{"id":165745,"date":"2010-10-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010"},"modified":"2016-04-19T08:38:24","modified_gmt":"2016-04-19T03:08:24","slug":"mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And H.S.Kempanna<\/div>\n<pre>\\\\&gt;'\u00a7\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 257\" DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010.\n\n: PRESENT :\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PAif1*1'L5;~..f ft  _\n\nAND\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE  \u00ab  1'\n\nM.F.A.NO. 6973 or '2o_( )5  . .  \"\n\nBetween:\n\nMrs. Alice Varkey, __ . .\nW\/0. Late 1\\\/LEVI. Varkey,' '  '\nAge: 54 years, \"  .\nR\/ at. S.M. 598\/3,__ 791 :Cafn'p.\u00a7\nJalahalli East'  '  2: \nBanga10re__~l4\u00ab.4' if '\n\n(By Sri, %\nSn'. Easavaraj..R.M;a\ufb02-X,' ~~F~,,\u00a2.c'1\\,voeaetes]\n\nA_r1_&lt;i.; - _\n\n.  &quot;&#039;*I}nifed&quot;Endia In\u00e9inanee Co., Ltd,\n\n.YesVhwanV1\u00a7hapur,\n\n  \n\n&quot;By itshixifiesional Manager.\n\n2. . Ms.&quot;&quot;vS. iieepika.\nD &#039;\/&#039;.r_)__. Sukurnar,\n\n &quot; * \u00abAged aboui 26 years,\n2  Fri\/0. N0. 853, 21%&#039; Cross,\n\nAyyappa Nagar,\nJ alahalli,\nBangalore.\n\n... Appellant\n\n\n\n8. Vinod Varkey\nS\/0. Late M.M. Varkey,\nAge: 33 years.\n\n4. Miss. Vidhu Varkey\nD\/o. Late M.M.Varkey,\nAge: 29 years.\n\nRespondent No. 3 &amp; 4 are\n\nResiding at SM 598 \/ 3,\n\n7*&quot; Camp, Jalahalli East,    --_ H .. g  .\nBangaIore--14.   j.  &quot; &quot; \n\nA.&#039; Respondentjs\n\n{By Sri. S.Srishaila, Advocaagicr R1  V\n\nR2 to R4 notice dispensed .v\/o dated :18&#039;\/07.l\/E2006}\n\nThis MFA is filed U\/S.&#039;vI73[}&quot;}~.vbf.:VVl&#039;2\/EV: Act against the\nJudgment and_Award.d&#039;ated&#039;ig 04 103\/ 2005&quot;=passed in MVC No.\n3678\/2003 ;0n*;tpl_&#039;.ie \ufb01le of~~th&#039;e  SCJ and MACT,\nBangalore .-{SCCil\u00a7_--_--?_ 7&#039;},_pai*tiy aiitj\ufb01mng the claim petition for\ncompensation and &#039;s-eekifig enhancement of compensation.\n\nThis * MFA V. on for Hearing, this day,\nN.K_. _PATIi~.~.  d&#039;eiiv~:~_:red the following:\n*&quot;* JUDGMENT eeeee\n\nit  --  is \ufb01led by one of claimants challenging\n\nthe  judgment and award dated 4th March\n\n n2o05,..&#039;passed in M.V.C.No.3678\/2003, by the XIX\n\n --..Vi-&#039;\\d.lditiona1 SCJ and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,\n\n-IlBanga1ore (SCCH~\u00bb17), (for short, Tribunal&#039; ) for\n\nenhancement of cornpe sation on the ground that, the\n\n\n\ncompensation of &#039;&lt;&#039;5,8i,OOO\/-- awarded as against their\n\nClaim for ?16.00 lakhs, is inadequate.\n\n2. The facts in brief are that, the \n\nthe wife of the deceased Late Sri.  V&#039;\n\ntheir children, who are respondientis\u00e9yfi  it\n\nfiled the claim petition under Section \n\nVehicles Act, contending    on 17-\n05-2003, the deceased  proceeding on\n\nhis bicycle to his house :after  his duty from\n\nAirfoirce&#039;Trainirig&quot;&#039;C&#039;si1ege,tifaiahalii West. When the\n\nbicycie yvas the extreme left side of SM.\n\nRoad, near V_V&#039;Fa,thi:A1&#039;i_aV&quot;Church, a car bearing N0.KA -\n\n  peing&quot;&quot;dVriven by its driver, in a rash and\n\n   Rdnianner, came from behind and dashed\n\nagainst~ thheddbicycle of the deceased. Due to the impact,\n\n the tudeceased sustained grievous injuries and\n\n  V&#039;si1c&#039;curnbed to the same in Command Hospital at 6:45\n\nd V .I%A.M. on the same da\n&#039;_____W_,__,_,,,....\n\n\n\n3. It is the case of the appellant that, the\ndeceased was aged about 57 years, working as Warrant\nOfficer in Indian Air Force at Airforce Technical.g&#039;C--ollege\n\nand drawing salary of ?14,776\/-- per \n\nincome tax assessee. It is her further.c&#039;ase:.A_1that.,.&quot; \n\naccount of his untimely death,  it\n\nhaywire and she has lostgthe &#039;life&#039;*partne1f.. \n\nsecurity and therefore,  to&quot;-ldedcompensated\nadequately.\n\n  of the deceased in the\naccident,&lt;_the  her two children, who are\n\nrespondents&quot; 3_&#039;and_ V\u00e9fdlherein, filed the claim petition\n\n Ab&#039;ei;or\u00a7,,th;&#039;e,_Trihun&#039;alV seeking compensation of a sum of\n\n  the respondents 1 and 2 herein.\n\n&#039;I&#039;h__e saiddijclaim petition had come up for consideration\n\n pp before. the Tribunal on 4% March 2005. The Tribunal,\n\n&#039; --..V&quot;aft.eir considering the relevant material available on file\n\nRand after appreciation of the oral and documentary\n\nevidence, allowed the &#039;m petition in part, awarding a\nWWW&quot;.\n\nI&#039;\n!\n\n\n\nsum of ?&#039;5,81,000\/- with interest at 6% per annum from\nthe date of petition till the date of deposit. Being\naggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by\n\nthe Tribunal, on the ground that is\n\ninadequate, the appellant is in appeal   \n\nseeking enhancement of cornpe1nsatio1_;7..&quot;&#039;.gg &#039;1 he &#039; V t\n\n5. We have heard  coi1ns_ueIv&#039;:foi;&#039;;appellant\n\nand learned counsel&quot; for ;_Insu_1*a&#039;r1-be Company, for\n\nconsiderable length of ti1ne.&#039; - _  &#039;l &quot;\n\n *  counsel for the parties\nand afteiapherulsaltl judgment and award passed by\n\n ir1cl&#039;uding&#039; the original records placed before\n\n&#039; ,.1,1sV,. _ weof the View that, the occurrence of accident\n\n thev&#039;vls:ife.sultant death of the deceased are not in\n\n dispute. It is also not in dispute that he was aged about\n\n v$7&quot;_\u00abyears and working as Warrant Officer at Airforce\n\n __&#039;?&#039;i&#039;echnical College, drawing salary of ?l4,&#039;\/&quot;76\/-- per\n\nmonth or ?1,&#039;77,312%,,per annum. Out of which,\n\n:&#039;~&quot;&#039;&quot;&#039;\u00b0&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&#039;&quot;M&#039;w&#039;m&quot;\nt\n\n\n\nprofessional tax and income tax are to be deducted.\nAccordingly. if a total sum of ?l8.200\/-- is deducted\nunder the said heads, the net income comes to\n\n31,59,112\/-- per annum. The app1&#039;0p1&#039;iat_e..__lintill\u00a3l1;lliiE1&#039;\n\napplicable. having regard to the age of  \n\n&#039;9&#039; as per Sarla VerIna&#039;s case&#039;-4.&#039;  &#039;regard &#039;4\n\nnumber of dependents, 1V,xs&quot;3fd \n\ndeducted from ?I,59,ll\u00a7&#039;\/El&#039; and lithe said\ndeduction, it comes annum. In the\n\nlight of the well settledv:.law&#039;V--1ai,d  this Court, in\n\nthe pcaseagsc  Iiiiiiaill and others Vs. K.S.\n\nLaksliIni\u00ab. reported in ILR 2000\n\nKa1;&#039;.3800&#039;;&quot; lVoss_iofA&#039;dependency, in this case has to be\n\n  atbylladopting split multiplier. Accordingly,\n\n   deceased was left with another three years of\n\nser__&#039;lVic_e,~  multiplier of &#039;3&#039; has to be applied for a sum\n\n of ?i,.o6,075\/--, which comes to ?3,18,225\/-- and\n\n uptheireafter, after deducting 50% from &quot;(&#039;l,06,075\/-,\n\n &#039;&#039; Nlmultiplier of &#039;6&#039; has to be adopted, which comes to\n\n?&#039;3,l8,225\/--. Accordin\u00e9lg\ufb02the total loss of dependency\n[I ##2##\n\n\n\nworks out to 33,18,225\/- (i.e. 31,06,075\/--~ X&#039;3&#039;} plus\n33,18,225\/- (i.e. ?1,06,075\/~ x&#039;6&#039;], which comes to\n?6,36,450\/-- as against ?5,56,000\/-- awarded by\n\nTribunal.\n\n7. Further, the Tribunal   T\n\nsum of ?10,000\/-- towards&#039; loss of\n\n not awarding reasonabievv.borriperisatiori tinder the\nother conventional   The&quot;&quot;~deceased has left\n\nbehind his Wi.f_e   having\n\nregard   cirourristances of the case, we\nawardra .si1n&#039;r -- towards loss of love and\n\naffeotionf s&#039;urr1&#039;,=of&quot;? 101000\/-- towards transportation of\n\n  a\ufb01body arid&#039; &quot;&quot;&quot; &#039;funeral expenses; and a sum of\n\n  V&#039;towards loss of life expeotancy\/ loss of estate\n\n the compensation of ?15,000\/~ awarded by\n\n xTribtmal towards funeral expenses and loss of estate.\n\n8. In the light of the facts and circumstances of\n\nthe case, as stated abo\\%t;&#039;1e appeal filed by appellants\nIf \ufb02\n\n{\n\n\n\nis allowed in part. The impugned judgment and award\ndated 4th March 2005, passed in M.V.C.No.3678\/2003,\nby the XIX Additional SCJ and Motor Accident.g&quot;Clgaims\n\nTribunal, Bangalore [SCCH--17], is \n\nawarding a sum of ?&quot;6,81,450\/-- as  \n\nawarded by the Tribunal, with    it\n\non the enhanced sum, fro1n_the\u00ab&#039;d_at&#039;e of  thjeg\n\ndate of realization. The brealefupp is  follows;\n\nTowards Loss of Dep;eriden_cy,- .A  &quot;  &#039; 6,363,450\/~\n\n15,000\/--\n\n3\nTowards Loss of love and affection  f it 1\n &#039; 10,000\/ -\n\nTowards Lossof esteatejj\/&#039;-loss&#039; of V\nexpectancy,   V  ~  \n\nTowards loss of&#039;con~s&#039;ortirin1  3  V 10,000 \/-\n\nTowards  transportation  dead 10,000 \/ --\n\nbody  funei*al exp&#039;e:1se&#039;s.__\n\n&#039; T()fI&quot;_AL__.  A 2* 6.81,45o\/-\n\n  Insi1ra.nc,e-- Company is directed to deposit the\n\n&#039; ,eriha,nc&#039;ed&#039;\u00abcompensation of ?1,00,450\/-, with interest\n\nt.he*reon  6% per annum, within four weeks from the\n\n date~.oi&quot;\u00a7&quot;eceipt of copy of the judgment and award.\n\nA  Immediately on such deposit by the Insurance\n\nCompany, out of enhanced compensation of\n\n\n\n31,00,450\/~, 50% of it with proportionate interest, shall\nbe invested in Fixed Deposit, in any Nationalized or\nScheduled Bank, in the name of the appellant --&#039;&lt;&#039;:&#039;\\?iIife of\n\ndeceased, for a period of three years, reinewabiei for\n\nanother three years. with liberty reserved   \n\nwithdraw the interest periodically,  f} \n\nRemaining 50% of .enhanee::_1&quot;&#039;compe&#039;neation&#039;\u00a7 \n\nproportionate interest, sha11Kbepre1ease&#039;dsfaviour of the\nappellant, immediate*1\u00a7E,.&quot; _ \nOffice to draw   \n\n .....  \n<\/pre>\n<p>Iudg\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>sax-<br \/>\nfudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010 Author: N.K.Patil And H.S.Kempanna \\\\&gt;&#8217;\u00a7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 257&#8243; DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010. : PRESENT : THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PAif1*1&#8217;L5;~..f ft _ AND THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE \u00ab 1&#8242; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-165745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-19T03:08:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-19T03:08:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":36,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-19T03:08:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-19T03:08:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-19T03:08:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010"},"wordCount":36,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010","name":"Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-19T03:08:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-alice-varkey-vs-united-india-insurance-co-ltd-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mrs Alice Varkey vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 25 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=165745"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165745\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=165745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=165745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}