{"id":163302,"date":"2009-11-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009"},"modified":"2019-04-02T02:07:31","modified_gmt":"2019-04-01T20:37:31","slug":"the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre>1\n\nIN THE HIGH COU'R'{' OF KARNATAKA. BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS 'THE 24*?' DAY OF NOVEMBER 2099\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE I~ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE S{IBI{ASI;I:.:E'1':&amp;i1)TI*--   .<\/pre>\n<p>M.F.A. No. 5979 ofzops [WC] C75; L  *<\/p>\n<p>BETWEEN I<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE NEW INDLA ASSU_RA,NCECO ETI1<br \/>\nNO A0 LAKSHM1 COMPLEX. &#8216;<br \/>\nOPP VANIVILAS HoSPr1_&#8217;AL.,_ <\/p>\n<p>K G ROAD FORTBANGALORE &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>BRANCH OFFICE &#8216;AI'{.I1\\z;-ZKUR  .  .1<br \/>\nSHOPPING COMPLEX &#8216;rU:viKLIR- A  <\/p>\n<p>REP BY 1&#8217;rSVSRD&#8221;&#8221;*iSjIONAL_ ] .1 &#8216;&#8221;&#8216;<br \/>\nMANAGER AT DO X111&#8217; PEENY-A_ <\/p>\n<p>:3ANG2ALOE\u00a7_;:_5S0G:5S&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>.  1:.  &#8230;APPELLANT<\/p>\n<p>[BY SR1. A K  )<\/p>\n<p> MAHADEVAPPA<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&#8221; A. :v\u00a3A;;.OR BY AGE<\/p>\n<p>~ vINjAj{A_&#8217;E&#8217;A BUS SERVICE<\/p>\n<p>5TH ROAD<br \/>\nS:DO&#8221;AGANGA EXTENSEON<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8216;V&#8221;I&#8217;_U&#8217;1\\\/EKUR&#8211; 572 101<\/p>\n<p> ADILAXMI<br \/>\n&#8216; AGED 39 YEARS<\/p>\n<p>W\/O RAMANJINAPPA<br \/>\nR\/O BRAMASANDRA<\/p>\n<p>B PALYA HOBLI<br \/>\nGOWRIBIDNUR TQ<br \/>\nKOLAR DIS11561208<br \/>\n RESPOND~ENTS&#8217;  , &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>[BY SR1. GVDAYANANDA, ADV. FOR R1  _ V. &#8216;<br \/>\nSR1. PATEL D. KARECOwDA.-ADv. FOR R2)<br \/>\nTHIS MFA FILED U\/S 30(1) OFWC. ACT AGAiNs&#8217;I?<br \/>\nTHE JUDGMENT DATED 31}..03;20&#8217;08&#8217;ie\u00bb._PASSED, &#8220;*I.I_\\I<br \/>\nWCA\/FC\/CR&#8211;115\/2007 ON ,T&#8221;E~IE FILE OF  LAB4O&#8217;UR&#8217;&#8211;,<br \/>\nOFFICER AND COIvIMI:3s&#8217;IONER*- E-&#8216;OR._<br \/>\nCOMPENSATION, TUMKUR,  DEST&#8217;P_EC&#8217;T,.  &#8220;TUMKUR.<br \/>\nAWARDING A COMPENSATION&#8217;~Of?__RS.3,*36V,O0VC}\/- WITH<br \/>\nINTEREST@ 12% RA.&#8221;   &#8221;   &#8221; &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>THIS MFA C0MIN&#8217;0I._  :EOR0&#8243;eAAE&#8217;AI:)fMIssION THIS<br \/>\nDAY, THE COURT DELIVE&#8217;BI$D.&#8217;:T_HE. FOLLOWING:<\/p>\n<p>..,fOp,\u00ab\ufb01nDa\ufb01ENT IIII<\/p>\n<p>v&#8217;:i&#8217;.his&#8217;: the insurer questioning the<\/p>\n<p>liability in&#8217;&#8212;respect of &#8216;the Commissioner for Workmen&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p> Q01.1}&#8221;i3\u00a2?1;\u00a7\u00bbsii_tionA&#8217;,V&#8221;&#8216;Tumkur, dated 31.03.2008. The 2&#8243;<\/p>\n<p>   &#8216;-the mother of the deceased. She \ufb02ied a<\/p>\n<p>  seeking Compensation for the death of her<\/p>\n<p> son, who was working as a Cieaner in the bus bearing<\/p>\n<p>regi&#8217;g&#8217;tratiOn No. KA.06.B.1i88, in the accident that<\/p>\n<p>  occurred on 06.06.2007&#8217;.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>2) It is alleged that, when the deceased was<\/p>\n<p>opened the door of the bus to alight from the but&#8217;s;&#8221;.tdue<\/p>\n<p>to two electric wires feil on the roof of on<\/p>\n<p>account of heavy rain fall, he electrocuted <\/p>\n<p>succumbed to the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>3) Before the Col:-*h13:1_issio13_er, Vt}i\u00a7~ly&#8217;\u00a7ai.idVVV <\/p>\n<p>petition was contested by____the_ irisurer.c_&#8217;_Thef% insured<br \/>\nthough served, has remained  <\/p>\n<p>4) The irlsurer&#8217;;  cfontestedllthe matter, has<\/p>\n<p>Contef1ded&#8217;iri.cleaner is not entitled for<br \/>\ncompe1&#8217;isation* Vunder&#8221;&#8211;the.\u00abprovisions of the Workrnen&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>Col-npensat&#8217;ion  Section 147&#8242; of the Motor<\/p>\n<p>. it  Ve&#8217;hicies  statutoirily fixes the liability on the insurer<\/p>\n<p>  of the driver of the vehicle and in case of<\/p>\n<p>a &#8216;public&#8217; service Vehicle, the risk of the conductor or the<\/p>\n<p> .ticket&#8221;e\u00a7&lt;a1niner is only covered. as such. there is a<br \/>\nldstattltory liability on the insurer. In View of the<\/p>\n<p> &quot; ~-&#039;provisions of Section \u00a347. in case of the Private<\/p>\n<p>cleaner.\n<\/p>\n<p>conductor and\/or cleaner, as such, it is the driver and<\/p>\n<p>the Conductor, who can only be compensated. .\u00ab_&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>7) On the other hand, lea.tr:n_eduV::&#8211;c0u11se&#8217;l..<\/p>\n<p>appearing for the claimant sub_mitt.ed. <\/p>\n<p>discloses collection of extra&#8217; premiiirnof  <\/p>\n<p>employees. The &#8216;two  but, it<br \/>\nonly mentions as &#8217;em.p:[&#8216;oye:es&#8217;;;_p: any employee<br \/>\nsuccumbed to injuries  he<br \/>\nwas entitleditol  employer vis&#8211;a&#8211;<br \/>\nvis   for the appellant<br \/>\nsubmitteti&#8217; it covers the risk of the<br \/>\n and in this case, the policy<\/p>\n<p>disciloses that&#8221;there_is collection of extra premium of<\/p>\n<p>d l\u00a7si:5G\u00ab,%&#8217;fQ&#8217;3;VlCoverage of extra employees apart from the<\/p>\n<p>H  The risk of the other employees<br \/>\n &#8216;fbene\ufb01t, the extra premium is collected are<br \/>\nV&#8217;  xalsocoyered. Learned counsel for the insurer submits<\/p>\n<p>that ll&#8217;\/{T410 refers to only driver, conductor and not the<\/p>\n<p>It is also not in dispute that 2 employees are<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><br \/>\ncovered on the basis of the extra premium co\ufb02ected by<\/p>\n<p>the insurer. {M1140 refers to coiiection offextra<\/p>\n<p>premium, necessarily shows the risk of the&#8230;.Cieane_r.Vis<\/p>\n<p>covered by the policy. No other provisionsatchftasp, a&#8217;1&#8217;3.y__ &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>prohibitions for covering the <\/p>\n<p>persons, is pointed out byrtiie learned couiisdeid \u00a303: there.<\/p>\n<p>insurer. In View of theV\u00b0x_sda:ne, E&#8212;  that the<br \/>\nCommissioner has rightly awarded&#8217;compensation to the<br \/>\nclaimant a.nd __fixed   t  = &#8216;the Insurance<\/p>\n<p>:78) -_ &#8216; _f:ar_&gt;as_::th.e&#8217;rate of interest is concerned,<br \/>\nthe Commissioner&#8217;.&#8217;h&#8221;a.sf;awarded interest at 12% pa.<\/p>\n<p> one month:a_ft_er&#8217; the date of accident tiii the date of<\/p>\n<p>. jgja\ufb02ifiliiit.:&#8217;.,A.V&#8217;i&#8217;IQW\u20acV\u20acF, the Apex Court, in the judgment<br \/>\n  aoog AIR saw 371 7 [ Oriental Insurance<br \/>\n    Mohd. Nasir and Another] has ciari\ufb01ed<br \/>\nV&#8217;  held that the award of interest to be awarded at<br \/>\n&#8216;A73&#8217;\/&#8217;2ti\/o from the date of fiiing of the claim petition tiii the<\/p>\n<p>date of judgment and at 12% from the date of judgment<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>from the date of deposit or payment. in View of the<br \/>\njudgment of the Apex Court cited supra, the impugned<\/p>\n<p>judgment is modi\ufb01ed to the extent of rate ofVVin1_:&#8217;erest<\/p>\n<p>awarded by the Commissioner. Accordiingiytjj__&#8217;:t1*1_e&#8217; _<\/p>\n<p>claimant is entitled for interest aptmf71\/2% \ufb01&#8221;o1n.::the&#8221;Vdate = 2<\/p>\n<p>the petition till the date of judgment<\/p>\n<p>the date ofjudgment til} thed-ate oifclepositii\/C  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>against the rate __ of  avi}a1&#8217;de_d Vvfiby the<br \/>\nCommissioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>With theisboveiimodi\ufb01estiion  the extent of<\/p>\n<p>rate of_interest;.&#8217;this s_&#8217;ppe&#8217;a.i &#8216;stands disposed of.<\/p>\n<p>_-The siniount deposited before this Court shall he<\/p>\n<p> tr\u00e91nsfei&#8217;red..&#8217; to the Commissioner for Workmens<\/p>\n<p>A r. Co~mpensati on \u00a7.~~Tumkur.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sci\/*<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n<p>d*aw.\ufb01sR*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009 Author: Subhash B.Adi 1 IN THE HIGH COU&#8217;R'{&#8216; OF KARNATAKA. BANGALORE DATED THIS &#8216;THE 24*?&#8217; DAY OF NOVEMBER 2099 BEFORE THE I~ION&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE S{IBI{ASI;I:.:E&#8217;1&#8242;:&amp;i1)TI*&#8211; . M.F.A. No. 5979 ofzops [WC] C75; L * BETWEEN I 1 THE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-163302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-01T20:37:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-01T20:37:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":879,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009\",\"name\":\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-01T20:37:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-01T20:37:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-01T20:37:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009"},"wordCount":879,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009","name":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-01T20:37:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-t-n-mahadevappa-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs T N Mahadevappa on 24 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=163302"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163302\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=163302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=163302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=163302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}