{"id":16472,"date":"2009-05-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009"},"modified":"2015-11-29T07:44:51","modified_gmt":"2015-11-29T02:14:51","slug":"sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Hulagaji S\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Hulagaji S\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.Ramanna<\/div>\n
B\/EA N0.1649.!2\ufb02{}3\n\nIN mm HIGH corner or KARNAMKQA %A-ff _Vf  \n\ncmcurr BENCI-I AT D;iARW_aLi3\u00bb' VI & Q ~\n\nnxrsn mm TEE 2911* my 01-\"   \n\n3EF9'V'\u00a5\u00a5      \n'1-'HE HoN*m.:; \nmscELLA.1mous VVH(};\u00bb'1\u00e949[2008 gm\n\nBetween: V' V' V V 'V 'V\nsr1.Hu;agaji,.   --Kh9:1a\u00e9\u00a7,' \n\nAged abeut   9  '_  \n\nOcc: B1lSiI1\ufb01SS ,' ' Resi::!_.emt-of--_Ha.t1:;maVn Road ,\n\nAinavar;'I'a1u_1\u00a7' 2i:'n;i3:\u00e9__I}.iVs\"ir;'v1('3t. }Z)ha;rwad.. .. APPELLARTS\n\n(By Sri.S':1z1_J3.y \n\n 5., \u00abV\"$'ri';\"\"Vb\ufb01!tV\u00a7'g\"}1a\u00ab_ raj V\u00e9\u00a7i'andraka11th Kaiai,\n\n.. \" -1~.4TAaLjpf=,\u00bbV\u20ac,3\u00a7\u00a7c--:Eusiness,\n\" _ =\"__Re~'si{i-;:1i;.\u00a7;f'3A3navar,\nA V 'Taluk  Dist:{)ha:wa\u00e9..\n\nS\u00a7i.S}a}?1a e\n\n\n\nMFA }\u00a7\u20ac0'1649f2\u20ac}G3\n\n2\n\nThis appeai is filed 'l}.I1\u00a7\u20ac{' Section 173 (3) cf MV Act\nagainst the jucimctit and award dated 26.05.2007 passed\nin MVC No.1233\/2004 on the file of the ii Add}; Civil\nJudge (Sr.If}:1.} and MACH', Belgaum, at Khanapuf,'\n\nallowing {ha claim petition for <:0n}peI1sati;:'\u00a31'4.$3jg3r;}s:\u00a7.:;g~.A\n\nenhancement of compensation.\n\nThis appeal coming on for ord'e':'~s;    \ndeiivcrcd the followiilgt     ' .     .\n\n  \n1.<\/pre>\n
 Theugh this matter has Ht\ufb01e-\u00e9fr;-.\u00a7ist\u00e9r;fi  admission,
\nthe same is taker; up fe:\u00a7I’*– consent.<\/p>\n
2. This   the.”\u00a7:”i;iure\u00e9~claima11t not being<\/p>\n
satis\ufb01ed  ::r_’1_th_ the.:_ ‘ and award passed by the<\/p>\n
(i’.1aim\u00a7:\u00bb’*I*ribz1’f121i”i11’h’i\\I\u00a3\\}’C ‘M1233\/2004 dated 26-05-2007<\/p>\n
 iviagree\u00e9y wixereign\u00e9er the mbunal has awamed a $11111<\/p>\n
usA:)’f ? ,’S%:\u00a7:;’8\u00a7)f).;j-\u00bb.’iogether with interest at 6% p.a. from the<\/p>\n
 L da’:e’ie3f at the ciaim petitsm.\n<\/p>\n
    : “Efhe main g\ufb02unds urged by ihcit learned counsel for<\/p>\n
V.   appeilant is that the appellant was earriing Rs.5,000\/ –<\/p>\n
 . ufto Rs.6,C1\u20ac){}\/– per month as a b:.13ir1ess man and that the<\/p>\n
app\ufb01zllam; $u\ufb01’ers 65% cf whole \ufb02y disability. The<\/p>\n
WA Ne.1649\u00a2’2008<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\nClaims Tribunal has taken the functional disabiiity at 20%<\/p>\n
which is Without proper appreciation of the evidence He<\/p>\n
has produced medical bills Worth Rs. 1,02,000\/ ~, <\/p>\n
it may be presumed that he has su\ufb01ered-IE1   <\/p>\n
undergoing eeatment. He fu1’the?:* ‘{\u00e9ont;er1\ufb013es <\/p>\n
of earning capacity ought to have \/.ett\u00bb.Ez59L’:{:{“:;11.zt._VV<\/p>\n
not 20%. Hence, this a\ufb01mm; <\/p>\n
\n4\u00bb. I have carefully   ‘placed on<\/p>\n
record.    all three fractures for<\/p>\n
which the epee\ufb01aet eiai:e\u00e9”‘te have undergone treement<\/p>\n
for t\\&fe*v 3;r;oI\u00a7;{1;e,V’ ”  seme has been accepted by the<\/p>\n
  doctor who has treated the<\/p>\n
 exami\ufb02ed and he has issued the<\/p>\n
 _disa\u00a5fr\u00e9lit3:_'” cetjifaeate. According to him, his right lower<\/p>\n
H  is ei\ufb01yrtened by two inches, movement of joint of hip<\/p>\n
 are restricted. He has not stated what is the<\/p>\n
VT  “(‘ie\u00a7ee of the restriction of the particuiar hip or knee joint.<\/p>\n
9’ ‘ A. The deetor has assessed the whole body ciieability at 65%<\/p>\n
MFA Ni). 164952008
\n4<\/span>
\nwithout: assessing the percentage of disability a<\/p>\n
particular limb. Therefore, the learned MAUI’ <\/p>\n
observed in para 12 of the judment and… 3 ‘:9; ”  <\/p>\n
doubt as to the percentage of  ;z\u00a7\u00a7:2;_ ‘V<\/p>\n
PW–2 which has not beenV.eeeepted f’~ Mereige<\/p>\n
appellant has spent Rs. \/_-2  Ieedicines
\ndoes not mean that he   of disabiiity.\n<\/p>\n
However considering the    sustained by
\nappellant   ‘__.treatr}.1ei1t_ j_4Ve:i(.?{ei’gene by him the
\nTribunailhas  :2s.35,oe0\/– towards pain<\/p>\n
and $uffe1?i:f1g?  – towards meciical exgeenses<\/p>\n
”  \/~ \u00bb\u20acewa_rd.e transportatiozi, diet eta, Further<\/p>\n
 ‘\u20ac.i”1e\u00bb    the absence of predzxetien of any<\/p>\n
   deeueiez1fer;\u00a7*?’j__e:e\u00a7dence by the appellant to peeve his<\/p>\n
 ‘ixtgeezne  fightly taken his income at I~?s.3,D{}G\/~ p.m.<\/p>\n
   it is a weil established law that the mrcentage ef<\/p>\n
”  ._.\u00a7’ ‘:d}isV:f:b\ufb02ity 01″ a particuiar limb hae :0 be divided by 3 to<\/p>\n
 lessees the actual fmzetional disability or 3:333 01″ earrzring<\/p>\n
capacity. In the instant ease the learne\u00e9 MACH’<\/p>\n
Ev\u00a7*’A No. 164912008<\/p>\n
considering the fractures sustaizled by appellant ap.d. the<\/p>\n
nature of tI’\u20ac\u00a3:1tIIt\u20acI1t 113f}d&I’g(Z)}TiS by him has ate”<\/p>\n
the <:{}I1<:111$ic:I1 that appellant suffared only   _  <\/p>\n
body disability. Therefore, by'; M.%ipp\u00a7.\u00a7,af\u00e9"j;21_g -:  <\/p>\n
multipliar '14' which is a.pp1ica1 )}ti 'tL\u00a7  fac'E:sn <\/p>\n
circumstances of the case.,""'L'L.\u00a7\u20ac;}f'1::   Eightiy V<\/p>\n
quanti\ufb01ed the compenx\u00e9iiiqn \ufb01"2:e"L'h=ead 'f\ufb01t\ufb01fe loss of<\/p>\n
earrxings' to the exterif, H_(}f  Rs.25,(}O0\/–<\/p>\n
towarcis lavas,  ait\u00e933\u20acnit.iJ<3s.'a:1t\u00a7v~..t{3wards loss of income
\nRs.18,00e{)\/~_ 'i1aS"'V'0e\u00e911,T\u00e9tw.\u00e9rded. Therefom, viewed from<\/p>\n
any angle,'  _n\u00a33t_   illega\ufb01ty or incorr\u00e9ctrxess in
\nthe j1;<"}–g1neni\u00bb..a11-:1' award passed by the Tribunal.<\/p>\n
._j""'\u00a75if1era%f\u00e9\u00a73i'<ij,.L.A it. is Iidt–a-1"\ufb01t case 1:0 admit. Hence, it is
\n vat,_th\u00a7_-": stage at' admission. Accor\u00e9ingly, IA<\/p>\n
N':.3{1~,!_{\u00a73  bjiwtize appe}133:1tr'seei<:ir:g to C\u20ac)i1d{}i"1\u20aci delay is<\/p>\n
 21180 <i\u00e9\\sm,\u00a7s5::\u20aci.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/—\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Hulagaji S\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009 Author: K.Ramanna B\/EA N0.1649.!2\ufb02{}3 IN mm HIGH corner or KARNAMKQA %A-ff _Vf cmcurr BENCI-I AT D;iARW_aLi3\u00bb’ VI & Q ~ nxrsn mm TEE 2911* my 01-” 3EF9’V’\u00a5\u00a5 ‘1-‘HE HoN*m.:; mscELLA.1mous VVH(};\u00bb’1\u00e949[2008 gm Between: V’ V’ V V ‘V […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Hulagaji S\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Hulagaji S\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-29T02:14:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Hulagaji S\\\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-29T02:14:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":685,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Hulagaji S\\\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-29T02:14:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Hulagaji S\\\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Hulagaji S\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Hulagaji S\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-29T02:14:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Hulagaji S\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-29T02:14:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009"},"wordCount":685,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009","name":"Sri Hulagaji S\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-29T02:14:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hulagaji-so-fakirappa-khalal-vs-sri-megharaj-chandrakanth-kalal-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Hulagaji S\/O Fakirappa Khalal vs Sri Megharaj Chandrakanth Kalal on 29 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16472"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16472\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}