{"id":163784,"date":"2008-07-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008"},"modified":"2017-12-05T23:12:34","modified_gmt":"2017-12-05T17:42:34","slug":"ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 25 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 25 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
OUR? OF KARNATAKA HiGH COURTAAQFOKARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HJGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF IERREATAIEA, BHNGALOPL5\n\nnnmnz THIS on THE 25 TH may as July 2\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7O',\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE H9N'aLz HR. ausT1gE-_A.s;\ufb01d\u00a7#\u00a7a#'OfV= u\n\nw? as 13334 or 2ad5At\u00a7*\u00a5kihhn:O :Via'*T\n\n8ET&'EEl'i\n\nan-an-an-auuuu-4:-u-nun\n\nMrs TSIRHMALA ENGIH\u00a7ERI&3\"*\ufb02OOO: \nPLOT wo.451, 4TH FHA$3,; jV.'='\u00bb'\nPEERYE INHUSTRIAL Anna,'.-*;\nnauennuas 569 959. _M_>, X'u\nREF. 3? R.HA\u00a7I,EAR3NER\"; _ ,O3 -1,'\n5 fa\u00bbV.'p 3\"\" f'a*<;.w=PET1T1oN3a\nt\ufb01y 3:15? $'g\u00a7\u00a7Rn:\u00a753nv.g\nAND  . . ' . .,   ll  ~. \n\n--q:-nu----u'cnq- .\n\n VINDE}3'I'R1.\\L"'--ARE83\nnEv3LQPHEsT"5Q3\u00a3ng 'v\n\nI: Fhacn, RhsHTRoT\ufb01RHA ?ARI8HhT BLBG.,\n1\u00a7i3,,HRQ?ArH\u00a7m\u00a7A<nnAs,\n\n\u00b0".aAxqxLagz\u00ab5ao ooz\n-,';EEB,*5Y*$\ufb01IEF xxzcuwxvz orrxcsn\n mO%r:mm-:%O%%\n\n. . . RESPGNDEI-IT\n\n(\ufb01g s;iO3 R gnsxzvnsnsewnn \u00ab A\ufb02V.}\n\nL  , THIS 'LP. ?I{.:ED \u00a7'RAYIHG TO CALL FOR RECORDS\n  FF'.\u20ac0~! THE F:.ESPO!41DKN'I'S PERTAINIKG TO THE PETITIGNER\n }PL#B'l' Ct?' {.3141} A115 UN PEIRUSAL OF THE 510$ QUKSH 'THE\nV' IMPUGHED ORBER DT. 23.6.2905 VIBE AKNEKJG. TO THE\n\nPE'}"I'I'I0h\u00a5.\n\n'l"H'IS PETITIGH CUMINS BM FOR HEARING THIS\n\nBAY, THE CUHRT MADE THE FOLLGWIRG :\n\n\u00e9\n\n\n\n5. The zzndisputad facts are thVat_p than\n\nrespendent has allottad the plot\n\nPenny: 4"' Phase indzzestrial ax:-an,'? .::3&n:_\ufb01i\u00a2i\u00a7,%"'\n\nmaasuring an extent: f :1\u00a79\"?~g:\u00a7;.::;ai\u00a7\u00a7&::s: v'1;{n\u00a7\u00a7er '\n\nleast: -czum-sale agreement -\ufb01azxzad  5 \n\nPossassian of the aa.id'=\u00a73;:>t  {:5\nthe petitioner   fii'\"\"J:\u00e9vz:sepect of\nthe anj oymorxt or   conditicms\nwere irmzjm-'=,:cV;\u00a3',1 '_'.   In this\nregard  required to put up\n<2c::nLgs'*:'t\u00e9zc%.:\u00a7\u00a7g<L'.:svrz..\u00e9 :   as Prcwided under:\nthe  "2a:aE_.:\u00a7 ,.-'k\ufb01aping in view the sat\n\nba.\u00a7'.:_k_a  ,v:}'9ef.~,_  "'\u00a3:ea.a to be retained an\n\n   the lease agreanzent. The\n\n,\u00a7:'a;if;i\u00a7:::'_:i;\u00ab:.'*11::-'e:4\u00a7;.%-\u00a3h\u00a7i;gsa.\u00a3ter is said to have put up\n\n  can\u00a7t_;\u00a7i1et_i\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9.V. A\u00e9znly ta an extent of 231 square\n\n.. _f'_j ..4x_\u00a3sc:t9r3 " \ufb01e'? alleged by the reaspandent and\n\n 4..t'}\u00a7.T\u00a7r\u00a7_f'\u00a7%x:\u00a2, the reaptandant being of the View\n\n'  the plat allctted to the patitiorzaxz has\n\n been utilised in the manner in which it\n\n.uuxI Ur uuumamm Hum couxr_o:=. :<AmATAxA men COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA a-new COURT 'or I(ARNA1'AKA HIGH count:\n\nwas mquire\u00e9 to he done despite the legume at\n\ni...\n\n\n\nDURT or KARNATAKA HIGH ccwar 9M;ARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Hie:-i count or KARNATAKA HIGH (SOUR?\n\nsufficient time, thought it fit: ta issue a\n\nshow cauae notim: to the petition\u00a7;;":V:\u00a2a\u00a7Iii'i.ng\n\nupan the petitioner ta show czaunseiiazuiAift\u00e9i\ufb02 \nthe allcttnent to tha axteyiif' \u00a3   ' \n\naha-aid nut he carm311a&;__  . \n\nprmriarion  C:A.J;au:1\u00a7'ac:...Vj'v_:4VVA\" \u00a7$f th\u00e9'\nagreement.  w\u00a7\u00a7\"'* igauad an\n21.3.2005. The 1a \u00e9ti$i\u00a7r;\u00a7fJ::  to the said\nnoti-ca     The\n  by its order\n to an extant\nat   in tha said plot. The\nzap: o$\u00a7:i%e:;_   in this petition.\n\n \"\u00bb:':_aaae put forth an behalf of the\n\n  that the respondent was not<\/pre>\n
 in cancelling the allotment: of at<\/p>\n
V.  ‘*,*,g*.a<*::;t't.{\u00e9.ar1 of the land in the manner done since
\n ta them, they had caxtain financial<\/p>\n
V' '" di\u00a3ficultias in the beginning to put up the<\/p>\n
construction and as such they had ta, in fact,<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
"'4:\n<\/p>\n
OURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF’-LKARNATAKA I-HGH COURT’ OF KARNATAKA I-HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
with regard to the insertion of Segtion<\/p>\n
34-B tea the Act, the learned. cou:;;\u00a7g_9e’j}i.’V”-.:iiias’:::$i1J,d<\/p>\n
amntand that thaugh such prc\u00e9ifiaei\u00e9iiitt <\/p>\n
available under: the Act, j’iAt'”i.sA_ “–4\u00a3.;z” O7 <\/p>\n
to decida in such art’ than tz\ufb01gt\ufb01rs <\/p>\n
notice: sheuld be issuctigir ns\u00a7t’? V   <\/p>\n
‘3 . In that  3*-‘9\u00e9’st 4′   tatztenti one
\namraxmd by. thgr tor the
\npaxtieaf     jjti1.\u00e9:””jivapa::a no doubt
\nwoul\ufb01af events that has
\ntak\u00e9gz  as the zmdisputod facts
\nwhich.’   me above. In that<\/p>\n
hg,;:tgrounxi,~A tardy quassticn ta ha considmsad<\/p>\n
 11%,  .t\u00a7:..V\u00a7ah\u00a2thsr the xeupondent is justified<\/p>\n
  the lease ta an extent: of B90<\/p>\n
 “:ii&teru as in dune vide the izmugned<\/p>\n
O  ” e.::g_deV}:’? dated “.f.6.2005.?<\/p>\n
8. While coriaidering this aspect of: the
\nmatter it is no doubt true that the patitioner
\nhas hean allattad a plot in the year: 1976 and<\/p>\n
J2<\/p>\n
E.\n<\/p>\n
JURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF’\u00a5_(ARNA?AKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
gsassassian has been handed over on 22.3.2+3_.9′?6.<\/p>\n
It is also a fact that the petition\u00a2f\u00ab.I.:”:f:fi\u20aci=.!k!5jf*.i:x3?ut<\/p>\n
up cxonstxuczticrz ta an extent at
\nmetaza. At: the outset. I-ii11a\u00a2t.’1\u00a7s\u00a7q;i\ufb01i;\ufb01J\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9z\u00a7:VV:
\nnoticed is that the   <\/p>\n
require that the   bi\u00bb<\/p>\n
utilised for thw\u00e9iibiwnij granted
\nanti while puttin:gC1ip”‘   the same\u00bb
\nix tea be:  approved frcxu<\/p>\n
the   ‘i{;:t.her aspect which<\/p>\n
req2;i’\u00a7i\u00e9s:f\u00a7.V:,;>   that the tartan of
\nthe zliii\u00e9asd  the coamtructad area<\/p>\n
51’:-cV:\u00ab_1.\u00a7L;:’i  1:19;. than 50% 9f the plot. If<\/p>\n
 ‘t’\u00a7i3i’s:,.A~–ei532gctAVi\u00a7i:f”Eha matter: is kept in view, it
\n  ta: impaaa 3. conditinza that the
\n should be put up in the entire
\n pl<\u00a7tmI.'\u00a7\u00e9ii'1\u00a29 than szcmstructad area svmuld cioponaci
\n  the nature of business that would has<\/p>\n
i  __?ca::ried out by the allottoe because in certain<\/p>\n
type cf huainaaa it: may be required that the<\/p>\n
canstructed pcxtion shall remain to the<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
‘a’:.\n<\/p>\n
OURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT IGFV-LKARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA I-HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR’!<\/p>\n
limited extent and an open area. wcmld be<\/p>\n
required for the husinesa puxgmae <\/p>\n
state the raw materials or to
\n\ufb01iniahed pxadutta, which  Ja&_e”._ d:ati\u00a7\u00a2;”._\u00a7:eV1:r’six in 91′
\nan open space. In the insAtgiitV_A.<\/p>\n
is seen that initiallyvjizha ti-.3,\u00a3:tm_\u00a5a:xut:vv ‘V\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9t\u00a7V’ tot’<\/p>\n
decorative pxinting, 2th\u00e9vfj4;$\u00a7\u00a7t;.itit-i1e’.t””than put
\nforth as. scam\u00bb that   difficulty<\/p>\n
he was f\u00a7;t’%:\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01 ta gs.}.f$e  for granite<\/p>\n
poliahiz\ufb01\u00e9    .\u00ab– ‘ If that business ‘<\/p>\n
is axtent cf open area
\nwoul\u00e9\u00e9t-a stare granite and as such<\/p>\n
all, _ tiiesf\u00e9  of the matter were<\/p>\n
 n\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7;i*a$*-\u00ab’$atj;.1.yV”t:s”‘is-h <1'.-cnaidmzed by the raspandcnt
\n  ta: a: definite conclusion on this<\/p>\n
'a.g\u00a3rj;$a<:t. '  ' Fltha mat tar .<\/p>\n
 Though the patiticmax: had not put<\/p>\n
7!:f::;tth all these meticuloua details in the<\/p>\n
'tmnjaction statement, if the petitioner had<\/p>\n
been heard in the matter, the same could have<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
4-.\n<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
been hmught ta the notice or the xespomnnt.<\/p>\n
A pezzusal cf the reascna indicatad <\/p>\n
impugned order dated 7.6.2005 wouz\ufb01 ;\u00a7aia\u00a7t\u00a7a<\/p>\n
that the respondent, $.33. fa.z:’c;–.ha:\u00a7 <\/p>\n
to all tha details of the bhj\u00a7\u00a2\u00a3i6n$7Qhi\u00e9\u00a7\u00bb\u00a3a\u00a2<\/p>\n
been indicated by \u00a3h\u00a7*.xa\u00a7\u00a7and9\u00a7t,*fhut’ has’<\/p>\n
merely statezd thyagf; tA1:3a3 ..iit_.f:a&zs_.n.-..-J’ ‘ f’a.::nvi:ahed by<\/p>\n
the allcttoa   and<\/p>\n
acceytabl\u00a7h,. A:V  “\u00a7:c;:der ha: been<\/p>\n
passed rm’.   mind insofar as
\nthe   extent which<\/p>\n
it has hark: 1i2:a:’w.. ‘   %<\/p>\n
‘I.\u00a3Z\u00a7._\u00a7 ‘  oih\ufb01fi \u00abinspect at the matter: is<\/p>\n
 :\ufb01’\u00a7\u00a7:;:t;;i’=.\u00a7:\u00a7r.1 of the: Act has baen inserted<\/p>\n
%a% to Eng 35% gn&[ay the time the notice in the<\/p>\n
 ;\u00a7zgaen\u00a7i” r:;\u00a7s’-3″; has bean issued, the amid<\/p>\n
 has already came into fatcta.\n<\/p>\n
T::?.1}ei\u00a5a’ f \u00ab:>fe in at matte: cf this nature. it is<\/p>\n
 agz\ufb01t\u00e9\u00e9pxiate the ::espondent- Board should have<\/p>\n
i\u00e9itaued. appxtapriata notice as <::cnte:up1a.ted<\/p>\n
aunr ou= KARNATAKA 1-\u00aben COURT gs "!\u00a7ARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA H16!-I COURT or KARNATAKA mo:-s count or-' KARNATAKA men count<\/p>\n
1;\n<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
under the said pnavision sinae said<\/p>\n
imertien has been made with <\/p>\n
purpcasa to pzcrsrida an oppaurtuzzi’-\ufb01r  <\/p>\n
allottee to recti\ufb01r the 3V.&’p’aa,\u00ab_  Oi’ <\/p>\n
wauld be pointsd out by   V’ <\/p>\n
is aha ma-re opgortmxityiikhi
\nto the al1ttee”~..V_’1:o  O”the’A”V\u00a7p1ot is
\nutilized I63: Eh; ‘O  it is
\ngrantad.     present case
\nthe   v”j:’Vr\u00a7–\u00a7;p-\u00e9radent cannot: “be
\nauatainedi”‘1i\u00e9i:VAV..:’:V:%\ufb01i\u00a7f””  i;\ufb01\u00a7”””;:eaaon of non
\na.pp1iaatioO1:\u00e9 V  in the
\nirmugned  _:::s.r:\u00a7\u00e9”1: V_:da:t:’Va::AiO’-._O”?’;”‘:6.2005, but a1a for
\n;’Ii\u20ac=r\u20ac3B9\u20aci:i\u00a7iiLg2,.A*-O’\u00a7\u20aci.1;h  “” ‘matter without pxaviding<\/p>\n
   to the petitionsur as<\/p>\n
 Section 34-2 a: the Act.\n<\/p>\n
 bei’:1g\u00b01~ ea, the ircqaugnnd amen dated<\/p>\n
is liable ta be quashed.\n<\/p>\n
O  However, liberty is r-aaamrad. ta than<\/p>\n
.’V..’OOO’e:4’\u00a7Oape>ndent ta iaaue a notice an cacznteraplated<\/p>\n
DDR1″ OF KARNATAKA HiGH COURTbQF’-LKARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA I-|iC-EH COUR? OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR?<\/p>\n
J2.\n<\/p>\n
IURT OF KARNATAKA 1-RGH COURT  EQARNATAKA HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
under Section 34-2 at the Act, if they at:<\/p>\n
ckmoaa ta: do and only thereaftar, prooued wit\ufb01.-__”:<\/p>\n
the matter in aaaardanaa with km.<\/p>\n
12. Acaordingly, the under
\nwhich it inpugnad. at Ann-image-ff~._”‘tg <\/p>\n
petitienar is quashad and the sis}<\/p>\n
allwm. No \u00abmurder: as tov ‘\u20ac\u00e9*3t\u20ac_g ” ‘ ‘<\/p>\n
W   O O % judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 25 July, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna OUR? OF KARNATAKA HiGH COURTAAQFOKARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HJGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF IERREATAIEA, BHNGALOPL5 nnmnz THIS on THE 25 TH may as July 2\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7O’, BEFORE THE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-163784","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-05T17:42:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 25 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-05T17:42:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1061,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-05T17:42:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 25 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-05T17:42:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 25 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-05T17:42:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008"},"wordCount":1061,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008","name":"M\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-05T17:42:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thirumala-engineering-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Thirumala Engineering vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 25 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163784","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=163784"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163784\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=163784"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=163784"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=163784"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}