{"id":163387,"date":"2011-03-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011"},"modified":"2019-02-12T20:18:26","modified_gmt":"2019-02-12T14:48:26","slug":"mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                       at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                        File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000064\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a011,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a011,\u00a02011\n\n\n\nParties:\n\n\n\n           Appellant\n\n\n           Shri\u00a0C.T.\u00a0Adsule\n           796\/C,\u00a0Railway\u00a0Colony\u00a0(West),\n           Valsad,\u00a0Gujarat\n\n\n\n           The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present.\n\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Western\u00a0Railway,\n           Headquarters\u00a0Office,\n           Churchgate\n           Mumbai\u00ad\u00a0400\u00a0020\n\n\n\n\nRepresented\u00a0by:\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0P.K.\u00a0Gopikumar,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Officer(Engg.)\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Madhav,\u00a0Chief\u00a0O.S.\u00a0and\u00a0Shir\u00a0\n\nV.M.\u00a0Balse,\u00a0Chief\u00a0Inspector\n\n\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner                :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                                 Decision\u00a0Notice\n                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                             at\n                                                     New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                          File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000064\n\n\n                                                          ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0 his\u00a0 RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0Headquarters\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       01.08.2010\u00a0wanting\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0declaring\u00a0his\u00a0result\u00a0for\u00a0selection\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0post\u00a0of\u00a0AEN\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       pursuant\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0remarks\u00a0dated\u00a009.04.2010\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Assistant\u00a0Law\u00a0Officer\u00a0who\u00a0opined\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0&#8220;Result\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       may\u00a0be\u00a0declared\u00a0subject\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0outcome\u00a0of\u00a0W.P.\u00a0pending\u00a0in\u00a0High\u00a0Court\u00a0keeping\u00a0in\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0rule\/policy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       on\u00a0the\u00a0subject.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.     The \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 on \u00a0 20.08.2010, \u00a0 furnished \u00a0 the \u00a0 copies \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 relevant \u00a0 file \u00a0 noting \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Applicant. \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0on\u00a0being\u00a0approached\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0through\u00a01 st\u00adappeal\u00a0dated\u00a001.09.2010,\u00a0sent\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       a\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0Dy.\u00a0CPO\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0offering\u00a0the\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0relevant\u00a0files\u00a0to\u00a0him(the\u00a0Applicant).<\/p>\n<p>3.     The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0however,\u00a0being\u00a0still\u00a0dissatisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0information,\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a02 nd\u00adappeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Commission\u00a0on\u00a014.10.2010\u00a0alleging\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0furnished\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0is\u00a0incomplete\u00a0.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>4.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0inspected\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       files \u00a0 on \u00a0 24.03.2010 \u00a0 and \u00a0 has \u00a0 also\u00a0 obtained\u00a0 the\u00a0 photocopies\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 complete\u00a0 file. \u00a0 The\u00a0 Appellant,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       however,\u00a0was\u00a0still\u00a0unhappy\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0and\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0are\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       not\u00a0complying\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Court\u00a0direction\u00a0by\u00a0which\u00a0his\u00a0case\u00a0for\u00a0selection\u00a0was\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0considered\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       by\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0authority.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0clarified\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0judgment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Court\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellant\u00a0is\u00a0referring\u00a0to\u00a0,\u00a0was\u00a0passed\u00a0in\u00a02008\u00a0whereas,\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0matter\u00a0referred\u00a0to\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       application\u00a0 \u00a0relates\u00a0to\u00a0a\u00a0separate\u00a0pending\u00a0proceeding\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Court.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0thereafter,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       identified\u00a0a\u00a0document\u00a0i.e.\u00a0Selection\u00a0proceedings\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0case,\u00a0which\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0keen\u00a0on\u00a0obtaining\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       which\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0reacted\u00a0by\u00a0saying\u00a0that\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0selection\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       pending\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Court,\u00a0the\u00a0selection\u00a0proceedings\u00a0can\u00a0only\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0after\u00a0applying\u00a0the\u00a0severability\u00a0<br \/>\n         clause \u00a0 of \u00a0 Section \u00a0 10 \u00a0 (1) \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0 \u00a0 ie. \u00a0 after\u00a0 removing\u00a0 all \u00a0 the\u00a0 proceedings\u00a0 \u00a0 related\u00a0 to\u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Appellant\u00a0.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.      Considering\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0very\u00a0same\u00a0\u00a0matter\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0pending\u00a0before\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the\u00a0court\u00a0of\u00a0law,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0considered\u00a0fit\u00a0to\u00a0remit\u00a0this\u00a0matter\u00a0back\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0who\u00a0will\u00a0examine\u00a0this\u00a0piece\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        of\u00a0request\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a08(1)(b)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct\u00a0and\u00a0then\u00a0take\u00a0a\u00a0decision\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        same.\u00a0This\u00a0is\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0completed\u00a0by\u00a010.4.11.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6.      The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0these\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                       (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                              Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc<\/p>\n<p>1.      Shri\u00a0C.T.\u00a0Adsule<br \/>\n        796\/C,\u00a0Railway\u00a0Colony\u00a0(West),<br \/>\n        Valsad,\u00a0Gujarat<\/p>\n<p>2.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n        Western\u00a0Railway,<br \/>\n        Headquarters\u00a0Office,<br \/>\n        Churchgate<br \/>\n        Mumbai\u00ad\u00a0400\u00a0020\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n     Western\u00a0Railway,<br \/>\n     Headquarters\u00a0Office,<br \/>\n     Churchgate<br \/>\n     Mumbai\u00ad\u00a0400\u00a0020<\/p>\n<p>4.   Officer\u00a0In\u00adcharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000064 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a011,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a011,\u00a02011 Parties: Appellant Shri\u00a0C.T.\u00a0Adsule 796\/C,\u00a0Railway\u00a0Colony\u00a0(West), Valsad,\u00a0Gujarat The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present. Respondents Western\u00a0Railway, Headquarters\u00a0Office, Churchgate Mumbai\u00ad\u00a0400\u00a0020 Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0P.K.\u00a0Gopikumar,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Officer(Engg.)\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Madhav,\u00a0Chief\u00a0O.S.\u00a0and\u00a0Shir\u00a0 V.M.\u00a0Balse,\u00a0Chief\u00a0Inspector Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000064 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0 his\u00a0 RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0Headquarters\u00a0on\u00a0 01.08.2010\u00a0wanting\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0declaring\u00a0his\u00a0result\u00a0for\u00a0selection\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0post\u00a0of\u00a0AEN\u00a0 pursuant\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0remarks\u00a0dated\u00a009.04.2010\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Assistant\u00a0Law\u00a0Officer\u00a0who\u00a0opined\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0&#8220;Result\u00a0 may\u00a0be\u00a0declared\u00a0subject\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0outcome\u00a0of\u00a0W.P.\u00a0pending\u00a0in\u00a0High\u00a0Court\u00a0keeping\u00a0in\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0rule\/policy\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-163387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-12T14:48:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-12T14:48:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":455,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-12T14:48:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-12T14:48:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-12T14:48:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011"},"wordCount":455,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011","name":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-12T14:48:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=163387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163387\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=163387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=163387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=163387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}