{"id":165210,"date":"2009-06-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009"},"modified":"2019-01-11T09:46:32","modified_gmt":"2019-01-11T04:16:32","slug":"smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Rudramma W\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\/O Late … on 1 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Rudramma W\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\/O Late … on 1 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT op' KARNATAKA AT sANGA1.a1\u00a7:i:'_T~~% V\n\nDATED THIS THE 161: DAY OF JUNE 29\u00a2?\" :'   *' \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSFICE} A;sT13oi?A._i~:NA  \nREGULAR srscom A?PE,AL rm. \"465; \n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1 RUDRAMMA '  ._ 3. _ ~\nW10 LATE NAGENDRAPPA   \nAGED ABOUT 77 YEARS\"  . '\n\n2 UMMA1=\u00e9*r:iY  ''\nsgo LATEJPEAGENLERAPPA .\nAG..gE1:>.AoBU'rj3.? \";'EA~!!?_S\"' .. ' -\n\n3 MU\u00a7\u00e9??.HAPPA\"w--   . 4 J\ns\/0 Lain: NAGEND-ARAPPA\nmap AB0I}'}\"3'7 YEARS\n\n A V. \u00a7LLi;'nR'E..\u00abREs1D':\u00a7Si\u00e9 AT PHREGANUR\n= --. 1VvI1,:;a;;\u00a7s;%,\"c\u00a71ANNAG:R: TALUK  APPELLANTS\n\n(*5? '9}2_-\nCHANNAGIRI TALUK I\n\n3 RAJAPPA\nAGED ABOUT 53 YEARS\n\n4 USHA D\/O RAJAPPA\nAGED ABOUT 26 YEARS\n\n5 MANJUNATHA s\/0 R'A;iAP?A__  L\nAGED ABOUT 2: YEARS _ 5 :\n\nREsP0NDgz~\u00a31jS'-3 TC!'5ART\u00a3\u00a7 ,  V:\nR\/A GUNDERI;HO\u00a3.ALKERE frzxwx \nCHITRA.-D'uR.Qa.vLw1s'rR;;:t:;~\"~..   *~ \n\n6 ANUSUYAM_MA--1:;:._ __ \nw\/16:) NANJU.NDA'?PA.  .\nAGED ABOUT YF._ARS\"\"--._ '\nR \/A*..1AKA'1'HI Ko..Pi\">A,' VSHLMGGA\n\nT SARGJAMMA   \nWm LATE MURUGENDRAPPA\n.-.'t{Z3ED' ABOUT  }'__E\u00a3.RS\n\nV.  ':8 LA ' \u00bb.i51e.a.\u00e9;ANNA-~..\n\n fs;o\"L.A'rE*:s5UgUG;:NmeAPPA\n Z?n{3E'DfA.I30I.j'i\"'23 YEARS\n\n  9  sAbrrH(::S?HA\n\nSf'? LATE MURUGENDRAPPA\nAGE?) ABOUT 21 YEARS\n\n. :r\u00e9E=sPeNDENTs 7 TO 9 ARE\n~ ._ REESIDING AT CHIKKALAGHATTA\n VILLAGE, SHFTRADURGA DIST.  RESPON\u00a33EN\"'I'S\n\n\"mi? SR:: BASAVARAJ PGOJAR s, ADV. FOR\n\nI{AC'zA\u00a5I}EE&J GOWDA PATXL, ADV. FORE-1'1 85 '3')\n\nJ\n\n\n\nTEES APPEAL IS FiLED U\/S 100 CFC AGAENS'}' 'TIei'E\n\nJUDGMENT 85 DEGREE DTD: 29.07.2005 PASSED Es: 'E.A.E:>.'=.\n50\/2003 ON THE FILE OF' THE i ADDL. crvn, JUD_(3'E'{SR_.*ED_N.}-V \nDAVANAGEEE, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND sE'rr1NGA.As!i3E '\nTHE JUDGMENT AND DEGREE DTE) 3.3.2003 _PA.SSvEI3\"--1N._OS \" .,\n373\/94 ON THE FILE OF' THE CIVIL 3.99.33 {e'IR.DN1--L&. JMFQV;\n\nCHANNAGIR1.\n\nThis Appeal coming on for  dE:,y_,Afhe\" 'V\n\ndelivered the fo\ufb02orwing ; ' _ .\nJunemeiw: \nThe appe\ufb02ants herei.\ufb01--:3reA_V_th;ew  No.1,2 and 3\n\nin O.S.No.373\/1994. Th\u00a2.,\ufb01:{4st.,x~c\u00a7{s~;pQ;n<'1egit'~%1:\u00a2x7Eia2. was befom\n\nthe   said seeking for a judgment and\ndecree   possession of the suit\n\nscheduie  ,TI'V['he';:es};$'c:1;t j f   '\n\nancesttrai property, has altered ti1e:\"1.q1i.\u00e9_i:ti1Ixi'~.Qvf \nagainst the one granted by \nshare to the piainti\ufb01' and\ufb01thc  'I;.1'1:::-:1:;--;\u00a7:A1'e;v1::;r1a1:1ts 1\nto 3 are not ouly  t1L;\u00a2   shares as done\nby the trial Couxt and th4f:.VLe:\u00a7\u00bb7\u00a7::r  but is also\naggieved by    property is the\nancezstral   family.\n\n  the appeal on 24.7.2007\nhas  \ufb01ne  question of law for\nco1:x\u00a3'*5f'.1\u00a7.\u00a7I*e3t+i\u00a70n.\".V  ' .' \n\nVA '   Lower Appellate Court was\n\nA  V Ti  fgm in holding that the pIainti\ufb02' rs\n\n kaar\ufb01\ufb01on and separate possession of\n\"\"'---9\/\"\u00a7V8'\"'*'s:hare in the suit schedule property ?'\n\nA'   in the light of the said judmcntl and the\n\nK   question of law \ufb02amed by this Court, a brief\n\nJ\n\nan\n\n\n\nreference to the facts invelved would indicate  M\n\nthe reiationship between the partjee; 'Ibex \n\ndispute inasmuch as the plain\ufb01\ufb02 2 2  \n\n3 are the sons of late Nagendfep:;:iat_white the  Viiefe\ufb01dent 'V\n\nis his wife. The defendants 4,   'd:a.ugi3teIs of\nlate Nagendmppa. The   widow of the\ndeceased son of   8 and\n9 are the  4'   born to his\ndeceased    p1a1'nti\ufb01' was before\nthe    being one of the sons of Late\nNagendratipa\u00e9twvae  shape in the suit schedule\n\nproperty; _ S1'4J\".vt(:\u20ac!_  xt\u00e9rle\ufb01oztship and the fact that the\n\n V.   AoAg1'g:n'  owned by the grandfather of the\n\n  the enly question. would be the\n\nnaniret of fritefence set up by the contesting defendants\n\n deferniant Nos. 1 to 3. It is their contention that the\n\n   son of late Nagendrappa viz., the husband of the\n\n .._\" {:iefe;11dant No.7 had executed a xelinquishment deed in\n\n  gesp\ufb01ct of the property in question after receiving a sum of\n\nJ\n\n'0\n\n\n\nRs.10,00G\/~ and therefore, he would not be ~ V.\n\nshare. Even in respect of the plainti\ufb01\", it is conie\ufb01ded  H\n\nthey have been residing separately f;)f\"ti:1e.   \n\nand as such the plamti\ufb01 cannot   to. \n\nmember of the joint family.  M    \n\n5. While noticing the 1'iva1__e6nte1;tionS;\u00abtE1e  Court\nhas asclverted to the evi<'1e1zikf:e'o'.f Rfe{;"1~1V.yiv,}";~et;1e plaintiif and\nalso the evidence, of  :12  and\n\nChidanan:  _ ieiied on at Exhs.P1 to P6\nalso  "been.  regard to the properties.\n\nFurther the to D4 is also taken note\n\n ,_o_f.  at_1a1yeii:g...tb_e said evidence, the trial Court has\n\nthe }::13::i1\u00ab:2113.sioxt;. that even though it was contended\n\nthat. tiiere jxeiijzquishment deed, the same has not been\n\n  the learned counsel for the appellant\n\nx V' :\u20ac:0xI1\u00a5ie3:gds fhat this aspect of the matter has been admitted by\n\n--   considering the fact that the documents said to\n\nT " ls\u00e9m the nature of Ielinquishxnent deed has neither been\n\nJ;\n\n'b\n\n\n\nproduced and marked not has anything been indjevatedittto\n\nshow that the same has been Iegistered in  _\n\niaw, the same does not emme to the   u  \n\ndefendants to put forth such cont\u00a3;;1\ufb01Q.ne\u00abA.\u00e9a_13;d_   e\n\ntrial Court was justi\ufb01ed in zejectisrgg the    3\n\n6. Further with   .,eex;ten\ufb01ei1  the\npiainti\ufb01" was residing    Court has\n\nappmpziately n;::iiL~:-3:13.' the: 1ne\u00e9i213*'wieetsixiitggtsepaxately would\n\nnot indit\u00a7s1te_ the __severance of status of the joint\n\nfam\ufb02 y  vetli\u00e9iezeferewttxe ssiirin\u00e9eententioxl was rightly rejected\n\nby the; trisj   "  "\n\nA   'Inseef%.:r_ as the said findings with regard to the\n\nsa\ufb01iti*e'ef ._ \ufb02*am1ly' and the entitlement of a share in\n\nV . the EIIOPCITY, the Lower Appellate Court has also\n\n  these aspects of the matter and has re\u00bb-\n\n the evidence and has come to the conclusion\n\nVt   the trial Court was justi\ufb01ed in this regemzl. Insofar as\n\nJ\n\n'5\n\n\n\nthe said \ufb01nding is concerned, evczn this  \n\nconsidering the said aspect and on noticing  .\n\nCourts below have Inferred to the I ;:fsI;i_(1\u00a3=:n.<:_t" "av%,ii1af$1;:v"9n " " 'V\n\nIecorcl and have rendered a \ufb01nding 6: ra\u00ab;m\u00a5itAh=j;\u00a7ega":d \n\njoint status of the family. The'TVpz:(\u00a7pe1'Vt2y-V_1\u00a7i::ir;g \n\nproperty is for the bene\ufb01t of the  df family.\nHence, the said \ufb01nding   be interfered\n\n __ 'q1:fc:vs_tio}:1 that would arise for\ncons\ufb02erafio\ufb01' is   the allomcnt of share as\n\nmade ;by _the 'V   The Lower Appellate Court\n\n   'I131'  was not jus\ufb01\ufb01cd in denying the\n\n  and in that regard, the trial Court\n\nwas not  in allot\ufb01ng om-*:--sixth share has come to the\n\n  txsnclusitsjgii' that even if the daughters ware maxxitad prior to\n\n    into force of the Karnataka amendment Act in\n\nV'  year 1994, tht: Court below has taken mate of the fact\n\n ihc daughters would be entitic\u00e9 $0 a sham in the\n\nJ\n\nP:\n\n\n\nproperty that would be allottsd to the share of " \n\n\ufb01atber viz., Nagcndrappa on notional partzitiozlh  \n\nshare has been allotted to the daugh5e\u00a3~s"as. wan. .; <It::j;st.in_t1Ai:2at\n\ncontext, the Lower Appc\u00a7}atcV   \u00e9tjtjt\u00e9 ~ ft} x \n\nconclusion that the share to   48th\nshare in the instant cva-ag. "'h\u00a71vinig\u00ab  this\naspect of the matter what'   -I.1o1;i<:ed is that\neven though   a 'providing for\nentitiement  3   was quali\ufb01ed by\nthe eve\ufb01ts Q1;   into force of the Act, the\nsubs<:q13,etitV._  made to Section 6 of the\n\nHindu; 3ugccs?sg:\u00bbnV_' Ad {rouge}. indicate that the female heir\n\n  'V ' -so 'v:'rnuEd:"'t"b\u00e9 trea. \u00a2_ tad as a coparcencr.\n\nA   A\u00e9onsiiic\ufb01ng the nature of amendment to the\n\n '~___VE{a1*nAatak.a;_ :Act as well as the Ccizntral Act, the iaarned Ju\u00e9gc:\n\n    in the case of SUGALABAI vs GUNDAPPA A<\/a>\n\n ,._\ufb01MARAQ1 AND OTHERS (ILR 2007 Kar 4790) has held that\n\n , Jthe amcndmcnt made to the Central Act would apply even to\n\nJ\n\nW\n\n\n\npending proceedings. Hence the contention of the learned\n\ncounsel for the respondent by placing reliance on theedsaid<\/pre>\n
judgment would have to be accepted. If that be  ” H<\/p>\n
instant case, independent of what has been   ‘<\/p>\n
Lower Appe\ufb01ate Court, shares will b.\u00e91iie”tc.  made” <\/p>\n
in View the amendment made  the  Act.  d’<\/p>\n
if that aspect of the matter in   the
\ndeceased Nagendrappa, there  ec\ufb01aaieeners who
\nare entitled to a sham  5Tjtsi\u00a7:.:eV Nagendrappa<\/p>\n
the flatlter   to partition, on notional
\npartition his Wife ‘(E\ufb01 defend_ani) though not a coparcener will<\/p>\n
be entitied      held by the Apex Court in<\/p>\n
 “GURB.{?A9v.  ..K%iAi~i:3A}’>PA MAGDUM vs. HIRABAI<\/a><\/p>\n
“”KHA:?5DA}3P\u00a7\u00a7\u00bbv4Y9i\u00a7($.\ufb01UM AND ores [(1978) 3 sec 383] and as<\/p>\n
snch.__4″V\u00a3\/Qfhds\ufb01aie would have to he aifiotted to his sham.<\/p>\n
 \ufb01le piajnti\ufb01” and defendants 3. to 6 Weuld be<\/p>\n
   to 1\/9&1 sham each and the defendants ‘3’, 8 and 9<\/p>\n
  Weauld be entitled to 1\/9* share. Since<\/p>\n
‘4 u*.N’a.g\u20ac11drappa has died prior to the partition, out of the<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
notional share allotted to him, ail his legal heirs  .<\/p>\n
enti\ufb02ed to a sham each and as such    ‘V\u00e9ham,  V’ ” ”<\/p>\n
the plainti\ufb01” and defendants 1 to 6  ‘bejeVe1’3;i:it;1et’:1 “f::’.1′ ” :Ij;–grn-:;’<\/p>\n
share and the defendants Nude?’-..  \u00a719o1.1_.1\u00a71 <\/p>\n
entitled to 118th share in’ asdditiqe\u00e9 iheir if  each
\n(1\/9* +1\/ath in 1\/9* =–*e%e%%2t’t\/’7’i??’ : in e\ufb01em, the
\npiainti\ufb01’ and defendantsvA1..te:–6  1\/8*” share
\neach in the    7 to 9
\nare together  1′  f\ufb01 terms of the above,
\nthe     is answmed partly in
\nfavour of   in favourof the defendants
\nsince   of shares asmade above.\n<\/p>\n
V  “I12  above, the appeal stands disposed of<\/p>\n
   shall draw up the iaeliminaxy decree<\/p>\n
 % 35\/…\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
” Alec\/bms<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Rudramma W\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\/O Late … on 1 June, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT op’ KARNATAKA AT sANGA1.a1\u00a7:i:’_T~~% V DATED THIS THE 161: DAY OF JUNE 29\u00a2?” :’ *’ BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSFICE} A;sT13oi?A._i~:NA REGULAR srscom A?PE,AL rm. “465; BETWEEN : 1 RUDRAMMA ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-165210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Rudramma W\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\/O Late ... on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Rudramma W\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\/O Late ... on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-11T04:16:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Rudramma W\\\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\\\/O Late … on 1 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-11T04:16:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":300,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Rudramma W\\\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\\\/O Late ... on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-11T04:16:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Rudramma W\\\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\\\/O Late … on 1 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Rudramma W\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\/O Late ... on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Rudramma W\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\/O Late ... on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-11T04:16:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Rudramma W\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\/O Late … on 1 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-11T04:16:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009"},"wordCount":300,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009","name":"Smt Rudramma W\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\/O Late ... on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-11T04:16:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-wo-late-nagendrappa-vs-sri-dasharathappa-so-late-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Rudramma W\/O Late Nagendrappa vs Sri Dasharathappa S\/O Late … on 1 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=165210"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165210\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=165210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=165210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}