{"id":163828,"date":"2009-09-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009"},"modified":"2016-07-19T20:10:43","modified_gmt":"2016-07-19T14:40:43","slug":"the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Kumar &amp;B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>IN13H3HKHiCOURTINFKARNATAKA\nCHRCUTFBENCHJMFDHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 3RD DAY or SEPTEMBER  \" %\n\nPRESENT \n\nTHE HOTWBLE MR. JUS':\u00a3f'ICl:E~  i{\ufb01MAR=  \u00e9  1'\n\nArm\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR.J_UsT1cE%: 'EgsEEEN1VA$E VVGOWDA\n\nITA\"'1'$O..1?.. 1:3;  M\n\nBETWEEN: \n\n1.  QFKV' .\n\nINCO_ME$_ TAX;   _  '_ E\nHUBITLT.  '  '\n\n2.  DEFICER,\nWARD ---- 1-(3':\u00bb,. D   \nHUBMDV-_*'\n\n -  _ (B'gr?sI\u00a7i:.r\u00ab:%1.v.SAHESHACHALA, ADV.)\n\n      \n\n' s_Ri'\u00a7T?DA'L1cHAND AKOTHARI,\nBU'1\"1\"ER MARKET,\n~HvBu.\n\n Eg:B'1Y\"%_~sR1.M.v.JAvAL1, ADV.)\n\n.\"APPELLANTS\n\n.\"RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>L\/\/W&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>THIS ITA IS FILED U\/S 260-A OF I.T.AcT, 1961,<br \/>\nARISING OUT OF ORDER DT.23.06.04 PASSED INITA<br \/>\nNO.1394\/B\/O3 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR I9.S5,;S7,<\/p>\n<p>PRAYING THAT THIS HON&#8217;BLE COURT__\u00a7&#8217;_:i.MAYf&#8212;-::<br \/>\nPLEASED To FORMULATE THE _.S,(\u00a7BS&#8217;FAN.TIALl<br \/>\nQUESTIONS OF LAW STATED T1*Il\u00a7RElN&#8217;-AN;D.iETCV_v\u00ab[3 <\/p>\n<p>THIS APPEAL CO1\\\/\u00a3Il&#8221;Jll(&#8216;}&#8221;*-,(z)\u00a7\\E  VHEAl1\u00e92iiI\\Ie(3VV THIS if<\/p>\n<p>DAY, KUMARJ DELIVERED  FxOLl\u00a7&#8221;O\\?l}&#8217;l&#8217;1\\:EG:i&#8217;g<\/p>\n<p>J if :i&#8217;LS;I,;;E* N&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>1986-18?&#8221; * fit,<\/p>\n<p>2. The&#8221; Corrxniissioner of Income Tax has<\/p>\n<p>challeinged the~&#8211;..oorre:-:tneSS of the order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>\u00bblncoIn.e=.Ta\u00a7{~&#8211;.Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench A<\/p>\n<p>H  where the tribunal annulled the<\/p>\n<p>~ Atoiassessment was barred by limitation.<\/p>\n<p>aSSleSSine&#8217;:alt on the ground that the notice issued prior<\/p>\n<p>3. The assessee is a money lender. A search<\/p>\n<p>action under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act_,._&#8217;had<\/p>\n<p>taken place on 19.08.1988. The original <\/p>\n<p>was completed under Section 143(3) read  8&#8242;<br \/>\n147 on 30.03.1990 on the basis&#8217;-of&#8221;<br \/>\nemanating from the seized bookslof <\/p>\n<p>the said assessment was anr&#8221;tu.l}&#8211;ed. However, agdirection 0&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>was given to the Asses.sing.&#8217;ti0l&#8217;ficerjto._ isstie&#8221;fre&#8217;sh notice<br \/>\nunder Section 148 providingthe a.sse.ssee&#8217;_.time to file the<\/p>\n<p>return in not  than da3t&#8217;si;.i_&#8221;-Aggriieved by the said<\/p>\n<p>order; the&#8217;  appeal to the Income<br \/>\nAppellate &#8216;Tribunal; \ufb01tteti&#8221; order dated 07.01.2000, the<\/p>\n<p>tribjirial anr1&#8243;t1l_led the assessment. The tribunal upheld<\/p>\n<p>   jlljorder. The assessee filed a Miscellaneous<\/p>\n<p> .Petiti0ti\u00b0bVef0r~e&#8221;the tribunal that the hearing notice Was<\/p>\n<p>not served&#8221; on him and therefore, assessee be given an<\/p>\n<p>8   &#8216;topportuinity of being heard. T he tribunal vide its order<br \/>\nii&#8217;-dated 18.12.2000 recalled its earlier order dated<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&#8221;0&#8217;7.01.2000. Thereafter, hearing both the parties, the<\/p>\n<p>tribunal by its order dated 28.02.2001 has held the<br \/>\nannulment of the assessment is not correct. i-lowefi\/&#8217;er, it<\/p>\n<p>upheld the directions to issue fresh notice <\/p>\n<p>fresh assessment. The said order was  K g <\/p>\n<p>revenue before this Court<br \/>\nHowever, in the meanwhile_4_&#8217;notic\u00e9viiqnad<br \/>\nassessment had been compVlieted._V  said<br \/>\nappeal came to  p  infructuous.\n<\/p>\n<p>Thereafter, the impvLA1g1&#8217;1:i&#8217;3dr  In the<\/p>\n<p>impugned orpde\u00a5;s.i.l-ag-giiii the a_ssessn*i-ent is annulled on<\/p>\n<p>the gzfiounidi   issued and the proceedings<br \/>\ninitiated.rV_Vvere&#8217;  by time calculating the<\/p>\n<p>period from t.he&#8221;original proceedings. Aggrieved by the<\/p>\n<p> said  &#8220;the present appeal is filed.<\/p>\n<p>4?.&#8221; &#8216;v&#8217;fThe learned Counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n<p>  econtends that the time is to be computed from the date<\/p>\n<p> direction issued to the department to issue fresh<\/p>\n<p>if &#8220;notice and to complete assessment. If the time is<\/p>\n<p> \\<\/p>\n<p>computed from that day, it is in time. The tribunal was<br \/>\nin error in computing the time from original proceedings<br \/>\nand therefore, the impugned orders require<br \/>\nAs the tribunal has not decided the case<br \/>\nmatter is to be remitted back. tomthe.<br \/>\nconsideration in accordance   it\n<\/p>\n<p>5. The learned  ior<br \/>\nfairly submitted that xtl_&#8217;1e   tribunal is<\/p>\n<p>CITOIICOUS.\n<\/p>\n<p>  the aifioresaid undisputed fact,<br \/>\nthe assetssnieritiipirocVe&#8217;edi&#8217;n&#8217;gs commenced in pursuance<\/p>\n<p>of the directions issued, to issue notice of fresh hearing<\/p>\n<p> to.x&#8221;the&#8221;&#8216;.i:as:scssee  then pass appropriate orders on<\/p>\n<p>  circumstances, the period stipulated<\/p>\n<p>un&#8221;der.i__&#8217;law\u00abi&#8217;is to be calculated from the date of direction<\/p>\n<p>H   Arissuedand not from the date of the original proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>i\u00b0.iT&#8217;herefore, the order of the tribunal holding that it is<\/p>\n<p>it &#8220;&#8221;barred by time requires interference, consequently, the<\/p>\n<p>it\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>assessment orders cannot be sustained is erroneous<\/p>\n<p>and it requires to be set aside. Accordingly, we<\/p>\n<p>following order:\n<\/p>\n<p>1)<\/p>\n<p>2)<\/p>\n<p>3)<\/p>\n<p>Appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>The order of the<br \/>\nproceedings arebarred&#8221;by&#8221;time;&#8217;is&#8217;_heVreb_y set <\/p>\n<p>aside and held  is irletirnej.\n<\/p>\n<p>The tribunal ha&#8221;s&#8221;&#8221;r:o&#8217;t d&#8217;ecided&#8221;the&#8221; case on<br \/>\nmerits.  matter&#8217;.is-r._rerr1ii.tted back to the<br \/>\ntribunal for .}fres&#8217;h7&#8217;corisideratiori on merits<br \/>\nand. in V,a-cco:rdan_c.e &#8216; &#8216;with-..&#8221;&#8216;EaW affording<br \/>\nreasoriablle oppiorturiityuto both the parties.<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-5<br \/>\nIudg&#8221;&#8216;\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/&#8217;:2<br \/>\nkids?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009 Author: N.Kumar &amp;B.Sreenivase Gowda IN13H3HKHiCOURTINFKARNATAKA CHRCUTFBENCHJMFDHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY or SEPTEMBER &#8221; % PRESENT THE HOTWBLE MR. JUS&#8217;:\u00a3f&#8217;ICl:E~ i{\ufb01MAR= \u00e9 1&#8242; Arm THE I-ION&#8217;BLE MR.J_UsT1cE%: &#8216;EgsEEEN1VA$E VVGOWDA ITA&#8221;&#8216;1&#8217;$O..1?.. 1:3; M BETWEEN: 1. QFKV&#8217; . INCO_ME$_ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-163828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-19T14:40:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-19T14:40:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":691,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009\",\"name\":\"The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-19T14:40:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-19T14:40:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-19T14:40:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009"},"wordCount":691,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009","name":"The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-19T14:40:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commr-of-income-tax-hubli-vs-sri-dalichand-a-kothari-on-3-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Commr Of Income Tax Hubli vs Sri Dalichand A Kothari on 3 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163828","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=163828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163828\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=163828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=163828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=163828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}