{"id":163607,"date":"2011-04-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-04-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011"},"modified":"2017-07-01T01:02:45","modified_gmt":"2017-06-30T19:32:45","slug":"in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011","title":{"rendered":"In The High Court Of Judicature At … vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
In The High Court Of Judicature At … vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011<\/div>\n
Bench: A. B. Chaudhari, P. D. Kode<\/div>\n
     apeal76.05.odt                                1\n\n\n\n\n                                                                               \n            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n                      NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR\n\n\n\n\n                                                       \n                            CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.76\/2005\n\n\n     APPELLANT :-            Bisram Sanu Jambhekar,\n                             Aged about 45 years,\n\n\n\n\n                                                      \n                             R\/o Dabka, Tq. Dharni,\n                             District Amravati,\n                             (Prisoner No. C-2914, Central\n                             Prison, Amravati).\n\n\n\n\n                                        \n                                            ...VERSUS...\n\n     RESPONDENT :-      ig   State of Maharashtra,\n                             Through P.S.O. Dharni.\n\n     -----------------------------------------------------------------\n                      \n                      [Shri R.M. Daga, Adv. for appellant]\n                      [Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for respondent]\n     -----------------------------------------------------------------\n\n                                         CORAM     :      A.B. CHAUDHARI AND\n                                                          P.D.KODE, JJ.\n      \n\n\n     Date of reserving the judgment:   03.03.2011\n   \n\n\n\n     Date of pronouncing the judgment: 11.04.2011\n\n     J U D G M E N T               (PER : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J.)\n<\/pre>\n
     1.               Being aggrieved by the judgment and order<\/p>\n
     dated 26.10.2004, passed by the Additional Sessions<\/p>\n
     Judge, Achalpur in Session Trial No.10\/2004 by which<\/p>\n
     the appellant\/accused was convicted for the offence<\/p>\n
     punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and<\/p>\n
     was   sentenced          to    undergo      rigorous        imprisonment            for<\/p>\n
     life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000\/-, in default of<\/p>\n
                                                       ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:11:02 :::<\/span>
\n      apeal76.05.odt                                2<\/span><\/p>\n
     payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment<\/p>\n
     for    15    days,       the    present    appeal         was     filed       by    the<\/p>\n
     appellant.\n<\/p>\n
     2.               In support of the appeal, learned Counsel<\/p>\n
     for the appellant made the following submissions.\n<\/p>\n
                      (a)            The prosecution case is not based<\/p>\n
     on any direct evidence and is based only on oral and<\/p>\n
     written dying declarations.\n<\/p>\n
                      (b)            The     witnesses           on       oral        dying<\/p>\n
     declaration have not supported the prosecution and the<\/p>\n
     trial Court has also disbelieved them.\n<\/p>\n
                      (c)            The only evidence on record that<\/p>\n
     remains for consideration is that of written dying<\/p>\n
     declaration            proved    by   P.W.8             Abdul       Jabbar,         the<\/p>\n
     Executive Magistrate.\n<\/p>\n
                      (d)            Perusal of the evidence of P.W.8<\/p>\n
     Abdul       Jabbar       with    other     evidence           and       the      dying<\/p>\n
     declaration (Exh.28) show many serious discrepancies<\/p>\n
     and    therefore,         the    said     dying      declaration           (Exh.28)<\/p>\n
     will    have      to     be    discarded.     In      the     absence         of    any<\/p>\n
     corroborative            evidence       and       existence          of       serious<\/p>\n
     discrepancies in the dying declaration, the same is<\/p>\n
     liable to be rejected and consequently, the appellant<\/p>\n
                                                       ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:11:02 :::<\/span>
\n      apeal76.05.odt                                3<\/span><\/p>\n
     is liable to be acquitted.\n<\/p>\n
                      (e)           F.I.R. was lodged by the sister of<\/p>\n
     the deceased but she has not been examined before the<\/p>\n
     Court though the prosecution claimed that she was an<\/p>\n
     eye witness to the incident. There is no explanation<\/p>\n
     furnished by the prosecution for not producing her<\/p>\n
     before the Court.\n<\/p>\n
     3.               Per     contra,        learned           A.P.P.           for       the<\/p>\n
     respondent opposed the appeal and argued that some<\/p>\n
     corroboration            can       be     found             out         from         the<\/p>\n
     cross-examination of the witnesses who deposed about<\/p>\n
     oral dying declaration and particularly the mother of<\/p>\n
     the deceased and therefore, the appeal deserves to be<\/p>\n
     dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
     4.               We have heard learned Counsel for the rival<\/p>\n
     parties at length. We have also carefully perused the<\/p>\n
     record     and     the    evidence       of       the      witnesses.            F.I.R.\n<\/p>\n
     (Exh.32)         was   lodged      by    Smt.        Rajali         Kasdekar         the<\/p>\n
     younger sister of the deceased Maniklal. The F.I.R.\n<\/p>\n
     was exhibited and proved by the Investigating Officer.\n<\/p>\n
     5.               Informant Rajali described the incident in<\/p>\n
     the    F.I.R.      stating      therein           that     on     1.11.2003          the<\/p>\n
     appellant had brought his daughter Pramila and the<\/p>\n
                                                        ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:11:02 :::<\/span>
\n      apeal76.05.odt                               4<\/span><\/p>\n
     deceased Maniklal from Burhanpur to the village since<\/p>\n
     his daughter had eloped with him. At about 5:00 p.m.<\/p>\n
     the    appellant         came   with    stick         to     her     house       when<\/p>\n
     deceased         Maniklal       was    with        her      in       the      house.\n<\/p>\n
     Therefore, Maniklal went out from the back door of the<\/p>\n
     house towards the house of his uncle Munna Bhilavekar<\/p>\n
     who was followed by Bisram and Isram. Then deceased<\/p>\n
     Maniklal went inside the house of uncle Munna and the<\/p>\n
     appellant and Isram barged their entry into the house<\/p>\n
     of uncle. Then Isram lifted kerosene tin and put it on<\/p>\n
     the    person       of     Maniklal         while       Bisram        lighted          a<\/p>\n
     matchstick and burnt Maniklal. She raised shouts and<\/p>\n
     thereafter had poured water on his person. It is thus<\/p>\n
     clear that she was an eye witness to the incident and<\/p>\n
     was also the informant.\n<\/p>\n
     6.               In the first place, she lodged F.I.R. on<\/p>\n
     6.11.2003 in respect of the incident dated 1.11.2003,<\/p>\n
     for which there is no explanation. If she was an eye<\/p>\n
     witness the police did not make any attempt to produce<\/p>\n
     her before the Court during trial and there is no<\/p>\n
     explanation why she was not produced. The story set<\/p>\n
     out in the F.I.R. (Exh.31) is completely different<\/p>\n
     from    the       story    stated      by    Maniklal           in     his      dying<\/p>\n
                                                      ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:11:02 :::<\/span>
\n      apeal76.05.odt                            5<\/span><\/p>\n
     declaration (Exh.28). In dying declaration (Exh.28)<\/p>\n
     the story about he being in the house with his sister<\/p>\n
     Rajali at the relevant time and then he going out from<\/p>\n
     the back door as Bisram the appellant had come with<\/p>\n
     stick at the house is to be found nowhere in the dying<\/p>\n
     declaration (Exh.28). The story that the appellant had<\/p>\n
     gone to the house of Maniklal armed with stick is not<\/p>\n
     to be found in the dying declaration (Exh.28).\n<\/p>\n
     7.<\/p>\n
                      On the contrary, the dying declaration shows<\/p>\n
     that while Maniklal was moving on the road, he found<\/p>\n
     appellant and Isram with axe and stick in their hands<\/p>\n
     at some distance and therefore, he went into the house<\/p>\n
     of his uncle where the incident of burning allegedly<\/p>\n
     took place.\n<\/p>\n
     8.               In   our   opinion,     this      discrepancy           in     the<\/p>\n
     dying     declaration        and   the    prosecution            story       is     a<\/p>\n
     serious discrepancy. Not only that the evidence of<\/p>\n
     P.W. 8        Abdul Jabbar that Maniklal had told him while<\/p>\n
     giving dying declaration that Bisram and Isram met him<\/p>\n
     in the way when he was going to the house of his uncle<\/p>\n
     and    that      they   were    armed     with      stick,        is     a     very<\/p>\n
     important omission, which has been duly brought on<\/p>\n
     record     in     the   cross-examination            of    P.W.8             Abdul<\/p>\n
                                                   ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:11:02 :::<\/span>
\n      apeal76.05.odt                               6<\/span><\/p>\n
     Jabbar. It is further seen that Maniklal was burnt as<\/p>\n
     per the prosecution case to the extent of 90% and was<\/p>\n
     shifted      from        Dharni         hospital       to     Irvin        hospital<\/p>\n
     Amravati and the dying declaration was recorded on the<\/p>\n
     second day.\n<\/p>\n
     9.               From the evidence of Doctor particularly in<\/p>\n
     the cross-examination, it is difficult to believe that<\/p>\n
     the     patient          was      mentally        fit        to      give         dying<\/p>\n
     declaration. It is highly doubtful whether he was fit<\/p>\n
     to    give   dying       declaration         having         been    administered<\/p>\n
     pain    killers        and     the      Doctor    says      that     he     did     not<\/p>\n
     measure the body temperature of the patient before<\/p>\n
     declaring him fit.\n<\/p>\n
     10.              It is in this view of the matter, we are of<\/p>\n
     the    opinion         that       the     dying     declaration            (Exh.28)<\/p>\n
     requires corroboration. But then all other prosecution<\/p>\n
     witnesses have not supported the prosecution case and<\/p>\n
     thus    there       is       no    corroborative            evidence         to     the<\/p>\n
     satisfaction of this Court for corroborating the dying<\/p>\n
     declaration (Exh.28). We are of the opinion that we<\/p>\n
     should not take the risk of convicting the appellant<\/p>\n
     or confirming the conviction of the appellant in the<\/p>\n
     wake    of       the     above       serious      discrepancies              in     the<\/p>\n
                                                       ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:11:02 :::<\/span>
\n      apeal76.05.odt                              7<\/span><\/p>\n
     prosecution             evidence.     That           apart,          the        dying<\/p>\n
     declaration (Exh.28) though was recorded on 2.11.2003<\/p>\n
     and    was       received    by     the    Investigating             Officer         on<\/p>\n
     4.11.2003, no offence was registered and it is only<\/p>\n
     after Rajali gave a report, the offence was registered<\/p>\n
     on 6.11.2003 but then Rajali had no explanation as to<\/p>\n
     why F.I.R. was lodged after 5 days particularly when<\/p>\n
     she was an eye witness. There is no explanation as to<\/p>\n
     where was she when the deceased Maniklal was taken to<\/p>\n
     Dharni       hospital       first         and     thereafter            to      Irvin<\/p>\n
     hospital, Amravati.\n<\/p>\n
     11.              To sum up, in the above factual scenario,<\/p>\n
     benefit      of    doubt    will     have       to   be     extended         to    the<\/p>\n
     accused. We, therefore, hold that the conviction of<\/p>\n
     the appellant for the offence charged against him is<\/p>\n
     not legal. In the result, we pass the following order.<\/p>\n
\n\n                                          O R D E R\n\n                      (i)         Criminal           Appeal        No.76\/2005             is\n\n\n\n\n\n     allowed.\n\n                      (ii)        The     impugned         judgment         and      order\n\n<\/pre>\n
     dated 26.10.2004, passed by the Additional Sessions<\/p>\n
     Judge, Achalpur in Session Trial No. 10\/2004 is set<\/p>\n
     aside.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n                                                      ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 17:11:02 :::<\/span>\n      apeal76.05.odt                       8<\/span>\n\n\n\n\n                                                                      \n                      (iii)   Appellant       is    acquitted            of     the\n\n     offence charged against him\n\n\n\n\n                                              \n                      (iv)    Appellant be set at liberty.\n\n                      (v)     Fine, if paid, be refunded to the\n\n\n\n\n                                             \n     appellant\/accused.\n\n\n\n\n                                \n                      JUDGE                               JUDGE\n                       \n                      \n     ssw\n      \n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n                                              ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 17:11:02 :::<\/span>\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court In The High Court Of Judicature At … vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011 Bench: A. B. Chaudhari, P. D. Kode apeal76.05.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.76\/2005 APPELLANT :- Bisram Sanu Jambhekar, Aged about 45 years, R\/o Dabka, Tq. Dharni, District Amravati, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-163607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nIn The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-04-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-30T19:32:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"In The High Court Of Judicature At … vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-30T19:32:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1198,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011\",\"name\":\"In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-30T19:32:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In The High Court Of Judicature At … vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-04-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-30T19:32:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"In The High Court Of Judicature At … vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011","datePublished":"2011-04-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-30T19:32:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011"},"wordCount":1198,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011","name":"In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-04-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-30T19:32:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-the-high-court-of-judicature-at-vs-unknown-on-11-april-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In The High Court Of Judicature At … vs Unknown on 11 April, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=163607"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163607\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=163607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=163607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=163607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}