{"id":164249,"date":"2010-05-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010"},"modified":"2017-01-21T16:15:33","modified_gmt":"2017-01-21T10:45:33","slug":"patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.M.Thaker,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCA\/3631\/2010\t 1\/ 5\tORDER\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCIVIL\nAPPLICATION - FOR FIXING DATE OF HEARING No. 3631 of 2010\n \n\nIn\nFIRST APPEAL No. 5882 of 1995\n \n\nTo\n\n\n \n\nCIVIL\nAPPLICATION - FOR FIXING DATE OF HEARING No. 3648 of 2010\n \n\nIn\nFIRST APPEAL No. 5899 of 1995\n \n\n===============================================================\n\n\n \n\nPATEL\nVITHALDAS JORDAS, DECEASED THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIR - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nDISTRICT\nPANCHAYAT, MEHSANA &amp; 2 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n==============================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nBS PATEL for\nPetitioner(s) : 1, \nMR AMIT M PANCHAL for Respondent(s) : 1, \nMS\nJIRGA JHAVERI AGP IN CIVIL APPLICATION Nos. 3631 to 3641 2010 and Ms.\nV.S. PATHAK IN CIVIL APPLICATION Nos. 3641 to 3648 of 2010 for\nRespondent(s) : 2, \nNone for Respondent(s) :\n3, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 03\/05\/2010 \n\n \n\nCOMMON\nORAL ORDER<\/pre>\n<p>1.\tRule.\n<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Amit Panchal learned Counsel waives service of rule on behalf of<br \/>\nthe opponent No. 1. Ms. Jirga Jhaveri learned AGP waives service of<br \/>\nnotice of rule on behalf of the opponent No. 2 in Civil Application<br \/>\nNos. 3631 to 3641. Ms. V.S. Pathak learned AGP waives service of<br \/>\nnotice of rule on behalf of the opponent No. 2 in Civil Application<br \/>\nNos. 3641 to 3648 of 2010. With the consent of the learned advocates,<br \/>\nthe applications are taken up for hearing today.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tThe<br \/>\naforesaid applications have been filed seeking below mentioned<br \/>\nrelief\/s:-\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>(A)&#8230;..\n<\/p>\n<p>(B)<br \/>\nYour Lordships will be pleased to direct the office to place First<br \/>\nAppeal No. 5882 of 1995 for final disposal at an early date as may be<br \/>\ndeemed fit by this Honourable Court;\n<\/p>\n<p>(C)&#8230;..\n<\/p>\n<p>(D)&#8230;..\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tThe<br \/>\napplicants have requested that though the Reference Court has made<br \/>\naward in their favour since February 1995 with regard to acquisition<br \/>\nof land effected in 1981, they have still not received full<br \/>\ncompensation as awarded by the Reference Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\tThe<br \/>\napplicants urge that the connected appeals i.e. appeals arising from<br \/>\nthe acquisition of the lands from the same village for the same<br \/>\nproject, First Appeal Nos. 2126 of 1992 to 2139 of 1992 have been<br \/>\ndismissed by the Court by judgment dated 6th November<br \/>\n2009. The applicants, while relying on the said judgment on the<br \/>\nground that the lands under acquisition in both the group of appeal<br \/>\nare from the same village and were acquired for the same project,<br \/>\npreferred present applications with a request that present appeals<br \/>\nalso may be decided on the same lines as in the order dated 6th<br \/>\nNovember 2009.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\tIn<br \/>\nthe said group of appeals, this Court dealt with the award of the<br \/>\nReference Court in LAR Nos. 19 to 32 of 1984. Whereas in the award on<br \/>\nhand in captioned group of appeals, the Reference Court has relied<br \/>\nupon the same award of the Reference Court in the said LAR Nos. 19 to<br \/>\n32 of 1984.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\tThe<br \/>\napplications were first listed on 26th April 2010. On 26th<br \/>\nApril 2010 the learned Counsel for the opponent-panchayat was not<br \/>\npresent since his name did not appear in the cause list. Considering<br \/>\nthe fact that the name of the learned Counsel appearing for the<br \/>\nopponent was not mentioned, by the order dated 26th April<br \/>\n2010 the applications were adjourned to 30th April 2010.<br \/>\nThe learned AGP appearing for the opponent No. 2 was requested to<br \/>\nverify and confirm whether the impugned award would be covered by the<br \/>\njudgment dated 6th November 2009 or not.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\tOn<br \/>\n30th April 2010 the name of the learned Counsel for<br \/>\nopponent-Panchayat was reflected, however learned Counsel was not<br \/>\npresent. The learned AGP has confirmed that the award would be<br \/>\ncovered by the judgment dated 6th November 2009 in view of<br \/>\nthe fact that lands acquired were from the same village and for the<br \/>\nsame project and while passing the impugned award the Reference Court<br \/>\nrelied upon the award which was subject matter of the group of first<br \/>\nappeals decided by the judgment dated 6th November 2009.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\tHowever<br \/>\nin view of the absence of the Counsel for the opponent-Panchayat who<br \/>\nhad filed sick-note, the applications were adjourned to today.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.\tIn<br \/>\nthe award impugned in the present appeal the learned Reference Court<br \/>\nhas, in para 8 observed as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8230;..claimants<br \/>\nhave relied upon the award given by learned Assistant Judge in L.A.R.<br \/>\nNo. 19\/84 to 32\/84. The said lands were acquired under same award<br \/>\ngiven by Special L.A.O. under which lands of present claimants are<br \/>\nacquired. The lands were acquired for the same scheme and the lands<br \/>\nare situated near each other. The claimants of said award had<br \/>\npresented their petitions earlier and said petitions were forwarded<br \/>\nin the year 1984 in the Court by Special L.A.O. But present petitions<br \/>\nwere forwarded in the year 1990 only. So the said petitions were<br \/>\ndecided earlier and award is produced at Ex. 2\/1. Learned Assistant<br \/>\nJudge had visited the site personally and had made notes of the land<br \/>\nacquired and the surrounding area and had relied upon the sale<br \/>\ninstances which are also produced on record by the claimants&#8230;.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;&#8230;In<br \/>\npresent case the lands under award produced at Ex. 21 are situated<br \/>\nadjoining to the lands of present claimants and were acquired for<br \/>\nsame road and under same award. So, the said award is very much<br \/>\nrelevant for deciding the market value of present claimants also&#8230;.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.\tThe<br \/>\nlearned Counsel for the opponent-Panchayat has submitted that he<br \/>\nneeds time to verify the factual aspect as he has not been able to<br \/>\nverify the record.\n<\/p>\n<p>11.\tIn<br \/>\nview of the fact that the award passed in 1995 and the appeals filed<br \/>\nsince August 1994 are pending which has made the applicants prefer<br \/>\npresent applications. Considering this aspect and the submission of<br \/>\nthe applicant-claimants that the subject matter of the appeals is<br \/>\ncovered by the order of this Court passed on 6th November<br \/>\n2009, the appeals deserve to be examined and decided at an early<br \/>\ndate. However, the learned Counsel for the opponent-Panchayat has<br \/>\nrequested for time to verify the record.\n<\/p>\n<p>12.\tHence,<br \/>\nfollowing order is passed.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.\tThe<br \/>\nrelief prayed for in para 5(A) is granted. The registry shall list<br \/>\nthe First Appeals for final hearing on 6th<br \/>\nMay 2010. It is clarified that any leave-note or sick-note by<br \/>\neither side will not be considered.\n<\/p>\n<p>14.<br \/>\nWith the aforesaid direction and clarification, the applications are<br \/>\nallowed. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.\n<\/p>\n<p>(K.M.THAKER,J.)<\/p>\n<p>Suresh*<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010 Author: K.M.Thaker,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CA\/3631\/2010 1\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL APPLICATION &#8211; FOR FIXING DATE OF HEARING No. 3631 of 2010 In FIRST APPEAL No. 5882 of 1995 To CIVIL APPLICATION &#8211; FOR [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-164249","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-21T10:45:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-21T10:45:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":905,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010\",\"name\":\"Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-21T10:45:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-21T10:45:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-21T10:45:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010"},"wordCount":905,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010","name":"Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-21T10:45:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-vs-district-on-3-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Patel vs District on 3 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164249","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=164249"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164249\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=164249"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=164249"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=164249"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}