{"id":165873,"date":"2010-09-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010"},"modified":"2018-08-22T14:17:02","modified_gmt":"2018-08-22T08:47:02","slug":"thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA.No. 347 of 2010()\n\n\n1. THOMAS, S\/O.JOHN, VADAKKEKARA HOUSE,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THOMAS @ JOY,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.RAJU JOSEPH\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :08\/09\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                   S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J\n                   --------------------------------------\n                       R.S.A No.347 OF 2010\n                       --------------------------------\n           Dated this the 8th day of September 2010\n\n                               JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
            Plaintiff is the appellant. Suit was one for declaration<\/p>\n
of title, recovery of possession and injunction, both prohibitory<\/p>\n
and mandatory. Both the courts below have declined the reliefs<\/p>\n
canvassed by the plaintiff. At the time of hearing of the appeal,<\/p>\n
the learned counsel appearing for the appellant\/plaintiff<\/p>\n
submitted that the main dispute agitated upon by the parties<\/p>\n
related to a small strip of land having an extent of 250 sq. links<\/p>\n
which was claimed by the plaintiff as part of his property but<\/p>\n
trespassed upon by the defendant.                Since such area being<\/p>\n
negligible, the learned counsel submits that further probe as to<\/p>\n
whether the plaintiff can seek recovery of that property with<\/p>\n
reference to the materials tendered in the case does not have<\/p>\n
much merit. However, it is submitted, the plaintiff has a genuine<\/p>\n
apprehension that there would be further trespass into his<\/p>\n
property taking advantage of the adverse decision rendered in his<\/p>\n
suit. In the context, it is submitted that though the title deeds of<\/p>\n
plaintiffs demonstrated that he has title over an extent of 3 acres<\/p>\n
36 = cents, on determination of the property by survey<\/p>\n
measurements with reference to the deeds what is presently<\/p>\n
R.S.A No.347 OF 2010            – 2 –<\/span><\/p>\n
available is only 3 acres 20.213 cents. The common boundary<\/p>\n
which the plaintiff has with the defendant has been fixed by the<\/p>\n
advocate commissioner and shown in the plan as RQ.               The<\/p>\n
learned counsel submitted that both the courts below which have<\/p>\n
been called upon to examine the recovery of possession claimed<\/p>\n
on the basis of title inadvertently overlooked the claim for<\/p>\n
injunction on the basis of the apprehension raised by the plaintiff<\/p>\n
that there is a threat of trespass over the property now under his<\/p>\n
possession and enjoyment. Whether the plaintiff was entitled to<\/p>\n
the decree of injunction in respect of the property as available at<\/p>\n
present, which has been identified by the commissioner under<\/p>\n
Ext.C2 was necessarily a matter which should have been gone<\/p>\n
into by the courts irrespective of the rejection of recovery claimed<\/p>\n
over the trespassed area. But, it was not done is the grievance<\/p>\n
espoused by the learned counsel for the appellant to contend that<\/p>\n
the plaintiff, in the interest of justice, has to be granted a decree<\/p>\n
of injunction over the property identified in his favour under<\/p>\n
Ext.C2 plan, to safeguard and protect that property. Since his suit<\/p>\n
in its entirety has been dismissed, it is submitted by the learned<\/p>\n
counsel even in the event of a subsequent trespass, whatever be<\/p>\n
the merit of the cause of action, the plaintiff would be seriously<\/p>\n
prejudiced in getting appropriate relief from the competent court.<\/p>\n
R.S.A No.347 OF 2010            – 3 –<\/span><\/p>\n
Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent pointed out<\/p>\n
that both the courts have found that not even an inch of land of<\/p>\n
the plaintiff had been trespassed upon by the defendant and that<\/p>\n
being so, apprehension canvassed that there is a likelihood of<\/p>\n
trespass in view of the dismissal of the suit is bereft of any merit.<\/p>\n
      2. The property of the defendant has been identified in<\/p>\n
Ext.C2 plan as MNPRS as having an extent of 6.10 are. Property<\/p>\n
of the plaintiff is identified under the plan as P3 A B C D E F G L K<\/p>\n
O R R1 R2 R3 P1 P2 plot. The common boundary between the<\/p>\n
properties of the parties has also been fixed as RQ in C2 plan.<\/p>\n
When such identification has been done and it has been accepted<\/p>\n
by the court, over which there is dispute is subsisting between the<\/p>\n
parties, in the event of any trespass, over the property identified<\/p>\n
as belong to the plaintiff, nothing prevents him from approaching<\/p>\n
the court and seeking appropriate reliefs.             To allay the<\/p>\n
apprehension raised by the plaintiff, it need only be recorded<\/p>\n
that the parties have no dispute over the identification of the<\/p>\n
properties as determined by the commissioner in Ext.C2 plan and<\/p>\n
that RQ is the common boundary of their properties.         Though I<\/p>\n
find that there is some force in the argument raised by the<\/p>\n
appellant’s counsel that the decree of injunction canvassed in the<\/p>\n
suit was not examined by the court below in the proper<\/p>\n
R.S.A No.347 OF 2010           – 4 –<\/span><\/p>\n
perspective. No further enquiry thereof is called for in view of the<\/p>\n
recording of the common boundary of the parties under C2 plan,<\/p>\n
as it would safeguard the interest of the plaintiff over the property<\/p>\n
identified as belonging to him. A meticulous consideration of the<\/p>\n
materials tendered in the case with reference to the pleadings to<\/p>\n
examine the question whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree<\/p>\n
of injunction is not warranted in the second appeal. Subject to<\/p>\n
the above observations made, confirming the decree and<\/p>\n
judgment of the court below, the appeal is disposed of directing<\/p>\n
both sides to suffer their costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                    Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                                      S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
\n                                                 JUDGE<\/p>\n
                            \/\/True Copy\/\/<\/p>\n
                                            P.A to Judge<\/p>\n
vdv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA.No. 347 of 2010() 1. THOMAS, S\/O.JOHN, VADAKKEKARA HOUSE, … Petitioner Vs 1. THOMAS @ JOY, … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE For Respondent :SRI.RAJU JOSEPH The Hon’ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN Dated :08\/09\/2010 O R […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-165873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-22T08:47:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-22T08:47:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":839,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-22T08:47:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-22T08:47:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-22T08:47:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010"},"wordCount":839,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010","name":"Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-22T08:47:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thomas-vs-thomas-joy-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Thomas vs Thomas @ Joy on 8 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=165873"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165873\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=165873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=165873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}