{"id":164252,"date":"2010-09-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2"},"modified":"2014-09-30T15:26:32","modified_gmt":"2014-09-30T09:56:32","slug":"ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"M\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) – … vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 27 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) – … vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 27 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
111'? THE HIGH COURT 91%' KARNATAKA AT B\u00a7:\u00e9#\u00e9s;a.t\u00e9\u00a7R.\u00a7.:\n\nEATED THIS Tim 27m mm? or sEPTEne::3:Ez\u00a7T52\u00e9i6.%%_'LT    \n\nBEFORE;  %\n\nTHE HOWBLE am. JUSTICE $4.\u00a7;S.\u00a5F\"\ufb01'\u00a7iV\u00a3:\\:R\ufb01Y\ufb01\u00a7\u00a3._:&\n\nwar}: PETITIGN N9.:>;\u00a7_\u00a7o\u00a7'2.;0\"G9 ;\u00ab;:.a.%::;E.s; \n\nEETWEEKI\n\nE.\n\nr;;\u00e9\n\n' i..4\\.u1 .\n\n\" ,Es=;ai* }{ot:ia_\u00a7:,\n'  \u00abI'v$ah'e:a1a;x:1 I;~i,\" \n\u00a7\ufb01UME\u00a7L;4Q903\u00a3\n\" .R'&pr%s;se:\u00e9i\u00a7<d3' by its Dimcter,\n\nM\/' s.E}11;i.t;=:si F:1:1gi1':eC:{'::;..V_  "  j \n{Malaysia} Basal" P1AUi'\u20ac'G'{S' L'ifr;1,;.j_{JV};. ' AA  \nEssay HCJIISC, ilgi\u00e9ii Marg,'   V .  *\nMahalaxmi,    _    _\n\nmvamxx \u00abw4~M99,i1$s,-3%      L   .\n'?_i11'ougE3. i_'\u00a7:\u00a3:Jc2\u00a7iit_.'v'\u00a2;ii11}::c P8L?.."'C'f.}F;i', \n\nM,' 3. E3331" Projects L'\u00a3,(ji~...,K  __   H V\n\u00a7\u20acepIv\u00e9:sent\u00a7<:i5. its 3I'3\u00abi:1?et:*.:'{;:::_   \nsd3\ufb02\u00a7N\ufb01\u00a7w\u00a3?y='.* "W"\n\n8\/ 05 Sri.T_'.\\l';}{ris1I11a1s.:r11It11}\ufb01, _'\ni'ageLi:7'5 'Years; .'?AshitW~3,d",__\nNear Athani (3911:-gs, ' __  "\nNo. ?;384L,.._S. S. La};o:\u00a7:.t," n \n;\u00a73?\u00a3.-;E.AN.._...G_  -V "  V'\n\n ._\u00a7\u00a7s:"~:;~31' Pf{3j\u20ac:<%--t.s 'Lici. ,\nKK Marg,\n\n$53+1fi.T.v_};;F\\?aga1'aj,\nS \/ :3; Sri.T. V. Krishnaxnurthy,\nAgeti-a}'J Sri.M\u00a2Si;r:.garave1u,\nAgent} absssut 69 'r':tars,\n{\u00a5\"I'<:)je<;:t DiI'\u20ac:C"[OI" --- UEM~{%}SSAf2 JV,\n\n*1\n\n\n\nix.)\n\n"AS11i1Wa{1", Nez-11" Atixani Coilege,\nN0. 2384 , S. S. Layollfi,\n\nD.&VA,NGERE. .. P1\u00ab:frm\u00a7) re}e:fR,s. 1   ' \n\n(By S:ti.S.N.i31'a$i'13ntI1 Ch\u20ac1I3.dI'E2 ,; Adm}. \u00ab_ \nANS:\n\n1 . 'E'}1z: Dsputy {E11111\u00a7isSi0 I'1\u20acI',' }.   .\nf3aVangeI\"e, _   \n\ufb01AvANGERE nisrraimt  *  '\n\n \ufb01afiazzai Highway\n\n\u00a33&1,11Z}]OI'\u00a7ty <tafI:_1(iia,   _ \n\nA body COf;(3{%\u00a3fa i\u20aci  _, _\nCo11stit:1';e'i._r;1 ug\u00e9dttz .tE':.e 1 _ V\nNat.i0n.:-3"} E"Eigi..:'m't2iari'E3:pf  \nIndia Aci:v,G~EE-.;K.{;63   ~ :.\n:~:-.2?:'*m--- 13;, L::x:a1+;a:::;3;3..:~,1'1j\u00a23  --\n\nRe\u00a7}'::\u00a2s\u00a7:3n.t.e\u00a3.\u00a5_ bjgfifs '(L\/:b'(;E~:w>;ffg4.i.\u00a3'\u00a51 ( .. RE$PONDEN'I'S.\n\n{E3}: Sri. :'33.i1:1gv3{1:s:1'11f_\u00a3123;, V E:'a;:3t:T;\u20acr$\u00a7\n' V _ Adv.  for R--2,'\n\n. E\u00e9fi,  B_.S2:t\u00a7ai;\u00a7\u00a71\":;zya:}a Sirzgli,\n   \u00a7~_{(\".:{.}P for R4.)\n\n'5f'\u00a7I\"2r'(\u00a7(k\u00a7e'}r?\u00a2'\n\n'4\u00a7'iT::.i:\u00a7  \u00a7\u00a5%Eii.i<;z1 is \ufb02ied under Art.ic1c~:S 225 of the\n\nM. "{'\u00a7\u20ac};<:e3\u00a3\u00a7E,:.1\ufb01\u20ac::r1 of India, prayirzg {\u00a33 quash ihii' i;}r<ie1'*\/ dire<::I.io:1\n\n  ...'52\u20ac$._}.2.2{){)8 paswjgi 1:23: $2.16: first, ;'<::sp0r1dez:1t, Vida\n\n ----. }?\u00a7'x\u00a7'2:'\u00a3@X1.11't: W '"''%i''.\n\n'I_'E'1i::-: E3{=':ii1;i\u20ac;;:1 is: mi1'3g can for P1\"e1i1ni:1a:2\"y Hea1'i:1g ~\u00ab~ B\n\n\u20ac}m1.1p ihi\u00e9; <:Eay, I".1'1Ii0wiI1g:\n\n'Va\n\n\n\nGREEK\n\nPc::*i;i't:ic>:\"1e:\"s E1\u00a3=:.z*e::i_:1 air: \u00bbfjL'm\"'1't.1'*2:a.(::1';.c>rs, who ;i\"1a{i. f3I':1.f.t\u00a7:v:.if:'t':3=1'\u00a7:'.39Z\"1fO\n\n211': ag:*t3e1':1\u20acs1\"1t, mm :\u00bb;:=:::o1'1d 1\"t3:;p<3I'1\u20acL\u00a2:::'I:jbr }j{%:\u00a7\u00a7'i%1'%3i}\u00a7.t\u00e9ii'E\u20ac:z': az\ufb02d\u00bb L4 "\n\n{E ;::gradiI1g of (3hitra<im"ga H\u00a3:'LV\u20ac3E"i S:;\u00a3'1t.1'a<:t for pack3\u00a7<_\u00a7""    \nN04 is for tin: distance. ..bet.\u00a3\u00a3f\u00a7%t::1r { afgmi Har\ufb01iiai'\n53\u20ac{:{i\u20ac)I'1 (28? to 284}. u is for the cliatesmce\n\nb<':'twt:t\u20ac:':z }'1E3I'"i\u00a7"IaI'8f ?}I1\u00a31   Vt.<:3 340 19111,) The\n\nfact: that '(i33'\u00a7"{:E31'6:(i_1"VV}:i\ufb01;1V{.() between p\u20actitiO"i'1\u20acI'S arxd\n21%? ;v<;aspo1'x1{:i_e2I1-it in tViiiv\u00a7~1'\u00a7\u00a3:'13;\u00a71iT4c;'xi 16.6 1.2002 is :1<)tA in {iispu-ts.\n\nIt is aisn _I'1c:)i'. ii'; <,iis*;r1l:Ee"i'1'1\u00e9ii. the war}: COI}I}II3;\u20ac".('iC\u20ac{'i in '5C(iI'IZIi1S of\n\n <i(;1':{r.:&:.:f 5ij;E":a{:~-- is aw*\u00e9if{'ieci to p\u20ac3;it:%.0:T1\u20ac::1"S E3131' (:{)zi1pi\u20act.i01:1 ('sf\n\np\u00e9:>_.s*\u00a7_1.. raqaziregi to be C\ufb02fiiplfit\ufb01d 0:1 or b\u20acfGI'\u20ac\n\n\"  E3}. T\u00a72;..i,';\u20ac}{)$..  \"$73163 wcisrk C{)I3.(3EiI'I3\u20aci(i. to pI'<)jt:<:\u00a7 No.4 was\n\n" i;' ~1'ii.:\u00bb!' (::1'1\u00a7:aE,\u20ac:'\u00a7;e('i Wit1\"1ir': the s'i%;;2:.1iaE.e<ii p\u00bb\u20ac31*i<3{i, it was exteI'1(ie:\u00a3.i\n\n"f'i{.':(3*}fi';\u00e9' .ti:\u00a71<: ta} f.ir1';.\u00a3: bjg: s;\u00e9\u00e9<:0\u00a31ii I'\u20ac${Z3OI}{iE3I}{i he;<'\u20aciI: amt} Ei.}}\u20ac31"t:"(}ffj.\u20ac3I'\n\n%  f.h;<::__{:<3:1tI';:1<:t\u00a7T '%A?\u00e9;1.S t,:31'21'1i.IT1a3;<:d. ""4\n\n\n\n12. \u00a7ut:EnT1iitc::ii}s' E1316 (?ii$p'tT1t:\u20ac: :*\u20ac:ga1'\u00a3ii:'1g il\u20ac3E";EZ1"\u00a3i1"1f:3.'i'iOi'.I :;:i"\u00bbr;\u00a7i:'_1{\u00a7'a\u20ac;'i.\n\nis iii z;:rbi\u00a7:'at;iI'1 in;i.tia1'.f:.c:\u00a7 in that b:':3,h.a.};\u00a7. B03: I 'pi%:{1\u00a7.ti<\u00a7:jj1%:3f$\n\nand. 295* I'\u20acE\u00a7p*C31'i(1\u20acEI'11, have': \u00e9:I\ufb01,e?:1"s:{iHmapp\u20acaI'21:1C\u00a7;$\u00bb 9 11'*;\u20ac.i'{:-:*<4:  'ih<%: \n\nArbii;1'ati<';aI': '['I'\u00a7.\u00a73t11'1ai and ti'1::~:}'   .. --:'s1dj;:di\u00e9z'3E;'i31fg*,~..' "*iheiI' \n\nregpedive I'ight.:;. What: t.i'j\u00e9: '--..;V;1atTt:6:1' :i.:'1v1:x,SV,A \n1'\u20ac:Sp<')1'1(i{~:1'1t ht\u20ac'3I"\u20aciI1 by e:2s:A__<:1'{:is\u00a7i1A1Vg<_L:ighi.  C\u00e9g\u00e9ill\ufb01\u00e9 63 (4)\nof the Cm1t1"a1a::t has V  L. 1:11a::1'}.i1'1\u20ac1"y axzd\n6{_1L1ipI11t3I'1'i., :a1'1(i  :0 be I'\u20acsers;ed\nf*3X(_T1E,:S\u00a7'&'\u20ac:i}?      by the 2114\n\n}:\u20acSp0\u00a3"1a:i\u20ac:1'1t_id"pi<:3fi_ti\u20ac:::T1<::1fs4:;"-.,.}1i2r\u00a7i;t'1 under the provis\u00e9mls sf\n\n<:{;~11t;.1*a\u00a7Tit1\" \"d1\u00a7S}\u00a711t,e thai. the iI:i11'1pi6\u00a3':\u20ac work in\n\n1\u00b0t':spc:(:fj  \"91' pa1{;:k;:gE: F\u00e9.4 is alr\u00e9ady \u20ac:}'\ufb01,};'\u00a7}S:'{.\u20acd {.0 an\n\n\u00a5_i1: c1{::\u00a7;}\u00e9\u00a71'1cii\u20ac3:1'i; .\u00a3';=;n 1t1'*act'.()1* hf; thri End rE:sp0t1c\u00a3\u20acI1t anti {E16 war};\n\n11513 7<:%;:111'1;1\u00e9%2.iz;::c:-:Ti:V'.'WEIT1 am: 1;11<~:a\u00bb1';T:*wE'1ii\u00e9::, ih\u00e9i admiI1isi1*a.E,ive hf:1'\u20acid\n\n(if {}3\u00a7;*:?:1'1g\u20ac=:f<:';v :E}istri\u00e9:t.ii'.i0I\"2\u20ac1's 3114:} a3 155631} 218 s<:<:z:a11{:1 I'\u20ac3S}')OI'1d\u20aci1'1\u20ac,\n\n__\u00a7\u00a7:'f3a%:T:*\u00e9:\ufb01;2 he E"1a1$ p21s3$<:d t\ufb01fifiaill F6so1:_1t,i01i, wliich is imp:.1gi';@z;':;\n\n~. \u00a7;\u00a7i'f;E"1\u00e9s petitioiz. wt?\n\n\n\n3. in terms of the said resolution passed by the its\nrespondent, the petitioners herein are restrained from<\/pre>\n
obstructing the use of equipments installed for<\/p>\n
completion of Project No.4 by the new Contractor’<\/p>\n
by 2nd respondent to continue and cor11p1ete–‘_:th:e”same.   1. <\/p>\n
said resolution the 13′ respondent’glf1asA’ <\/p>\n
anybody causing obstruction V toithe devg.1optn_ent’}”Vof project<\/p>\n
No.4 Work wil} be dea\ufb01t with”  ‘ua::cordan’c:eW:with law.
\nPetitioners herein have chlalienged Jthe:  resolution on the<\/p>\n
ground that, the   .:respAec:j_~~_of fnrination of road as<\/p>\n
per package ” or Tjis _”‘b.etwee’n'”V petitioners and second
\nrespondent}, The  Deputy Commissioner is not<\/p>\n
a party. -to the”  contract. According to petitioners. the<\/p>\n
 entirg-.e_. contract datedddv 16.01.2002 is subject matter of<\/p>\n
 said arbitration proceeding is pending,<\/p>\n
‘  it is  open first respondent herein to call for meeting of<\/p>\n
it”:7.4”’petitioners.– 1’ and 2nd respondent and to pass resolution<\/p>\n
restricting the right of petitioners so far as the machineries<\/p>\n
it  ‘that’: belong to them. It is also the ease of petitioners that the<\/p>\n
“W<\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner is not competent to pass any
\nresolution directing the petitioners herein not to obstruct the<\/p>\n
development activity in the public interest.<\/p>\n
4. Heard the counsel for petitioners, respond–ent <\/p>\n
Government Pleader for respondent  l_._<\/p>\n
Admittedly, contract dated   <\/p>\n
petitioners and second respondent therein.’ iidijspute’<\/p>\n
regarding the termination . and pexerciseof p’ov.*er,by second<\/p>\n
respondent in taking oi\/ei’~    machinery and<\/p>\n
equipment’ bevloiiging  petitioners” herein, is subject matter
\nof arbitration, ivhichdlisijin”progress. It is needless to say that<\/p>\n
the subject matter ofeontract is formation of road, ie, N .H.4<\/p>\n
{the distpanceyybetiween Chitradurga and Harihar (207<\/p>\n
to’VA”i’:’b:\\.(.ii:r\u00e9ittedly, first respondent herein is District<\/p>\n
Ex'”V’AdministrativeVlA.:Chief having every right to see that all the<\/p>\n
it 4(ieifel,opment’.acti\\rities going on within his District is carried<\/p>\n
 in”-unobstructed manner. When admittedly the dispute<\/p>\n
d between the parties, i.e., petitioners and second respondent is<\/p>\n
“*1<\/p>\n
pending before the arbitration, petitioners cannot have any
\nobjection for making use of plant, machinery and equipment<\/p>\n
by second respondent herein by exercising clause  the<\/p>\n
contract dated 16.01.2002. Ultimately if <\/p>\n
Tribuna} resolve that exercise of; ,csu_ch  second. <\/p>\n
respondent is improper and bad’:\n<\/p>\n
petitioners herein are entitled _V’S~uitab};y  for the<\/p>\n
damage that is caused to   “s.1.;ch.:\u00a7 option is
\navailable for petitioners to  redressal of its<\/p>\n
grievance before the .arbitration, xnotgopen for petitioners<\/p>\n
herein   development activities of N.H.4
\nunder package’ afoi’i_:’the”‘\u00bb\u00abp’roject taken up by second<\/p>\n
respondent.\n<\/p>\n
  tibje’c..tpionslraised by petitioners herein so far as the<\/p>\n
resolt1iti.o’n.ipassedydby Deputy Commissioner is untenable for<\/p>\n
0  the reason3_v’th_;at0ir1 public interest, it is open for the District<\/p>\n
04 ly\ufb01idniinistrative to pass necessary orders or to pass resolution<\/p>\n
4l_li\u00a7lI’:l_l1Ve”i’I}leet}’_I’1g, which has taken place between the concerned<\/p>\n
‘*1<\/p>\n
parties to the dispute to prevent obstruction to development.<\/p>\n
activities within the lrinnts of his District. The1\u00e9efo’re”‘–this<\/p>\n
Court \ufb01nds that the resolution passed by  <\/p>\n
herein in the meeting dated 19. 12.2008 pedtitionters ‘ ; <\/p>\n
and second respondent and the resoiut.io_Ii passed ther <\/p>\n
is in order and the same does  for..tr1terfere-jade  this<\/p>\n
Court. However, it would~st1f\ufb01ce'”1:o.:say–that process if
\nthere is any loss or damage to  herein, they are
\nat liberty to rerisaegylthe  t\u00e9ddiuonm poirit for
\nconsideration\u20ac.oet’o’re”  Reserving this liberty to
\npetitioners  of, w1’.thout. any order as<\/p>\n
to costs.\n<\/p>\n
Sa\ufb01<\/p>\n
A ”   aaaaa  d Ttidga<\/p>\n
  AGV..”7 ” d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) – … vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 27 September, 2010 Author: S.N.Satyanarayana 111′? THE HIGH COURT 91%’ KARNATAKA AT B\u00a7:\u00e9#\u00e9s;a.t\u00e9\u00a7R.\u00a7.: EATED THIS Tim 27m mm? or sEPTEne::3:Ez\u00a7T52\u00e9i6.%%_’LT BEFORE; % THE HOWBLE am. JUSTICE $4.\u00a7;S.\u00a5F”\ufb01’\u00a7iV\u00a3:\\:R\ufb01Y\ufb01\u00a7\u00a3._:& war}: PETITIGN N9.:>;\u00a7_\u00a7o\u00a7’2.;0″G9 ;\u00ab;:.a.%::;E.s; EETWEEKI E. r;;\u00e9 ‘ i..4\\.u1 . ” ,Es=;ai* }{ot:ia_\u00a7:, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-164252","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) - ... vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) - ... vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-30T09:56:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) – … vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 27 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-30T09:56:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":599,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) - ... vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-30T09:56:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) – … vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 27 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) - ... vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) - ... vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-30T09:56:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) – … vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 27 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-30T09:56:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2"},"wordCount":599,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2","name":"M\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) - ... vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-30T09:56:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-united-engineers-malaysia-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-27-september-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S United Engineers (Malaysia) – … vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 27 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=164252"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164252\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=164252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=164252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=164252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}