{"id":166412,"date":"2009-02-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009"},"modified":"2015-08-15T00:36:47","modified_gmt":"2015-08-14T19:06:47","slug":"the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH coax? 0? KRRNATAKA c:\u00e9cg:\u00a77\u00a7g$\u00a23*_\n\nAT GBLBARG%\n\nDATED THIS THE 24\"i\u00a3%f o\u00a7\"E2\u00a7R\ufb01g\u00a7$;\u00a52Qa\u00a77\n\n9REs3NT_ =\n\nTHE HON'BLE Ma.J8Sf:cE V}s;\nTHE HGN'BLE.MR:JUST;C\ufb01_,\ufb01;5.PACHHAPURE\n\nVSAEHABIT\n\nwA.No;29:\/2oc? r\u00e95\u00e93\n\nBETWEEN: _.; \u00bb ; i ;=-.\"*3\u00bb \ufb02f\n\n1.\n\nThe Stat\u00e9\"\ufb01f K\u00e9%&at\u00a7k\u00e9. :A\u00a7\nRep:esented<by_it$*Sed:e\u00a7@\u00a7y~II\nEduca\u20acibn_Eepa\u00a3\ufb01meh\u00a7"\n\nM.S.Eui1di\u00a7g \u00ab '\u00bb[v_ .\nBangalore 550'0Q1*. %.x\n\nThe Commissioner fdf Public\nInstructiens, New Public Offices\nNrugathgmga Road "\n\n.. 8an\u00a7a1bL3'\ufb015O so;\n\n.  T\ufb01e-Dir\u00e9c\ufb01o\ufb01~\u00e9f \u00a7:imary\n\nEducation, New'Pub2ic Gffices\nNrupathanga road\n\n' 3angaEQr\u00a7 558 O9}\n\n. \u00a7The"\ufb01eputy Directs: cf\n"_Eublic Enstructisns\n=~Gu3barga District\n'"\u00bbGuibarga\n\n;\u00ab The Block Education Officer\n\nYadgir Taluk\n\nGulbarga. \ufb01ppellantg\n\n\n\n.And:\n\n1.\n\n"L0\n\nSri H Pater\n\nSri Hanumappa .\u00abw-\nAged about 66 years\n{Senior Citizem}\n\nRetired Head Master'\nJeevan Vidyaiaya Lgwex\nKannada Primary Schegi\nYelleri, Yadgir "\nTaluk, f~, . .u\nGulbarga DistriC:;.?[;\n\nResidiag at V\/"*. \nAbbe Tumkur V\nyadg;g_Tg:uk_* _V,\nGulbarga'5i5trimt}_ ,u\n\nWEE 3\u00e9%i'sfe.::a.?:3?\u00ab..% .\n\nJaevan V1\ufb01yaiaya Educati\u00aen\nSdci\u00e9ty \u00a7owe\u00a3_?ri$ary School\nYeilexir Ya\u00e9gi:JTalak\n\ng@ulbargaV\u00a7istrict\n\n.?\ufb01& Rccountant General\n\n*gVig'&VE}_Karnataka\n\nTF3rk"HQu\u00a7& R\ufb01ad\n\n =r@pp-g--E?sc Qffice\n\n'  Bangalore \u00a360 881 ..\n\n*,HKa\u00a7n\nQrder passed\n\nRespon\ufb01ents\n\n{\ufb01g 8ri.R.Padmanabha ~ Rdvscate fer C\/R1;\nR2 $erv&d; R3 digpansed with}\n\nThis Writ \ufb01ppaai filed undai Section \u00e9 of ihe\nataka High Cwurt Act praying to sat aside the\nia the Writ Patition NQ.EG399\/2854\n\ndated 1.932006.\n\n\n\nThia Writ \ufb01ppeal Gaming on fQf'h&\u00a7fin\u00a7'%Qday,\nSRBHAHIT, J delivered the fQ2lowing;fu"\u00bb . vu \u00bb\n\nJwDGB\ufb01E\ufb01? ":\n\nThis agpeai is f:1ed t\ufb01r'th\u00e9 ~\ufb01\u00e9s@o\ufb01Qent~State in\n\nm\n\nw. .NO.l$399f2004 b\u00e9ghg .\u00e9gg:i2\u00a7\u00a7d, by 13%? or\u00e9er sjated\n\n2.9.2895 wharein theA;g\ufb01zn\u00a7\u00a7:S\u20ach\u00e9\u00a7% \u00a7g&g% of this Court\nhag a1iQwad3"\u00a3$\u00e9 .#;$\u00a7";\u00a7e\u00a3\u00a3%i@\ufb01\u00ab and diracte\ufb01 ihe\nrespondent35#\u00a7i\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7 w\u00a7\u00a7\u20acf%\u00e9Ei%\u00a7dh, appeliants h\u00e9t\ufb01i\ufb01, to<\/pre>\n
compute3 \ufb01E\u00e9V\ufb01pg\u00a7;\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01&__b%\u00a7\u00a7fits af regpondent No.1
\nherein, Et@\u00a7~vwr\u00a7\u00a7m \u00a7\u00e9\u20ac\u00a7\u00e9\ufb01bner, wit\ufb01 fEf&f$\ufb01C\u00e9 to ihe<\/p>\n
peziodygf s\u00e9ryzce frQ% 1.5.1995 to 3l.3.198\u00e9 and to<\/p>\n
f\u00a7:antth$ c;der,.i\u00a7 hot eariier.\n<\/p>\n
V2.KRespanden: $9.: h&:ein fiie\u00e9 W.?.NQ.iG399f2G\u00a74.<\/p>\n
yVH\u00e9 w\u00a7s workimg as & teach@: in :he gixth rasgondentw<\/p>\n
“\u00bb;\ufb013tiiutien from l.6.;95\u00a7. it wag a recognised<\/p>\n
=inst:tutiQn. The appointmeni. sf the QStitiO\u00a7\u20ac\u00a3 was<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
approved from l.6.196\u00a7 by order ee:edd\u00e98.ej\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9% ee per
\nAnnexure~A ts the writ p\u00a7\ufb01itiQniHeee\ufb01\u00a7%\u00a7%\u00e9f;1 e\ufb01\u00e9le
\ncomputing the pensionary ben\u00a7fi\u00a7$}V\ufb01\ufb01efpe\ufb01ie\ufb01tfende\ufb01ed
\nby the writ pet:i.t.i.c3r:e3: V,\u00e9\u00a75::;Lor ‘\u00e9gg ‘i:’}’V1V:.=.= 61\u00b0?’
\nrespondent to grant ge a\ufb01\u00e9 ey*erde\u00a3 dated 28.6.1984,
\nwas not reckoned an\ufb01”e$e\ufb01g\ufb01\ufb01re?e\u00a7h\u00e9.w\u00a7it petitien was
\nfiied for a di:e\u00a2\ufb01:Q\ufb01Wt\ufb01:i\ufb01\u00a2:\u00a5\u00a7\u00e9*gHe said \ufb01eriod also
\nfor the pu;pdee:\u00a7f*\u00a7g$pgting \u00a7%e pensionary benefits
\nand to p$y_fh\u00a7 eQ\u00a7eegu\u00a7$tiel-\u00a7rrears thereafter. The
\nresponde\ufb01\ufb01-Siege \ufb02ed n%\ufb01.fiie any objection atatement
\ngo the W:i\u00a7g@e\ufb01\u00a7fi5e.%$\u00a7@\u00a7h suffiaient opportunity was
\ng\ufb01verzx\ufb01b” ena$l\u00e9\u00abD\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7e:Government ta file statement. cf
\n%b\u00a7ect%b\ufb01$: \ufb02ja\u00a7he learned Si\ufb01gle Qudga after hearing<\/p>\n
the”\u00a7\u00e9e:n\u00e9dVQoq\ufb01Sel appearing for the writ p\u00e9titicner<\/p>\n
Mend t\ufb01e i\u00e9af\ufb01ed Qovermment Advocate agpeari\ufb01g for<\/p>\n
“”eeeeeeeeeee : te 5 held, though the eeeez admitting the<\/p>\n
A”, 6\ufb01Ver\u00e9\u00a7pdndent. ta grant in code is dated 3i.3.l98\u00e9,<\/p>\n
\ufb01\u00e9nefit wag given from 1.4.1984 and wherefore, directed<\/p>\n
“ath\u00e9m that for the purpose cf computi\ufb01g pensionary<\/p>\n
benefitg of ihe writ patiiicner the \u00a7eriod of service<\/p>\n
whichj was not taken into account f;%\u00a7 \ufb01}\u00a7$:;\u00a76\u00a7 ta
\n31.3.1984 wa$ alsa to be takE\ufb01_4in:\u00e9 \u00a7\ufb01;5U$\u00a7}’a$@f the
\nwzit petitionar was to be p%@d\ufb02a\u00a3r\u00e9a%sEQf \u00a7\u00a7\ufb01S\u00a7O\ufb01 on
\nthe said Esaais and \u20acgrani\u00a7d ]j9*Qeeg$LT\ufb01iR@m’\u00a30 d\u00a7  the
\naea\ufb01ful and accordingly, g\u00e9i\u00e9we\ufb01 \u20ac\ufb01@ \u00a7r;{ petitien by
\nordex* dated l.9.2O$6{ .A That \ufb01%\u00e9\ufb01\u00a7  aggxieved by the
\norder of the 1ea:ne\u00a7rS%dgi\u20ac{J\u00a75@\u00a7Yd\u00a7ted 1.9.2006, the
\nKarnataka 3:a\u00a3\u00a7\u00ab\u00a7%\u00a7 \ufb01\u00a7\u00a7f%%r\u00a7d %hi\u00e9 appeal.<\/p>\n
3. %e’\ufb01a\u00a7% 5e\u00a7r% \u00e9\ufb01\u00a7h\u00e9earned Govexnmemt Advocate
\nappearing f@rVth%-\u00a7p\u00a7\u00e9i:&nts.\n<\/p>\n
‘_@nV?h\u00e9 r\u00e93\u00a7ondent wc.2, Education Institution in<\/p>\n
7\ufb01_ which res\ufb01o\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9h\ufb01 NQ.: is emplay\u00e9\u00e9, thoug\ufb01 sexv\u20acd with<\/p>\n
 &n@t:ce has \ufb01at che\ufb01en ta appear before this Court &md<\/p>\n
= \u00a7@i:\u00e9\u00e9H;o respondant N$a3 was disgensed with.<\/p>\n
 5. The Zearned Gmvernment Rdvecate vehemently<\/p>\n
\u00ab argued that the perio\u00e9 sf servica xendared by the wzit<\/p>\n
petitisnez prior to 31.3.2984, the \u00e9ate on whish the<\/p>\n
,M.5hj\\<\/p>\n
Enstitutien was admitted to grant in aid, \u00a2Q\ufb01ld”\ufb01\u20act be
\ntaken into accaunt for cgmputingV ihelv\u00a7e\ufb01siQn\u00e9\u00a7y
\nbenefits of respondent \u00a7o.l, \u00e9s7\u00a7f&ere\u00e9lhy,t\ufb01ejlearn\u00e9d<\/p>\n
Single Judge and the game ls cs\ufb01\ufb01rgry ac \u00e9\ufb01le 52 \ufb01f the<\/p>\n
Karnataka Stata Aided Sghd\u00a7E *Empl\u00e9y&@$\/ECentrlbutsry<\/p>\n
Qravid\ufb01nt Fund, Insur\u00e9$\u00a7@l\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01$l\u00a7\u00a7l\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7es, 1963 which was
\nin existence w\ufb01a\ufb01 \ufb01\ufb01\u00e9l{%flEhm\u00a7\u00e9ti\u00a3l\u00e9U\u20acf retired from
\n5@KViC9 9\u00a7,*\u00e93;3;33\u00a73fll.V3i5\u00a7\u00a7lm{he writ petitioner
\nzatired ggyv\u00a7t\u00a7aiQ;nQ\ufb01$\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9%\u00e9n\ufb01\u00a7ation ax: 3l.l.1\u00a793, in
\nView of Rule \u00a72lQf.\ufb01h%”apbVe referred triple banefit<\/p>\n
Schem\ufb01 Ruie\u00e9,fra\ufb01edllh\u00e9feinaftar referred to as the the<\/p>\n
Rules}, hnly t\ufb01e_peri\u00a9d cf service rendered after the<\/p>\n
I\u00a7s:ituti\u00a7m.w\u00e9s recoqniged and was admitted EQ grant-<\/p>\n
in–\u00e9od\u00a7 c\u00a7Q\u00a7d’h\u00e9Vtake\ufb01 inta account and w\ufb01erefoxe, the<\/p>\n
H\u00e9\ufb01d\u00e9f \u00a7a3a\u00e9d”by the learned Single Jadge hag ta be set<\/p>\n
lasideu,<\/p>\n
“4. W@ have given careful consideration to the<\/p>\n
“qabntentian and scrutinieed th& material an record.<\/p>\n
\\,.,<a_<\/p>\n
zeependeet institution which was ' e "eieeeeeieed<\/p>\n
r '<\/p>\n
ineiitutien wee approved ee~-1,e,196Ef ahdf.{neVfeeid
\norder does not mention thee' the \u00a7e\u00a2ied."\u00a7f "service
\nrendered from 1.6.1955, kthe .eete} e\ufb01 "Which the<\/p>\n
eeitidner wee apereved :0 the<\/p>\n
eppeietment of the egit p
\ndate of the ezder eeeed 3\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7Di\u00a7Se'eeu1d not be taken
\niete account \ufb01g: \ufb01hemba\ufb01\ufb01eeeeefeeeieeleting pensionery
\n\ufb01enefite ene \ufb01g %ect;_%hexbeee\u00a7\u00e9e of eeevice rendered
\nevee 3515:"#Q'\u00a7$\ufb02p\u00a7e\u00a7elef\u00abedeieeion to the Grant\u00bb En~
\nCede haeebeee eye\ufb01tee ey tee appellant in View ef the
\ncircular ieeeed'ee$e\ufb01eegeeder would clearly reveei that<\/p>\n
ehe Geeeremeetaeill not be entitled te pay eaiery t-<\/p>\n
'the'w:i: \u00a7et:eione\u00a7 prier to the date ef edmieeien ef<\/p>\n
the ,eigt5J eeegendent Ieetitutien te the Gree:~Im~Aid<\/p>\n
Cede. %" Eewe\u00e9er, for the puxpeee ef calculating the<\/p>\n
u"%eeeienaV" beeefite, the eried ef service rendered
\n._e H _<\/p>\n
'tf\u00a7eme lC6.l965 to 31.3.1984 eeeld net have been<\/p>\n
  :1. '\\~~3r\\ 3\\\u20ac\u00bbc\\ 'pr
\niee\ufb01ixhae. Rule 52 ef' the Rules relied epem by "the<\/p>\n
e,1ee:nee Geverement Advocate eagle not be heieful :0 him<\/p>\n
ie the preeent appeal as the said Rule e\ufb01iy envisages<\/p>\n
\\J\u00bbJ3<\/p>\n
tfm\u00e9 service rendered kg! the .ret:red\u00bb}emeie%ee eim mere
\nthan one aided institutien,wte& pg" e\u00a7g\u00a7\u00a3\u00e9e,'f\u00e9\u00a3; tbe
\npurpose of payment of peesieearf'eeeefieeeee\u00e9\ufb02\u00e9\ufb01e eeed
\nRule does met prohibit gee \u00a7he"eeme ;5Kh\u00a2t eppiieabie<\/p>\n
to the facts ef the eeee._W"\n<\/p>\n
6. ?he Appel;ant4See\u00a7e”\ufb01\ufb01eegereee given sufficient
\nO\ufb01pertunity \u00a7&!f%i\u00a7’$\u00a73g%\u00a7i\u00a7\u00a7e ie eke writ petition did
\nnot cheese \ufb01oee;;\u00a2::\u00a7\u00a7;\u00a7b\u00a7g\u00a7:\u00a7ons to the writ petition
\nand the ereef \u00a7aeea\ufb01%\u00a7y.t\ufb01e appeilant itself produced
\nat Annexeeeea is {\ufb01e efi\ufb01 petition referred to above<\/p>\n
de\ufb01ed 2;;6,l984.\ufb01b\ufb011d alee shew that the eppeintment ef<\/p>\n
‘2<\/p>\n
“\ufb01he”.wf\u00a7t\u00b0fpet;tioner was approved en ;.6.l965 and<\/p>\n
where\u00a3ere;7:heeZeazee\u00e9 Single Judge was justified in<\/p>\n
‘”me1ding_thei.ihe period of service reedere\u00e9 by the wrii<\/p>\n
~fF%$i\u00a7ienez free 2.6.1965 to 3\u00a7.3;l98\u00e9 eheil be taken<\/p>\n
ea\u00a3\ufb01ie_eeeeuet fer computing the peneieeary benefits and<\/p>\n
‘ the eaid erder does not euffer frem enye errez or<\/p>\n
‘_ei;iegelity end we do not find any reeeee to \ufb01iffer wit<\/p>\n
‘the View taken by the Eeareed Single Judge.<\/p>\n
V) e<\/p>\n
I3<\/p>\n
7. Accerdingiy, we pass the fol<\/p>\n
lowing”\u00a9fd\u00e9E::+<\/p>\n
The writ Appeal is reje\u00a2\u20ac\u00e9\u00a7; \u00a7he\u00a2a\ufb01\u00a7e;l\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7 hep\u00e9in
\nare granted 12 weeka time fro\ufb01_\ufb01oday ta Comply Qiih the
\norder passed by the learne\ufb01 \ufb01ingi\u00e9 \ufb01u\ufb02g\u00e9 having regard<\/p>\n
to the gecuiiar facta of the \u00e9a\u00e9\u00e9,<\/p>\n
 Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
  JUDGE<\/p>\n
sd\/—\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009 Author: V.G.Sabhahit & A.S.Pachhapure IN THE HIGH coax? 0? KRRNATAKA c:\u00e9cg:\u00a77\u00a7g$\u00a23*_ AT GBLBARG% DATED THIS THE 24″i\u00a3%f o\u00a7”E2\u00a7R\ufb01g\u00a7$;\u00a52Qa\u00a77 9REs3NT_ = THE HON’BLE Ma.J8Sf:cE V}s; THE HGN’BLE.MR:JUST;C\ufb01_,\ufb01;5.PACHHAPURE VSAEHABIT wA.No;29:\/2oc? r\u00e95\u00e93 BETWEEN: _.; \u00bb ; i ;=-.”*3\u00bb \ufb02f 1. The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-166412","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-14T19:06:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-14T19:06:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1117,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009\",\"name\":\"The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-14T19:06:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-14T19:06:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-14T19:06:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009"},"wordCount":1117,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009","name":"The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-14T19:06:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-sri-h-peter-sri-hanumappa-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The State Of Karnataka vs Sri H Peter Sri Hanumappa on 24 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166412","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166412"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166412\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}