2009-01-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009"},"modified":"2019-02-17T22:54:59","modified_gmt":"2019-02-17T17:24:59","slug":"chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRPFC.No. 184 of 2008()\n\n\n1. CHANDRAMOHAN,C.NO.4938,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n Dated :21\/01\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                            R. BASANT, J.\n                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                   R.P.F.C.No. 184 of 2008\n                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n             Dated this the 21st day of January, 2009\n\n                               O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioner has suffered an order under Section 125<\/p>\n<p>Cr.P.C. obliging him to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>p.m. to his wife and two minor children from 16.6.2003, the date<\/p>\n<p>of the petition in M.C. 227 of 2003. That order was passed on<\/p>\n<p>18.12.2003. Four petitions were filed for execution of that order.<\/p>\n<p>Total period of default covered by these four petitions was 46<\/p>\n<p>months. The learned Judge of the Family Court took note of the<\/p>\n<p>fact that an amount of Rs.10,000\/- had been paid. The two minor<\/p>\n<p>children had allegedly become majors and in the third and fourth<\/p>\n<p>applications, execution was sought only of the order so far as it<\/p>\n<p>relates to the wife. No payment was made and as per orders<\/p>\n<p>passed in two applications on 1.6.2007 the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>sentenced under Section 125(3) Cr.P.C. to undergo imprisonment<\/p>\n<p>for a period of 9 months and 12 months respectively. By later<\/p>\n<p>orders dt. 22.6.07 and 31.8.2007 he was sentenced to undergo<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for a further period of 12 months and 12 months<\/p>\n<p>respectively. The petitioner is thus undergoing imprisonment from<\/p>\n<p>1.6.2007.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. The petitioner has preferred this revision petition through the<\/p>\n<p>prison authorities.   Services of a State Brief counsel was made<\/p>\n<p>available to the petitioner.     Subsequently a counsel has entered<\/p>\n<p>appearance and he has advanced arguments on behalf of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>      3.    According to the learned counsel for the petitioner the<\/p>\n<p>impugned orders are incorrect, wrong, unjust and harsh. The counsel<\/p>\n<p>raises a contention that the petitioner, as a matter of fact, had paid a<\/p>\n<p>total amount of Rs.75,000\/- Credit has been given to an amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.10,000\/- by the learned Judge of the Family Court. But for the<\/p>\n<p>balance amount of Rs.65,000\/- paid (Rs.50,000\/- on 13.4.06 and<\/p>\n<p>Rs.15,000\/- on 4.5.06) no credit has been given. This payment was<\/p>\n<p>actually made by cheques, it is submitted. Receipts duly executed by<\/p>\n<p>the first claimant wife duly attested by witnesses are available with the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and those documents are produced before this Court. It is<\/p>\n<p>prayed    in these circumstances that the sentence imposed on the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is unjust and harsh. There may be a direction to the learned<\/p>\n<p>Judge of the Family Court to consider the matter afresh.<\/p>\n<p>      4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first<\/p>\n<p>claimant is already before the Family Court with a later application for<\/p>\n<p>execution of the order. In these circumstances the petitioner, who is<\/p>\n<p>remaining in custody from 1.6.2006, may not be compelled to remain<\/p>\n<p>in custody any longer awaiting issue and return of notice to the<\/p>\n<p>respondent. Appropriate directions may be issued, it is prayed.<\/p>\n<p>      5. I am ignoring the technicality that one revision petition has<\/p>\n<p>been filed to assail four different orders. I find merit in the submission<\/p>\n<p>of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the question whether as a<\/p>\n<p>matter of fact a further amount of rs.65,000\/- had actually been paid or<\/p>\n<p>not deserves to be considered. This is notwithstanding the fact that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner had not raised such specific plea before the learned Judge of<\/p>\n<p>the Family Court when the impugned orders were passed.                The<\/p>\n<p>genuineness of the receipts has to be got to be ascertained in detail<\/p>\n<p>and the response of the claimant has to be ascertained.<\/p>\n<p>      6. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that even<\/p>\n<p>going by the admitted version of the claimant, second and third<\/p>\n<p>claimants attained majority long earlier and the petitioner is not liable<\/p>\n<p>to continue to pay maintenance to them during the relevant period.<\/p>\n<p>That contention also deserves to be considered. The counsel further<\/p>\n<p>submits that execution has been claimed in the third and fourth<\/p>\n<p>petitions for the period during which the petitioner was admittedly in<\/p>\n<p>prison as per order dt. 1.6.2007. That aspect has also not been taken<\/p>\n<p>into consideration by the learned Judge of the Family Court. In these<\/p>\n<p>circumstances the only prayer made is that the impugned orders may be<\/p>\n<p>set aside and the learned Judge of the Family Court may be directed to<\/p>\n<p>dispose of all the four petitions afresh giving opportunity to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner to substantiate his contentions:\n<\/p>\n<p>      a) that a further amount of Rs.65,000\/- had already been paid as<\/p>\n<p>per receipts dt. 13.4.06 and 4.5.06;\n<\/p>\n<p>      b) that the minor children had attained majority and the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>is not entitled to pay maintenance to them after the dates on which they<\/p>\n<p>attained majority.\n<\/p>\n<p>       c) At least for the period during which the petitioner was in<\/p>\n<p>custody undergoing imprisonment he should not be reckoned as having<\/p>\n<p>wilfully defaulted payment.\n<\/p>\n<p>       d) At any rate, the petitioner is entitled to leniency and merely<\/p>\n<p>because it is legally competent to impose a sentence of one month for<\/p>\n<p>default in payment of maintenance for one month or part of it, the<\/p>\n<p>maximum sentence need not necessarily be imposed.<\/p>\n<p>       7. I am satisfied that the request can be accepted. I take note of<\/p>\n<p>the fact that the petitioner has been remaining in custody for a period<\/p>\n<p>exceeding 19 months(from 1.6.07).        I am satisfied that this revision<\/p>\n<p>petition can be allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>       8. In the result:\n<\/p>\n<p>       a) This revision petition is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>       b) The impugned orders i.e. i) dt.1.6.07 in CMP 564 of 2004,<\/p>\n<p>ii) dt.1.6.07 in CMP 750 of 2005, iii) dt. 22.6.07 in CMP 610 of 2006<\/p>\n<p>and iv) dt.31.8.07 in E.P.(Crl.) 1085 of 2007 are hereby set aside.<\/p>\n<p>      c) The learned Judge of the Family Court is directed to dispose<\/p>\n<p>of all these four applications afresh in accordance with law giving the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner an opportunity to raise and substantiate his contentions.<\/p>\n<p>      d) The petitioner is said to be in custody . He shall be released<\/p>\n<p>from custody forthwith. He shall appear before the learned Judge of<\/p>\n<p>the Family Court to continue the proceedings on 24.2.2009. If he does<\/p>\n<p>not appear the learned Judge can proceed to dispose of the petitions<\/p>\n<p>afresh on the basis of the materials available and placed before court.<\/p>\n<p>      e) The receipts dt.13.4.06 and 4.5.2006 produced before this<\/p>\n<p>Court shall forthwith be forwarded to the Family Court along with a<\/p>\n<p>copy of this order.\n<\/p>\n<p>      9. Hand over the order.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                               (R. BASANT)<br \/>\n                                                   Judge<br \/>\ntm<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RPFC.No. 184 of 2008() 1. CHANDRAMOHAN,C.NO.4938, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice R.BASANT [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-163263","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-17T17:24:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-17T17:24:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1016,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-17T17:24:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-17T17:24:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-17T17:24:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009"},"wordCount":1016,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009","name":"Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-17T17:24:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandramohan-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-21-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chandramohan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 21 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163263","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=163263"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163263\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=163263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=163263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=163263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}