{"id":16345,"date":"2010-01-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010"},"modified":"2015-03-11T03:48:27","modified_gmt":"2015-03-10T22:18:27","slug":"shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCRICUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 12TH DAY or JANUAE\"i?;\"2t\u00a73[j'0V\u00e9  -\n\nBEFORE_w__\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR.JUsTzcE-,AI+2'g'ALz 1S:A\u00a2+.\u00a7Rg\u00a7.:T-of\n\nCRIMINAL PET1T1oi\u00a7*~No.8'1oG\/;2'i3o9_;\"\"  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1.\n\nShri. Roopsunder s\/op, 1.\\I'2\u00a7_ikV  V\nAge: 38 Years, Occupationz' .in.su'r'anCei_-Agent\nR\/o. I-I.No..33OL')_\/JA.\/f_'1, shn R\"e~m1_ka Niwas\nShivagiri,     \n\nHubli, D'1'\u00e91L5_\"Dh&fWad:f-._V  _   '\n\n. Dr.   W  o\u00bb..Vv.:'Roofuisiirtder N aik\n\nAgeig_38_ YevarVs;\"'QCQu'pa'tion2' Associate Professor\nR\/o. House   10, G.O.Quarters\nKIMS Campus', _ 'V . ' \nHubii, Diu'st;_VDharWad\"'\n  \"  Petitioners\n\n \u00bb{I:3'y--\u00bb S.Raichur, Adv.)\nj State oftiatr\u00e9rzataka through\n\n  Officer, Mahila Police Station\n.. ff ~HV1ib1.i'.\n\n Respondent\n\n%  tgsgy Sri. \u00a5;.H.Gotkhindi, HCGP)\n\n,,.,......(\"\"\"'\"\"\"\"\"\n\n\n\nThis Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482\nof Cr.P.C praying to quash the proceedings in C.C.N'o.\n704\/2009 in the court of the JMFC II, Hubli.  T\n\nThis Criminal Petition is coming on for .\n\nthis day, the Court made the following:\n\nThe present petition u\/ s   \n\npetitioner Nos. 1 and 2  respe.ctiVeily,i[accused\n\nNos. 1 85 2 in CC.No. \/O9i'l(Clriineip'ivl\\lo. 12\/V09 \ufb01r Mahila\n\nPolice Station, Hubli) :ioffenc'e_'sfa\/secs. 498A,\n\n323, 504      \n\n2. Statedliin\"'br\"i'eAf \u00bb-theulfacts leading to the present\npetitigon are as \n Vi(.a}-{The petitioner No.2 Smt. Janaki, the\nof petitioner No.1 Roopsunder\n. hilaik, filed a complaint before the police\nof l\\\/lahila P.S., Hubli, against her\nhusband (Petitioner No.1 herein)\n\nalleging that he committed offences\n\nu\/secs. 498A, 324, 504 and 506 of\nr--...{\"\"*---\n\n\n\n(b) After completion of jini%e's<t.iga.tio_;n,::p'"the \n\nDJ\n\nIPC. On the\n\ncomplaint crime No. 12\/09 came to\n\nregistered against him by the  \n\nPolice Hubli.\n\nsaid police submitted  \n\nagainst the first petit.io'ner~a:ccus.eVdV \n\nbefore the iearned  Coi\ufb02ubli\nfor the offences  323, 504\nand 506 of iPc1.* 'JMFC, by\nhis _"or_de1~_... \u00ab'dtd:   took\n\nco_g7nizai'ice_ 4"of:V_ the 'saicl""offence and\n\n"'*iSSU.eda':Qprocess agmnst the present\n\n-.p'etiti'c.1'i'er'i _ "accused returnable by\n\n'x24\/7\/2o\u00e99.'\u00abT"\n\n  the pendencey of the\ni  investigaitiiioin the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2\n\n dispute amicably settled and\n\nit ' joint petition 11\/ s 13B of the Hindu\n\n . Marriage Act seeking dissolution of their\n\nmarriage by consent of each other.\n\nTherefore, both the petitioners have filed\n\nthe present joint petition seeking\n\n,.~._\u00a7'\u00b0'-'---~'-\n\nbasis of the said_____\n\n\n\nquashing of further proceedings in the_, \n\nsaid case before the Trial Court.\n\n3. Heard the arguments of Sri. Sathis S.   ~\n\nlearned counsel appearing for bo.th~th'e  1._ ii\n\nand 2.} Perused the averrnents  \n\npetitioner No.2 against peititioner i\\1'o.,_15 "ihiisiband, " V\n\nthe order cit: 10\/7,.\/.2O()9Ar.----passed'. byi"the.-V2 learned\nMagistrate taking   of:  -said offences\nagainst the   the joint petition\n\nfiled by   1:: of the Hindu Marriage\n\nAct seiekingii their marriage by consent of\n\neach othieri .\n\n  \u00e9atish S.Raichur, the Eearned counsei for the\n\n reiiance on the decision of the Hon'b1e\n\nSuiiremiei Court in the case of, B.S.Joshi and Others vs\n\nit i\u00ab,:&*tat_\u00a2  Haryana and Another reported in ILR 2003\n\n 'R-':Ai.iiR"i2\u00a3'785, strongiy contends that, since the dispute\n\n"between husband and wife has been settled amicably\n\nf \n\n\n\nand they have fiied the petition 11\/3 13 B of Hindu\n\nMarriage Act, seeking dissolution of their marriagfeby\n\nconsent of each other, no purpose would be sveryeldi  "\n\ncontinuing the proceedings 'oefo;*e"t--he \n\ntherefore all further proceedings   case. deser:%e~.tio'w._\n\nbe quashed. V    \n5. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 ar'e_pr.e_sent.' ._'I_'hey together\n\nsubmit that they have'-gl:Ct_ th_eii:j 'd.ispute'rsettIed amicably\n\nand therefore, they ha.Ve~i.'i1::edi  138 of Hindu\n\nMarria,ge"iAct.:9V5jn   165'\/'2oo9 before the 11 Addi.\n\nCivil Judge (Sr.ViDn}~,._iiH--ub\u00bbEi..~--'seeking dissolution of their\n\nmarriage  _con.s'ent. of each other and the same is\n\n....r__p\u00a2riiding'*.ar1d therefore, further proceedings in the said\n\ni..cr'irriirla}'~.,_casVe_Lgaending before the learned Magistrate\n\nmay be qtia\u00e9shed.\n\n\n\n6. Honb'1e Supreme Court has observed   "\n\nNos. 4,6,8,9 of its judgement inv~th'e--above _si'iiL1 c\u00e9ise'.was--.\u00ab\nunder:\n\nPara 4. The High COi.J1'1"i13.S,  \nJudgment, dismissed :thel"peti_tiorii fiied  the\nappellants seekiiag'  FIR for in\nView of the  th'eiv.ioffef1ces under\nSection?\u00bb     are non-\n  powers under\ns\u00a2\u00a2;1pn.V%:%;8';2:___g'f  be invoked to\nby  provision of Section\nsiizoor 'tingiejqdev;{fm~ its View, the High Court\n_hasixre1i"erre:c1'V._to'-einziirelied upon the decisions of\n..\u00ab\u00a7\u00a5.ti}1is Coi;1:*fi.,___.i.if1o\u00bb STATE OF I-IARYANA AND\n o"'fHi::2s Vs BHAJAN LAL AND OTHERS (1992\no ittsi:;\u00a7p1\u00a7(1):'_1.\u00bbscc 335) MADI-IU LMAYE vs THE\n  MAHARASHTRA [(1977) 4 sec 551]\n a\ufb01gi "SURENDERA NATH MOHANTY AND\n\n ~  ANOTHER vs STATE OF ORISSA [AIR 1999 so\n'=.f21s1}\n\nq....._,5"'-\\.....-o\n\n\n\n..  powers. V "\n\nPara 6. In PEPSI FOOD LTD. AND ANOTHER\nvs SPECIAL JUDECIAL MAGESTRATE Al_\\l.i_)\n\nOTHERS [(1993) 5 sec 749], this C01.1I"t'4"'\u00bb'.i\u00bb'_:i:"\u00a3\u00abl?i_Ll'--i.V\n\nreference to Bhajan Lal's case observed__th'atijthei ;. \n\nguidelines laid therein as to wherQ,..tf1\u20ac. Ciourt it\n\nwill exercise jurisdiction unclei'\u00abSection_il4i82V of: in\n\nthe Code could not be in\ufb01exibie er ieytihg ;igiseti:i'itii'\n\nformulate to be fo'Eilowed   Courts.\nExercise of such power  the\nfacts and circurnstancelsl  casevybut with\nthe sole purpose _e.'EOl'vi'\u00bbtL1l3L1Se of the\nprocess of_*a.r1y Cdurtiiorv  to" secure the\n\nends of ju:stil_ce.,l'~\u00a2  'is t\ufb01fellll settled that these\n\npiowersi"Ii.a.Ve7noul,irni_ts, _' Of course, where there\nisimore p'o_WeAr~,._iit'--beco~rnes necessary to exercise\n\nutmost care-_'a'n,d"c'aution while invoking such\n\n  1\u00b0'3.?"='c  is thus, clear that Madhu Lirnaye's\n 4 sec 551], does not lay down\n\n  general proposition limiting power of\n\nquash-ing the criminal proceedings or FIR or\n\nA likcomplaint as vested in Section 482 of the Code\n\n"or extra ordinary power under Article 226 of the\n\n,..r.c-----~\n\n\n\nConstitution of India. We are, therefore, of the\n\nView that if for the purpose of securing the\n\nof justice, quashing of FIR becomes   \n\nSection 320 would not be a bar to  C'\n\nof power of quashing. V---"'It*---.is,hovxisjeiferg  \n\ndifferent matter depending\u00bb facts \n\ncircumstances of eachiease Whether to'e:~revrcise\n\nor not such a power.\n\nPara 9. The  ha__s.:a]so reiied [AIR\n1999 so 2181] upgn  in case of\nSurender_E:\\iath  "{siiL1pra) for the\n\npropos.ition1';j'i'i_t.:f;ati:\u00aboffence declared to be non-\n\nco~11~1p.ounda?3,1e 'eannot"be--"compounded at all\neVen_ 'with.theiperrnvission of the Court. That is\n\nofi'C\\ouirse'V..soif _ offences which can be\n\n_::_oInpo'unded'-- areiiiinentioned in Section 320.\n\n offe'n'ces~which are not mentioned there\n\n  in  be permitted to be compounded. In\n\n case, the appellants were convicted\n\nA  by.-thveltrial Court for offence under Section 307.\n\n High Court altered the conviction of the\n\nif 'i"=._appe1lants and convicted them for offence\n\n"under Section 326 and imposed sentence of six\n\nmonths. The trial Court had sentenced the\n\n,,.......$".""'Nv--'"'u..\n\n\n\nappellants for a period of five years R1. \n\napplication for compounding was, hov\u00a7(eV_ieri,\\_\n\ndismissed by the High Court.  \n\nholding that the offence for wh'ie:hvjV'_=thei  it\n\nappeliants had been convicted wiiee,-his \n\ncompoundable and, theref;o.re,;'_"it~'icouid  \n\npermitted to be com:)oundeid.V_but  i\n\nthat the parties had'i"t'e\u00bbs"e\u00bbtt1ed their: dispute\noutside the Court,__ the,rs'e1iit_enee_wasi 'reduced to\nthe period already 'unde_r,\u00a7;.o}ne'\u00a7':.Vit,iiis\u00bb,however, to\nbe borne in mind  case the\nappe11ar_itisi}haVd  of the\noffen-\ufb01es " V  if   \ufb01apipirovached the Court\n  if FIR under the\n\noircum staneesi above .. stated.\n\n A' 7. above observation of Hon'b1e Supreme\n   E am of the opinion that though the\nof IPC is not compoundable, this court,\n;_1n def its inherent powers u\/S 482 Cr.P.C. can\n\nif  the further proceedings before the Trial Court in\n\ng--..S"'\\'-..\u00bb\n\n\n\n10\n\nView of the special and peculiar circumstances of the\n\ncase. Hence, the following:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The present petition fileti ,u-\/eii48\u00a7i.i,c–f\u00a713.ic_e <\/p>\n
hereby allowed. A11 furthiez\ufb01h pre’eeed1ngeV:\u00b0n;[ccINe. <\/p>\n
704\/ 2009 pending on the   Court,
\nHubli, pursuant to  \/ 2006, taking
\ncognizance of the  0ffen-ceei   504, 506 IPC
\nagainst th e_     it hereby quashed.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-7
\nJUDGE<\/p>\n
Vmb, ,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010 Author: Arali Nagaraj IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CRICUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAD DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY or JANUAE”i?;”2t\u00a73[j’0V\u00e9 – BEFORE_w__ THE I-ION’BLE MR.JUsTzcE-,AI+2’g’ALz 1S:A\u00a2+.\u00a7Rg\u00a7.:T-of CRIMINAL PET1T1oi\u00a7*~No.8’1oG\/;2’i3o9_;”” BETWEEN: 1. Shri. Roopsunder s\/op, 1.\\I’2\u00a7_ikV V Age: 38 Years, Occupationz’ .in.su’r’anCei_-Agent R\/o. I-I.No..33OL’)_\/JA.\/f_’1, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-10T22:18:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-10T22:18:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":66,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-10T22:18:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-10T22:18:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-10T22:18:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010"},"wordCount":66,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010","name":"Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-10T22:18:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roopsunder-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-12-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Roopsunder vs State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16345\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}