{"id":16502,"date":"2008-11-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008"},"modified":"2016-02-29T05:23:27","modified_gmt":"2016-02-28T23:53:27","slug":"state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"State Of Haryana vs M\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & … on 17 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
State Of Haryana vs M\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & … on 17 November, 2008<\/div>\n
CR No.2464 of 1991                                            1\n\n\n      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                     CHANDIGARH\n\n\n\n\n                                    CR No.2464 of 1991\n\n                                    Date of Decision: 17.11.2008\n\n\n\n\nState of Haryana                                       ....Petitioner\n\n                        Vs.\n\nM\/s Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & Anr.                ..Respondents\n\n\n\n\nCoram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod K.Sharma\n\n\n\n\nPresent:    Mr.Madan Gupta, Sr.DAG, Haryana,\n            for the petitioner.\n\n            Mr.Sarwan Singh, Sr.Advocate with\n            Mr.N.S.Rapri, Advocate,\n            for respondent No.1.\n\n                        ---\n\nVinod K.Sharma,J. (Oral)\n<\/pre>\n
            This revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil<\/p>\n
Procedure (for short the Code) is directed against the judgment dated<\/p>\n
18.2.1991 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh vide<\/p>\n
which appeal filed against the order dated 8.9.1982 passed by the learned<\/p>\n
Sub Judge First Class, Chandigarh was accepted.\n<\/p>\n
            The petitioner State of Haryana filed a petition under sections
\n CR No.2464 of 1991                                             2<\/span><\/p>\n
14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short the Act) for making the<\/p>\n
award the rule of the Court in which respondent No.1 filed objections under<\/p>\n
sections 30 and 33 of the Act.\n<\/p>\n
             It was claimed that the contract was executed between the<\/p>\n
State of Haryana and M\/s Dashmesh Woolen and Silk Mills vide rate<\/p>\n
contract bearing No. GL\/RC\/209\/72-73\/38505-506 dated 20.4.1973. The<\/p>\n
case of the petitioner is that a dispute arose between the parties and in<\/p>\n
terms of the arbitration agreement the same was referred to Smt.Sushil<\/p>\n
Dogra, arbitrator who pronounced the award on 15.9.1978.<\/p>\n
             The respondent took a plea that the award passed was illegal,<\/p>\n
void and without jurisdiction. It was claimed that Smt.Sushil Dogra could<\/p>\n
not be appointed as an Arbitrator as Shri S.P.Bhatia, Joint Director of<\/p>\n
Industries was appointed as an Arbitrator in exercise of authority vested in<\/p>\n
the State of Haryana under clause 18 of the agreement and once the said<\/p>\n
authority was exercised it could not thereafter appoint Smt.Sushil Dogra as<\/p>\n
an arbitrator. It was also claimed that there was no valid contract between<\/p>\n
the parties. A plea was also raised that the reference made to the Arbitrator<\/p>\n
was not valid one as it was a unilateral reference.\n<\/p>\n
             The objections were contested.\n<\/p>\n
             Learned trial court rejected the objections and made the award<\/p>\n
rule of the court.\n<\/p>\n
             Appeal against the rejection of objections was accepted by the<\/p>\n
learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh holding that there was no<\/p>\n
concluded contract between the parties and therefore, the award passed was<\/p>\n
without jurisdiction. The learned appellate court also held that the
\n CR No.2464 of 1991                                                3<\/span><\/p>\n
appointment of Smt. Sushil Dogra as an Arbitrator was also vitiated as she<\/p>\n
could not be appointed as an Arbitrator after Bhatia was appointed as an<\/p>\n
Arbitrator.\n<\/p>\n
              The learned court also held that the reference made was not in<\/p>\n
consonance with law as unilateral reference is not permissible.<\/p>\n
              Mr.Madan Gupta, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General,<\/p>\n
Haryana challenged the impugned order on the plea that the learned lower<\/p>\n
appellate court was in error in coming to the conclusion that there was no<\/p>\n
valid contract between the parties. The contention of the learned counsel for<\/p>\n
the petitioner is that the learned lower appellate court has misread Clause 6<\/p>\n
of Ex.O.2 to come to this conclusion.\n<\/p>\n
              Clause 6 of Ex.O.2 reads as under:-\n<\/p>\n
              “6.   Failure to execute agreement, deposit prescribed security,<\/p>\n
              effect supplies within the stipulated period, repeatedly offering<\/p>\n
              supplies liable to rejection, without prior inspection by this<\/p>\n
              Department may render your earnest money\/security liable to<\/p>\n
              forfeiture and cancellation of this acceptance letter and also<\/p>\n
              blacklisting of your firm in addition to other remedies as<\/p>\n
              available under terms of the contract.”\n<\/p>\n
              There is force in this contention of the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
petitioner. Clause 6 of Ex.O.2 gave power to the State of Haryana to cancel<\/p>\n
the contract which stood accepted.\n<\/p>\n
              This view of mine finds support from the fact that subsequent<\/p>\n
thereto there was correspondence between the parties where the respondent<\/p>\n
sought concession from the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
 CR No.2464 of 1991                                                4<\/span><\/p>\n
            Learned lower appellate court, therefore, was not justified in<\/p>\n
holding that there was no        valid contract between the parties. Even<\/p>\n
otherwise, the reading of Ex.O2 shows that offer made by respondent was<\/p>\n
accepted, thus contract stood concluded. Clause 6 of Ex.O.2 reproduced<\/p>\n
above only gives right to cancel the contract and is not prerequisite as was<\/p>\n
held by learned lower appellate court.\n<\/p>\n
            However, this revision deserves to be rejected on other two<\/p>\n
grounds, Arbitration Clause between the parties reads as under:-<\/p>\n
            “18.         If any question, difference or objection whatsoever<\/p>\n
            shall arise, in any way connected with or arising out of this<\/p>\n
            instrument or the meaning or operation of any part thereof or<\/p>\n
            the rights, duties or liabilities of either party then save in so far<\/p>\n
            as the decision of any such matter is herein before provided for<\/p>\n
            and has been so decided, every such matter including whether<\/p>\n
            its decision has been otherwise provided for and or whether it<\/p>\n
            has been finally decided accordingly or whether the contract<\/p>\n
            should be terminated or has been rightly terminated in whole<\/p>\n
            or part and as regards the rights and obligations of the parties as<\/p>\n
            the result of such termination shall be referred for arbitration to<\/p>\n
            any officer appointed by Haryana        Government         and   his<\/p>\n
            decision shall be final and binding and where the matter<\/p>\n
            involves a claim the amount if any awarded in such arbitration<\/p>\n
            shall be recoverable in respect of the matter so referred.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
            Clause 18 authorized the State of Haryana to appoint an<\/p>\n
Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute. In exercise of said power admittedly an
\n CR No.2464 of 1991                                              5<\/span><\/p>\n
Arbitrator was appointed. Thereafter, it was not open to the State to appoint<\/p>\n
any other arbitrator as the authority appointed Arbitrator can be revoked<\/p>\n
only by the court, unless the arbitration agreement gives such a power to a<\/p>\n
party to fill up the vacancy.\n<\/p>\n
             However, no such power was given in the arbitration clause<\/p>\n
entered into between the parties. This view finds support from the judgment<\/p>\n
of this court in the case of Messrs Shamji Mal Vs. Messers L.Sefton &<\/p>\n
Co. Ltd. Mirzapur and another 1954 P.L.R. 187, wherein this court was<\/p>\n
pleased to lay down that once the power to appoint an Arbitrator under the<\/p>\n
contract is exercised by appointing an arbitrator, thereafter there is no power<\/p>\n
with the authority to appoint another Arbitrator.<\/p>\n
             The order passed by the learned appellate court is also required<\/p>\n
to be upheld as it has been rightly held that it is not enough for the contract<\/p>\n
to provide for arbitration as the arbitrator only gets jurisdiction when both<\/p>\n
the parties specifically agree to refer specified matters or, failing that, the<\/p>\n
court compels them to do so under the Act if the dispute is covered by it.<\/p>\n
             This view finds support from the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme<\/p>\n
Court in the case of Seth Thawardas Pherumal V. The Union of India<\/a><\/p>\n
(1955) 2 S.C.R. 48 and the judgment of Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the<\/p>\n
case of East India Construction, Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India AIR<\/p>\n
1970 Calcutta 243, wherein it has been held that in the absence of specific<\/p>\n
provision in agreement giving power to the appointing authority to fill up<\/p>\n
vacancy, power to appoint arbitrator gets exhausted once it was exercised by<\/p>\n
the said authority. Thereafter it is only the court which is competent to<\/p>\n
appoint arbitrator.\n<\/p>\n
 CR No.2464 of 1991                                                6<\/span><\/p>\n
             In view of what has been observed above, there is no merit in<\/p>\n
the present revision petition which is ordered to be dismissed.<\/p>\n
17.11.2008                                         (Vinod K.Sharma)\nrp                                                      Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court State Of Haryana vs M\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & … on 17 November, 2008 CR No.2464 of 1991 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2464 of 1991 Date of Decision: 17.11.2008 State of Haryana ….Petitioner Vs. M\/s Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & Anr. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState Of Haryana vs M\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Haryana vs M\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-28T23:53:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Haryana vs M\\\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & … on 17 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-28T23:53:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1187,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008\",\"name\":\"State Of Haryana vs M\\\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-28T23:53:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Haryana vs M\\\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & … on 17 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Haryana vs M\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Haryana vs M\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-28T23:53:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Haryana vs M\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & … on 17 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-28T23:53:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008"},"wordCount":1187,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008","name":"State Of Haryana vs M\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-28T23:53:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-ms-dashmesh-woolen-silk-mills-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Haryana vs M\/S Dashmesh Woolen & Silk Mills & … on 17 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16502"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16502\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}