{"id":165940,"date":"2008-03-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008"},"modified":"2016-07-04T02:18:21","modified_gmt":"2016-07-03T20:48:21","slug":"mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And … on 20 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And … on 20 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT   ~\nI DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY 0F.MAI\u00a7CII  I\n\nBEFORE-.V  I I  I \n\nTHE ON'BLE MR.    \nwmr Pm-TIQ__I\\I NC):  2905 IGMI.-..RE&I)\nBE WEEN: I  I  \n\nIvIOHAiv'dv'iED maria? AIIMED\u00bb  ' '\nAGED ABouT_.4-a3zEAR:s:; I  \n\nsxo MOHAIVIED A5%ui,AI., K,H:\"=.N.  .,\" \" \nNO.3'2 85 3:3,' 'Rim EN'I'--.L_Vt*)_RI\u00a3S IFACFORY)\n    I  '\nP()ST:,KU-KNOQR, 'FAI.UK.;YALBUR(}A \nD1S'T'E:iCT:KOF'PAL   _\n\nT) .\nr ETITI O N E R\n\n(By S195:IMAHIviOOE5\"?V\"I'PEL; I\n\nAND :\"\n\n I  'f1'HE\"K\u00abARNATAI<A STATE KHADI AND VILLAGE\n* -. _ ..lNDUtS'T.RIES BOARD.\n2 I10. 1U,uJASMA BHAVAN ROAD\n"\u00a3zA_N.GA;;oRE--s5o 052\nI3Y'iT-st::11EF EXECUTIVE OFFICER\n\n2 .. 'I'H,E DISTRICT OFFICER\nKARNATAKA STATE KHADI AND VILLAGE\nINDUSTRIES BOARD. OFFICE AT KINNAL ROAD\nPOS'I':KOPPAL, DIS'I':KOPPAL I\n\n 3 THE SPECIAL 'I'AHASILDAR\nKARNATAKA STATE KI-IADI AND VILLAGE\nINDUSTRIES BOARD\nGULBARGA DIVISION\n\n)2\n '\n \n\n\n\nmmwxmwmMmmT _f'\ufb01g2\ufb01\nGULBARGA ".RESH$NDE\ufb01TS T\n{B3,..r1;; SAMPATH ANAND Sf{ET'FY,l,{I5V."FOR R1.;\u00ab  V'\n\n3\nSri: H M MANJUNATH, HCGA FOR  A. \n\nTmswmrmmnmu\u00e9mmpummRmawws$m&='\n\n227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF'L'..INDIA, W{.'I_'H"{'.' PRAYER TO\nQUASH THE :2\u00ab.4PU\u00ab31~1EDi__ <:n_2_DER_..DA*PEL1_ 17.3.2uoV5 PASSED BY\nR.3 AT ANNEXURE--L; DIRECT THE R+Es?UNDENTS"'rO RELEASE\nTHE SANCTIONED EAL-AM?-E. LQA1:1AMoLIN'?.'OF RS. 3.01.910}-\n(REPEES THREE LAKHS ONE THOU:SA_T$IEi. I\\iINE HUNDRED TEN)\nBEING THE PART_OF THE M._AIlHI--NERY LAND )'}'RAC1'I'C)R-TRAILER\nVEHICLE LOAN\u00ab'AMOUI'\u00a7\u00a7'I', AS..:VPER~.fTHE' S::ANC'I'IONED ORDER\n\ufb01T.9,r"15.2.199._9 P\u00a3%.SSP.1".)'-B'! 1::1_.A'.'--.:.* \n\nThis  ;F1*s::t;_it_ior_; cq::$i11itlg;9;1..\u00a7foz' hearing. this day, the\nCourt mac'te't'r1\u00a7; fo\ufb02pwiiig.\n QRDER\n\n ..'1)Bti\ufb01(5I1EI?~--iS befom this Court seekfulg for issue of\n\n' =wT1"it _t)f..c:fe1fti0:1%LTi to quash the auction notice dated 17.3.2005\n\n *.xrl'iti\u20ac:l1 is;.V~V'Li\u00e9,1V1F;)i1g11ec1 at Am1cxu1\\3 --L to the pet1'11'o11. The\n\npct'iti(i 11;1*Vhas also sought for issue of writ. of mallclamus to\n\n~  \u00a3;1Lij,_.&r_'.-'.r. the 1'BSpO1ldC1\ufb02'.S to release the sanctioned balance\n\nflcan 9:u'1{:u31t cf Rs.-\u00a3101,910,!-,\n\nJul\n-1\u00bb.\n\n\n\n2. 1 have heaitl sn Mahamoocl Patel, leaxjied gtailgsgi -\n\nappearing for the petitierlier and Sri Sarnpatiii  it 99\n\nlearned counsel tier the 1es1Jonde11te';\u00ab\u00a2  ' \n\n3. uavmg he..1.'. t1-e reepeetiveleained' \u00abcounsel, I have\n\nperused the WT"it papeie} \n\n4. The lieii\ufb01\u00e9iier is the' 11* "5 tire\nbene\ufb01eiary   the Iespondents as per\nthe   eff Khadi and Village Induatiies\nBoard. \\.'r'1-is: 91j1x::ijeCVt"9.l3ei11g Rs.9,88,000\/--, the loan\n\ng1fa.\u00a7ited.by thea1jesj1;)o1idei1ts was to the tune of Rs.9,08,000\/ --\n\nA "\u00a39514" t1;s~._';;gjree111e11t at Annexure ---A to the petition. As per\n\n . t';':Iiu:-  'rid uie S311-eti_1. e1__er dated 9]15.2.1999, the\n\naii10t11it.".nzz=is to be '1'e1"""""1  "1stal'.:1e11ue. .A...1.3QI'd.i_T1i! to the\n\n AA petitieiiei', in so far as the ainount which 11 1 be": ""itia1'.y\n\n9'  V're1e'asec1, the petitioiier had utilised the same for puttiiig up\n\n the c:onstruc:tio11 of the unit on the land belonging to the\n\npetitioner and the amount had been utilised for the puipose\n\n1\n13\n\n\n\nLu.'\n\nfor which it was granted. However, eVen"~'u1o1i\u00a7Ei'--  .\nsubsequent instalment of the loan __a1notint' ~-- he \nreleased, the respomtlents deliheratelgo   ':1'-J:f_1k"'_1'i'\n\nappmpniate steps for 1e1ease"oi'--..tl1e   115a \n\ncaused great. di\ufb02iculty 'for the   out his\n\nSB\n\n..J.iviti_.:3= Therefone, i1e_iti1er'.the_ 'could be completed\n\n1 time nor z=Ji}r.9.1I=.eu;r1\u00bbt\u00bb--eo--u1;_--.he repaxdtuy the petitioner.\n\nI\n\nTheieibie, 3-his  lltif\ufb02tj  ":'e:\u00ab:5ponden.e "weld. not\nhave     eaid anionnt. ""3 do"! in\n\nthe piesent   for the petitioner in this\niegaltllliefers tot_.lt1:ie.euh:SeqL1ent release orders to indicate\nthat at  the amount had been released only\n\n.  _ A  fepieeentntione were made by the petitioner which itself\n   that the respondents themselves have not<\/pre>\n
 1.’._.11ne of the agreement while releasing the<\/p>\n
   It is t’u1’mer contended that even the order
\nV’ V. eoitceiiing the loan ar *1 i”‘”?<-."i1EITLg the same, which is now
\n proclucecl along with the objection statement we "ot. made<\/p>\n
known to the petitioner. Therefoze, the petitioner was not<\/p>\n
41<\/span><\/p>\n
aware of the cancellation and as such even   V’
\nthe said date viz., 12.7.2001, the  viiiade
\nzrepresentation seeldng for releaseof  <\/p>\n
…1e peti1:L_11er th,1 ,fo1e aseaile” the aiiotioi1.V\ufb010\ufb01eeV'”whieh isV V<\/p>\n
5. 011  offh\ufb01.  counsel
\nwould iefejr-to   to contend that
\nout ofm;     sum of Rs.6,06,090\/–\n<\/p>\n
had heen._1eleee-33% the_?pe11tione1′ and despite the same, the
\n_]Z)B1’it3iOI1’Af2I?:11ElVd’   any portion of the amount.<\/p>\n
Theiefoie, fh\u00e9’I1fiS\ufb01Onti\ufb0111tS were left with no other alternative<\/p>\n
, but to .ean%c:el tee loan -,..aL1.–ti-11..;1 -_Ld  the anioluit<\/p>\n
 it  ‘the loan aclvanced to the petitioner is under the
\n\u00ab’–..V”\u20ac?.\u00a31’1.::isorti1un Bank Credit Scheme which is the scheme
\n\ufb02oated by the Khadi and Village :i11dustries Commission,<\/p>\n
Mumbai and the respondents heiein me only disbursing<\/p>\n
I
\nJ;\n<\/p>\n
agencies of the loan eanctioiied by the Khadi iaiidi V’
\nInclllstries Commissioii, Mu1nbai;'””As\u00a2 per  ‘\u00e9  V
\nirrespective of the bene\ufb01ciary  tlie. <\/p>\n
,11_1,1.11it would have to be   the-ii<\/p>\n
interest. T’ en:-fore no ii1:i11}’g’5f<\/p>\n
grantees of t]ie”l9a:n.;””It*  t11erefbic..e(3i1tended that the
\naction iiiitimegl ti1e”1feepo1i:i.\u00e9\u00a7j11tfs  acoorclance with
\nlaw- …. ..\n<\/p>\n
6;  the=1’iVal eiiiifeiitions advancecl, a perusal of the<\/p>\n
wiigfpupers WO1_i1dV’iIldiCatC that the saiiction oitlei’ is as per<\/p>\n
saiictipii .4i.A”J.\u00a7i*’ci’1ie1*. As per the ‘semis of me agi'””rae1*1t., the
\n n\u00a71inoi1n.i::’ is to be iepgaid in 28 quarteriy instalments of
\nV”Vi.i%’R$;”19,998.75. No documents have been pmduced along
\nH\u00e9with the Writ Petition to iiidicate that the instalments as<\/p>\n
coiitezuiplatecl under “the agreeuient has been repaid by the<\/p>\n
I
\n4;\n<\/p>\n
I…-1<\/p>\n
peiitioiier. ’11 31 y \u00e9vT::1t,i do ‘rt wish in g” tum’ ‘*f;’.,%:–.  _<\/p>\n
aspect of the matter since these aitgili disp’dt\u00a3d-iqii\u00e9stialla  =<\/p>\n
fact which cannot be n=.-solved in   i<\/p>\n
7. The only point to be ii1\u00e9e1isei:iVe1t:ci”at;i:tlii5 jiincttut: is
\nas to whether the Iespgiidenis \u00a7=.H:\u00a7f’rc..Vj:1i’.\u00e9.iiiied in b1’ing;’u1g the<\/p>\n
piupcrty to sa1e__as 1)\u20ac1’A..AIiI’i.tV3}\ufb02.l_}'(..!b –E\u00a7”vtO’1i::\u00a7:.0ver the amount<\/p>\n
 flit} .’Vf.\u00a7.i;3=Ifi’V\u00a3’1.:’:i’A\ufb01*}.i”\ufb01S”\u00a7T}\u00a7?3 Ghiac\ufb01cii statement {if
\nthe  the peiiiioiicr is not
\ndiS1)l1i\u00a53;;JH0iETt3W4i\u00a7i1:,’:.:\ufb02Ti\u00a2”iii\ufb01ilgilt\ufb01 put forth by the petitioner is<\/p>\n
that. _the  }~’.-oaii i\ufb01iiiotlnt smictionccl has not been<\/p>\n
3 V’  . ‘1’\u00e9i:(%:\u00a3iSt_’JC:1 ij3.A favAoi1i1i””t3’f’t11e petitioner and therefore the pmjcct
\nV  “:p;::mp1cted and the business could not be
\n the inanztier envisaged so as to enable<\/p>\n
1  of the amount. It is in that regard, it. is<\/p>\n
“’11 1-1 n:-1 {~11 nu.\n<\/p>\n
‘I1.I.’.Il-IE1 lll\ufb01lt 1…]. E F-.r”‘-;’-II’  1)’; ‘-1 3<\/p>\n
LI. \u00a2J.’Lr 141.11.:\n<\/p>\n
fcamioi; be jusii1’ied. in a mat<\/p>\n
project is to be undertaken in the 1118111161′ as agrceci to<\/p>\n
J_J<\/p>\n
between the parties and if there an: any b1eaeij:”ot’f  A ”
\nthe sanction onzler or the agIBCl1l|?fHt”b3.t9V\u20ac=f’;I.V1″\ufb01i#%.’:]L}%f’ii\u00e9S, it V
\nwould have ten be Iesolved beib1eVai\ufb01   <\/p>\n
However, the fact that. w}1e1i\u00bbtj::\u00a7e\u00bb..  t1iis’\u00bb L<\/p>\n
‘””-=’ ‘* by aee-.a\ufb02:’.ng V  at Ailnexllzje —-L_, this<\/p>\n
C’o11r’t stayed \ufb01e ‘    e=.:b’eet .9 certain
\nterms is evicielg\ufb01 f:t'()1″I1; A ‘\ufb02’1’e–  ”
\npetitioneq.    \u00a3f\u00a3\ufb02’3;E1il’1’u(%ifHRS.2,OO,0QO[- at the
\nrate o;f_Rev.v’   eenieveiieeeassiolae as orcleled by
\nthis Cp111f_t.– 1 to.’ this aspect of the mattel’ to
\nindicate  t11e–\ufb01as shown some bona\ufb01des after
\na1;\u00a7gmae11hi\u00a7 th:'[\ufb01;’C’oeit \\;vitl1 Iegantl to his intexltion to eettie<\/p>\n
V A \u00abthe m:’.f1e1_:, ‘What requires to be 11ot1’ced at this _junctm’e is by<\/p>\n
schedliicsi  as i11dieat”i \ufb02rrein. S\ufb01iee the .’.:1’tl1eI
\n A lnluceedinge had been stayed by this C’o111″t., the Ieepcrident-,
\n”  ‘Vin  event, would have to restart the pmeees,  ultiltiately<\/p>\n
the 1Jet1’t1’oI1e1’ does not settle the issue. Since smne amotmt<\/p>\n
I
\nI3<\/p>\n
is depositecld an opportunity could be g11anfed_.””fo  ‘<\/p>\n
matter by negotiatillg with the reap-:mVd.t3I1ts._” H  ‘<\/p>\n
8. Thevcfole, keeping aspect in. view;  satiation’. . L’<\/p>\n
notice dated 17.3.2095 17\u00a2:-E1i1_1_l{\ufb01’3s’s’~.’__ ‘#9 be  The<\/p>\n
pe\ufb01rie er is m be \ufb01eauztted *_ make .11 “pi: Jonllate<\/p>\n
re1)1esenta\ufb01en ‘tat:  the  9a- \u00e9;v_   Piha\u00e9i Jillane
\nI]1dl.lSt]’i\u00a32S.’   V’ :’T’i1’e repleselltaiion is
\n Iii\u00e9jsuii 6:; Village I11clust1’iea
\n .tl_1e reason that the cirmllar
\npmd11cAied ‘by ’tile  along with their objection
\nstafugzment ihiidieate that in so far as any concession to
\n     of Consortium Bank Credit Sc:11eme
\n  i-.._.’..V1.Vr1\u00ab.’,  would not he autlmrised, but it is the<\/p>\n
Iiha\ufb01i and Village I1}…us+-gee CL-…mi-Helen, Mumlwni,<\/p>\n
9. Accordzingly, the foliowillg:\n<\/p>\n
P<\/p>\n
I) The auction notice datsd <\/p>\n
II) The petitioner .’is’__ atii”  1
\nappropriate 1eprcssiiis’vI.oi1 ts’  Iifspiigiclsnts as
\nwell as I{iiiiitl.i \u00a7;;\u00a71’tust1’iesiiii\ufb01\u00e9iinmissioii,
\nMunibai    the facts which<\/p>\n
1’_\u00a2”eai:i”‘:;:j1i;’:en  pmsent. pctitioil<\/p>\n
Q . jitiieh iespondcnts as wen ‘s \ufb02’-2′;
\n_. ia1_idVil.lagc Industries Commission,<\/p>\n
 A l\\I’_i1ii1ii1″t3a=\u00a3.–\u00ab’-vs71’tl1 vegarrl to the grant. of concession
\niepayincnt of the loan as well as to revive the<\/p>\n
A  iiiiitasny, if the same is permissible as per the
\n. scheme available with the rcspondciits and the
\nKhacli and village Industries Commission,<\/p>\n
R5111 m’i_<\/p>\n
‘I1
\n11’: -I..nJ..|.:n..a–us.\u00bb<\/p>\n
I
\n12<\/span><\/p>\n
III)<\/p>\n
VII)<\/p>\n
The pe\ufb01\ufb02oner is permitted to . ‘fi1e
\nrepresentation within _a~    s\ufb01fcckg ‘
\nfrom the (late oI’1eccipf-oi’ ‘0.f 1″.h:i”&I 7f<\/p>\n
The 1wespo11dcntSj_$’h\u00a7i]1 t1A1’e1v:t:.2:;t’t:_::f-‘.:Vr\u00a7(A*:’\u00a7t._1’.-‘:*.–i.t.iV.Vt\u00a7:1-*3 mid-.  L’<\/p>\n
clispose of such _Z[_’.I’31V’)’.”1’v’t;SI’.’\u00a3I_V_1t:t-“l1Zi()’Ii’  av\u00e9:-coltlallce
\nu   di._}1t.)-11211 of the<\/p>\n
‘$113.11 11.-at be<\/p>\n
 \ufb01eimitted to wi\ufb02ldraw the<\/p>\n
 2,ao,o0o\/- which is said to be
\nde’]gn_.\u00a7iAAi .3 d’ :]4;i’_\\;v:_:EtV”r1(=\u00a7’.1Jct1’t:io11\u00a2:1~ before this Court.<\/p>\n
 is directed to draw the cheque in
\nthe  the first respondent herein viz., The<\/p>\n
iis\ufb01llataka Stats Khadi &. Village Industries<\/p>\n
The: said a1nmu1t shali be credited by \ufb01n:<\/p>\n
respondents to the account of the pettitioner and<\/p>\n
the same shall be kept in View whi!A\u00a7S:–co’1Ar:1i;=fi.5’1ihie–1\u00ab’iii*s-55′ <\/p>\n
the repr\u00a2::sc11tat1’o11 to bcmade  Ht}iE’::}\u00a7e\ufb01\ufb01Q\ufb01CI’;’-  u u<\/p>\n
with the above obsc’rs{ati01\u00ab1S._’a3.1d dii$r:\u00a3:\ufb01dj1s’,a[ti2e.”‘ <\/p>\n
peti\ufb01on stallcls disposed  O1’dBl’ &S  iiosfg.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And … on 20 March, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT ~ I DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY 0F.MAI\u00a7CII I BEFORE-.V I I I THE ON’BLE MR. wmr Pm-TIQ__I\\I NC): 2905 IGMI.-..RE&I) BE WEEN: I I IvIOHAiv’dv’iED maria? AIIMED\u00bb […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-165940","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-03T20:48:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And … on 20 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-03T20:48:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1210,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-03T20:48:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And … on 20 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-03T20:48:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And … on 20 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-03T20:48:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008"},"wordCount":1210,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008","name":"Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-03T20:48:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-inayath-ahmed-khan-vs-the-karnataka-state-khadi-and-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mohammed Inayath Ahmed Khan vs The Karnataka State Khadi And … on 20 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165940","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=165940"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165940\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=165940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=165940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}