{"id":164727,"date":"2009-07-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009"},"modified":"2015-01-07T09:42:25","modified_gmt":"2015-01-07T04:12:25","slug":"smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
$1\n\nIN THE HIGH Comm 0}? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 2911* DAY 09' JULY, 2009\nBEFORE _ H %\nTHE }~IC}N'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHQK B. H1svcE\u00a7:\u00a7:c}E}\u00a7V: T'  \nwrm' PETITION M3123 of     \nBETWEEN   A\u00bb   . .\n\n1. SMT. JAYAMMA.\nW] O A.N. ESHWARAPPA\nAGES 41 YEARS\n\n2. SR} VIJAYKUMAR\n\nS\/O AJJ;\"E$H'\u00a7{I\u00a7RA'PP;'$.  M \"\nAGED28   \n\n3, Sm. cHANs}RA3x\u00a7I\u00bbi1\\ A  \nmo gm. \";:=;sHwARApp2a_\nAGij\u00a53..25 YEARS -   \n\n -  _ SR: .\u00a73H.I'JAi{1JMA'R2V' \"\"\" \" 'V\n A $v,t\u00ab:_>% A,N;,ESHWARAPI3'A\n    \n\niittix\u00e9i. Rsg\ufb01sziwanx,\n_ om gm. gsnwamppa\nV AGE!) 19:. YEARS\n\n 5]\" .\u00a5s:i;REs1s1NG 0+9 C\/O SAGANAPPA,\n '%1m*:':). AVA on me. HOSPITAL\nGHIKMA(}ALUR OBEDULLA GUJARI (BESIDE)\n\n  ..-3RI> moss, SHANKARAPURA\n\nCHIKMAGALUR -- 577 I01.\n PETITIUNERS\n\n(BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH, ABVOCATE)\n\n\n\nAND\n\n1. NAGARAJA \n310 Mi, ESHWARAPPA\nAGED 25 YEARS\n\n2. SMT. GEETHA\nD10 AN. ESHWARAPPA\nAGE!) 23 YEARS\n\nBOTH RESIDING AT WARD-No,??*, '   \nAMBEDKAR NAGAR, M;\u00a7RA'S?'AN_JI;ROAD',~~._'j\u00bb .. \nKABUR TOWN.' KA_I)UP: 'TAL:.1{E\u00a3, '   \"\nCHIKMAGALUR ';;2;3rRz.(:11 -4:377' w--1*.~' \n\n    ~  .,    RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
1111 H (8? ‘SM; M, c:..,J_a_YAH1}2f;j;a.i. ADVOCATES)<\/p>\n
THIS “G1RI.’_I’- PETiPI{)N’ISa_FiLED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
\n227 0;-* THE “coNs’nTuTiQN-09.. 4129:9121 ?RAYING T0 QUASH THE
\nORDER m.1o.12.2oo7; Passsa BY THE PRL. DISTRICF JUDGE,
\nCHIKMAGALUR EN ‘I\u00b0.dA’ _(P’~._6a$”SC) 5×07, AND PRODUCED AS
\nANNEX-H,’ ~ _  <\/p>\n
 . -*;fH’IsxwA:\u00a7rr””PErrr@\u00a7*comma an ma ORDERS THIS DAY,
\nCULIRT  ms; Xramowrm:\n<\/p>\n
9_.B_IZ_E_E<\/p>\n
 Jayagamm, the learned counsel ur1dertakt::s tr) file<\/p>\n
  ‘;.:{za.ka*f!V’at  the respondent No.2 also. Although the matter is<\/p>\n
.  __f0r orders, it is taken up for \ufb01nal disposal with the<\/p>\n
\u00ab ‘VAAVC31i sent of both the learned advocates.<\/p>\n
Gg\ufb01\ufb01i<\/p>\n
2. The petitionmfs have raised the  <\/p>\n
order, dt. 10. 12.2007 passed by tlarfr ‘Cm3.r\u00a7:   <\/p>\n
District Judge, Chikmagalur in    \" \n\n3. The facts of the  __b1V\"ief  Sri\nA.N.Eshwarppa passed    A H The \ufb01xst\n<\/pre>\n
petitioner is his wife,  are his sons
\nand the am and   They \ufb01led P
\n& s.c No.6\/2Qd5k%p%::yfix\u00a7%g  of the certificate in
\nfavour of   the Indian Succession Act,
\n1925. The ‘ for the issuaxme of the
\nsaid C\u20ac:I’\ufb01;\ufb01Ca’J.t   \u00e9hcxe are no respondants. The<\/p>\n
 was published in Jilla Suddi Madhyama<\/p>\n
  Nobody appeared in response in the<\/p>\n
 n<:$ii::e."~–':A. "'*I"i1e Civil Judge (Srf 1311.), by his order,<\/p>\n
'  1G,.2G(55 allowed tha petition by wanting the Succession<\/p>\n
 the first petitioner. it states that it is issued an<\/p>\n
 'T  of all the petitioners to cnable her to rewive the<\/p>\n
 payable \u00a30 Sri A.N.EshWarappa.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4. The respondents hemin \ufb01led    <\/p>\n
ms\/2007 before the Court    ..J\u00bb.iqg\u00a2;.<\/p>\n
Chikmagalm’ and prayed for  setfin\u00e9’-asid\u00a2..’.c:f  .<\/p>\n
(111.19. 10.2005. In the said   \ufb01led
\nthe applicatidn for the Idtzlay dd] “xt.11e omce
\nraising the objec\ufb01en    is not
\naccompanied by   cdzddona\ufb01on of delay.
\nThcrea\ufb01ter the   for the eondonation
\nof delay.   bdwi\ufb01s order, dt. 10.12.2007
\nallowed the  I.A  there was no delay in \ufb01ling
\ntha apps:-.E;–v eyed   that them was 2 months
\n   that are bona \ufb01dc reasens to<\/p>\n
 Vt11\u00a75:d and Thus the delay was ccandoned.<\/p>\n
  dorder condonirlg the delay, this petition is<\/p>\n
M   ”\n<\/p>\n
   “E\u00a7\ufb011t.Namit11a Mahesh, the learned cmmsel appearm g<\/p>\n
  V  , _  ” tiad petitioners submits that although the Sl}.C.C\ufb01ISSi0I1<\/p>\n
da”‘vC’\u00e9:i’ti\ufb01catc was ordered ‘[0 lm issued on 19.10.2085, the<\/p>\n
appeal is filed on 86.02.2006. That is a delay of 4 months in<\/p>\n
Q\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9<\/p>\n
\ufb01ling the apmal. Worst of all, she contends that the appeal<\/p>\n
memerandum was net accompanied by any app1ieati\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7r1e.for<\/p>\n
the cendonation of delay. She submits that  <\/p>\n
doubt that subsequently delay contionatien   –.  <\/p>\n
to be \ufb01led, but it does not explairt eeoseaaay  <\/p>\n
date czaf filing the appeal til} theriafce of  t?1’e ‘%’  ;<\/p>\n
for the cendenation of delay.\n<\/p>\n
6. Sri Jayak1’rthi,  ._  eetmsel for the<\/p>\n
respondenta   _’ cendonation of delay is
\nprocedm~a1. ‘ once mi  is given to remedy the
\ndefect of 1;1i)i;  L-‘1.e a’ppiScation fer the eendonation of delay<\/p>\n
  availed of the opportunity and \ufb01led<\/p>\n
 the A  therea\ufb01zer it cannot be held that the<\/p>\n
VV1:; eeeponde11tsv*..’:ha\ufb01e net remeved, remedied or rect1:fi’ ed the<\/p>\n
_ \ufb01efeet; II; siippori; 91′ his submissions, he relies on a Division<\/p>\n
 of this Court in the ease of S’1’A’I’.E OF<\/p>\n
 v. NAGAPPA, reported in me 1985(2) mm<\/p>\n
 The relevant portien of the said judgnmt is extracted<\/p>\n
hereinbelaw: 83%.\n<\/p>\n
“I3.”  Even the Legisfaiive his\ufb01ary of sub-rgzfai’  A’ <\/p>\n
to whidz\ufb01we have adverted. does not indiazte thgit  %<\/p>\n
rules (1) and (2) cf Rule am inse\ufb02edin 4ihe_’..’:zzr\u00e9Vfe.  _
\nintended to award the penalty of digmissqz ofg}z.fip;\u00a7\u20ac:j::’~_.  T, T<\/p>\n
in {he event of nan~mmpIianx;:e’ uriih”t?t\u00e9–.require\u00a7mA\u00e9n2″af
\nsub-mle (1) by an appellani pf\u00e9aen\ufb01\ufb01ga
\nappeal Qhus, when the  ggmrgsszyfinor
\noonieucualfy      an
\nappellant presenting a,  as a
\npenarty, entaii c;z’ir;r(tissr2i”‘\u00a3)f’.?\u00a7js   it rather
\ndiam: to  about
\nimpfiedfy   f\u00a3 i3 ra3oi”s:\u00bbz1.so open to us to
\ncx)nsim\u00e9M’d  “Qf  intended to aid in
\nthe  irnplying the award
\non :2  “its” if we have
\nregard in   b\u00e9arf\u00e9aid by the Supreme Court as
\nto   “cf reqzired of a Court in<\/p>\n
‘V   a procedural rule.\n<\/p>\n
‘ 1-:4, V}:\u00a7%%1:.S\u00e9ngxa:nT’V ” Sing}; vs. Election mbunal, ii is<\/p>\n
   “.’i’a:);;: a  ofprocedure must be regarded :25 such. It
\n j ” .AAi;::.._\u00a3p\u00a7’vcedz;re’, sornething designed to fadfitate justice<\/p>\n
dad \ufb01zrther its ends not :1 penal enactment for<\/p>\n
‘  ‘”punish1rn,er:,\u00a3 and pemzltiesg not at thing designed to trip<\/p>\n
peopfe up. Too techmhaf :1 cranstrmriion of Sections that<\/p>\n
leaves rm momfor reasonable elcrstidiy cf i1tterp:etc:g!id}’:=.<_:\u00bbT~.._
\nshmdd therefore be gmzrded against azvrovidecl   ;_ " .
\nthatjustice is done to 'both' sides) last the vmy,gneans%%   <\/p>\n
designed for the \ufb01utherance of _j11s,tiQe    <\/p>\n
\ufb01usfrate it. *<\/p>\n
?'. Sr} Jayakirthi submits   mplayad V<\/p>\n
by the petitioners both on    the Vf\u00e9\ufb01vmondczlts.
\nHe brings to my notice an   the petitioner<\/p>\n
No.1, the respondg%rit'j::j[I$fQs5    ":'::1-$3' Kavitha (another<\/p>\n
daughter   Section 125 of the
\n(3r.1P.C  –.Vg?\u00a7:;'I$%.VE$hwa1'appa fer majntenanme
\nsf Rs.2,{}{&}f}\/~   \ufb01rsst petitioner statcs that the
\n  of the first petitioner and<\/p>\n
  made such an application in the<\/p>\n
  the pe\ufb01tioner N9. 1 has chesen not 1:0<\/p>\n
_ ,'.j'\u00a7;;1A1gj1ea;d t1i(:\u00a7._. 'I'{':SpDI}(Z1fi1"}t Nos. 1 and 2 in the P 85 S.C<\/p>\n
 It is his speci\ufb01c giexvancct that Succession<\/p>\n
 \u20ac'.}:t:1;ti\ufb01.(;;ats is Qbtained behind the back of responclazrtt Nos. 1<\/p>\n
 2. He also submits that Suddi Madhyama has no<\/p>\n
wide cimulatien in the locality and that is why :<\/p>\n
unrneticed by the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
8. In the course of her rsjoindeic,  <\/p>\n
submits that the respondents  Iii’) }_va.yVTVrcl\u00e9a1f:\u00e9t’}~V~’\u20ac\u00a3) Sri” ‘<\/p>\n
A. N. Eshwarappa.\n<\/p>\n
9. My mading Aaf the   \ufb01izveals that the<\/p>\n
raspendents   me  the prescribed<\/p>\n
lixnitatinn  ” \ufb01l\ufb01 date at’ knowledge of<\/p>\n
” 4 IS<\/p>\n
‘ ‘Gate. The demand that each<\/p>\n
passing of tht2,__S’t1C{3\u20ac3\u00a7*3:’.\u00a7iA:(:).Ij   L’
\nday’5 dehfay  Vt<::v cxgplz-\ufb01ned appears ten be pedantic in
\n    hype;-techmcal appraach \ufb01nstrates and<\/p>\n
 sf justice. The Division Bench<\/p>\n
T'  r\u00ab3ii\u00e9d."f"bAy Sri Jaya kirthi is of grea\u00e9: assistance in<\/p>\n
'  th\u00e9"E:enmt)versy in question. The appeal cannet be<\/p>\n
\ufb01n the guund of not fling of the delay condenatian<\/p>\n
  V  , _ VTa;\u00a7;:5iica4;h'on at the time of the instritutsion of the appeal. As the<\/p>\n
 which is cha\ufb02enged hem is reasoned and W6}!-<\/p>\n
considemd, I refuse 1:9 interfe the matter. Whethcr the<\/p>\n
s =–\n<\/p>\n
respondents are related to A.N.lE3shwarappa   <\/p>\n
petitioners have played the \ufb01waud c)n:-‘\u00e9:iir:~’*{1c)A1i1’j’\u00a3    is ‘<\/p>\n
be dcci\u00e9ed by the District Judge; on Tr::e%+.r;e <\/p>\n
pending mnsideration.\n<\/p>\n
10. Pe\ufb01\ufb01on is disInisscfi._ A Ho \u00ab:;rd\u00e9r’L’\u00a3=-5:9 costs.<\/p>\n
 J  i ‘E Fudge<\/p>\n
bvr<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri $1 IN THE HIGH Comm 0}? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2911* DAY 09′ JULY, 2009 BEFORE _ H % THE }~IC}N’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHQK B. H1svcE\u00a7:\u00a7:c}E}\u00a7V: T’ wrm’ PETITION M3123 of BETWEEN A\u00bb . . 1. SMT. JAYAMMA. W] […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-164727","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-07T04:12:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-07T04:12:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1137,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-07T04:12:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-07T04:12:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-07T04:12:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009"},"wordCount":1137,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009","name":"Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-07T04:12:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayamma-vs-nagaraja-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Jayamma vs Nagaraja on 29 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=164727"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164727\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=164727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=164727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=164727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}