{"id":164693,"date":"2008-08-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008"},"modified":"2018-04-20T05:58:07","modified_gmt":"2018-04-20T00:28:07","slug":"smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Rani W\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\/S Durgamba &#8230; on 28 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Rani W\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\/S Durgamba &#8230; on 28 August, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Deepak Verma A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT me\" KARNATAKA AT    _\n\nDATED THIS THE 23'\"! DAY ore' AuGu$TM,A'j2oaaij[  3\n\nPREsENT; \n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. Ju,3TzcE'u13:}:\u00ab:pAx   \n\nAnn. L\nTHE HOPPBLE, M8.JUb\"I'1CE:4 .\u00a7;'s,B0pA1\u00a7'NAV'\n\nMESCELLANEOUS FIRST  (MV)\n\nBETWEEN: _   \n\nSMTRANI wro I'--.i\u00a7.'i&lt;\u00a3.MU&#039;P?TH3\u00a7.,&quot;&#039; \u00ab_ &quot; V  \n43 ms, 125;? B? HE-f:t__HU!\u00a7BAND  \nASNEX?i&#039;FR1EN\u00a33M.K;ME!RTHI .\nR\/O R.9.JEE1IANA&lt;3\u00a2a~3, NI\u00bbT&#039;\u00a3~&#039;I_JR---,__ -- -\nPU&#039;I&#039;\ufb01JE2&#039;VILI,A(3E, &#039;Uf}.Ui-&#039;*!_TQ,.4 \n\n _   _  &#039; AP?ELLAN&#039;\u00a3&#039;\n\n(By 8:&quot;; ; EAVANAQHENDRA \u00e9nwrw, ADV.)\n\nI  m\ufb01a\u00e9iitss\ufb01 m\u00e9msa.\n\n&#039; ms ouncgmagg MOTORS,\nH;\u00e9\u00a7N(&quot;3};1:R,..~KUNDAP1}RA TQ.\n\n  &#039;2. THE&quot; QEIENTAL INSURANCE co.\n\n&quot; LTD, REP ITS BRANCH MANAGER,\n\nA 5f .,\u00a7&lt;u~;~IDAPUreA.  Rasmmanrrs\n\nV&#039;   .(.a&#039;\u00a7 SR1 B.C.S!-IIVANNE GOWDA, ADV. FOR\n\nSR! A.M.VENKA&#039;K&#039;ESH, ADV. FOR R2, R-1 Si)!\n\nin\n\n&#039;n\n\n\n\nTHIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION   V&#039; \nACT AGAINST THE JU&#039;.OGMEN&#039;!&#039; AND AWARID  ~ .. V\nPASSED IN MVC 130.1275\/O3 ON &#039;l_fHE,__F&#039;}I.E OF&#039;\nJUDGE (SRDNI 85 MEMBER AEIDL. MAUI&#039;. &#039;i&#039;{UNDA.FUR;&#039;  A&#039;\n\nALLOW1NG THE CLAIM PE&#039;I&#039;T&#039;l&#039;ION  . -.\n\nThis appeal havm&#039; g h-com&#039;  _    S &#039; V\n\non for pmnouncement this day; \nthe following:     \n\nThc      Cmm mm:\n &quot;   Vagaiust: the amaunt\nawmdegby    Tribunal (for short\nthe    &quot;No. 1275\/ 2093. By the said\njudgment sum of Rs. 12,40,000\/~ has been\n\ncom&quot;  that while the appellant was walk:m&#039; g by the\n\n {aide  nwzr Brindavan Hotel, Udupi, on 14.10.2003\n\n\n\nagainst the appellant. The acmldent is   ~\n\nocscuned due to the ms]: and   t&quot;\n\nThe appellant was taken to  \n\nthereafter she was shiftcd.&#039;in__  \n\nwherein she was treated as   the\ndmnaga, the appellant  ._\nby her during the   The that\nrespondent   while tm 2&quot;&#039;<\/pre>\n<p>respondent        hawcvcr<br \/>\ndenied vth\u00e9t   the rash Md ncgligtnt<br \/>\nact of   #12:&#8217;! alleged that the appcl-mt<br \/>\nwas    ncgligencc. Furthcr the claim<\/p>\n<p> with  to  was also denied.\n<\/p>\n<p> ._   mien&#8217; g not: of the rival contentions<\/p>\n<p> _ ham&#8217; &#8220;ed raugnssm farits consideration. Aftaer ansWcnng&#8217; the<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; i&#8221;-.. 3isstza5:&#8217;:.a in-&#8216;f\u00e9atvour of the appellant, a part of the chum&#8217; was<\/p>\n<p>A  _ Insofar as the kxling relating to the negligence&#8217; of<\/p>\n<p>    bus driver; the amount of compensation already awarded<\/p>\n<p>1:\n<\/p>\n<p>ncxve is &#8216;mdicaI3cd. Them are also other  &#8216;<br \/>\nfbrchcad over \ufb01tmtal mgon. 1=&#8217;o1j_.::h\u00a2&#8217;   &#8216;<br \/>\nappellant had undengam<br \/>\nmmxmitmay as disclosed bymg;   A<\/p>\n<p>and P39. &#8216;I&#8217;hcmaftcr the   treated<br \/>\nas an inpatient. In   an inpatimt for<br \/>\n26 days and oontizmcd   after a ycar.\n<\/p>\n<p>Thc husband Qf    amino she<br \/>\nwas not in git   evidence due no the<\/p>\n<p>diaahi1i::y&#8217;\u00a7\u00a7:J;g~ga&#8217;4..;i&#8217;1::  aw  em. The doctors who<br \/>\nhad  th\u00e9  aiso examined as P.W.3 md<\/p>\n<p>P.W.4,_ _1-&gt;.W.&#8221;3  the Gp\u00a3ima1m&#8221;\u00b0 olog1s&#8217; t who has szauzd with<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;~  the appellant to her right eye due<br \/>\n  to the optic name. The docmr who was<\/p>\n<p>mm&#8221;  is the Ncum Surgeon.\n<\/p>\n<p>    \\*Iith mgani In the seriousness of the injuries and<br \/>\n I  x\ufb01mm of disability, no doubt the MAC&#8217;? has mferrcd tso<br \/>\n  evidence of Pw.3 and Pw.4 in claw] and no13cmg&#8217; * the<\/p>\n<p>.12<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;o<\/p>\n<p>disability stated due to lass of vision Md  M<\/p>\n<p>reckoned the disability at 30% But.     &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>disability coupled with cm: cm once-  , ozfm\u00e9  <\/p>\n<p>would notbcablc to do  Vcr&#8217;!\u00a7$dl\u00a7;_ingVV1:\u00a73thc <\/p>\n<p>nemomm disability, she   to take<br \/>\ncare: of hcmclf but  1a  since she has<br \/>\nlost hm&#8217; mummy V Ix-@333-\ufb01g,&#8221;   husband wan<br \/>\ncmwed. Th.-gt&#8217;   In be worked<\/p>\n<p>out under      of future mam&#8221; g<\/p>\n<p>would r\ufb01axa\u00e9  m5;7;.;e_&#8217;V of mm&#8217; &#8216; &#8216; g to 80% as<\/p>\n<p>assesacci&#8217;~33j,&lt;&#8211;t\ufb01c   that. aspect}: in vimv, the<br \/>\nadequgtc  haw: to bc domed and for the<\/p>\n<p> &#039;      out.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8217;22  this mgani though the husband of the appellant<\/p>\n<p> that she was earning Rs.5,\u20ac)O0\/~ per month, he has<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;tn subsmntiatc the same. Though the Trmunal ms<\/p>\n<p> V   to Exh-s.P45 and P47 to a:rnve&#8217; at notnonal&#8217; mom&#8217; of<\/p>\n<p>J:\n<\/p>\n<p>4&#8242;!<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,250\/~, we we of the new&#8217; that the  <\/p>\n<p>just1\ufb01ed&#8217; . The sand&#8217; documentaan:.f.hc.;Ih_4A   V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>the adms&#8217; aion sheet of District ;:m\u00bba;;itz;;&#8217;Tai:d&#8217;TTsurjjta.&#8217;%mga,%  <\/p>\n<p>the amount paid by the    tn <\/p>\n<p>ooilection of gold \ufb01lings.    an:<br \/>\nappmximam and   fig: \ufb01ict am pxaidr<br \/>\nto thc disability   811:: was aha:\n<\/p>\n<pre>bodied and    cannot be in\n\nwork  \"\"\"    M '$3  g work in the shops in\nthe  of gold \ufb01lings. That\n<\/pre>\n<p>apart   aha, she would contribute and<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;&#8216;  gs   the aocidcnt was in the year W03,<\/p>\n<p> at Rs.3000\/* would not be an<\/p>\n<p>mg &#8216;   Hence, if the said wage is reckoned and<\/p>\n<p> .if   of 12 as adapted by the &#8216;l&#8217;r.ilmna1 is<\/p>\n<p>H M K  the amount tnwanrls disability md 1035 43\u00a2&#8217; futun:<\/p>\n<p> would be in a sum afRa.3,-45,600\/-.<\/p>\n<p>E<\/p>\n<p>8. The learned counsel tbr the  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>aspect eonacnded that even   <\/p>\n<p>by this Court wank! be reasonable,   <\/p>\n<p>should be made inwards    * L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>amount is being awarded    It<br \/>\nis conmnded that it     one-t.h1&#8217;ni<br \/>\nof the amount     personal<br \/>\nexpenses. &#8216;I&#8217;h:-1:&#8221;  human in<br \/>\nadd, m  be a\ufb01vc unlike in the<\/p>\n<p>such   deduction is to be made.<\/p>\n<p> the dwisaon&#8217; m the caac of<\/p>\n<p> =.I\u00a7&#8217;.a&#8217;.\u00a7Lii.%T&#8217;I&#8217;:4\u00a7}\u20ac&#8217;f&#8217;iA\u00a7)E:.. vs. M\/S PEST CONTROL (INDIA; Wr.<\/p>\n<p>LTD AND  {Ara 3.995 so 755) and in the mac of NEW<\/p>\n<p> ;1;~ID1A&#8221; ASSQRANCE co. LTD vs. CHARLIE AND ANOTHER<\/p>\n<p>  1l31)(SC). We have perused the said judgments<\/p>\n<p>  by the Hon&#8217;bk: Supreme Court and \ufb01nd that \ufb01rmly<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;  &#8221; ob.-sexvations made therein&#8217; are takan&#8217; g into <\/p>\n<p>L<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;on<\/p>\n<p>cf the judgments, the Hmrble Sggpxeync rxsmeii K 2<\/p>\n<p>stated that the percentage of<br \/>\nexpenditure cannot be      %&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>by universal&#8217; apppliwtion    upon<br \/>\ncimumsmmoes of each   the we  been<br \/>\nnoticed in the said case   mount.<br \/>\nThe-:refo1e   as a guidance<br \/>\nand if tbs       .A it is noticed that the<\/p>\n<p>   &#8216;   &#8221; feat was wm&#8217;k:tn&#8217; g in a small<br \/>\nteam in   &#8220;E{a&#8221;&#8221;mata]ea and theme is nothing<br \/>\non meani   appellant had to travel any<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;~    &#8221; expen &#8220;&#8221; &#8216;A Av sea to reach her work phone and<\/p>\n<p>arid   of the persons of lower sham  which<\/p>\n<p>   expenses cannot be assumed and as<\/p>\n<p>  are of the View that the facts of the present case<\/p>\n<p>V.  eat call for deduction on that gxoum and the entire<\/p>\n<p>.-\n<\/p>\n<p>fa<\/p>\n<p>derivative on the said head calculated above   V&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>9. In so \ufb01at as the   * L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal has no dpubt   tg\ufb01der the<br \/>\nother conventional     itgis on the<br \/>\nlower side. The   has been<br \/>\nindicated   details of the<br \/>\nsame is    judgment. in so far as<br \/>\nthe &#8212;    has mm. into<br \/>\n  but  me \ufb01at<br \/>\nthat flak:  admitted ofand cm md was<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;~  Q   certain cxpcnscs \u00a30: which that<br \/>\n  came: be ruled out and as such a mmgaml<\/p>\n<p>a would have to be made, which we<\/p>\n<p>  nsses\ufb01s ##us.;h\u00a2%.\u00a3om1 of Rs.30,()00\/- i.c., including the amount<\/p>\n<p> 23,; the &#8216;I&#8217;ribuna!. On the hwd of loss of &#8216;moomc<\/p>\n<p> the Txtibunai had oonaidcmd the 3% for<\/p>\n<p>VT  czfsix mantha on the rate at which the WW had<\/p>\n<p>J;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;h<\/p>\n<p>been noticed by it. Since we have reckoned   _<\/p>\n<p>Rs.3,000\/- per month, the same for a  &#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>would amount as R:-I.18,O00\/~, whi\ufb01h  T<\/p>\n<p>the other heads towards food&#8217; ,:  _ &#8216;cnt,   <\/p>\n<p>convcyancc, during the   of&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>R3.20,00O\/- is awamied..\n<\/p>\n<p>10. That;  summg the<br \/>\nTxibuznal   In a normal<br \/>\n have been adequah.\n<\/p>\n<p>But, in \ufb01_:1c&#8221; the aspect mxauag<br \/>\nto disability the name of injmiea<\/p>\n<p>  su\ufb01cxixig  mm be faced by the appellant due to<\/p>\n<p>     and lzcum-aurg1cal&#8217; disability. No doubt<\/p>\n<p> is awm\ufb02ed on the pound of dzaalnhty&#8221; <\/p>\n<p> _   the oompcnsatsom towards pain,&#8217; su\ufb01cna&#8217; g<\/p>\n<p> %%*mamnw agony would in fact be normally an the puma<br \/>\n _&#8221;c.1;&#8217;xr:n\u00a7 which the same is undergone by the injmud i.c.,<\/p>\n<p>   the pcxiod of moovcry, but, in the instant mac, the<\/p>\n<p>J2<\/p>\n<p>1:\n<\/p>\n<p>very natuxe in whm 11 she has bum rend. cred  &#8221; &#8216;A &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>fame her to undergo the su\ufb02bzring   K 2<\/p>\n<p>her cum ma: inn&#8217; :3 which in fact  mt <\/p>\n<p>mums of money in its real    <\/p>\n<p>case, it is also on record that  21;:  5: t1 1E:ahnent,<br \/>\nsh: had been looked     5;: such if<br \/>\nshe is in the same state   to expect<br \/>\nthat then: wo;;1\u00ab,3I\ufb01_c  with her<br \/>\nthroughout    to kccp an attnndmat<br \/>\nthmug1:.t;:ii;       awn-mg cvcn wmut.<br \/>\n&#8216;r2m~crox\u00e9,.  in view, it would be<br \/>\nappmp:na   tn&#8217;  of R.s.1,00,000\/&#8211; towards this<\/p>\n<p> 2    A. H  &#8230;.. .. V<\/p>\n<p> of the above disc&#8217; 133311135&#8242; , the apps]. lmt<\/p>\n<p>  to a total amount 01&#8243; Rs.5,l3,600\/&#8211; as<\/p>\n<p>  jagaius;  sum awarded by the Tribunal. The ghnt<\/p>\n<p> be entitled to interest at 6% pa. cm the<\/p>\n<p> amountfromthedahaofpctition tillpaynmnt. The<\/p>\n<p>is<\/p>\n<p>enhanced portion along with intcmat shall be  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>the Insurance company within a  of   u 2<\/p>\n<p>the date ofmocipt \ufb01foc1&#8217;\ufb01\ufb01ed ouvpy    &#8216;V &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>12. In the result, the   The<br \/>\nappellant would also b6   . I<br \/>\nin this appeal fmm the   as for<br \/>\nthe said  &#8216;g,.\u00a7j33.,\u00a7i=_g,\u00a2  <\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>Iud e<\/p>\n<p>  Sd &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8230;..  Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Rani W\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\/S Durgamba &#8230; on 28 August, 2008 Author: Deepak Verma A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT me&#8221; KARNATAKA AT _ DATED THIS THE 23&#8242;&#8221;! DAY ore&#8217; AuGu$TM,A&#8217;j2oaaij[ 3 PREsENT; THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. Ju,3TzcE&#8217;u13:}:\u00ab:pAx Ann. L THE HOPPBLE, M8.JUb&#8221;I&#8217;1CE:4 .\u00a7;&#8217;s,B0pA1\u00a7&#8217;NAV&#8217; MESCELLANEOUS FIRST (MV) BETWEEN: _ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-164693","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Rani W\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\/S Durgamba ... on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Rani W\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\/S Durgamba ... on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-20T00:28:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Rani W\\\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\\\/S Durgamba &#8230; on 28 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-20T00:28:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1177,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Rani W\\\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\\\/S Durgamba ... on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-20T00:28:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Rani W\\\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\\\/S Durgamba &#8230; on 28 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Rani W\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\/S Durgamba ... on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Rani W\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\/S Durgamba ... on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-20T00:28:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Rani W\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\/S Durgamba &#8230; on 28 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-20T00:28:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008"},"wordCount":1177,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008","name":"Smt Rani W\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\/S Durgamba ... on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-20T00:28:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rani-wo-m-k-murthi-vs-managing-partner-ms-durgamba-on-28-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Rani W\/O M K Murthi vs Managing Partner M\/S Durgamba &#8230; on 28 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164693","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=164693"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164693\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=164693"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=164693"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=164693"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}