{"id":166208,"date":"2008-12-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008"},"modified":"2015-12-31T22:17:31","modified_gmt":"2015-12-31T16:47:31","slug":"sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>FAO No. 401 of 1992                   1\n\n        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n                     AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                           FAO No. 401 of 1992\n                          Decided on : 17-12-2008\n\nSh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal\n                                                   ....Appellant\n\n                      VERSUS\n\n\nJoginder Singh and another\n\n                                                   ....Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>CORAM:- HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER<\/p>\n<p>Present:-   Mr. O.P.Goyal, Senior Advocate<br \/>\n            with Ms. Priya Khurana, Advocate<br \/>\n            for the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nMAHESH GROVER, J<\/p>\n<p>            This appeal is directed against the award of the Motor Accident<\/p>\n<p>Claims Tribunal, Ambala dated 26.11.1991.\n<\/p>\n<p>            The claim petition preferred by the appellant on account of the<\/p>\n<p>injuries that he had suffered in an accident which took place on 8.5.89 was<\/p>\n<p>declined as the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the appellant had been<\/p>\n<p>unable to prove the negligence which he attributed to the driver of the bus.<\/p>\n<p>            Dis-satisfied with the award the appellant is in appeal.<\/p>\n<p>            It was contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that<\/p>\n<p>the evidence on record conclusively shows that the accident had been<\/p>\n<p>caused on account of the rash and negligent driving of the bus. He refers to<\/p>\n<p>the testimony of the appellant PW1 and another witness whom he had<\/p>\n<p>produced to substantiate his pleadings.\n<\/p>\n<p>            I have heard learned counsel        for the appellant and have<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> FAO No. 401 of 1992                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>perused the record.    A perusal of the testimony of PW1, the appellant<\/p>\n<p>himself is revealing to an extent. He has stated that he was proceeding on<\/p>\n<p>his scooter near the divider of the road and the bus was in the process of<\/p>\n<p>over-taking from the left side of his scooter and in that process bus hit his<\/p>\n<p>scooter on the left side causing injuries to him. The Court need not to travel<\/p>\n<p>to any other evidence to understand the manner in which the accident had<\/p>\n<p>taken place. According to the case of the appellant himself he was driving<\/p>\n<p>towards the right side near the divider of the road which is not expected<\/p>\n<p>from the driver of the scooter and is contrary to the traffic rules. Slow<\/p>\n<p>moving traffic has to be on the left side of the road to give path to the fast<\/p>\n<p>moving traffic like bus. From this it can be inferred that the appellant<\/p>\n<p>himself was also guilty of having caused the accident. In so far as the<\/p>\n<p>negligence of the bus driver is concerned, it can also be inferred that he was<\/p>\n<p>negligent that he took the bus so close to the scooter so as to strike against<\/p>\n<p>it. There is evidence in the shape of testimony of the driver of the bus who<\/p>\n<p>stated that he shifted towards the right side because of the sudden arrival of<\/p>\n<p>the stray cattle on the road. When all these pieces of evidence are taken into<\/p>\n<p>consideration cumulatively it appears that both the drivers are partially<\/p>\n<p>responsible for causing the accident. Therefore, there is little hesitation to<\/p>\n<p>hold that the driver of both the vehicles i.e bus and the scooter have<\/p>\n<p>contributed to the accident. In so far as the apportionment of the liability<\/p>\n<p>regarding negligence is concerned prima facie it appears that the appellant<\/p>\n<p>was driving vehicle on the side which was not meant for him. Therefore,<\/p>\n<p>the inter se liability is determined as 70% to the appellant and 30% to the<\/p>\n<p>driver of the bus.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Now coming to the question of compensation, the details of the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> FAO No. 401 of 1992                    3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>injuries have come in the testimony of PW4 Dr.S.N. Mathuria, Associate<\/p>\n<p>Professor, Neresurgery, PGI, Chandigarh who has stated as follows:-<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                      &#8220;He has a sutured would in the left parietal region and<\/p>\n<p>      had depressed fracture in the left frontal region.      He underwent<\/p>\n<p>      craniectomy and dural repair with the help of neuro-surgeon and<\/p>\n<p>      plastic surgeons on 10.5.89.         The OPD card (photo-stat) 28617<\/p>\n<p>      belongs to Sanjeev Mittal which is Ex. C.W.4\/1. I have also seen its<\/p>\n<p>      original. The bone fregments which have been removed at the time of<\/p>\n<p>      surgery performed on 10.5.89, have produced a bone defect in the<\/p>\n<p>      frontal region which is to be bridged in by cranieplasty surgery. I<\/p>\n<p>      have seen the original of another card which bears the No. as 30198.<\/p>\n<p>      It is Ex.CW 4\/2. It is correct copy of the original. The previous<\/p>\n<p>      operation was major operation. The operation to be performed now is<\/p>\n<p>      comparatively minor.        In case the patient is not subjected to<\/p>\n<p>      crenieplasty surgery, the bone defect (cosmatically bad) continues in<\/p>\n<p>      addition the patient is exposed to the direct injury to the underlying<\/p>\n<p>      brain which does not have a bone cover.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            It is apparent that the appellant had suffered injuries on his<\/p>\n<p>head which required one major and the other minor surgery. There is no<\/p>\n<p>proof of the expenses that the appellant incurred on his treatment. There is<\/p>\n<p>no permanent disability which has been established on record.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            The Court is therefore left with no option but to travel to realm<\/p>\n<p>of conjectures to determine the quantum of compensation.<\/p>\n<p>            The appellant was aged 23 to 24 years at the time of accident.<\/p>\n<p>He was engaged in the business. Apparently he had suffered damage to his<\/p>\n<p>skull which required immediate surgery. It would thus be safe to assess the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> FAO No. 401 of 1992                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>amount spent on medical treatment as Rs.15,000\/-. Being a young man, the<\/p>\n<p>injuries are going to haunt him for the entire life and there is a trace of a<\/p>\n<p>suggestion in the testimony of PW4 that it is likely to dis-figure his face.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, in this eventuality, the amount for pain and suffering is assessed<\/p>\n<p>as Rs.75,000\/-. Rs. 5,000\/- is awarded for loss of income which he would<\/p>\n<p>have suffered on account of hospitalisation and another amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.5,000\/- for special diet etc. In this manner, compensation comes to Rs. 1<\/p>\n<p>lakh.   Since the appellant had been held guilty of contributing to the<\/p>\n<p>accident to the extent of 70%, therefore, he is entitled to 30% of the<\/p>\n<p>awarded amount i.e. Rs.30,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The enhanced amount of compensation shall be paid alongwith<\/p>\n<p>interest at the rate of 9 % per annum from the date of filing of petition till<\/p>\n<p>the date of its realisation.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The liability to pay the amount shall be of the respondents<\/p>\n<p>shall be joint and several.\n<\/p>\n<p>             I am of the considered opinion that dismissal of the claim<\/p>\n<p>petition by the Tribunal on the issue of limitation is also erroneous as<\/p>\n<p>considering it from any angle there is only a marginal delay in preferring the<\/p>\n<p>petition and the proceedings before the Tribunal are a result of a beneficial<\/p>\n<p>legislation which should be interpreted liberally.<\/p>\n<p>             The appeal stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms and the<\/p>\n<p>award of the Tribunal is modified accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>December 17 , 2008                             (Mahesh Grover)\nrekha                                            Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008 FAO No. 401 of 1992 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 401 of 1992 Decided on : 17-12-2008 Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal &#8230;.Appellant VERSUS Joginder Singh and another &#8230;.Respondents CORAM:- HON&#8217;BLE MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-166208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-31T16:47:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-31T16:47:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1079,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-31T16:47:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-31T16:47:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-31T16:47:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008"},"wordCount":1079,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008","name":"Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-31T16:47:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-sanjeev-kumar-mittal-vs-joginder-singh-and-another-on-17-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mittal vs Joginder Singh And Another on 17 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166208\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}