{"id":164682,"date":"2009-08-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-07-11T02:19:00","modified_gmt":"2015-07-10T20:49:00","slug":"m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of &#8230; on 3 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of &#8230; on 3 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 21082 of 2009(E)\n\n\n1. M.C.ANTONY, PRESIDENT,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR (G) OF CO-OPERATIVE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (G) OF\n\n3. THE KUTTIKKADU FARMERS SERVICE\n\n4. T.D.CHAKKUNNY, THOTTEPPURAM,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.G.ARUN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.JOHN NUMPELI (JUNIOR)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC\n\n Dated :03\/08\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.\n                  -------------------------\n                    W.P.(C.) No.21082 of 2009\n             ---------------------------------\n             Dated, this the 3rd day of August, 2009\n\n                          J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioner is the President of the 2nd respondent, a Co-<\/p>\n<p>operative Society. The total strength of the Managing Committee is<\/p>\n<p>13, out of which, 12 are elected and the 13th is the Managing<\/p>\n<p>Director, an ex-officio member. In the last election that was held,<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner, owing allegiance to the Janatha Dal (Secular),<\/p>\n<p>contested as part of the Left Democratic Front. According to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, the candidates sponsored by the Left Democratic Front<\/p>\n<p>won all the 12 seats, out of which, 5, including petitioner owe<\/p>\n<p>allegiance to the Janatha Dal (Secular). Finally, the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>also elected as the President of the Bank.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.   On account of subsequent political developments in the<\/p>\n<p>State, there was split within the Left Democratic Front, and that led<\/p>\n<p>the 4th respondent to move a no-confidence motion against the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner. On its receipt, the Joint Registrar, authorised the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent, the Assistant Registrar, to convene a meeting of the<\/p>\n<p>Managing Committee in terms of the provisions contained under<\/p>\n<p>Section 28AA of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 and<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.21082\/2009<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Rule 43A of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules. Accordingly,<\/p>\n<p>the 2nd respondent issued Ext.P1 notice dated 17\/07\/2009<\/p>\n<p>convening a meeting on 07\/08\/2009.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.   In terms of the bye-laws of the Society, if members of<\/p>\n<p>the Board of Directors are absent without permission in four<\/p>\n<p>meetings, they will lose their membership in the Board.           The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner states that after Ext.P1 notice was issued, meetings of the<\/p>\n<p>Board of Directors were held on 18\/07\/2009, 20\/07\/2009 &amp;<\/p>\n<p>25\/07\/2009, and that the 7 members including the 4th respondent<\/p>\n<p>remained absent in the said meetings.        As a result of this, the<\/p>\n<p>meetings did not have the minimum quorum, and therefore could<\/p>\n<p>not transact any business. At that stage, Ext.P2 representation was<\/p>\n<p>filed by the 4th respondent and other six members belonging to his<\/p>\n<p>group, requesting the 2nd respondent to restrain the petitioner and<\/p>\n<p>his group from convening any meeting of the Board of Directors of<\/p>\n<p>the Bank. Accordingly, the 2nd respondent issued Ext.P3 order dated<\/p>\n<p>24\/07\/2009 directing that in view of Ext.P2 complaint signed by 7<\/p>\n<p>members of the Board of Directors, and as Ext.P1 notice for<\/p>\n<p>convening the meeting to discuss the no-confidence motion is<\/p>\n<p>already given, no further meeting of the Board of Directors, to make<\/p>\n<p>the provisions of proceedings under Section 28AA of the Act and<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.21082\/2009<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Rule 43A of the Rules infructuous, shall be convened. It is on<\/p>\n<p>receipt of Ext.P3, the writ petition is filed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.    The learned counsel for the petitioner mainly contends<\/p>\n<p>that the Assistant Registrar has been authorised only to convene a<\/p>\n<p>meeting of the Board of Directors, for considering the no-<\/p>\n<p>confidence motion moved by the 4th respondent and others, and<\/p>\n<p>that his power is only to convene the meeting and that he does not<\/p>\n<p>have any power to issue an order in the nature of Ext.P3.<\/p>\n<p>      5.    On the other hand, the 4th respondent filed his counter<\/p>\n<p>affidavit and submits that the endeavour of the petitioner is totally<\/p>\n<p>ill motivated. According to the 4th respondent, he or his group have<\/p>\n<p>not received any notice of the meetings alleged to have been held<\/p>\n<p>on 18 &amp; 20th of July, 2009. In so far as the meeting allegedly held<\/p>\n<p>on 25\/07\/2009 is concerned, it is stated that what he received is<\/p>\n<p>Ext.R4(a) notice of meeting, which is an undated one, and that the<\/p>\n<p>said notice was received only on 27\/07\/2009. It is stated that, the<\/p>\n<p>attempt is to make it appear that four meetings were convened<\/p>\n<p>before 07\/08\/2009, and to show that the 4th respondent and six<\/p>\n<p>others were consecutively absent in all such meetings and hence<\/p>\n<p>have ceased to be members of the Board of Directors. It is stated<\/p>\n<p>that the object is that no-confidence motion moved by them will be<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.21082\/2009<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ultimately defeated.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.    It is also pointed out that under Section 66 of the Act,<\/p>\n<p>the Assistant Registrar is conferred with supervisory powers, and<\/p>\n<p>the learned counsel for the 4th respondent has referred to<\/p>\n<p>notification dated 08\/07\/2009 issued by the Government under<\/p>\n<p>Section 3(2) of the Act, delegating the power of the Registrar to the<\/p>\n<p>Assistant Registrar. The learned counsel also placed reliance on<\/p>\n<p>Section 66A of the Act and contended that the Assistant Registrar,<\/p>\n<p>by exercising the delegated power, is perfectly competent to issue<\/p>\n<p>directions in the nature of Ext.P3.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7.    The only question to be considered is whether in a<\/p>\n<p>proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, where<\/p>\n<p>the remedy available is discretionary, this Court should come to the<\/p>\n<p>rescue of the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>      8.    As can be seen from the facts, the no-confidence motion<\/p>\n<p>moved against the petitioner is scheduled to be considered in the<\/p>\n<p>meeting to be held on 07\/08\/2009. Going by the bye-laws, if a<\/p>\n<p>member of the Board is absent without permission in four meetings,<\/p>\n<p>he will lose membership. Subsequent to 17\/07\/2009, when Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>notice of meeting was issued, the petitioner claims to have already<\/p>\n<p>convened three meetings, when the 4th respondent and his group<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.21082\/2009<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>were absent. The present endeavor is to call the 4th meeting, and if<\/p>\n<p>the 4th respondent and his group remain absent in that meeting<\/p>\n<p>also, they will automatically lose membership in the Board of<\/p>\n<p>Directors. If that happens, in the meeting that is to be held on<\/p>\n<p>07\/08\/2009, the Board of Directors will have no quorum, and that<\/p>\n<p>will lead to the appointment of an Administrator. Therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>intention of the petitioner is only to avoid a situation, where the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner will have to face the no-confidence.         This intention<\/p>\n<p>certainly lacks bonafides, and in my view, irrespective of the<\/p>\n<p>contentions on the merits, this Court will not be justified in invoking<\/p>\n<p>its discretionary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India<\/p>\n<p>and help the petitioner to evade the no-confidence motion.<\/p>\n<p>      9.    In my view, the Assistant Registrar, who has been<\/p>\n<p>authorised to convene the meeting, should also be conceded the<\/p>\n<p>power to ensure that status quo continues until the no-confidence<\/p>\n<p>is considered by the Board of Directors. As otherwise, it will be<\/p>\n<p>open to the manipulators like the petitioner to wangle the situation<\/p>\n<p>in such a manner that the no-confidence is avoided.<\/p>\n<p>      The writ petition fails, and is accordingly dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>                                         (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)<br \/>\njg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of &#8230; on 3 August, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 21082 of 2009(E) 1. M.C.ANTONY, PRESIDENT, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR (G) OF CO-OPERATIVE &#8230; Respondent 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (G) OF 3. THE KUTTIKKADU FARMERS SERVICE 4. T.D.CHAKKUNNY, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-164682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-10T20:49:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of &#8230; on 3 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-10T20:49:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1058,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009\",\"name\":\"M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-10T20:49:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of &#8230; on 3 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-10T20:49:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of &#8230; on 3 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-10T20:49:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009"},"wordCount":1058,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009","name":"M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-10T20:49:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-c-antony-vs-the-joint-registrar-g-of-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M.C.Antony vs The Joint Registrar (G) Of &#8230; on 3 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=164682"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164682\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=164682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=164682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=164682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}