{"id":165135,"date":"2009-06-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2"},"modified":"2018-08-21T00:05:01","modified_gmt":"2018-08-20T18:35:01","slug":"sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nmuss was THE 241\" an or-' JUN\u00a72{i:Q\u00a7II\"~;.A4 \n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. P. D. DIhf,.*kD<\ufb01.RA\ufb02;'& I\n\nTHE Honma Mn;z\u00a2sfnc\u00e9vgs;  \n\n8ETWEEN: %\n\nsass mssmvamag mTERPR1sis\nA Pmmg\ufb01snzp FIRM *    \n M(wA\u00a3\u00a7If3G'~\u00abPARTNER\nSE1 N suamnaaavgiaa REDDY,\nIIN9-5!;\n opmvausmcz 1-1:357:51,\n wmmi' I    {J    \nasumy 5s:me3I \n\n   % %  PETITIONER\nmy sat : L as  Aw, )\n\nI ' U \ufb02 \ufb01 H U \ufb02 V ' ' ' I ' ~.\n\nI sTA1*E or KARNATAKA\na nap av zrs secammv\n'rs eovemnearr\n\n~  '  (MINES, 551 mu TEXTILES)\n' " COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES\nem"\n\nDEPARTM\n94.5. BUILDING\nBANGALORE 50 W1\n\n \n\n   !5...W\u00a3"M\u00a3mra wxomaxvr-nr\u00bb M\n\n\n\n2 THE omecroa as MINES ma caeonorsy   \nGovazrmsm as acmmmcs % '    \nNo.49, I6-IANIJA BHAVAN ,\n\nRACE couase mm\nBANGALGRE % W1\n\n3 me DEPUTY omecron  \nor MINE AND eaowevy. \nasumv, BELlARYV|.'3\u00a35'.l'R1C'r_ *\n\n4 THESENIORWOLOGIST' W  e\naePARTMEm' or HI1\u00a7\u00a3%.\u20acs:-.\u00a5\u00a7-GEOLOt?\u00a3Y \naemmmr     \nseuanv msmicrr.    \n\n    \n(By Sri   csevemmzm\n\nL%?1i4Is5s*vFf\u00ab  Pa\u00e9\ufb01ns 10;;-\u00bb cm. me 'me\n\n   \n\n n  z  petmn is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of\n\n of India saeldng far: quasi-ling of the erder\n\n% \u00e9ama 02.12.2086 (Annaxuro ''A') menu by an rim:\nmspondent - Stan: of Karnataka, whcruin tho rwision\n\nK)?\u00bb\n\n \n\n  W'WW'\u00a7'Wm\u00a7M'%='A\u00a2""o.L2 I  i8'\ufb01$?Wkxn"'a\ufb01"*:s. \u00ab ammx ' .-'M \n\n\n\n.....-......mmwm aruluwri mwm\ufb01i 'UT' mmtwawm\ufb02 WWW 600%"? 0? E{A&N&"WaK& HIGH \ufb01\ufb02i\ufb01m" W? K\ufb01\ufb01m\ufb01af\ufb01a\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 %\u00a7G\u00a7*M\n\nin various quarries in the Stabs of icamataka. Fa\ufb01tionar\nhad made an application for grant of  in\n\nrespect of sy. Ho. 3.97 measttring 07 Acme  cagr\u00a7kas%s:t-Jase \n\nin Badanahatti viilaga, Salim-y Tami: .:mf_ud    \n\ndmcribod in the achoduh no  %   \n\nDimchor (Miami Mminis\u00e9ra\ufb01cny, v\u00a7h9 wa\u00e9j'v_\ufb02i\u00e9: 66:t;pou\u00a7tt\na\ufb02mr undo!" the Kyrrjgtaigg-"?~u1ui\u00a33:rf' 'aAn=l \u00a7<T:oncmion\nRules, 1959 cherenaaft\u00e9zf mam: Rule,\n1069'')   of the schaduia\nPWP\u00a2W:f\u00a2T__3'_  10 years. The said\n Thar pcti\ufb01omlr has\nmade hugfvcy   lakhs of rupow in\ndcvoioping t\u00a72\u00e9L...4guatV'\ufb01v__."V the schadulo pmporty.\n   the petitionar, in ail, has\n  being the royalty and dead rant\n\n Vin  property in accardance with the\n manna pig; KMHC mm, 1969. roatmcr mod an\n\nw... W\u00bb-\n\n  rnmwn! of have and the same was not\n\n  tho rapondcats. As on 12.02.1%3, than\n\n  wakid\ufb01a of R3348:-=5GPs., and the m\ufb01\ufb01oner had paid the\n\n amount as an that data. As an 219$. 1993,, there was\n\n\\\/9\u00bb\n\n\u00a7W}i\u00a3\u00a7~'w'?1"M\u00a7 \ufb01m\ufb01li-i'\u00b0W\u00a7\u00bb...ik mw\ufb01w-\ufb01\ufb01wrkrwmwau \u00abml awm\n\n\n\nduo cf Rs.'748=a51Ps., and the same was paie\ufb01by the\npetitioner. There was no due whatsoever in \n\nquarrying leasa. Thu pe\ufb01tia:-tar applmd  \n\nsaid leans am 27.06.1994. Haw\u00e9va:;,_\u00a3he  \nfor rmawal was nujnctad  A':'w\u00a7\u00a7a_f:.<Ai\u00a7sn\ufb01 \n\nDirochor of Him and GoVb<:b:\u00a73'.on.v'ti*=13_V_ w,...u..t am.\nam dumod usual u....;;.\u00abs.\u00a2ta..-. \ufb01la6d""farv\u00a7mnuwa\u00a5 in\nrespect 0! the :chodu&\u00a3\u00a7,_';:z\u00a79t;p;\u00a7\u00a7tyU.A\u00a7\u00a7';\u00a7gved by the ma\nerdar at \ufb02ag   pg\ufb01ffaoner appnoached\nthe aaaoga\u00e9  of Mina and Geology by\nfiiin\ufb02.      'rm mend mmnaam:\n  and directed \ufb02u third\nrcspondisnf 6:9  spplicatbn for renewal of ham.\n A' ..... \ufb01uarrying lease was renewed an\n\n. ;'i8.1\u20ac):. \n\n z   It is furthor mmrud that for the period from\n\nV.   " t\ufb02i 18.16.1997, than was no ma 5::\n and thorn was no quarrying aparwfen talcum up I\n '" \u00a2:onti\\nued by the petl\ufb01onar an accnunt of non-mnewal of\n\n31\u00a2 quarrying base grarstm earlier. Therein:-3, the claim\n\n\u00ab\/3\n\n?w%a.w:'e.m...zums vewm .1\" M. .... 'V' . .\n\n\n\nof dud rant cr royalty does not aria. Siam the p\u00e9\ufb01tiomr\nhas not ban permkud to carry an the \n\nby wk-hue of the action of the authoI'ims,\"A\u00ab t_:|:1a. \n\ncannot make a claim for dand:-r'c!hi:;\u00ab.     \n\n28.05.1993 as 18.19.1997. a....:;uon......mt .;.......a\nno conduct tm Ql.laf't'yI'iz-5%-..:;:';;i.\"\u00a7za>ratAi:<V.)\u00a5'i$..'&!IV1d_V'_:5\u00a7:i\u00a7\ufb01&!, \npu\ufb01uomr cannot by "_;it_n1iit::_._bee\ufb01h"t:c:n\u00e9ucti:tg the\nquarrying opemtionsiui-'$6 'tiic:  zjannot claim dud\nrent. Afwf   the mm\nin qustin;rg1"byv'\u00e9\u00a7z4$\u00a34::er.Vd#;aad 13.19.1997. It as\nfurtixsa\ufb01\u00bb   Md \ufb01bd W.P.\n court and this Court dirucmi\n\ufb02int poiidifig.  cf \ufb01ne applicalson for manual,\nV' '_  parmittm m excavaee, narmve and\n a\u00ab\u00a2%~Gr\u00a7n:m blocks from the schedule property.\n\n In   by dais Court on 01.09.1995,\n\n ...i_A...,V'........ ... mmuw-umau-c mun mwum W? wwwwmmmh WQZWE Kl\ufb02ti\ufb02\ufb01" OF WmMA'\u00a5"\ufb01kK& Ev\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01\ufb02\ufb01mf WE mmmmm M\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 \u20ac\n\n_V  wtit\u00a7f\u00a7\u00a2"4r.:_v&a\u00a7 not pcnnkud tan carry on an quarrying\n\n1' A \u00e9offaccount of non-monewai of the quarry luau\n an powomr. Powmr was infnrmw by tbs\n\n  'J \u00bb . _   rupondes-ct that it shun not be permittaad no canduct\n quarrying operations un\ufb01t and unless there 3 renewal\n\nV.\/5\n\ns\\""\u00a7\u00e9""'\u00a7"'\u00b0'\ufb02x mm"; in mmwmrrm an\n\n\n\naf have in accordarm with the Karnataka Mino\ufb01\ufb02inura!\nand Connexion Rule, 1994 (hemina\ufb02w  2;:\n'the scum: lulu, 19:4').   LL    \n\nagain on 13.05.2001,   r\ufb01ipszrfji\u00e9nitt \ndnmnding paynunt:-sf Rs,..i'3,;9 $,"$:58[-. 'Thin pitiuvncr on\n\nrealm cf the   Rs.2S,0.00l- on\n2a.os.2oo1%%   far the permits for\n ifigain, the w\ufb01wner made\npamanz\u00e9g\ufb01%%%\u00a7\ufb01&:m%%gum& \u00a2\u00a2=ka\u00a2\u00a7.2s,ooo\/- on 01.10.2001\nund\ufb01sj  slaoppod issuan\ufb01a of\nmincralVV'\u20acis\u00a7pataV\u00a7: h- for transpormtion of Granius of\n\n\u00a7\n5'?\n3\n59\nJ\nE\n\u00a7\n2\n\u00a7\n\u00a7\n\u00a7\n$2:\n3\nE\n:2\n3\n3\n\nvgethgar   the pe\ufb01tioner. The fourth\n\nwwanwmm\n\n\u00bb.._considering the law applicabie, has\n\n am 21.09.2602, caning upon the\n m%\u00a7p%.\u00a7 a sum of as.14,s3,7ss\/-- being me\n\n A \u00e9aaa\ufb01wrunt. P\ufb01ner dcputw his cmpioyus and\n\n"  tho notice of was fourth mswndcnt that than\n is mt labia no pay tha and rent during the\n from 28.95.1993 to 18.10.1997 what thare was Ira\n\nKr)'\n\n2.2 It 5 ruram .m.\u00a2.na.. \n\nf'M*"<;\u00b0\u00b0*?\u00a2 mmmx mmaswramwxm mm....m P9 4 w  m.  \n\n\n\n \n\nMEQH W\n\n\u00a7\n2\n\u00a7\n$33.;\n\u00a7\n\u00e9f\u00e9\n3\nQ\na;\nX\nE?\nE\n\n \n\n%\nE\n%\n\u00a7\n$9:\nQ'\n\u00a7\n3\n3\n.3\n:\n\u00a7\n\u00a7\n\u00a7\nE\n2\n2\ni\nE\n\u00a7\n\u00a7\ng\nE\n?\n\u00a7\n\nM...\u00bb -\u00abMW vr w\n\n \n\nwas cancelled am: imrrlndiauu effect and tt1o.J' isTcurity\ndepmit ma\ufb01a by the poul.-Inner in that regard\n\n2-3 was unarmed  bv%~m \n26.03.2W mead by \ufb01rs  \n\npotitionar mm mm.  court\nconmding mat mqugrryzag \ufb01\u00a7a\u00a7"'\u00a23pir*\u00a7d"\u00a2n"\u00a77.05. 1993\nand the lease was  18.10.1997 and\nwherefore,    rasmndent far\npayrrsent;6\u00a7"'d\u00a2$%i"?V'&f\u00a7n:\u00a3,jf\u00a7Ah.   from 28.05.1993 to\n18.16.  \u00a7nt\u00a3""*i;ithout authority of law.\n the  writ petition, the fourth\nmpondang  mm me: mad 11.03.2004\n\n \n\n\u00a2:\u00a7:_'3*:E:5\u00a7n;_';_; 't29_oi's   V war to pay 3 sum of Rs.9,46,380\/-.\n\n' pg\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7e\u00a7i\u00a7r_cha\u00a5hnged the said letter dated u.o3.2m4\nH  '  ukenond respondent in nevsbrs petition<\/pre>\n
 The ascend ruspondont, by order dated<\/p>\n
  AA3i.._1O.2004, a\ufb02owod um revision pcti\ufb01on and dimchnd aw
\n_  au\ufb02writy ho pmvws opportunity to \ufb01rs ‘
\n‘V “”petitioner and on satisfactory mpty, mark the payment<\/p>\n
mega-cg in mind the order passed by thk Cam! in ma.
\nVS<\/p>\n
\u00a3”\u00a5w”‘\u00a7u'”‘*e. Q iM\u00a3**9;.:eaa \u00bb< m..mme.u..mm.ms. \u00abwin\u00bb ..\n<\/p>\n
…….  mm.” W ommwmmm $”MEWW mmwwwm wr” mmmwwwtmmm mamw awmmw war’ ewmmmmwsm 3M%%::ii”% mmum WE” mywmmm WW4 \u00a33!<\/p>\n
No.38462[1989 (Jyothi Brothws Vs. State of Karaatala).
\nms Court by onder dam: 13.m.2cce, agmmakgm.\n<\/p>\n
No.38158\/2003 with liberty so the mtitmniigff mmr 5*
\nravision patitim under Rule .’E-3′{“1)~ af ‘ ,the;   ‘ Q
\n1994, wmxin 30 days from tho   9?.\n<\/p>\n
at an order.  rim.   mum
\nNo.CU156\/MMNl2m6bafer\u00a7 mm” iesmxianz. Tho
\nam mponaent by 5:’-\ufb01r   rajecead the
\nravsion  confirmed the
\norder  – master of Mines
\nand   canceiliri\ufb02 an sum
\n”  V    petitioner for quarrying Gray
\nGran\ufb01bnh land and may amount due
\n  i\u00a7m_.._nt:\ufb01tEoner is order\ufb01 be: be recovared as<\/p>\n
‘  rave:-xua. Being aggriaved by \ufb01ne said ondar
\nH ”  pw\ufb01oner has \ufb02ed this writ Pemn for<\/p>\n
ui. ‘\ufb02uid riliofs.\n<\/p>\n
3. Notice was issued to the rnspm-dams.\n<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
I\u00a5\u00a5Ns\u00ab’fIW’R *5o.w’vvui*Q:#3’%V\ufb01 ‘?m\ufb02’\u20ac3’ V\u00a7.”5M””M9$ ‘%,\u00a7f’% ” ‘ . .
\nII $I*\u20ac9\ufb01””%3’\u00a3\u00e9f”‘\u00a77.\u00a7~ \u00a78\ufb013s’\u20acI\u00bbW&\\’2  ‘\ufb02m\u00e9\ufb02\ufb01 bV”%am?.T””i%\u00a7z\\’i5a\u00a7’EW+$””M5(.RI”-?hi?%”%a\u00a7”ti~ Hwwwvw wwwmm WWI! B1″M1″‘*&&”ieI\u00a3”\u20ac7w”%sm””m\u00bb<V&J\u00a2'"t\\ mmwwmmzz ww\ufb02www\ufb01m *nns\ufb02'm uuuwmnwuswam–\u00abmans\u00bb we #3.:\n<\/p>\n
4. We havu head the learned counsel appearing
\nfor the petitioner and the leamed Gwernmant Advocaea
\nappaaring for $3 recpcndenm.  \u00bb<\/p>\n
5. Learned scum: app-arm ‘\u00b0’
\nsubmitted that \ufb02l\ufb02i we no
\npcti\ufb01omr to pay the dead rm: fnf the
\nof expiry af lam i.e., 27.05.1593 *2; of 33
\nrmewal i.e., 18.1Q19$\u20ac?  for
\npayment of dead  by the
\nfirst raspovrdcxgg. the was
\npassed by    amu 26.03.2003,<\/p>\n
c:muiIAi\ufb01g’_’  granud in favour of tbs<\/p>\n
  mid reccwery of me armunt due in be<\/p>\n
A 1′   as arrests of land revenue 3 iiabh no<\/p>\n
 =  cannsai further submitted Swat the
\nV i&ipmV\u00a7jid’ “or’dsrw passed by mspondnmt Mum. and 2 an<\/p>\n
 ” \ufb02\u00ae\ufb02%f\ufb01Gbh and suffer from cmar apparent on the fact<\/p>\n
6f tho order and whemrfom, the writ peti\ufb01on may be<\/p>\n
 affowed.\n<\/p>\n
vs-\n<\/p>\n
_– -._ .. …-….M.. wwwna wt’ mmwwvmi\ufb01\ufb02\ufb02 mam mwwm Q?’ K\ufb01R?”\u00a7A?&\u00a7(A Ni\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 QQURT 0? mmwmm Hi\ufb01\ufb02 $4
\n31%<\/p>\n
-13..\n<\/p>\n
7. We have given canafui consideratiorswo the
\ncontaen\ufb01ons cf the \ufb01aarned eounsai ”
\nparties and scrutinizad the material on    <\/p>\n
8. Thu mniaurial agn  <\/p>\n
patitioner was gmntacd q\ufb01a\ufb01jring 1
\nm\ufb01tion schodulo  poriw of
\n10 years. The    \u00a2_on 27.95.1993.\n<\/p>\n
Thasreafter,_.,t\u00a7i;\u00a7 -_.   \u00a7n appligation for
\nmnawai   by order dated
\n1s.1c.199?.. %%   with c\ufb01uct mm
\n28.65.  10 wars as par Annwtum ‘ F’
\nand wh\u00a7rs_for\u00a7,   no murit in the conian\ufb01on of the
\n V\u00a2_:a:::.:V’1′-sTs’ina;i….._a__;:zpearing for ma mastic;-zer that am<\/p>\n
 w\u00a7\u00a7~r’fsQ:t”vahbh to pay dead rent for axe pariod<\/p>\n
 3-;ea.ag%…: of base i.e., 23.95.1993 to the
\n of ‘itsz  i.s., 23.10.1997. Lam has but:\n<\/p>\n
 \u00ab ordsr mu: 23.10.1997 mm effect from
\n”  for: period of 16 years and me said fast is not
\n The material on record weuid shaw \ufb02at the
\n did not make appfication for mnewal of base<\/p>\n
\\\/’><\/p>\n
\u00a3”‘i:.#”\u00b0W’\u00a3:. zmmme 3% mmamsmm. MW n:va.\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n
….W WJQJMKS 1}!” \ufb01\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02 HIUH LWUN! W?” Mmmmmmm WIUVWI<\/p>\n
within tirm as the avarmcrm mad: in the pctitimj imlf<\/p>\n
would show me: me pe\ufb01bkmer mad; at: app\u00a5j\u00a3e:a:’j&\u00a2\u00bb)rs~.v_’for<\/p>\n
grant of renewal of lease on 27.96.1994 i.a\u00a7;;i;\n<\/p>\n
of lease. The fact that an petftioa’er.’1’\ufb01ii;\u00a7’ T\ufb01;}\u00a7””p\u00a7\u00a7;i em’ <\/p>\n
amount dun an be paid be tho  .\n<\/p>\n
and dead mat amounting   dat;\u00e9 <\/p>\n
of istuanm of  datpdV j111″1_3.O6.2@\u00a71,VAVVfitarmet be
\ndkputxed. Since  my the arrears of
\nroyalty and   in the natice
\nmead     {ease to become
\n  eohdiaona of Iona dud.\n<\/p>\n
 \u00e9ancsileti and thu amount due
\nno he paid   rospondsntc k ordtrod
\n  #5 land mvanue in exmzae sf<\/p>\n
?i.r=:–  first smpondarst. Therefone, having<\/p>\n
  rn-sharia! on record, it is clear that<\/p>\n
 irnpiigneij.  cancaliing than have and ardering<\/p>\n
 \u00e9t\ufb01aunt dam to in paid by an wtftionar as<\/p>\n
rut”! Wg\ufb01gif\ufb01ditl\u00e9 MW” W1?-tmWinnE5*LIU’\\ \ufb02lw\ufb01 MWUKQ WT mmnmatmn\ufb02<\/p>\n
 ‘a\ufb02and mronuu pawod by the \ufb01rst raspondcnt is<\/p>\n
 The first mspondent has rightly con\ufb01rrned Elm<\/p>\n
 paged by the manna respondant dated 26.03.2063,<\/p>\n
\u00bbuu-\u00abwan -an-ururamp -aver nu-ar’u|r\\I’I\u00a7J”tar”Ii\\l’l In<\/p>\n
\\.\/9*<\/p>\n
 –_..  wwwna Ur mnmumxmw. NW?! COURT (W KARNA’F\ufb02K& \ufb02\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9-i \u20ac@E..W”\u00a5” Q? @\u20ac\ufb02\u00e9WWA’\u00a5%%& HIQH \u20ac<\/p>\n
wmmin, rm been granmi in favour of ma pa\ufb01tkmgr was
\ncancelled as petitioner had wowed the  “to<\/p>\n
become maxed and did not pay tbs
\nthe amount dapmiew by me:-‘ge\ufb01tion\u00e9r  Rims’ *
\nbun forfeilaad. Uncior \ufb02u ‘Jcir\u00e9;;–\u00a7ifa1szan\u00e9\u00ab;\u00a7’,–~.’VVti:\u00a7<\/p>\n
quwmn of irr1;:!arr:\u00a2nti\ufb01\u00a7v:.}:’L:”i:.*1o 6rd\u00a7_r\u00bb..
\nmrisionul authority ;n_m:s:aa{ an; meoring
\n\ufb02ue lease gm-read Er; ?.\u00a7_v:\u00a7x:rff–.’\u00a2f  would not
\naim and me. any retief sought
\nfor in thgv.;’rfitV  hate! that the writ
\np\u00a2titir,\u00a7–n–w[is;   than fo\ufb02owing OfdIf:-\n<\/p>\n
    bmimd.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/~
\nChief Justic\u00e9<\/p>\n
Sd\/1\u00bb
\nJUDGE:\n<\/p>\n
 ' 'T . . _    index: Yes\/Na\n\nWub Host : You\/No\n\n<\/pre>\n
 5\u00a7no\u00a7t%’e3’\u00a7t;5\u00a7\u00a2% W’MVm$’\u00a7.’@wuEf!.%3’&.0\u00a3’6m\ufb01\\Jt um sown<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT muss was THE 241″ an or-‘ JUN\u00a72{i:Q\u00a7II”~;.A4 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. P. D. DIhf,.*kD<\ufb01.RA\ufb02;'& I THE Honma Mn;z\u00a2sfnc\u00e9vgs; 8ETWEEN: % sass mssmvamag mTERPR1sis A Pmmg\ufb01snzp FIRM * M(wA\u00a3\u00a7If3G'~\u00abPARTNER SE1 N […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-165135","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-20T18:35:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-20T18:35:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":902,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-20T18:35:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-20T18:35:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-20T18:35:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2"},"wordCount":902,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2","name":"Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-20T18:35:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-raghavendra-enterprises-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sree Raghavendra Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165135","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=165135"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165135\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165135"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=165135"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=165135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}