{"id":164704,"date":"2010-09-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010"},"modified":"2014-02-07T02:55:30","modified_gmt":"2014-02-06T21:25:30","slug":"smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n
EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 06?\" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010\". \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J  ' \n\nWRIT PETITION NO.28001 \n\nBET'j\ufb02_EEN:\n\nSMT. MANJULA,\n\nAGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,\n\nW\/O SRI SHIVAKUMAR SW\/\u00ab\\lV\u00a7Y,\nR\/AT ANKALLI VILLAGE,\nBOMMALAPURA POST,\nGUNDLUPET TALUK,\n\nCHAMARAJNAGAR DISTRICT. V :..'P\"IE~TiT'I:()j_.\\z{EjR\n\n(BY SRI: JAVAKUMRR' RAT1EASSoEIATE'S,'IA3vQiiATES)\n\nE. THE STATE Q_R..;\u00a7ARN%A':'R::k:;R,V._ ._ \nFOOD AT\\zDVC1v1L\"SuT>.PL1ESj AI\\!_D'z_ .\nC0NSL:MER;A':=E_A1R DERA..RT'MENT_,  * -\nM.S.Eu1LD1N._r3,'4 '    _.\nBANGALORE,  ' _\nav ITS SECRETARY. .\n\n2. THE CoTv1\u00a7vTT'SSIoNER\"'oEVE ODAND\n:.\u00bb\"CI._\\,\/IL SQRRLEIEVS,   ---------- \n';cuNm1Nc3HAM 'ROAQ,\n\nB{XN-C;TALQRE--v.._V  '\n\n THE DEVRUETV\"'Cc5MM1'S'SioNER\n\n CHAMARA}NAC_3AR',----_ '\n<:HAMARAJNA.__E;AR DISTRICT.\n\n"  TARSILDAR,\n\n 'AGpNDLuR_ET TALUK,\n.CHA_fv1A_RAj_NAGAR DISTRICT.\n\n\n\n5. SR1 M PARAMESHWARAPPA\nAGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,\nSIG MADARRA,\nR\/AT ANKALLI VILLAGE,\nBOMMALAPURA POST,\nGUNDLURET TALUK,  T \u00bb\nCHAMARAJNAGAR DISTRICT. ...RESRONDENT'S _  \n\n(av SRI: H c SHIVARAMU, ADVOCATE FOR REsRONDE:\\:T'v'~--:Tv , \n\nNo.5, SRI: S B SHAHAPUR, ADDI?ION!'1L"GO'VER!\\\u00a7MEN?" ._\nADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS 1 To 4'; "  ._ <\/pre>\n
THIS WRIT RETITION IS FILED UNDERVARTICIE 226 AN{3. 2~2.”Z. OF THE.’
\nCONSTITUTION OF’ INDIA PRAYING TO Q-UA’:-H ORDER ‘D.ATED’g 24.07.2010
\nPRODUCED AT \/-\\NNE)<URE–i< ISSUED BY RESRONDENT No.1 Al\\iD} TO QUASH
\nTHE ORDER DATED 1.6.1.2010 ,P.RODUCiED..V\/SIT"ANNEXURE-JV-'ISSUED av
\nRESPONDENT NO.2. I  ' –. .\n<\/p>\n
THIS WRIT RE”rITION,_cOIvTIN_G.O.N’=AORRRE’1.I’MIN’AiR’r’ HEARING BEFORE
\nTHE COURT THIS DAY, B-V1E.\u00a7jO.iJ_RTMADE_”‘fHE_F’O.LL.QWING:~<\/p>\n
Mr.S.B.S.h-a~haD’uiri.’  =.AdAciit’i’o.na\u00a7| Government _ Advocate,<\/p>\n
accepts notJce\\for’–  Notice to respondent No.5 is<\/p>\n
waived, as Mr.H.C1SuhixiaramU’.has.–_eTItered caveat.\n<\/p>\n
  .E\\rieI:IthAO.ug’hA. the HrrIat’teI’ is listed for preiirninary hearing, with<\/p>\n
Consent, {it is taken -F”or.Vfi’jIa\u00a5 disposai.\n<\/p>\n
 _ 3. Both tiiepetitioner as wet! as respondent No.5 were the<\/p>\n
‘4ap:ol’1caV.Dt.sV.for authorisation in respect of Fair Price Shop in Ankafii<\/p>\n
*-_VGVU*.”.–d’iUpE3t Tafuk. The said notification discioses that the<\/p>\n
#2<\/p>\n
\/\/.7<\/p>\n
applicant’s minimum required qualification for authorisation is SSLC
\npass and the applicant nor any members of the famiiy shoulrijnot be
\nan employee of the Government or the eiected
\nAnother condition was that the applicant shouid not
\nany political party, etc. Suffice to say t’nat”the
\npetitioner was considered by the
\nauthorisation was granted in his   was
\nquestioned by fifth respondent by ways—of:.a:n lavpypealdi Thesiaid appeai
\nwas accepted by the appeliate  iav:uthVorisati_on granted
\nin favour of the petitioneri vvas  that Clauses S
\nand 6 of the  (Pubiic Distribution
\nSystem)  Aggrieved by the
\nsaid order, the  the revisionai authority. The
\nrevisional authorityihasconfirriielcitih\u00e9ellorder of the appeliate authority,
\nbut with a riidertythaltiltheV_VHautho’;*isation should be granted in favour of
\n  petlitioner is realiy aggrieved by the order<\/p>\n
passed. Vthe}._reyyisio~nai authority to the extent of granting<\/p>\n
7.g}3″u’tvhor’isatio..n inviavofurl of fifth respondent.\n<\/p>\n
 weil as the respondents. Indeed, the reason for appeilate authority<\/p>\n
  “I iihavevlheard the learned counsei appearing for the petitioner<\/p>\n
are<\/p>\n
_,,\/””.'”T’<\/p>\n
to set aside the authorisation granted in favour of the petitioner was
\nsolely on the ground that the Deputy Commissioner  not
\nconsidered the application with reference to the Clauses
\nEssentiai Commodities (Public Distribution System}
\n1992. Indeed, a perusai of the order:-p’a’ssed&’
\nauthority would cleariy indicate that the
\ninterference. But, further surprisingly–a:’L”direction__ is .iuss~igAe’d_::t’owDeputy” V
\nCommissioner to grant authorisation  .fifi:KrI’vr..eS.\u00a73EOHd\u20acl3t to
\nrun the Fair Price Shop at  Taluk,
\nCharnarajanagar Disti’iCt_.:”  authority has
\nconfirmed the ordett aHutho:’ity remitting the
\nmatter for  for the revisionai
\nauthority to issue __ _ ‘<\/p>\n
5. iincidenta\ufb02yy, it is  that fifth respondent did not
\nhave. the belnvefit of  order before the appeilate authority.\n<\/p>\n
iEnd’e.ed:_; theljordier pafssed by the appeiiate authority was stayed by the<\/p>\n
 i’evisiofna_l tiaviiwg regard to the facts, I am of the view that<\/p>\n
Vfythe _directi”on \u00bbi’sst:ie’d by the ievisional authority to the Deputy<\/p>\n
“44’Corrim\u00bb.i’ssiorne:* “to” issue authorisation in favour of fifth respondent is<\/p>\n
it\u00bb?\n<\/p>\n
liable to be interfered, but however, rest of the order passed by the<\/p>\n
revisioriai authority is required to be confirmed.\n<\/p>\n
6. Hence, the foiiowing order.\n<\/p>\n
i) The order passed by the appeiiate authori_ty”as’iv1eEii.’
\nas the revisionai authority rem’itt’irig.th\u00e9 i’i_1att’ei_’ to-[3
\nthe {Deputy Commissioner for fir.esh’_”diispoisai”~st’arids’*~-._fli’<\/p>\n
confirmed.\n<\/p>\n
ii) The direction issued by thvei*ir_e’visionai’-.aA_utiiority to
\nthe Deputy Coi”nm.i’ssionei**’to’grant’-aLiti*ior9i’s’ation in
\nfavour of fifth resporide-nt’–is  aisiideid <\/p>\n
iii) Statuswquo in ._i_’espeEtV’o\u00a71c\u00a3is’trri:butionriot?” food grams
\nas on twiig gfate oi’. passing’ riof”‘the””order by the
\nrevisiotiai _au_tho’rit\\\/   .’ s A<\/p>\n
iv) TheW”Dreif\u00a7i.ity’;?i’Con*i:fi’issioner’it to conciude the
\ncorisitieratioifosfibt.h:\u00e9*i\u00bb_aV\u00a73p’iiCations for authorisation
\nwithinLouter’Ein\ufb01’it’o.f:”t~hi;eVe months from the date of<\/p>\n
_:<e{:eipt'uo.'._a Copy of  order.\n<\/p>\n
 “‘ii’\u00a3r.V’:”V\u00a7’;”.’Ei..Siiahapur, iearhed Additionai Government Advocate, is
\npermit~ted._rtoV iii.ie’irriei9riroVjof appearance within four weeks.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-gm
\nIuidge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010 Author: Ajit J Gunjal EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 06?” DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010″. BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J ‘ WRIT PETITION NO.28001 BET’j\ufb02_EEN: SMT. MANJULA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, W\/O SRI SHIVAKUMAR […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-164704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-06T21:25:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-06T21:25:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":730,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-06T21:25:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-06T21:25:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-06T21:25:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010"},"wordCount":730,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010","name":"Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-06T21:25:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt. Manjula vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=164704"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164704\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=164704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=164704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=164704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}