{"id":163954,"date":"2009-08-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-03-17T19:36:34","modified_gmt":"2015-03-17T14:06:34","slug":"dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009<\/div>\n
            CRM-M 15017of 2009 (O&M)                               1\n\nIn the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.\n\n\n             Decided on Aug 18,2009.\n\n\n\n Dilraj Singh and another                 -- Petitioners\n\n\n                  vs.\n\n\nState of Punjab                           --Respondent.<\/pre>\n
CORAM:HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN<\/p>\n
Present:     Mr.Akshay Bhan,Advocate, for the petitioners<\/p>\n
             Mr.Ranbir Singh Rawat,AAG,Punjab<\/p>\n
            Mr.G.S.Sandhu,Advocate,for the complainant.\n<\/p>\n
\nRakesh Kumar Jain, J:\n<\/p>\n
            The petitioners have applied for anticipatory bail in case<\/p>\n
registered vide FIR No.37 dated 17.4.2009 under Sections 420,<\/p>\n
465,467,468,471 IPC at Police Station, Lambi.\n<\/p>\n
            The aforesaid FIR has been registered on the complaint of<\/p>\n
District Collector, Muktsar, in which it has been alleged that Navjot Kaur<\/p>\n
daughter of Simerjit Kaur daughter of Jamiat Singh @ Kartar Singh has<\/p>\n
requested that decision qua mutation No. 2560 of village Khudian Gulab<\/p>\n
Singh was announced on 29.2.2009 by Sub Divisional Collector, Malout<\/p>\n
in which Simerjit Kaur has been shown as issueless, is an act of fraud on<\/p>\n
the part of the accused as the land of Simerjit Kaur has been illegally got<\/p>\n
inherited by Bikramajit Singh son of Jamiat Singh, Dilraj Singh son of<\/p>\n
Ranjodh Singh son of Jamiat Singh The said pedigree table         in which
\n             CRM-M 15017of 2009 (O&M)                                2<\/span><\/p>\n
Simerjit Kaur has been shown issueless, has been verified by Hardeep<\/p>\n
Singh Harijan Lambardar.\n<\/p>\n
            Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that Jamiat<\/p>\n
Singh had three daughters namely, Gurpal Kaur, Gurjeet Kaur, Simerjit<\/p>\n
Kaur and two sons, Bikramjit Singh and Ranjodh Singh. Ranjodh Singh<\/p>\n
left behind his widow namely, Basant Kaur and two sons Dilraj Singh and<\/p>\n
Sukhraj Singh. During his life time, Jamiat Singh retained 1\/3rd share of<\/p>\n
joint family property after giving 1\/3rd share each to his sons Bikramjit<\/p>\n
Singh and Ranjodh Singh. After his death, Jamiat Singh gave 1\/3rd share<\/p>\n
to his daughter Simerjit Kaur by way of decree and will. The said decree<\/p>\n
and will was challenged by sons of said Jamiat Singh, namely Bikramjit<\/p>\n
Singh, Dilraj Singh and Sukhraj Singh by way of civil suit which was<\/p>\n
decreed, but they lost thereafter up to the Hon’ble Apex Court.<\/p>\n
            During the pendency of civil litigation, Simerjit Kaur died on<\/p>\n
13.10.2006 . On 1.2.2007, mutation of the property of Simerjit Kaur was<\/p>\n
sanctioned on the basis of decree and will given by Jamiat Singh but the<\/p>\n
said mutation was challenged by way of appeal by Dilraj Singh which was<\/p>\n
allowed on 29.2.2008 by Sub Divisional Collector, Malout. In the said<\/p>\n
appeal, Navjot Kaur wife of Harvinder Singh was impleaded as a party,<\/p>\n
who alleged herself to be the daughter of said Simerjit Kaur.        In the<\/p>\n
meanwhile, on the basis of the report of Sub Divisional Magistrate, District<\/p>\n
Collector, Muktsar, allowed to review mutation No.2560 vide his order<\/p>\n
dated 24.3.2009. The said order was challenged by Dilraj Singh (petitioner<\/p>\n
No.1) by way of appeal before the learned Commissioner, Ferozepur<\/p>\n
Division, Ferozepur. It is further submitted that vide order dated 30.4.2009<\/p>\n
(Annexure P-3), the order dated 29.2.2009 by which the order of review
\n                CRM-M 15017of 2009 (O&M)                               3<\/span><\/p>\n
was passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate-cum District Collector, Muktsar,
\nwas stayed.\n<\/p>\n
               Apprehending their arrest in the aforesaid FIR and before<\/p>\n
coming to this Court, the petitioners had applied for anticipatory bail before<\/p>\n
the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Muktsar, which was dismissed on<\/p>\n
28.4.2009.\n<\/p>\n
               Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that Simerjit<\/p>\n
Kaur had left the village somewhere in the year 1985 and had not visited<\/p>\n
for once and as such Nambardar of the village has stated in the proceedings<\/p>\n
which culminated into order Annexure P-1 that ” he cannot say about<\/p>\n
Navjot Kaur as to who she is”. He further submitted that co-accused<\/p>\n
namely        Sukhraj Singh and Hardip Singh have already been granted<\/p>\n
anticipatory bail by this Court in CRM-M 13201 of 2009 on 19.5.2009 by<\/p>\n
Hon’ble Mr.Justice Sham Sunder.\n<\/p>\n
               On the contrary, learned counsel for the complainant has filed<\/p>\n
CRM No.36673 of 2009 in order to place on record a copy of the order<\/p>\n
dated 19.5.2009 (Annexure R-1) and copy of order passed by the learned<\/p>\n
Commissioner, Ferozepur Division, Ferozepur dated 18.6.2009 (Annexure<\/p>\n
R-2). It is further submitted that appeal filed by Dilraj Singh (petitioner<\/p>\n
No.1) under Section 13 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act,1887 against the<\/p>\n
order dated 24.3.2009 passed by District Collector, Muktsar vide which<\/p>\n
permission has been granted to S.D.M, malout for reviewing the pedigree<\/p>\n
table prepared in Mutation No. 2560 of village Khudian Gulab Singh,<\/p>\n
Tehsil Malout, District Muktsar in which Smt. Simerjit Kaur          d\/o Sh.<\/p>\n
Jamiat Singh alias Kartar Singh had been shown as issueless, has been<\/p>\n
dismissed by the learned Commissioner, Ferozepur Division, Ferozepur on
\n              CRM-M 15017of 2009 (O&M)                                    4<\/span><\/p>\n
18.6.2009. Therefore, the stay which was granted vide Annexure P-3 does<\/p>\n
not survive. It is also submitted that Bikramjit Singh son of Jamiat Singh,<\/p>\n
Dilraj Singh and Sukhraj Singh sons of Ranjodh Singh had filed civil suit<\/p>\n
against Simerjit Kaur, Gurpal Kaur, Parminder Kaur, Pushpinder Kaur,<\/p>\n
Amar Partap Singh as well as Basant Kaur widow of Ranjodh Singh to the<\/p>\n
effect that consent decree suffered by Jamiat Singh in favour of Simerjit<\/p>\n
Kaur be declared null and void, which was decreed by the trial Court in<\/p>\n
favour of Bikramjit Singh, Dilraj       Singh and Sukhraj Singh. The said<\/p>\n
decision was challenged by Simerjit Kaur by way of appeal No. RT 330<\/p>\n
of 23.10.1997\/22.11.1995 which was decided on 12.5.2003 in her favour<\/p>\n
holding that Simerjit Kaur is the owner in possession of the suit property<\/p>\n
since 5.5.1991 when mutation No. 2105 was attested six months earlier to<\/p>\n
the death of deceased Jamiat Singh. The said decision was challenged by<\/p>\n
Bikramjit Singh etc.in RSA Nos. 3670 and 3671 of 2003 but the same was<\/p>\n
dismissed by this Court on 30.4.2006. Further Special Leave Petition<\/p>\n
  filed by Bikramjit Singh and others was also dismissed by the Apex<\/p>\n
Court on 31.10.2006.\n<\/p>\n
             I have given my thoughtful consideration           to the       rival<\/p>\n
contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties.<\/p>\n
             It is worthwhile to mention here that co-accused Hardip Singh<\/p>\n
in CRM-M 13201 of 2009 made a statement, at the time of sanction of<\/p>\n
mutation, that Simerjit Kaur died issueless and attested the pedigree-table.<\/p>\n
Similar is the allegation against petitioner No.1 but there is no such<\/p>\n
allegation against petitioner No.2. It is also relevant to mention here that the<\/p>\n
learned Commissioner while dismissing the        appeal (Annexure R-2) has<\/p>\n
observed that ‘this order does not directly affect the persons who were
\n              CRM-M 15017of 2009 (O&M)                                  5<\/span><\/p>\n
parties to the order to be reviewed, as the rights of the parties are yet to be<\/p>\n
determined by the SDM, Malout’.\n<\/p>\n
             This Court at the time of notice of motion and also granting<\/p>\n
interim bail has observed that ‘no case for custodial interrogation appears<\/p>\n
to have been made out’.\n<\/p>\n
             The fact that the petitioners had arrayed Navjot Kaur as a<\/p>\n
respondent shows that no concealment was made whereas Navjot Kaur<\/p>\n
despite registered   notices and munadi did not appear. As the case is<\/p>\n
largely based upon documents and no recovery is to be effected coupled<\/p>\n
with the fact that petitioner No.2. is an old man of 68 years having been<\/p>\n
born on 04.4.1941 and petitioner No.1 has been attributed same allegations<\/p>\n
which are attributed to Hardip Singh, who is already on anticipatory bail<\/p>\n
granted by this Court, I deem it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory<\/p>\n
bail.\n<\/p>\n
             According    to the learned counsel for the petitioners,       the<\/p>\n
petitioners have joined the investigation in terms of the order passed by<\/p>\n
this Court on 09.6.2009. This fact is admitted by the learned State Counsel.<\/p>\n
             In view of the above, order dated 09.6.2009 is made absolute.<\/p>\n
The petitioners shall,however, keep on joining the investigation as and<\/p>\n
when required and shall abide by the provisions of Sections 438 (2) Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n
             This petition stands disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Aug 18,2009                                      (Rakesh Kumar Jain)\nRR                                                        Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009 CRM-M 15017of 2009 (O&M) 1 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Decided on Aug 18,2009. Dilraj Singh and another — Petitioners vs. State of Punjab –Respondent. CORAM:HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Akshay […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-163954","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-17T14:06:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-17T14:06:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1250,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-17T14:06:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-17T14:06:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-17T14:06:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009"},"wordCount":1250,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009","name":"Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-17T14:06:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dilraj-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-on-18-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dilraj Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 18 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163954","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=163954"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163954\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=163954"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=163954"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=163954"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}